Applied Biostatistics, Exercises- Mathematics - 1, Exercises for Mathematical Methods. The University of York
myohmy
myohmy10 September 2011

Applied Biostatistics, Exercises- Mathematics - 1, Exercises for Mathematical Methods. The University of York

PDF (92 KB)
2 pages
1000+Number of visits
Description
Exercises
20 points
Download points needed to download
this document
Download the document
Preview2 pages / 2
Download the document
Microsoft Word - varex.doc

1

University of York Department of Health Sciences

Applied Biostatistics

Exercise: Variability Question 1.

A study was carried out of the radiation dose used in dental X-ray diagnostics, based on quality control tests performed on 307 X-ray odontology installations in Spain. (British Journal of Radiology, 2001; 74, 153-156.) The estimated mean exposure value was 2.89 ± 2.12 mGy, with a median of 2.43 mGy, and the 75th percentile was 3.37 mGy. The following figure shows a frequency plot, which excludes five cases with mean dose values above 10

mGy.

(a) The mean dose was 2.89 with standard deviation 2.12 mGy. Why did the authors say ‘The standard deviation suggests that very few X-ray units irradiate the patient above 7 mGy (less than 5% based on this work)’?

2

Question 2.

In a study of muscle training in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patients were randomized to receive either a standardized exercise regime or normal care. Measurements were made before and after six weeks’ treatment. The observer was blind to the treatment (Physiotherapy Research International4: 55-67).

The following tables were given among the results: TABLE 1: The study population

------------------------------------------------------------ Characteristic Exercise group Control group ------------------------------------------------------------ Number 17 18 Females (males) 15 (2) 14 (4) Age (mean ±SD) (years) 51.4 (±11.1) 49.7 (±15.3) Body weight (mean ±SD) (kg) 71.0 (±23.4) 69.4 (±17.9) Height (mean±SD) (m) 1.63 (±0.6) 1.66 (±0.8) ------------------------------------------------------------

TABLE 2: Mean (±SD) for parameters measured in the control and experimental subjects before and after completion of the six-week study

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Control group Experimental group Measure Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak speed 125.2 (±33.9) 121.6 (±27.7) 132.0 (±40.6) 154.0 (±45.8) (deg/sec-1) TUG (sec) 12.6 (±1.5) 12.2 (±1.3) 11.7 (±1.9) 10.4 (±1.8) PVAS (mm) 4.1 (±2.4) 3.9 (±2.4) 4.3 (±2.2) 2.4 (±2.1) HAQ 0.7 (±0.4) 0.8 (±0.3) 1.0 (±0.6) 0.7 (±0.6) -----------------------------------------------------------------------

In these tables, ‘post-test’ means the test done after the six weeks of treatment. Peak speed is the peak angular velocity of the knee movement in rising from a sitting position, measured in degrees per second. TUG is the time to get up and go from a sitting position, in seconds. PVAS is pain measured on a visual analogue scale, where patients are given a 10 cm line, marked ‘no pain at all’ at one end and ‘worst pain you can imagine’ at the other. The patient marks the point which they think best represents the pain. HAQ, health assessment questionnaire, is a scale of limitations on activity, high scores being more limited. (Physiotherapy Research International, 1999; 4: 55-67)

(c) What does ‘SD’ stand for and what does it mean?

(d) In Table 1 there are two obvious misprints in the standard deviations. What are they?

(e) In Table 2, there are two obvious misprints in the units in which variables are measured. What are they?

(f) In Table 2, which variables must have a skew distribution?

Question 2 taken from Martin Bland and Janet Peacock: Statistical Questions in Evidence- based Medicine,Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.

comments (0)

no comments were posted

be the one to write the first!

Download the document