Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
According to Lee Gutkind, creative nonfiction is defined as: Dramatic, true stories using scenes, dialogue, close, detailed descriptions and ...
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 14
Michael Pickett^1
Available Online August 2013 This manuscript surveys and analyzes the relationships between 25
to identify the narratological relationships between fiction and creative nonfiction and to analyze creative nonfiction through a narratological framework created for fiction.
All of the surveyed stories contained many indicators that contribute to a deepened engagement for the readers, however at the individual writer level; the lowest common denominator is each writer’s ability to forge ahead and continue to create a narrative that develops meaning for the readers beyond the mere reporting of events.
Areas identified for further research includes experimental research in the areas of cross-cultural cognitive models that could provide insights concerning the existence of an unreliable narrator within narrative discourse. In addition research could be pursued in the areas of structural discourse of the narrative, much like Jahn’s model, yet somewhat more cognitive juxtaposing the more psychological aspects of narrative discourse to the structural components.
Key words: Narratological Framework; Narratological Relationships; Creative Nonfiction.
As with any major undertaking whether it is an anthology, essay, or research project, the beginning is the most difficult part. Therefore, after many hours of research and reading, I had always wondered, what makes creative nonfiction successful? Could it be the story itself, regardless of who the author was? No, that really cannot be the answer because there are many good writers who are not as well recognized as they might have been, even with famous or infamous stories. As my research began to sift through the various nonfiction essays, I began to find several areas in which the essays began to display fundamental differences in the ways in which the authors developed the reader’s interest with the ways in which they used narrative and voice. Hence, the discovery of these various characteristics within the creative nonfiction stories was the impetus for the following research questions:
The process of this analysis is undertaken with an understanding that there are many distinct as well as subtle differences between fiction and nonfiction. According to Richardson (444), the debate, while uncontested for years, suddenly has been rekindled in recent times. Much of the historical research dichotomizes the two genres in such polarities as true versus untrue, the author-narratortraditional dichotomy that is typically reserved for fiction, and the author-reader relationship. According to Valken (3);
(^1) National University, United States
Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), Volume -2, No.-7, August, 2013
The major difference between a fiction writer and a nonfiction writer, it was said, is that the latter should always adhere to truth and should never cross a certain inner border: he or she cannot write about emotions or dreams. Still it cannot be said that fiction is just make-believe, and only nonfiction contains the truth. Techniques are borrowed between fiction and non-fiction.
Interestingly, I found creative nonfiction to be a bridge from which fiction and nonfiction philosophically meet. In other words, for the purposes of this thesis, the delineation of nonfiction versus fiction as individual genresare very clear, however the nuances that makeup “creative” nonfiction are a matter of subtle degree.
According to Lee Gutkind, creative nonfiction is defined as: Dramatic, true stories using scenes, dialogue, close, detailed descriptions and other techniques usually employed by poets and fiction writers about important subjects...Creative Nonfiction heightens the whole concept and idea of essay writing. It allows a writer to employ the diligence of a reporter, the shifting voices and viewpoints of a novelist, the refined wordplay of a poet and the analytical modes of the essayist.
For methodological purposes, rather than developing an anthological source from which to begin the
acknowledged authors in the discipline of nonfiction. The second portion of the methodological strategy consists of research in narratology that had been performed by Manfred Jahn (2003) from the University of Cologne in analyzing narrative frameworks in fiction writing. A review of Jahn’s narratological framework resulted in certain areas that I will compare and contrast to the surveyed creative nonfiction essays.
According to Herman (1997) narratologists began investigating narratives and were determined to achieve a cataloging system that could differentiate components or, universal “...ingredients of narrative” (1046). Interestingly, Herman’s (1997) study was focused on the “...interrelations among linguistic form, world knowledge, and narrative structure” (1048). In essence the integration of the three served to form the understanding of the narrative. This strand of research proved interesting in the blend of early cognitive theory (Herman; Jahn). Herman’s research found relevance in the differentiation of the “tellability” verses the “narrativity” of the narrative in which the reader’s use of scripts while reading is a mitigating factor of the narrative. Whereas, Jahn’s use of frame theory posits that readers, when encountering new situations in narrative create a ‘frame’ wherein the new experience is developed and adapted to reality. Both views are similar in that the affect of the reader is cognitive based, whether readers use scripts for the integration of the narrative or the later frames from which readers are able torelate their experiences to the narrative.
In contrast, Zerweck (2001) argued that existence of an unreliable narrator is in essence a cultural and historical variable in narrative interpretive strategies. While the unreliable narrator notion is not found in nonfiction, according to Zerweck, the cultural continuum of cognitive understanding is mitigated by “...the context of frame theory as projection by the reader who tries to solve ambiguities and textual inconsistencies by attributing them to the narrator’s unreliability” (151). This attribution error poses unreliability in a narrative discourse such that the subtle affects cause readers’ interpretive strategies to vary, even within socio-cognitive framing paradigms. This ‘unreliable’ notion theoretically leads to the variable nature of the narrative.
Schneider (2001) in the development of a cognitive theory for characterization seeking the expansion of earlier mental model research was able to conceptualize cognitive and emotional structures for relevant character reception. Schneider argued that readers’ mental models are able to “...capture what the text is about, not the text itself” (609) thereby creating the need for the narrative to be cognizant of reader’s ‘working memory’ to achieve sufficient reader engagement.
In addition, Schneider (2001) differentiates readers’ cognitive structural mental models in terms of categorization and personalization. Categorization is the process by which “...readers try to establish a holistic mental model of the character early on” (619), whereas personalization is a process by which readers “...pay more attention to individual bits of incoming information” (625). Regardless, Schneider
An Analysis of Narrative and Voice in Creative Nonfiction Michael Pickett
found that, while conceptualizing the dynamics of the construction of cognitive mental models, they remain a complex and dynamic entity in the narrative.
Alonso (2004) furthered his earlier research by developing an integration network model from which to discern a level of metaphorical thinking in human cognition. Alonso’s model incorporates several of previously discussed conceptual components or attributes that are consistent with mental models, that of the integration of the narrative with the reader’s cognitive operations, yet Alonso integrates a blended space, essentially a construct for the proliferation of the metaphor. To develop this theoretical model,
rationale for choosing this story was based on previous researcher’s arguments that Updike’s “...fiction was thematically weightless...” and “...his elaborate qualifiers, metaphors and images as mere ornaments that hang on to events” (163). Therefore, according to Alonso (163), ...it seemed quite adequate to progress in the investigation of the conceptual structure of complex narrative discourse by analyzing the work of an author who is precisely renowned for his gifted treatment of the metaphor, a central topic in all linguistic approaches to human cognition.
Alonso’s findings were positive in that he was able to utilize his conceptual integration network model to investigate the structure and cognitive components of Updike’s short story and has found that the model sufficiently was able to integrate all intricacies found in metaphor theory and cognitive operations.
Manfred Jahn (2003) conducted a survey of incipits, or the beginnings of the stories from which he then developed his narratological frameworks. According to Jahn, narratology is ...the theory of the structures of narrative. To investigate a structure, or to present a ‘structural description’, the narratologist dissects the narrative phenomenon into their component parts and then attempts to determine functions and relationships. (18)
Jahn’s (2003) research went to great lengths to detail, diagram, and develop a complete framework by which he is able to analyze and categorize the various components of the narrative.
in which nonfiction is written so as to make it more dramatic and compelling” (Gutkind xix). Of the 10,
300, only twenty-five were selected to be republished in Gutkind’s book. As a result of this process, only the ‘best of the best’ creative nonfiction essays are featured.
This manuscript surveys and analyzes the relationships between 25 published essays identified in the book
identify the narratological relationships between fiction and creative nonfiction and to analyze creative nonfiction through a narratological framework created for fiction.
picture, performance, or a combination of these” (Jahn 18). For the purposes of this anthology, I will be
various techniques that make these fifteen stories good” (p 4), I will however, survey twenty-five excellent stories to determine the relationships among the narratives and voice.
narrative. However, for nonfiction only one area of his model applies; that of the communication between the author and reader. In as much as this seems to be a somewhat moot issue, the varying communication
Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), Volume -2, No.-7, August, 2013
styles by the different authors analyzed herein serve as a grounding from which to understand the their fundamental of successful narratives.
according to Jahn (2003) provides techniques that allow authors to render a character’s speech or thoughts. This methodology of Jahn’s framework will survey the beginning paragraphs of the selected stories to analyzethe level of free direct discourse narrative present.
that refers to themselves in the first person, to that of a covert narrator, or more of a neutral narrative.
understanding “who speaks?” within the prose. Additionally, this view is extremely important when analyzing the first paragraphs, or incipits, of these stories as the beginning sets the stage for the reader’s potential interest.
include whether the narrator utilizes inter or external moods within the context of the narrative. In other words, I will be surveying the narrative mood – it may either be a point of view from the perspective of the narrator (external) or from the perspective of the character (internal).
the opening paragraph of the selected stories from such notions as first-person, authorial and figurative narratives. After reading many creative nonfiction stories, I have found that this is one of the key areas within a narrative that serves to pull the reader deeper into the true feeling of the prose.
time in relation to the story. This component describes how the respective authors apply narrative tense within their writings.
such as showing versus telling. In a showing mode, the reader in a sense is or becomes a part of the events whereas in a telling mode, the author forms descriptive, commentary or summary narratives.
What is Narrative? Aside from the previous definition, if you were to ask 100 people “What is creative nonfiction narrative – to you?” You most probably would get as many different answers. They may range
Regardless of the responses that you are able to solicit, it becomes evident very quickly that many different situational components contribute to quality of narrative some of which will be the various topics of this
We get a distinct feel and understanding for her plight even to the point of empathy, before we really get into a truer understanding of the essence of the story. All we know at this point is that the title – that item that initially attracts our interest, causes us to ponder and read further;
Our engagement as a reader has been validated; we are beginning on a personal journey of reflective and agonizing disclosure of one woman’s experience – and we have now become a part of it!
As mentioned repeatedly in Simms’ (2002) text, many creative nonfiction writers often get their aspiration from reading many different authors’ work. In spite of the shared notion of the creative nonfiction
An Analysis of Narrative and Voice in Creative Nonfiction Michael Pickett
discipline, it remains a tenant in this thesis that the various authors surveyed herein may have some similarities on the macro level, but at the micro level, they are as distinct as their fingerprints and I believe that this is one of the main reasons that nonfiction has grown beyond journalism into what we see today as a strong and viable alternative to strict journalism.
4.1 NARRATIVE COMMUNICATION According to Jahn’s model (2003), in nonfiction narrative the communication typically lies between the author and reader. However, the survey of the literature contained within this study demonstrates various ways in which authors communicate through their narratives with the readers. From an initial survey of the opening narratives I was able to ascertain varying levels within the narrative communication that, while extraordinarily different, create an initial bonding with the reader to fully engage them into further reading.
of doctor’s intake notes;
This beginning, according to Jahn (2003) can be defined as a first-degree narrative, in other words, it is not contained or embedded within any other narrative. Of the surveyed stories, this is the only one of its kind, i.e., the cold matter-of-factly clinical opening. Others that display the first-degree narrative that provides
While this opening narrative provides a descriptive background similar to Lauren Slater, it doesn’t have the cold clinical feel and provides much insight into the mind of the little girl that was investigating possible answers to her past. Yet, another level of effective descriptive narrative may be found in Jana Richman’s
The fear begins to subside as soon as I'm out of town. The speed of the open road should cause greater fear, but the whir of the engine lulls me into a false sense of safety.
This next level that is found within this prose is that of Richman’s descriptive feelings and sensations. Richman is able to engage the reader into feeling of the open road. Also on another level, the narrative tells us of how the open road “should” cause us to feel greater fear, yet, we are not afraid because we are somewhat secure of the feeling we get being “one” with the motorcycle.
Another level that I was able to discern from the surveyed essays is somewhat a call to action on the part of
rhetorical questions concerning prairie dogs;
Within these few opening sentences, Williams is able to gain the attention of the reader by physically placing the reader into the minds of the prairie dogs; we are able to see and feel what the prairie dogs feel.
Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), Volume -2, No.-7, August, 2013
Lastly, another way in which the opening sentences of a story grasp the reader’s emotion is somewhat different in that the feeling may be more externally descriptive, yet the readers “feeling” of being there is
Thompson’s descriptive, yet abbreviated account of the pelts allow the reader to experience the same feeling of not only being there, but based on the descriptive prose, the reader is able to gain an idea of the size of the pelts which creates the awareness of the lifelessness of the store as we walk through the isles together.
From these somewhat limited samplings of exceptional nonfiction beginnings we are able to differentiate varying levels from which to better understand the captivating nature of developing and experiential opening for the reader. We are able to differentiate the subtle differences that the authors communicate with their readers from the very clinical setting from which Lauren Slater begins her essay to Terry Tempest’s empathetic view from a prairie dog’s perspective. Therefore, it is from within these authorial- specific subtle nuances the impetus of creative nonfiction takes its form to engage the reader beyond that of austere journalism.
4.2 FREE INDIRECT DISCOURSE Free indirect discourse is one area of creative nonfiction setting renowned authors apart from others. The notion of free indirect discourse is to develop an essence of thought or speech in a character without breaking the prose into portion of “he said, she said” dialogic methodologies. The essays that were surveyed in this anthology provide some very good examples of this technique and create a subtle key foundation of
It is not beyond most of our experiences to understand the thought behind the look on Laura’s face or the
the burrows with the little creatures;
Although now evident throughout all of the essays surveyed, the ability of these authors to seamlessly report on a character’s thoughts, feelings, and expressions is clearly an optional strategy in which authors make it easier for readers to navigate through the narrative.
An Analysis of Narrative and Voice in Creative Nonfiction Michael Pickett
4.3 OVERT VERSUS COVERT NARRATIVE The differences that are found in effective creative nonfiction is the ability for the author to transparently develop the narrative structure that will allow the best use of the notions of an overt narrator, one that refers to themselves in the first person, to that of a covert narrator, or more of a neutral narrative.
Both approaches were taken within the surveyed essays and were effectively utilized; however, the overt narrative was used more often as the first-person which added to the emotive influence of the prose. Some
person narrative much like Wideman’s opening lines;
The similarities found between these two excerpts involve not only the first-person portrayal of the narrative, but they emphasize more yet to come. With such types of opening paragraphs, the reader’s expectations are increased as they are pulled into the narrative.
South Philadelphia.
Mark Bowden’s narrative style is able to create the illusion for the reader of traversing the neighborhood in addition to the development of the ‘understanding’ of life in South Philly.
Regardless of the style that the surveyed authors chose to begin their essays with, it seems that the common thread between them is the creative and artful use of narrative to develop the foundation that causes readers to delve further into their work. From the overt perspective, John Edgar Wideman brings the reader into his world by sharing and enmeshing the reader with the feelings that one can have as a child, quite possibly many readers may identify with monstrous dreams that consume much of our memories. Similarly, Skloot, in his essay, utilizes the first-person narrative to give the reader a descriptive understanding from his perspective.
While using the first person or overt, narrative style does allow the reader to become engaged with the essay, the covert style also is creative in how a narrative can draw a reader’s curiosity into the essay. Mark Bowden’s essay is such an example, the way in which he uses the shorter sentence structure and descriptive sentences causes the reader to learn much of the area in a few lines of text. In this way one does not only understand the city, but also understand those that live there.
4.4 NARRATION (VOICE) All the essays surveyed were unique and as the individual authors themselves, however, using Jahn’s (2003) narratology guidelines, the effective use of voice within a each narrative was found to be very ubiquitous as to the author’s presence or absence as defined by Jahn (2003) as homodiegetic and heterodiegetic respectively.
Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), Volume -2, No.-7, August, 2013
One point that was very obvious within this surveyed group of creative nonfiction stories was that the homodiegetic or authors’ presence within the story greatly outnumbered those essays in which the author
This excerpt, in such a short and concise sentence, gives the reader not only the notion of the present, but
reader with the same feeling of past as well as presence of the moment;
Yet on another level, the homodiegetic narrative is developed by others through present experience as
The examples of the heterodiegetic narratives are just as diverse among themselves as were the
narrator creates an immediate awareness for the reader while maintaining a feeling of distance;
experience of the animals;
into the looks and feel of South Philly, but also insight into proximity of the relationships within the city;
An Analysis of Narrative and Voice in Creative Nonfiction Michael Pickett
navigation issues;
Even though the author’s presence within the story greatly outnumbered those essays in which the author was not present, it seems very apparent that even though we are able to differentiate the differences between homodiegetic and heterodiegetic narratives, we cannot help but understand that the continuum between the two provide many opportunities that authors are able to provide their desired affect for their readers.
4.4 FOCALIZATION (MOOD) According to Jahn (2003), “mood metaphorically invokes a grammatical verb category...mood categorizes verb forms according to whether they express a fact, a command, a possibility, or a wish” (p 30). Additionally, while a narrative may be from an external focalization, or the world view of the story, focalization may also be presented from the character’s point of view, or, internal focalization (Jahn).
The majority of the twenty-five surveyed essays present an internal focalization that invokes an emotion or sentiment in the reader which helps to differentiate these essays form the others contained within this
Another vivid focalization demonstrating the enmeshed power of possibility is presented in an excerpt of
this life, too, from this time of being mother and teacher and friend. That It — everything I care about, that I believe in, that defines and reassures me — will be wrenched from me again. Family. Church. School. Community.
This story demonstrates profound devastation in her life; however, the beginning lines set a mood of pending despair which is a narrative style that immediately develops reader engagement.
Factual-based focalization does not necessarily need to be depicted in a clinical or historical format as
Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), Volume -2, No.-7, August, 2013
This opening narrative not only presents factual data, the narrator crafts a somber mood that the reader is able to empathize with the narrator’s feelings.
Another effective way in which mood is set within a narrative is to create a presence for the reader within
placing us firmly within the story which transitions reader interest to participant;
From this somewhat limited survey, it has become very apparent that mood in the incipit, or beginning of an essay much like voice, truly sets the cornerstone of the foundation from which the author builds the relationship with the reader.
4.5 NARRATIVE SITUATION Narrative situation in an essay encompasses the arrangements of the patterns of the narratives (Jahn 2003). Such patterns may be narrated through first-person, authorial or figurative narratives. One of the observations noted in this thesis was that a great majority of the essays surveyed were written in the first- person as these example excerpts illustrate;
An Analysis of Narrative and Voice in Creative Nonfiction Michael Pickett
The similarities that become evident throughout this analysis between these stories is that when the narrator is the person ‘experiencing’ the story, it provides a level of disclosure that the reader is able to relate to and share the experience vicariously.
4.6 NARRATIVE TENSES Narrative tenses place the reader into specific points in time in relation to the story. The two types of narrative tenses are past and present. A majority of the stories surveyed were written in present tense which helps to engage the reader into a joint series of actions with the narrator experiencing the story.
Yet, others successfully perform tense shifts in which they are able to create a change of perspective such as
shifts enable Hall to creatively manipulate the intensity of the narrative by moving in and out of focus.
In addition, the tense shift creates a deeper distancing of the narrative which also helps to create a feel for the reader of shared memories and experiences as the present, past and future become a shared continuum.
4.7 NARRATIVE MODES Narrative mode, as the final section in this analysis that pertains to Jahn’s narratology framework essentially is presented in two major distinctions, showing and telling. If a narrative is developed in a showing mode, the reader becomes a part of the story such that they are witnessing the events that are taking place with the prose. On the other hand, in a telling mode the narrator overtly takes control of the reader’s point of view (Jahn 2003).
Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), Volume -2, No.-7, August, 2013
the reader is able to visualize each component and she is able to guide the reader through the discovery process;
It is interesting to take note that the textual layout provides a visual indication of the actual advertisement that she had uncovered.
The final form of telling is presented as a commentary in which the narrator comments on components of
Ackerman’s commentary and analysis “tells” us in an informative manner many varying items within her
An Analysis of Narrative and Voice in Creative Nonfiction Michael Pickett
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on my research within this thesis, there were really no two stories that would fit into a specific “creative mold.” However, all of the stories contained many indicators that contribute to a deepened engagement for the readers.
To review, the stated research questions were:
To address the first research question, the communicative quality of the analyzed narratives through voice and mood subtly pulls one into the feel of the characters through varying levels of self-disclosure; coupled with the authors creative use of tense espouses a virtual realm in which the reader is one with the prose.
Additionally, more often than not, these celebrated stories were developed through an overt-narrative that reinforced the first-person narratives through compelling communicative structures. The ability for the authors to develop a sense of urgency without creating a hurried sense of textual manipulation helps readers choose their individual levels of commitment within the narrative thereby creating a different sense and feel for each reader.
Lastly, the usage of free indirect discourse in a few of the stories produced the notion of thought or speech within the characters that helped the narrative flow through otherwise dialogic clutter.
The second research question can be somewhat more difficult to explain straightforwardly. As many of the components of Jahn’s narratological framework were applicable to the nonfiction essays surveyed in this research; there can be many problems associated with the literal sense of the creation of a nonfiction framework due to the inherent notion of nonfiction being the ‘representation of fact.’ In other words, reflecting on an earlier quotation by Valken (3); The major difference between a fiction writer and a nonfiction writer, it was said, is that the latter should always adhere to truth and should never cross a certain inner border: he or she cannot write about emotions or dreams. Still it cannot be said that fiction is just make-believe, and only nonfiction contains the truth. Techniques are borrowed between fiction and non-fiction.
The impetus for this research was the surveyed writers’ ability to “cross a certain inner border” yet still holing true to the genre of nonfiction. According to Simms, many good writers look to better writers for their inspiration or guidance on various skill-based abilities such as sentence construction, the creation of imagery, or the effective use of dialog. Nevertheless, at the individual writer level, the lowest common denominator is each writer’s unique ability to engage the reader in the essence of creative nonfiction.
The writer’s use of a narratological framework that allows us to understand the foundation of creative nonfiction will no doubt serve to bring the two genres of fiction and nonfiction closer in relation to each other rather than furthering the polarization between them creating a literary continuum. Nevertheless, while this research discussed a few of Jahn’s narratological frameworks with regard to creative nonfiction, it by no means advocates a joining of fiction and nonfiction.
One avenue for further experimental research could be in the area of cross-cultural cognitive models and the development of narrative analysis models. Once standardized results were made available, these data could be developed into a cross-cultural cognitive model, quite possibly utilizing causative methodologies that would espouse a commonality in the creative nonfiction narrative ideologies.
Lastly, additional research could be pursued in the areas of structural discourse of the narrative, much like Jahn’s model, yet somewhat more cognitive juxtaposing the more psychological aspects of narrative discourse to the structural components.
Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), Volume -2, No.-7, August, 2013
Works Cited
Alonso, Pilar.“The Conceptual Integration Network Model as Paradigm for Analysis of Complex Narrative Discourse.”Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature 37. 2 (2004): 161-181.
California Civil Code. California Law: Civil Code Section 1595-1599. September 7, 2005 <http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgibin/waisgate?WAISdocID=09492213072+0+0+0&WAISact ion=retrieve>
Gutkind, Lee. Creative Nonfiction: Lee Gutkind Editor and Founder Speaks Out. January 11, 2006 < http://www.creativenonfiction.org/thejournal/whatiscnf.htm >
Gutkind, Lee. In Fact: The Best of Creative Nonfiction. New York: W.W. Norton. 2005.
Herman, David. “Scripts, Sequences, and Stories: Elements of Postclassical Narratology.”Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 112 (1997): 1046-1059.
Jahn, Manfred. “Frames, Preferences, and the Reading of Third-Person Narratives: Towards a Cognitive Narratology.”Poetics Today18. 4 (1997): 441-468.
Jahn, Manfred. “Narratology: A Guide to the Theory of Narrative.” Part III of Poems, Plays, and Prose: A Guide to the Literary Genres. March 29, 2005 http://uni-koeln.de/~ame02/pppn.htm
Richardson, Brian. “Fiction and its Other.”Novel 32. 3 (1999): 444-445.
Schneider, Ralf. “Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literary Character: The Dynamics of Mental Model Construction.”Style 35.4 (2001): 607-640.
Simms, Patsy. Literary Nonfiction: Learning by Example. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Valken, Maaten. “Literature and Quality Non-Fiction: What’s the Difference?” Publishing Research Quarterly