Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Forecasting, Lecture Notes - Managerial Economics, Study notes of Managerial Economics

FORECASTING, BAROMETRIC MODELS, ECONOMETRIC MODELS, Forecasting Accuracy, Nickel Forecast

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/12/2011

myboy
myboy 🇺🇸

4.4

(72)

31 documents

1 / 5

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Forecasting, Lecture Notes - Managerial Economics and more Study notes Managerial Economics in PDF only on Docsity! ECN 469: Managerial Economics Professor Mark J. Perry - 1 - CHAPTER 5 - FORECASTING Case Study: World's largest nickel mining company (30% market share) with nickel mines in Canada does 10 yr. forecast in 1990 for: world nickel sales, nickel prices, competition and its own market share, production costs (labor, extraction, transportation, etc.). Based on forecast, it invests $1B in Guatemala and Indonesia to take advantage of expected, growing market for nickel. Was investment profitable? Depends on forecast – will take 7-10 years to assess investment, based on actual outcomes vs. forecast. Nickel case illustrates the importance of forecasting. Remember: successful firms are constantly engaged in long term strategic planning, even 10 years in future, which involves forecasting. Example: FDA approval. FORECASTING WITH TIME-SERIES MODELS Using historical, time-series data to forecast (predict) the future, i.e. extrapolate past trends into the future. Examples: Using time-series data for GDP, auto sales, interest rates, stock prices to predict the future. Possible limitation of time-series forecast? Decomposing Time-Series Patterns (Behavior over time): Four categories: Trend, Cycles, Seasonality, Random shocks 1. Trend (secular component). Long-run trend in a variable, e.g. real GDP has grown at 3% rate since WWII, CPI by about 4%, M1 by 5%, S&P500 by 12%, etc. Could decrease: no. of farmers, manufacturing share of economy, union membership, etc. See p. 185 Figure 5.1. 2. Cycle. Cyclical movement around the trend, e.g. the 10 business cycles in the U.S. since WWII. 3. Seasonal patterns, depending on the time of year or "season." Seasonal variation around either the trend or cycle. Examples of seasonality? Economic data are either: a) NSA (not seasonally adjusted) or b) SA (seasonally adjusted). 4. Random fluctuations, or shocks, i.e. unpredictable, irregular, unexplained variation. Even the most accurate, sophisticated economic model cannot account for, or predict, random fluctuations. The "errors" (predicted - actual) from a regression are partly due to random fluctuations. The importance of the trends, cycles, seasonality and randomness depends on the time-series variable and the length of time considered. Examples: sales of breakfast cereal or toothpaste vs. new vehicles or Xmas toys or golf clubs. Construction employment vs. retail. Daily sales of cars versus annual sales over thirty years. ECN 469: Managerial Economics Professor Mark J. Perry - 2 - FITTING A SIMPLE TREND See p. 187 Figure 5.2, plot of annual sales over time. SLS = f (Time). No obvious seasonality or cycle, minimum random fluctuations are small. We start by estimating a linear trend: Qt = a + b t, where Q = annual sales, and t = time trend, where: YR t___ 1990 1 1991 2 1992 3 etc... OLS results: Qt = 98.2 + 8.6 t Interpretation: As t goes up by one unit (one year), SLS goes up by 8.6 (units or dollars?). Alternative model: Qt = a + b t + c t 2 . Interpretation: If c is insignificant (not different from 0), the trend is linear. If c is pos and significant, the growth is exponential, SLS grow at an increasing rate. If c is neg. and significant, SLS grow over time, but at a decreasing rate. OLS: Qt = 101.8 + 7.0 t + .12 t 2 T-statistics indicate that all coefficients are pos and significant, indicating that the quadratic specification is a better fit, panel b on p. 187. Forecasting with the OLS equations for YR. 13: Linear: Q13 = 98.2 + 8.6 (13) = 210.0 Quadratic: Q13 = 101.8 + 7 (13) + .12 (13) 2 = 213.08 PROBLEM: Check Station 1 on p. 189: $50 (1.05) 35 = $50 (1. 06) 35 = Using Time-series Lags: We can also specify an OLS model using past observations, such as:
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved