Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Evidence-Based Practice: Exam 2 Study Guide, Exams of Nursing

A comprehensive study guide for the second exam on evidence-based practice (ebp). It covers key concepts such as the definition of ebp, the components of critical appraisal, the types of qualitative and quantitative studies, and the various models and frameworks used to guide the implementation of ebp. The guide also delves into important statistical concepts like p-values, confidence intervals, and effect sizes, as well as sampling techniques and data analysis methods. Additionally, it outlines the steps involved in eliciting patient preferences for care, a crucial aspect of ebp. This study guide is designed to help students and healthcare professionals deepen their understanding of ebp and prepare for exams or assessments related to this topic.

Typology: Exams

2024/2025

Available from 09/14/2024

rosze-macharia
rosze-macharia 🇬🇧

5

(3)

3.8K documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Evidence-Based Practice: Exam 2 Study Guide and more Exams Nursing in PDF only on Docsity! EBP- Exam 2 study guide evidence based practice: - Answer -conscientious integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient circumstances and values in the delivery of quality, safe, and cost-effective health care. i. Best clinical evidence ii. Nurses' expertise iii. Patient circumstances and values critical appraisal involves a - Answer -careful and complete examination of a study to judge its strengths, weaknesses, credibility, meaning, and significance for practice. qualitative studies: - Answer -primarily Exploratory research; ex. opinions, beliefs, perceptions, experience, culture, etc... -Can be used to develop theories -Occurs in natural settings -Why? How? What? -Subjective results, not objective -Small population size; People are called "participants" -Data represented in words -Conducted through Observations, interviews, focus groups, videos, documents, photographs -The researcher needs to be aware of his/her own feelings, beliefs, experiences, and account for these, separate from the participants what are the 4 types of qualitative studies? - Answer --descriptive -correlational -quasi-experimental -experimental quasi experimental research: - Answer --Examines cause-and-effect relationships -Less control by researcher than true experimental designs -Samples are not randomly selected. -All variables in the study cannot be controlled by the researcher. -An example: Sending patients home from the hospital with TED hose and surveying them about how well they worked; assessing for DVT occurrence post-op experimental studies: - Answer --Controlled manipulation of at least one independent variable -Uses experimental and control groups -Random assignment of the sample to the experimental and control groups -Highly controlled, objective, systematic studies -Involves the measurement of independent and dependent variables Who decides if an article is "printworthy"? - Answer -It has to be peer-reviewed and confirmed as being accurate through replicability validity: - Answer -Accuracy of application and findings What p-value is considered statistically significant? - Answer -Typically a p-value <0.05 is considered significant, can find in reading usually p-value - Answer -The probability of results of the experiment being attributed to chance. demographic variables: - Answer --age, gender, ethnicity, educational level, and diagnosis. -Same demographic treated with different interventions to see how it affects them descriptive statistics: - Answer --Gather, sort, summarize numerical data into one or two simple numbers that "describe" your sample, or "describe" your findings -Ex: Participants' age ranged from 26 to 64 years (average 45.5) with a quarter (25%) aged 54 and above measures of central tendency include the: - Answer -mode, median, mean, and standard deviation standard deviation: - Answer -"average" difference score. -Smaller SD: similar results, we want this -Large SD: wide range of results, not reliable relative risk: - Answer -The likelihood that the outcome would occur in one group compared to the other forests plots: - Answer -simply a picture of results of several studies, and always includes a "summary" diamond that shows you the results of the studies, all compiled together -The size of the diamond correlates to how much "weight they have" confidence intervals: - Answer -the range on either side of an estimate that is likely to contain the true value for the whole population -a 95% confidence interval in the results of a study, it means that 95% of the time, the population's mean will fall within the range that they give Cronbach's Alpha: - Answer -a measure of internal consistency, that is, how closely related a set of items are as a group -a measure of scale reliability. -0.7 is the lowest acceptable value for a Cronbach's alpha power analysis: - Answer -used to estimate the minimum sample size required for an experiment, given a desired significance level, effect size, and statistical power -Minimum acceptable power level rate is 80% -a statistical method to determine the acceptable sample size that will best detect the true effect of the independent variable -Ability to detect differences in the population or capacity to correctly reject a null hypothesis effect size: - Answer -the degree to which the phenomenon is present in the population -a measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables or the extent of an experimental effect Iowa Model: - Answer --Generate the question -Determine whether it is relevant -Develop a team -Determine if the evidence answers the question -Pilot the change -Evaluate the structure, process, and outcome data. -Disseminate results Stetler Model: - Answer -research utilization to promote evidence-based practice; 5 steps Phase I: Preparation -Purpose, outcomes, of making an EB change - is the agency ready for it? Phase II: Validation -Critically appraise research reports Phase III: Comparative Evaluation/ Decision Making -Is it feasible, is it fitting? What concerns are there? Decide Phase IV: Translation/Application -Use the research evidence through a planned approach Phase V: Evaluation -Evaluate its impact. Cullen model: - Answer -Create awareness and interest -Posters about evidence, staff meetings, slogans Build Knowledge and Commitment -Education, Gap analysis, find research, appraise it, do an action plan Promote Action and Adoption -Education, elevator speech, change agents, checklists Pursue integration and sustained use -Celebrate!! Public recognition, Trend the results, statistically, over time, revise as needed Grove Model: - Answer -This one seems like the closest to the Nursing Process -Nurses identify a practice problem -Search for the best research evidence to manage the problem in their practice -Evaluate the quality of EB guidelines -Integrate it -Monitor the outcomes -Refine the guidelines steps to elicit patient's preferences for care: - Answer -PHASE 1: SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE -Identifying alternative interventions to address a clinical problem of interest, -Critically reviewing evidence derived from research and practice, -Synthesizing the evidence on the intervention effectiveness in producing intended outcomes and relevance to patients seen in day-to-day practice