Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
FLORENCE BLACKMAN iHUMAN 49 YEARS OLD FEMALE PRESENTS WITH INTERMITTENT SQUEEZING CHEST PAIN The iHuman assignment for Week 7 of Walden University’s NURS 6512 typically involves a case study of a 49-year-old female patient, Florence Blackman, who presents with intermittent squeezing chest pain. This case requires you to assess the patient's symptoms, take a detailed history, perform a physical exam, and develop a differential diagnosis based on the findings. Youwill also create a management plan tailored to the patient's needs. This assignment emphasizes critical thinking in diagnosing and managing chest pain, which could potentially be related to cardiac issues or other differential diagnoses.Be sure to focus on gathering the patient's history of present illness (HPI), including when the chest pain started, any triggers, and accompanying symptoms like shortness of breath or radiation of the pain. The physical exam will guide you in narrowing down the possible cau.....................
Typology: Exams
1 / 14
FLORENCE BLACKMAN iHUMAN 49 YEARS OLD FEMALE PRESENTS WITH INTERMITTENT SQUEEZING CHEST PAIN
CHEST PAIN
The iHuman assignment for Week 7 of Walden University’s NURS 6512 typically involves a case study of a 49-year-old female patient, Florence Blackman, who presents with intermittent squeezing chest pain. This case requires you to assess the patient's symptoms, take a detailed history, perform a physical exam, and develop a differential diagnosis based on the findings. You will also create a management plan tailored to the patient's needs. This assignment emphasizes critical thinking in diagnosing and managing chest pain, which could potentially be related to cardiac issues or other differential diagnoses.
Be sure to focus on gathering the patient's history of present illness (HPI), including when the chest pain started, any triggers, and accompanying symptoms like shortness of breath or radiation of the pain. The physical exam will guide you in narrowing down the possible causes. The differential diagnosis might include conditions like angina, myocardial infarction, or gastrointestinal causes such as GERD.
CHEST PAIN
Immediate treatment, such as anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, or even percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), would be necessary.
CHEST PAIN
The combination of physical exam findings and diagnostic test results would guide the final diagnosis. If tests point toward ischemic heart disease (e.g., abnormal ECG, elevated troponins), the diagnosis would likely be myocardial infarction or unstable angina. If tests are more indicative of gastrointestinal issues (e.g., endoscopy findings), a diagnosis of GERD might be more appropriate. By systematically ruling out or confirming conditions, the healthcare provider can develop a targeted treatment plan based on the underlying cause of the chest pain.
For a 49-year-old female presenting with intermittent squeezing chest pain, several conditions could be considered in a differential diagnosis. Here are 3-5 possible diagnoses:
Tests : ECG, cardiac enzymes, stress test, coronary angiography.
Tests : ECG showing ST-segment elevation, elevated cardiac enzymes (troponin), coronary angiography.
CHEST PAIN
References : ACC/AHA 2021 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.
References : ACG 2022 Guidelines for GERD Management.
References : ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism,
These guidelines help inform the diagnostic process and treatment plans by providing a structured approach to the evaluation of chest pain, ensuring that life-threatening conditions are identified early and managed effectively.
Developing a treatment plan for a patient with a cardiovascular condition, such as unstable angina or myocardial infarction , involves immediate medical intervention, long-term management, and promoting lifestyle changes to improve heart health and prevent future events.
CHEST PAIN
o Heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) : Anticoagulant therapy is important in preventing the formation of new clots. o ACE inhibitors : These are used in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure to reduce mortality and prevent remodeling of the heart. o Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) : If the patient is at high risk or if an MI is confirmed (STEMI), immediate coronary revascularization (stenting) may be required.
Guideline Reference : ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Long-term Management :
Guideline Reference : ACC/AHA 2019 Guidelines on Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.
Guideline Reference : AHA/ACC 2019 Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.
CHEST PAIN
NURS_6512_Week 7_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is
20 pt s
linked to a Learning OutcomePhysical Exam: Complete an
20 pts Excellent
15 pts Good
10 pts Fair
5 pts Poor
0 pts Unsatisfactory appropriate physical Achieves a Achieves a Achieves a Achieves a Achieves a score of exam. (Scores are automatically
score of 90– 100%
score of 80– 89%
score of 70– 79%
score of 60– 69%
59% or below
calculated in the i- Human platform.)
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEMR Documentation History of Present Illness: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.)
10 pt s
10 pts Excellent Complete HPI meeting all 5 criteria.
8 pts Good 4 requirements are met.
6 pts Fair 3 requirements are met.
4 pts Poor 1 – 2 requirements are met.
0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements are met.
Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only
CHEST PAIN
NURS_6512_Week 7_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is
10 pt s
linked to a Learning OutcomeEMR Documentation Subjective Data Document Current Medications, Review of System: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.)
10 pts Excellent
8 pts Good
6 pts Fair
4 pts Poor
0 pts Unsatisfactory Accurate; 3.) Written Complete HPI 4 requirements 3 requirements 1 – 2 No requirements in Professional Language; 4.)
meeting all 5 criteria.
are met. are met. requirements are met.
are met.
Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEMR Documentation Objective Data Document Physical Exam Findings: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional
10 pt s
10 pts Excellent Complete HPI meeting all 5 criteria.
8 pts Good 4 requirements are met.
6 pts Fair 3 requirements are met.
4 pts Poor 1 – 2 requirements are met.
0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements are met.
Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Objective findings only
CHEST PAIN
NURS_6512_Week 7_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagemen t Plan: Use the expert diagnosis provided to create a pertinent, comprehensive, evidenced-based management plan. Address the following criteria in the plan: 1.) Diagnostic tests; 2.) Medications (write out a complete order, even for OTC meds); 3.) Suggested consults/referrals; 4.) Patient education; 5.) Follow-up, including time interval and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit
15 pts Excellent All requirements are met.
13 pts Good 5 requirements are met.
10 pts Fair 4 requirements are met.
7 pts Poor 1- requirements are met.
0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements are met.
15 pt s
sooner; 6.) Provide rationales for each intervention and include references to support your plan. Clinical practice guidelines should be utilized as applicable.
CHEST PAIN
NURS_6512_Week 7_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning 5 pts Excellent 0 – 1 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable.
4 pts Good 2 – 3 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable.
3 pts Fair 4 – 5 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.
2 pts Poor 6 – 7 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.
0 pts Unsatisfactory More than 7 errors; clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.
OutcomeReferences and Format: Current APA citations for references in 5 pts management plan. Use of clinical practice guidelines when applicable.
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext