Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Social Psychology & Methods: Lecture Notes on Social Phenomena & Research - Prof. S. B. Kl, Study notes of History of Psychology

A series of lecture notes on social psychology and research methods. Topics include the differences between social psychology and sociology, methods of research such as field and lab studies, self-perception theory, and the history of social psychology. The notes also cover various experiments and theories related to self-perception and social interaction.

Typology: Study notes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 02/13/2012

margopress
margopress 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Social Psychology & Methods: Lecture Notes on Social Phenomena & Research - Prof. S. B. Kl and more Study notes History of Psychology in PDF only on Docsity! LECTURE 02: 1. Social Psychology vs. Sociology • Both interested in social phenomena • Sociology can be scientific • tends to talk more about populations • ex. Will low income folks be more likely to vote a certain way? • Social Psychology tends to focus on lab studies • tend to look at individuals 2. Methods A. Field vs. Lab Studies -Field Studies= study people's behavior in their natural setting, less common -useful to have a control group -Lab Studies= what people can do -needed for experimental control • Field Surveys= call and ask someone how they will vote • need to be random • need to be representative (a sample of people that capture) • wording/phrasing of question (can be misleading) • Ecological Validity= results of research are valid in the real world • Correlational= a linear relationship between variables • positive relation= as one increases, the other increases (also called direct) • can't predict accurately • zero correlation= two variables are independent, not related • range from -1.0, 0, to 1.0 • absolute value tells the strength of the relation • the greater the strength, the greater the predicability • negative correlation= as one increases, the other decreases • correlation doesn't necessarily equal causation LECTURE 03: 1. Methods (Continued) -Lab A. Cause • want to know if x and y are related in a cause and effect • if x doesn't happen, y doesn't happen • effect should reliably follow the cause • replicability= want to see if the same cause will also lead to the same effect B. Terms • cause -> independent variable (IV) • effect -> dependent variable (DV) • extraneous variables= could affect it -Example: Darley-Latane • bunch of hypothesis were contributed: • diffusion of responsibility= the more people watching, less likely to help • IV= number of watchers -> DV= helping • lacks ecological validity -Experimental Control -Plus/Minus • Lab: • Plus: Experimental Control •ables us to infer causality • Minus: Lacks ecological validity • doesn't always simulate what people will do in normal circumstances A. Mead (1932), Cooley (1902) -looking glass self B. Tests • Gallup -chimps -can learn language, have frontal lobe -10 chimps were raised in a group, 10 were raised isolated -when they look in the mirror, count how many touch their brows as a baseline before the experiment (as a measure of self) -while they are unconscious, paint a little spot of red on one of the brows -then count how many touch their brows -indirect way of showing that chimps raised in group have a sense of self 2. Self-Perception Theory (SPT) A.What? B. Ben's Rules -sometimes we don't know what we feel about a situation until we study our behavior 1. We observe our behavior and the context 2. If context can explain behavior, we attribute behavior to context: Situational Attribution 3. If context can not explain behavior, then we contribute behavior to the person (the self): Dispositional Attributional C. Tests • Festinger and Carlsmith; Insufficient Reward -I.V. how much you are offered to be paid -D.V. will a person rate the experiment they performed better depending on how much they're paid -people who got paid only a dollar said they enjoyed the experiment more than people who were paid 20 dollars • Lepper, et al; Overjustification Effect LECTURE 06: 1. Lepper • went to Bing Nursery school • divided kids into 3 groups; -Expected Reward, Unexpected Reward, No Reward • remove the situation, remove the motivation • undermining intrinsique motivation 2. SPT II: Emotions A. James- P (behavior) -> C (thinking) C (thinking) P (behavior) • Bodily changes ( P ) follow directly from the perception of an exciting fact. And those changes as they take place, are our emotions B. Moranan -injected people with epinephrine and asked if they felt anything • 71% no, 28% 'Should I?'(both no therapy), 1% yes (therapy) • If can simulate P -> E -epinephrine, adrenaline -if no P, no E -for every E, a unique P • Cannon: Each E accompanied by some general diffuse P • E= PxC 3. Schacter & Singer • cognitive labeling, emotional plasticity • supraxin 1. Epi-informed 2. Epi-uninformed 3. Epi-misinformed 4. Placebo LECTURE 07: 1. Self Perception II Emotions A. Schater & Singer • emotional plasticity: depends on how you interpret what you're feeling (on the situation or what you've been told) 2. Nisbett & Storms "Insomnia" • gave participants a placebo, what they're told is the variable • group A is told: symptoms, anxious • group B is told: symptoms, relax • group A was able to fall asleep faster and better • could associate their own anxiety with the "side effects" 3. Selfy: A. Self-awareness Theory, Duvall & Wicklund • many behaviors are automatic, doesn't require us to think about it constantly • we tend to be self aware when something ruins our routines • awareness can be directed either inwardly or outwardly i. Theory