Advanced Research & Evidence-Based Writing Q & A, Exams of Nursing

Download Advanced Research & Evidence-Based Writing Q & A and more Exams Nursing in PDF only on Docsity!

ENGL 101

Composition & Rhetoric

II: Advanced Research

& Evidence Based

Writing

Q & A w/ Rationales

1. What is the main purpose of advanced research and evidence-based writing in composition and rhetoric? a) To persuade the audience of a certain point of view using credible sources and logical arguments. b) To inform the audience of a certain topic using factual data and clear explanations. c) To explore the complexity of a certain issue using multiple perspectives and critical analysis. d) To entertain the audience of a certain genre using creative techniques and rhetorical devices. Answer: c) To explore the complexity of a certain issue using multiple perspectives and critical analysis. Rationale: Advanced research and evidence-based writing is not merely descriptive or persuasive, but rather aims to deepen the understanding of a problem or question by examining various sources of evidence and arguments.
2. What is the difference between primary and secondary sources in academic research? a) Primary sources are original documents or artifacts that provide firsthand information or data, while secondary sources are interpretations or analyses of primary sources. b) Primary sources are reliable and authoritative sources that provide valid information or data, while secondary sources are unreliable and biased sources that provide questionable information or data. c) Primary sources are general and broad sources that

provide background information or data, while secondary sources are specific and narrow sources that provide detailed information or data. d) Primary sources are recent and updated sources that provide current information or data, while secondary sources are outdated and obsolete sources that provide outdated information or data. Answer: a) Primary sources are original documents or artifacts that provide firsthand information or data, while secondary sources are interpretations or analyses of primary sources. Rationale: Primary sources are the direct evidence of an event, phenomenon, or topic, while secondary sources are the indirect evidence that comment on, critique, or synthesize primary sources.

3. What is the difference between quantitative and qualitative research methods in academic writing? a) Quantitative research methods use numerical data and statistical analysis to measure, compare, or test variables, while qualitative research methods use textual data and thematic analysis to describe, interpret, or evaluate phenomena. b) Quantitative research methods use experimental design and controlled conditions to test hypotheses, while qualitative research methods use naturalistic observation and open-ended questions to generate theories. c) Quantitative research methods use deductive reasoning and generalization to draw conclusions from data, while qualitative research methods use inductive reasoning and

contextualization to draw conclusions from data. d) All of the above Answer: d) All of the above Rationale: Quantitative and qualitative research methods differ in terms of the type of data they collect, the way they collect it, and the way they analyze it.

4. What is a literature review in academic writing? a) A summary of the main findings and arguments of relevant sources on a specific topic or question. b) A critique of the strengths and weaknesses of relevant sources on a specific topic or question. c) A synthesis of the similarities and differences among relevant sources on a specific topic or question. d) All of the above Answer: d) All of the above Rationale: A literature review is not just a summary, but also a critical evaluation and integration of existing literature on a specific topic or question.
5. What is a thesis statement in academic writing? a) A sentence that introduces the main idea or argument of the paper. b) A sentence that summarizes the main points or subtopics of the paper. c) A sentence that states the main claim or position of the paper. d) A sentence that provides the main evidence or support for the paper. Answer: c) A sentence that states the main claim or

position of the paper. Rationale: A thesis statement is not just an introduction, a summary, or an evidence, but rather a concise and arguable statement that expresses the writer's stance on a specific topic or question.

6. What is a counterargument in academic writing? a) An argument that contradicts or challenges the writer's thesis statement. b) An argument that supports or strengthens the writer's thesis statement. c) An argument that modifies or qualifies the writer's thesis statement. d) An argument that explains or clarifies the writer's thesis statement. Answer: a) An argument that contradicts or challenges the writer's thesis statement. Rationale: A counterargument is an opposing view or perspective that the writer acknowledges and responds to in order to demonstrate their awareness of alternative positions and their ability to defend their own position.
7. What is a citation in academic writing? a) A reference to a source that provides information or evidence for the writer's claims or arguments. b) A quotation from a source that reproduces its exact words or phrases for the writer's claims or arguments. c) A paraphrase from a source that rewords its main ideas or concepts for the writer's claims or arguments. d) A summary from a source that condenses its main points

or findings for the writer's claims or arguments. Answer: a) A reference to a source that provides information or evidence for the writer's claims or arguments. Rationale: A citation is not just a quotation, a paraphrase, or a summary, but rather a way of acknowledging the source of any information or evidence that the writer uses in their paper.

8. What is plagiarism in academic writing? a) The use of someone else's words, ideas, or data without proper citation or acknowledgment. b) The use of common knowledge or facts that are widely known and accepted without citation or acknowledgment. c) The use of one's own previous work or words without citation or acknowledgment. d) Both a and c Answer: d) Both a and c Rationale: Plagiarism is not just the use of someone else's work, but also the use of one's own work without proper citation or acknowledgment. This is called self-plagiarism and it is also considered unethical and dishonest.
9. What are some common citation styles in academic writing? a) MLA, APA, Chicago, and Harvard b) MLA, APA, IEEE, and Vancouver c) MLA, APA, Turabian, and AMA d) All of the above Answer: d) All of the above

Rationale: There are many different citation styles in academic writing, depending on the discipline, field, or journal. Some of the most common ones are MLA (Modern Language Association), APA (American Psychological Association), Chicago (Chicago Manual of Style), Harvard (Harvard Referencing System), IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), Vancouver (Vancouver Style), Turabian (Turabian Style), and AMA (American Medical Association).

10. What are some common types of academic papers in composition and rhetoric? a) Argumentative, analytical, expository, and narrative b) Research, review, report, and proposal c) Literature review, annotated bibliography, case study, and reflection d) All of the above Answer: d) All of the above Rationale: There are many different types of academic papers in composition and rhetoric, depending on the purpose, audience, and context. Some of the most common ones are argumentative (persuading the reader of a certain position), analytical (examining a topic or issue in depth), expository (explaining a topic or issue clearly), narrative (telling a story or describing an experience), research (conducting original inquiry and presenting findings), review (evaluating a source or work critically), report (summarizing a process or event objectively), proposal (suggesting a plan or solution for a problem or need), literature review (synthesizing existing literature on a topic

or question), annotated bibliography (annotating relevant sources on a topic or question), case study (analyzing a specific case or example in detail), and reflection (reflecting on one's own learning or writing process).

11. What are some common rhetorical modes in academic writing? a) Narration, description, illustration, and definition b) Comparison and contrast, cause and effect, problem and solution, and classification and division c) Process analysis, argumentation, persuasion, and evaluation d) All of the above Answer: d) All of the above Rationale: Rhetorical modes are ways of organizing and presenting information or ideas in academic writing. Some of the most common ones are narration (telling a story or sequence of events), description (creating a vivid picture of something or someone), illustration (providing examples or evidence for something or someone), definition (explaining what something is or means), comparison and contrast (showing how two or more things are similar or different), cause and effect (showing how one thing leads to another or results from another), problem and solution (identifying a problem and proposing a solution for it), classification and division (sorting things into categories or groups based on criteria), process analysis (explaining how something works or how to do something step by step), argumentation (making a claim and supporting it with reasons and evidence), persuasion (convincing the reader to agree with

a claim or take an action), and evaluation (judging the value or quality of something or someone based on criteria).

12. What are some common rhetorical appeals in academic writing? a) Ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos b) Ethos, pathos, logos, and telos c) Ethos, pathos, logos, and ethos d) Ethos, pathos, logos, and mythos Answer: a) Ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos Rationale: Rhetorical appeals are ways of persuading the reader in academic writing. Some of the most common ones are ethos (appealing to the credibility or character of the writer or source), pathos (appealing to the emotions or values of the reader), logos (appealing to the logic or reason of the reader), and kairos (appealing to the timeliness or urgency of B:
13. Which of the following is not one of the core elements of composition and rhetoric? a) Context b) Audience c) Purpose d) Syntax

Answer: d) Syntax Rationale: Syntax refers to the arrangement of words and phrases in a sentence, while composition and rhetoric focus on context, audience, and purpose—the three elements crucial in effective writing.

2. When conducting advanced research for evidence-based writing, why is it important to evaluate the credibility of sources? a) To ensure the sources align with personal opinions b) To maintain a diverse range of sources c) To avoid plagiarism accusations d) To provide accurate and reliable information Answer: d) To provide accurate and reliable information Rationale: Evaluating source credibility helps to prevent the inclusion of false or biased information in evidence- based writing, ensuring accuracy and reliability in the research.
3. Which of the following statements accurately describes evidence-based writing? a) It relies solely on personal opinions and experiences. b) It does not require thorough research and supporting evidence. c) It combines research and analysis to form strong arguments.

d) It relies on emotional appeals rather than logical reasoning. Answer: c) It combines research and analysis to form strong arguments. Rationale: Evidence-based writing involves utilizing credible research and analysis to construct well-supported arguments, enabling the writer to present a strong and persuasive case.

4. What role does rhetoric play in advanced research and evidence-based writing? a) It helps persuade the reader through emotions and personal anecdotes. b) It offers a framework for organizing ideas and arguments effectively. c) It focuses solely on grammar and language usage. d) It aims to entertain the reader through creative storytelling. Answer: b) It offers a framework for organizing ideas and arguments effectively. Rationale: Rhetoric provides strategies and techniques for structuring ideas and arguments in a way that effectively communicates the intended message and persuades the audience.
5. Why is it important to consider the audience in advanced research and evidence-based writing?

a) To choose the most obscure and complex terms for academic writing b) To tailor the language, style, and tone to effectively engage and inform the intended readers c) To exclude any opposing viewpoints to maintain a biased argument d) To make the writing more challenging and demonstrate expertise Answer: b) To tailor the language, style, and tone to effectively engage and inform the intended readers Rationale: Considering the audience helps writers determine the appropriate language, style, and tone for their writing, ensuring maximum reader engagement and comprehension.

6. In advanced research and evidence-based writing, what does the term "context" refer to? a) The historical and cultural background surrounding the topic b) The author's personal experiences and biases c) The word choice and sentence structure used in the writing d) The font and formatting of the final document Answer: a) The historical and cultural background surrounding the topic Rationale: Context refers to the broader historical, cultural,

and social factors that influence the understanding and interpretation of a given topic in advanced research and evidence-based writing.

7. Which of the following is an example of a primary source for evidence-based writing? a) A scholarly article analyzing climate change b) A textbook summarizing different theories of economics c) An interview with a renowned economist on current market trends d) A blog post written by a high school student sharing personal opinions Answer: c) An interview with a renowned economist on current market trends Rationale: Primary sources are first-hand accounts and original documents directly related to the research topic, such as interviews, surveys, or diaries.
8. What is the primary objective of research in advanced evidence-based writing? a) To assemble a vast amount of unrelated information for the reader to evaluate b) To present multiple theories on a topic, leaving the reader to choose their preferred stance c) To support arguments with reliable evidence and strengthen the writer's viewpoint d) To showcase the writer's personal creativity and

imagination Answer: c) To support arguments with reliable evidence and strengthen the writer's viewpoint Rationale: Research aims to provide well-founded evidence that supports the writer's arguments and enhances the overall credibility and persuasiveness of the work.

9. Which of the following strategies is effective in avoiding plagiarism in advanced research and evidence-based writing? a) Quoting directly from a source without attribution b) Paraphrasing ideas and concepts without proper citation c) Including a reference list at the end of the document d) Borrowing entire sections from previously published articles Answer: c) Including a reference list at the end of the document Rationale: Plagiarism can be avoided by properly acknowledging all sources used through in-text citations and a comprehensive reference list, ensuring academic integrity.
10. What is the purpose of conducting peer reviews in advanced research and evidence-based writing? a) To seek validation and praise from peers b) To receive constructive feedback and improve the

quality of the writing c) To compare one's work with that of peers and determine superiority d) To promote competition and discourage collaboration Answer: b) To receive constructive feedback and improve the quality of the writing Rationale: Peer reviews allow writers to obtain valuable feedback from their peers, enabling them to identify areas for improvement and enhance the overall quality of their writing.

11. When constructing an argument in evidence-based writing, what is the significance of counterarguments? a) Counterarguments are irrelevant and should be avoided. b) Counterarguments weaken the overall impact of the writing. c) Counterarguments provide an opportunity to anticipate and address opposing viewpoints. d) Counterarguments are used solely to confuse the readers. Answer: c) Counterarguments provide an opportunity to anticipate and address opposing viewpoints. Rationale: Counterarguments are crucial in evidence-based writing as they allow writers to acknowledge and refute opposing viewpoints, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the topic and strengthening their own arguments.

12. Which of the following statements accurately defines advanced research in composition and rhetoric? a) It involves collecting basic facts from various sources without analyzing their significance. b) It entails conducting in-depth investigation and analysis, utilizing diverse sources and methodologies. c) It primarily relies on personal opinions and experiences without supporting evidence. d) It is a simple process that does not require extensive engagement with existing literature. Answer: b) It entails conducting in-depth investigation and analysis, utilizing diverse sources and methodologies. Rationale: Advanced research in composition and rhetoric involves comprehensive investigation, analysis, and critical evaluation of various sources using different methodologies, enabling a deeper understanding of the topic. 1 3. How does evidence-based writing differ from creative writing or fiction? a) Evidence-based writing focuses on presenting facts and evidence, whereas creative writing or fiction primarily relies on imagination and storytelling. b) Evidence-based writing is meant to entertain, whereas creative writing or fiction aims to persuade. c) Evidence-based writing and creative writing or fiction often have identical purposes and techniques.

d) Evidence-based writing and creative writing or fiction are interchangeable terms with the same meaning. Answer: a) Evidence-based writing focuses on presenting facts and evidence, whereas creative writing or fiction primarily relies on imagination and storytelling. Rationale: The key distinction lies in evidence-based writing's emphasis on factual information and supporting evidence, while creative writing and fiction prioritize imagination, storytelling, and artistic expression.

14. What does it mean to write in an evidence-based style? a) Rely only on personal opinions without supporting evidence. b) Utilize persuasive techniques to manipulate the emotions of the readers. c) Base arguments on verifiable facts and credible sources. d) Present imaginative and fictional information without any grounding in reality. Answer: c) Base arguments on verifiable facts and credible sources. Rationale: Employing an evidence-based style necessitates building arguments on trustworthy and reliable information, utilizing factual evidence and substantiating sources to support claims.
15. How does advanced research and evidence-based writing contribute to academic and professional success?

a) It allows writers to showcase their creativity and imagination. b) It offers opportunities for personal expression without adhering to any standards. c) It helps in developing critical thinking, research skills, and effective communication. d) It ensures conformity to rigid academic conventions without any scope for innovation. Answer: c) It helps in developing critical thinking, research skills, and effective communication. Rationale: Advanced research and evidence-based writing foster critical thinking, enhance research skills, and improve communication abilities—traits essential for academic and professional success. C: When conducting advanced research for a writing project, which of the following strategies is most effective for evaluating the credibility of sources? A) Relying on personal intuition B) Assessing the author's expertise and credentials C) Choosing sources that align with personal beliefs D) Prioritizing sources with sensational headlines Answer: B) Assessing the author's expertise and

credentials Rationale: Evaluating the expertise and credentials of the author is crucial for determining the credibility of sources in advanced research, ensuring that information is derived from knowledgeable and reputable sources. Which of the following statements best describes the purpose of a literature review in academic writing? A) To present the author's personal opinions on a topic B) To provide a comprehensive overview of existing research on a specific subject C) To persuade the reader to adopt a specific viewpoint D) To entertain and engage the audience with storytelling Answer: B) To provide a comprehensive overview of existing research on a specific subject Rationale: A literature review serves to synthesize and analyze existing research on a specific topic, offering a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. In the context of rhetoric, which of the following rhetorical devices is used to appeal to the audience's emotions? A) Ethos B) Logos C) Pathos D) Kairos Answer: C) Pathos Rationale: Pathos is a rhetorical device that appeals to the audience's emotions, evoking feelings and sentiments to persuade and influence their perspectives.

When analyzing the effectiveness of an argument, which of the following factors should be considered to assess the logical reasoning presented? A) The author's use of personal anecdotes B) The coherence and validity of the evidence provided C) The frequency of emotional appeals D) The length of the conclusion section Answer: B) The coherence and validity of the evidence provided Rationale: The logical reasoning of an argument is best evaluated by assessing the coherence and validity of the evidence presented, focusing on the soundness of the supporting information. Which of the following research methodologies is most suitable for conducting qualitative data analysis in advanced research? A) Surveys and questionnaires B) Content analysis C) Experimental studies D) Longitudinal studies Answer: B) Content analysis Rationale: Content analysis is a research methodology that is well-suited for qualitative data analysis, involving the systematic categorization and interpretation of textual or visual data. In academic writing, what is the primary function of a thesis statement? A) To provide a summary of the entire paper

B) To introduce the main arguments and evidence C) To present the author's personal experiences D) To conclude the discussion with a final viewpoint Answer: B) To introduce the main arguments and evidence Rationale: The primary function of a thesis statement is to introduce the main arguments and evidence that will be discussed and supported in the paper. When selecting sources for a research paper, which of the following criteria is most crucial for ensuring the reliability of information? A) The popularity of the publication B) The date of publication C) The length of the article D) The diversity of the author's background Answer: B) The date of publication Rationale: The date of publication is crucial for ensuring the reliability of information, as it indicates the currency and relevance of the content in the context of advanced research. Which of the following writing styles is characterized by a formal and objective tone, often used in academic and professional settings? A) Descriptive writing B) Persuasive writing C) Expository writing D) Narrative writing Answer: C) Expository writing

Rationale: Expository writing is characterized by a formal and objective tone, focusing on presenting information and explaining a topic without personal bias or opinion. In the context of evidence-based writing, which of the following is considered a primary source? A) A scholarly journal article reporting original research B) A review article summarizing multiple research studies C) An opinion piece in a popular magazine D) A blog post discussing current events Answer: A) A scholarly journal article reporting original research Rationale: A scholarly journal article reporting original research is considered a primary source, providing firsthand information and data on a specific topic. When revising a research paper, which of the following strategies is most effective for improving the overall clarity and coherence of the argument? A) Adding personal anecdotes to enhance engagement B) Ensuring a logical flow of ideas and transitions between paragraphs C) Incorporating emotional language to evoke reader sympathy D) Including excessive repetition of key points for emphasis Answer: B) Ensuring a logical flow of ideas and transitions between paragraphs

Rationale: Improving the overall clarity and coherence of the argument is best achieved by ensuring a logical flow of ideas and smooth transitions between paragraphs, enhancing the structural integrity of the paper. In academic writing, what is the purpose of in-text citations and a bibliography? A) To provide a list of potential research topics for future inquiry B) To acknowledge the original sources of information and ideas C) To highlight the author's personal achievements and credentials D) To summarize the main arguments and findings of the paper Answer: B) To acknowledge the original sources of information and ideas Rationale: In-text citations and a bibliography serve the purpose of acknowledging the original sources of information and ideas used in the research paper, demonstrating academic integrity and providing a pathway for further exploration of the topic. Which of the following elements is crucial for effectively engaging the audience in persuasive writing? A) Objective presentation of evidence and counterarguments B) Emotional manipulation to evoke sympathy and empathy C) Exaggeration and sensational language for impact

D) Repetition of the main thesis statement throughout the text Answer: A) Objective presentation of evidence and counterarguments Rationale: Effectively engaging the audience in persuasive writing is best achieved through an objective presentation of evidence and counterarguments, fostering critical thinking and informed decision-making among the readers. When conducting research, which of the following ethical considerations is essential for maintaining academic integrity? A) Fabricating data to support desired conclusions B) Plagiarizing content from existing sources without attribution C) Falsifying credentials to enhance author credibility D) Properly attributing and citing sources used in the research Answer: D) Properly attributing and citing sources used in the research Rationale: Properly attributing and citing sources used in the research is essential for maintaining academic integrity, demonstrating respect for the intellectual contributions of others and upholding ethical standards in scholarly work. Which of the following elements is crucial for establishing a strong connection with the audience in expository writing? A) Presenting a biased interpretation of the topic

B) Engaging the audience with personal anecdotes and experiences C) Providing clear and concise explanations of complex concepts D) Using dramatic and exaggerated language for emphasis Answer: C) Providing clear and concise explanations of complex concepts Rationale: Establishing a strong connection with the audience in expository writing is best achieved by providing clear and concise explanations of complex concepts, facilitating understanding and knowledge transfer without personal bias or embellishment.