Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Landmark Supreme Court Cases in First Amendment Law, Quizzes of Communication and Development studies

Freedom of the PressFirst AmendmentFreedom of SpeechSupreme Court Cases

Key supreme court cases that have shaped the interpretation and application of the first amendment's protections for freedom of speech and press. From tinker v. Des moines school district (1969) to the miller test (1973), these cases cover a range of issues, including prior restraint, obscenity, and expressive conduct. Understanding these cases is essential for anyone studying first amendment law.

What you will learn

  • What is the Miller Test and how is it used to determine whether a work is obscene?
  • What is the difference between the O'Brien Test and Strict Scrutiny in the context of First Amendment cases?

Typology: Quizzes

2014/2015

Uploaded on 02/23/2015

paytongk
paytongk 🇺🇸

4 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Landmark Supreme Court Cases in First Amendment Law and more Quizzes Communication and Development studies in PDF only on Docsity! TERM 1 *Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969) DEFINITION 1 Kids wore black armbands to school in protest of Vietnam War, demanding a ceasefire and the return of troops by Christmas Court decided that the First Amendment extended to public schools School had to prove that there was a constitutional reason for censorship TERM 2 *New York Times Co. v. U.S. (1971) DEFINITION 2 Near v. Minnesota used as precedent 1st stop of a major publication during peacetime Government has heavy burden to justify restraint NYT and Washington Post restricted from publishing the Pentagon Papers TERM 3 *Near v. Minnesota (1931) DEFINITION 3 Rejected prior restraint First Amendment through Fourteenth Amendment Minnesota law targeted malicious or scandalous newspapers Near started The Saturday Press, targeted by above law TERM 4 *Texas v. Johnson (1989) DEFINITION 4 Burning of flag on steps of Dallas City Hall in protest of Ronald Reagan campaign, after Republican National Convention Strict Scrutiny used Decision: A statute that criminalizes the desecration of the American flag violates the First Amendment. Marked as expressive conduct: 1. Is the conduct expressive? 2. Is there an intent to express a message? 3. Is there a likelihood the message will be understood by witnesses? TERM 5 *Miller v. California (1973) DEFINITION 5 Court redefined obscenity A work is obscene, if: 1) Found by the common person applying contemporary community, taking work as a whole, to be in the prurient interest 2) Work depicts, in particularly offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions, specifically defined by applicable state law 3) Work, as a whole, lacks Serious Literary, Artistic, Political or Scientific value (SLAPS) Work has to meet ALL THREE, or it is thrown out TERM 6 Gitlow v. New York (1925) DEFINITION 6 Set precedent for prior restraint First Amendment applies through Fourteenth TERM 7 Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) DEFINITION 7 Defined fighting words: Inflict injury; Incite immediate breach of the peace Arrest of Chaplinsky upheld, speech was targeted at one person TERM 8 Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart (1976) DEFINITION 8 Prior restraint on speech and press are the most serious and least tolerable infringements on the First Amendment TERM 9 U.S. v. OBrien (1968) DEFINITION 9 Precedent in Texas v. Johnson Burnt draft card, not protected by First Amendment Led to OBrien Test TERM 10 Common Law DEFINITION 10 judge-made law; precedent; discovered law Stare decisis let the decision stand. A court may: 1) Modify the precedent, 2) Distinguish the precedent, 3) Overrule the precedent