Welfare State and Welfare Regimes - Social Welfare Systems and Social Policy - Lecture Notes, Study notes for Welfare Systems

Welfare Systems

Description: Social policy can be regarded as the study of the history, politics, philosophy, sociology, and economics of the social services. This lecture handout includes keywords such as Welfare State and Welfare Regimes, Welfare State, Welfare Regimes, Origin of the Term, Historical Perspectives, Welfare State, Welfare Capitalism, Models of Welfare, Conservative, Social Democratic
Showing pages  1  -  4  of  8
1
Welfare State and Welfare Regimes
This lecture, we’ll discuss the concept of welfare state. In Hong Kong, the term carries
negative meanings. It usually refers to the business persuasion regarding the generous welfare
(in cash or services) provided by the government, which according to them, reduces people’s
intention to work and induce dependence. This lecture hopes to clarify the meaning of the
term and help you understand why it is considered so important by European countries (and
by the social work profession) and how it comes into existence, as well as the challenges it
faces today.
The idea of the ‘welfare state’ is an ambiguous one. In some writing, it means little more than
‘welfare which is provided by the state’; in others, it stands for a developed ideal in which
welfare is provided comprehensively by the state to the best possible standards. The term is
used then, both as a form of description and as a normative argument (Spicker, 1995).
An ideal model. The "welfare state" usually refers to an ideal model of provision,
where the state accepts responsibility for the provision of comprehensive and
universal welfare for its citizens.
State welfare. Some commentators use it to mean "welfare provided by the state".
This is the main use in the USA.
Social protection. In many "welfare states", social protection is not delivered by the
state at all, but by a combination of independent, voluntary and government services.
These countries are still usually thought of as "welfare states".
Source: http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/publicpolicy/introduction/state.htm
Origin of the term
In UK, the term, in its English form, appears to have come into common use in the late 1930s
and 1940s. Ironically, the Beveridge Report, sometimes referred to as the blueprint for the
welfare state, did not use the term. Titmuss called the Beveridge report an insurance
revolution… Welfare revolution occurred during the liberal government in 1905-1914,
Definition
A system in which the government undertakes the chief responsibility for providing for the
social and economic security of its population, usually through unemployment insurance, old
age pensions, and other social-security measures; A social system characterized by such
policies (Collins English Dictionary, 2000).
Asa Briggs (1961)A “welfare state” is a state in which organized power is
deliberately used (through politics and administration) in an effort to
modify the play of market forces in at least three directions – first, by
guaranteeing individuals and families a minimum income irrespective of
the market value of their property; second by narrowing the extent of
insecurity by enabling individuals and families to meet certain “social
contingencies” (for example, sickness, old age, and unemployment) which lead otherwise to
individual and family crisis; and third by ensuring that all citizens without distinction of status
or class are offered the best standards available in relation to a certain agreed range of
services (Briggs, 1961, p.228).
In a narrow sense, the welfare state may refer to state measures for the
provision of key welfare services (often confined to health, housing, income
maintenance and personal social services). Increasingly broadly, the welfare
2
state I also taken to define (1) a particular form of state, (2) a distinctive form of polity or (3)
a specific type of society as defining a society in which the state intervenes within the
processes of economic reproduction and distribution to reallocate life chances between
individual and/or classes (Pierson, 1998).
Historical perspectives
The early systematic provision of welfare by the state occurred in Germany but the
motivation was by then, to buy off the militancy of the labour movement at a time when the
antagonism of labor against capital was very strong in many parts of Europe. Bismarck
argued that if the state would only “show a little more Christian solicitude (care and concern)
for the working-man”, then the social democrats would “sound their siren song in vain”.
“The thronging to them will cease as soon as working-men see that the government and
legislative bodies are earnestly concerned for their welfare” (Briggs, 1961, p.249, 250)
Gradually, more politicians and scholars saw welfare provision under capitalism transformed
its nature, making it a viable combination of efficiency (in economic production), liberty
(individual pursuit) and equality. So, instead of controlling the state through revolution, it is
also possible to control the state through election to provide welfare to the working people.
Yet, another important concept about welfare is that it is a social right of the people.
Just as eighteenth-century civil rights (freedom of meeting, for example, or of the press) were
employed to ensure political rights (the rights to vote and its corollaries), so political rights
were to be employed to secure social rights (Briggs, 1961, p.239).
In USA, the “welfare state” was introduced in the inter-war era under the New Deal initiatives
of Franklin Roosevelt Administration. Contributory social security system was introduced to
provide retirement protection for employees.
“Homes, health, education and social security, these are your birthright”,
exclaimed Aneurin Bevan1(Briggs, 1961, p.227), 1949 after the labor
victory. John Locke some 300 years ago summarized man’s inalienable
rights as life, liberty and property.
The Second World War, which sharpened the sense of “democracy”, led to
demands both for “tidying up” and for “comprehensiveness”. It encouraged
the move from “minima” to “optima”, at least in relation to certain specified services, and it
made all residual paternalisms seem utterly inadequate and increasingly archaic (Briggs, 1961,
p.257). Attlee (British Prime Minister after the WWII) announced he would
introduce the Welfare State outlined in the 1942 Beveridge Report. This
included the establishment of a National Health Service in 1948 with free
medical treatment for all. A national system of benefits was also introduced
to provide 'social security' so that the population would be protected from
the 'cradle to the grave'. The new system was partly built on the National
Insurance scheme set up by Lloyd George in 1911. People in work still had
to make contributions each week, as did employers, but the benefits
provided were now much greater. (BBC)
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1942beveridge.html
1 Usually know as Nye Bevan (1897-1960) was a Welsh Labor politician and a socialist. He was the
Secretary of State responsible for the formation of the National Health Service (NHS).
3
Welfare state in crisis2 (Challenges of neo-liberalism, welfare
financing)
Curbing public expenditure (but with limited
effect)
Raising fees for public services
Tightening up of eligibility for benefits
Privatizing many public services
Shifting government’s role (from provider to an agent) (Arthur Gould, 1993)
[monetarist theory – government must control money supply]
Third Way (Antony Giddens, 2000, p. 50-54)
(1) Accepts the logic of '1989 and after' (the death
of socialism)
(2) Argues that the three key areas of power —
government, the economy, and the communities
of civil society — all need to be constrained in
the interests of social solidarity and social
justice.
(3) Proposes to construct a new social contract, based on the theorem 'no rights without
responsibilities'.
(4) Develop a wide-ranging supply-side policy, which seeks to reconcile economic
growth mechanisms with structural reform of the welfare state (from welfare state to
social investment state)
(5) Seeks to foster a diversified society based upon egalitarian principles (equal
opportunity, new forms of exclusion at the top and bottom)
(6) Takes globalization seriously
Why and how does welfare state come into existence?
Briggs (1961) argues that there are five major factors affecting the development of the welfare
state – 1) Basic transformation in the attitude towards poverty; 2) the detailed investigation of
the “social contingencies” which directed attention to the need for particular social polices; 3)
the close association between unemployment and welfare policy; 4) the development within
market capitalism itself of “welfare” philosophies and practices; 5) the influence of
working-class pressures on the content and tone of “welfare” legislation (Briggs, 1961,
p.252).
Pierson (2006) summarizes four major factors that contribute to the development of welfare
states.
1) The impact of industrialization
2) Population growth and the changing social composition of population
3) The growth of nation states
4) The growth of political democracy/the rise of political citizenship
Different worlds of welfare capitalism
Gøsta Esping-Andersen is a political scientist and author of
many books on the subject. His primary focus in the field is on
2 See also a report by BBC on welfare reform in 2005
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4720727.stm
4
the welfare state and its place in capitalist economies. He is a professor at Pompeu Fabra
University in Barcelona, Spain and member of the Scientific Committee of the Juan March
Institute (Madrid) (Wiki).
According to Esping-Andersen the rise of welfare state cannot be fully explained by
the system/structuralist approach (industrialization, rise of modern bureaucracy, product
of capitalist mode of promotion)
the institutional approach – democratization, nation building/extension of citizenship
Esping-Andersen considers – working class mobilization (welfare are basically working
class agenda)/ coalition with other classes are very important too.
Models of welfare
Esping-Andersen classifies the welfare state régime types through looking at certain crucial
elements – the degree of de-commodification (when a service is rendered as a matter of right,
and when a person can maintain a livelihood without reliance on the market) and the welfare
state to social stratification (whether it tends to diminishes class differences or strengthen
existing ones).
Esping-Andersen has described three main types of welfare régime:
corporatist régimes are work-oriented and based on individual contribution.
social democratic régimes favour universalist values.
liberal régimes tend to be residualist.
The grouping of particular countries tends to be unreliable, but the classification may help to
understand some of the main patterns of provision. This table shows rates of economic
exclusion in five countries. The blue bars show the proportions of poor people; the red bars
the "poverty gap", how far those remaining fall below minimum standards. Social protection
in the UK and Sweden is institutional; the UK covers less of its population, but the shortfall is
not as great as in Sweden. France is solidaristic, but its performance has still secured coverage
as good as the institutional welfare states. The German system is work oriented: it excludes
some people who have not contributed, and it does not extend to those on the highest incomes.
The system in the US has substantial residual elements, and social policy is often hostile to
the poor.
(Poverty gap ratio is the mean distance
separating the population from the
poverty line (with the non-poor being
given a distance of zero), expressed as
a percentage of the poverty line.)
The preview of this document ends here! Please or to read the full document or to download it.
Docsity is not optimized for the browser you're using. In order to have a better experience please switch to Google Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer 9+ or Safari! Download Google Chrome