Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Arson in the Second Degree: Penal Law § 150.15, Study notes of Law

New York State LawCriminal LawPenal Code

The legal definition of arson in the second degree according to new york penal law. It explains that a person is guilty of this crime when they intentionally damage a building or motor vehicle by starting a fire, and another person who is not a participant in the crime is present in the building or motor vehicle at the time. The document also clarifies the meaning of certain terms used in the definition, such as 'damage' and 'intentional'.

What you will learn

  • What are the three elements the People must prove to find a defendant guilty of Arson in the Second Degree?
  • What is the meaning of the term 'damage' as used in the definition of Arson in the Second Degree?
  • What is the definition of Arson in the Second Degree according to New York Penal Law?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

raimond
raimond 🇬🇧

4.8

(8)

216 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Arson in the Second Degree: Penal Law § 150.15 and more Study notes Law in PDF only on Docsity!

ARSON IN THE SECOND DEGREE

(Intentionally Damaging a Building by Fire When Another Person is Present) Penal Law § 150. (Committed on or after Sept. 1, 1979) The ( specify ) count is Arson in the Second Degree. Under our law, a person is guilty of Arson in the Second Degree when that person intentionally damages a building [ or motor vehicle] by starting a fire, and when another person who is not a participant in the crime is present in such building [ or motor vehicle] at the time, and the defendant knows that fact or the circumstances are such as to render the presence of such a person therein a reasonable possibility. The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning: [NOTE: Add, where appropriate: In addition to its ordinary meaning, the term BUILDING includes any structure, vehicle or watercraft used for overnight lodging of persons, or used by persons for carrying on business therein. 1 ] [NOTE: Add, where appropriate: MOTOR VEHICLE includes every vehicle operated or driven upon a public highway which is propelled by any power other than muscular power. 2 ] A person DAMAGES A BUILDING [ or MOTOR VEHICLE] (^1) See Penal Law §150.00(1). That provision further states: “Where a building consists of two or more units separately secured or occupied, each unit shall not be deemed a separate building.” (^2) See Penal Law § 150.00(2). Electrically driven invalid chairs being operated or driven by an invalid, vehicles which run only upon rails or tracks, and snowmobiles are not motor vehicles within this definition.

when that person causes the slightest damage to the building [ or motor vehicle]. Even proof of damage short of burning, such as charring, is sufficient to establish damage to a building [ or motor vehicle]. 3 Intent means conscious objective or purpose. Thus, a person INTENTIONALLY damages a building [ or motor vehicle] by starting a fire when that person's conscious objective or purpose is to cause such damage by that means. 4 In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all of the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, each of the following three elements:

  1. That on or about (date) , in the county of (county) , the defendant, (defendant's name) , intentionally damaged a building [ or motor vehicle] by starting a fire;
  2. That, at the time the defendant did so, a person who was not a participant in the crime was present in the building [ or motor vehicle]; and
  3. That the defendant knew that such a person was present in the building [ or motor vehicle], or the circumstances were such as to render the presence of such a person in the building [ or motor vehicle] a reasonable possibility. If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt each of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime. If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt any one or more of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime. (^3) See, People v McDonald , 68 NY2d 1 (1986). (^4) See , Penal Law § 15.05(1). 2