Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Understanding Mob Behavior in the Workplace: A Case Study, Study notes of Conflict Management

An educational case study aimed at helping students understand the dynamics of mob behavior in the workplace. The exercise involves assigning roles to students and simulating a situation where an employee is falsely accused and excluded from a group. The purpose is to illustrate the power of group dynamics and the importance of maintaining workplace justice and security.

Typology: Study notes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 08/05/2012

dinan
dinan 🇮🇳

3.6

(16)

111 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Understanding Mob Behavior in the Workplace: A Case Study and more Study notes Conflict Management in PDF only on Docsity! CPA This case is played with minimal preparation for the students assigned to each role. In a class of 42, I would assign the best six students to be JT, the supervisor (JTs numbered one through six), and another strong set of six to be Sandy the accused employee (also numbered one through six). The remaining students were all randomly called Roo and Dana, and assigned to six groups of five persons each to form an unruly "mob." Thus everyone knows with whom they will be playing. Everyone gets the General Instructions. The JT's prepare together, (they will be pretty concerned) and so also the Sandy's (who are usually rather subdued and troubled). The Roos and Danas I take away to a private area, to prepare the thirty of them together, clumped in their groups of five. I tell the Roos and Danas that they have an impossible and unreasonable role. In the group of five they are to attach themselves to JT and refuse to be dismissed. They are to ask relentlessly that Sandy be fired. They have virtually no proof of Sandy's guilt. They must simply state they are sure that Sandy is guilty. They are to keep this up-ignoring Sandy, if Sandy tries to speak-for ten minutes if they can do so. (No violence, no pushing and shoving, just "commitment power"). I then, as quickly as possible-so the JTs do not have more than five or ten minutes to prepare-send each group of five back to take on "their" JT. And then I send the Sandy's, each to join to their JT. The purpose of this case is to help students, at the end of the course, to understand a little about mob behavior in the workplace. Usually the (well-chosen) JTs survive it pretty well but are shaken. Some will have actually managed to keep things under control. The Sandys in the debrief discussions are usually very eloquent about what it means-and feels like-to be wrongly accused and excluded. The Roos and Danas are often very impressed and concerned and troubled about how easy it is to join and be part of a mob. The journals about this case are always very important-and this is one the cases that students remember best, years later. As the Instructor one must emphasize that the first priority for a manager is to establish and maintain safety and security in the workplace. One must know the available resources and the rules of the organization and be prepared to uphold the principles of workplace justice. (In this real case, the company went bankrupt after many suits were brought.) docsity.com