Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A case study of a 49-year-old female patient presenting with intermittent squeezing chest pain. The case study includes detailed patient history, physical examination findings, and a series of questions and exercises designed to guide the user through the diagnostic and management process. Useful for students of medicine and healthcare professionals seeking to enhance their clinical reasoning skills.
Typology: Exams
1 / 17
46020670
46020670
46020670
Time spent: 1dy
Status: Submitted
13hr 58min 29sec
Case Section Status
Your Score Time spent
Performance Details
History Done 63% 12hr
n 12sec
5mi
60 questionsasked, 22
to
the case'slist
correct, 13 missed relative
Physical exams Done 83%
13hr
52min
55sec
53 exams performed,
partially correct, 0
case's list
19
correct, missed
relative
1
to
the
Key
findings
organization
Done
34min 40sec
14 findings listed; 16 listed by the case
Problem
statement
Done 1hr
n 29sec
9mi
150 words long; the case's was 117 words
Differentials Done 88%
13min 14sec
13 items in
the
missed
relative to
DDx, 7
the case'slist
correct, 1
Differentials
ranking
Done 88%
(lead/alt
score)
88%
(must
not miss
score)
7min
38sec
Tests Done 89%
50min 23sec
10 tests
ordered, 8 relative
to the
correct, 1
case's list
missed
Diagnosis Done 100% 21sec
Management
plan
Done
46min 0sec
1645 words long; the case's was 79 words
Exercises Done
68%
(of scored
items
only)
32min
51sec
3 of 5 correct
1 partially correct
(of scored items only)
AA
HistoryNotecard by AA on case
Use
this
developing
worksheet to
a differential
organize
diagnosis
your
list.
thoughts before
The following table summarizes your performance on each
sectionof the case, whether you completed that sectionor
not.
46020670
the encounter
have
and
identified from the history. Start
symptoms
with the
patient's reason(s) for add additional obtained from
questioning.
symptom using "OLDCARTS". Capture the
and
further
details
the
in
fin
din
gs
attributes
the
and
of
each
appropriate column
consider possible diagnoses
row.
that may correlate with these
symptoms.(Remember to consider the patient's age and risk factors.) Use your
ideas to help
the case.
guide your physical examination in the next section of
History of Present Illness
Category Data entered by AA
Reason for Encounter Chest pain
46020670
History of present illness A 57-year-old female 10 days
status post inferolateral STEMI with
stent placement, presents to the
ED with a 2.5-hour history of
progressively worsening chest pain. The
pain is sharp and
stabbing, gets to pierce through her back
with inspiration. Pain
is partially relieved by sitting up and leaning
forward. She reports mild nausea without vomiting, denies
fever/chills, palpitations, lightheadedness/syncope, SOB, cough, URI,
or extremity/catheterization site pain or
swelling. She reports compliance with her antiplatelet
medications (ASA and clopidogrel),
pantoprazole, and aspirin since
discharge. On exam, patient is febrile,
shallow respirations at normal rate, low-normal
oxygen saturation, and has pericardial friction
rub. PMH
is significant for hypertension, hyperlipidemia,
tobacco abuse, obesity, and family history of
heart attack and type- 2 diabetes. Past Medical History
Category Data entered by AA
Past Medical History Hypertension Hyperlipidemia
Hospitalizations / Surgeries
Acute inferolateral wall ST-elevation myocardial
infarctionwith PCI/stenting of the
right coronary artery (RCA).
Balloon angioplasty of the left circumflex artery.
Medications
Category Data entered by AA
Medications Clopidogrel 75 mg QD
Atorvastatin 80 mg QD at
bedtime Pantoprazole 40 mg QD
Aspirin 81 mg QD
Allergies
Category Data entered by AA
Allergies Bactrim (rash)
Preventive Health
Category Data entered by AA
Preventive health Up to date immunization
including flu shots annually. Reports gynecology exam
was
normal.
Family History
Category Data entered by AA
Family History Father - Heart attack, 59 years
old Mother - Type 2 Diabetes
Sister - Type 2 Diabetes
Social History
46020670
Category Data entered by AA
Social History Freelanceworker, telephone sales. Smoked a pack
and a half for the
past 25 years.
Quitted since she’d the heart attack and
takes a healthy heart diet. Review of Systems
Category
Data entered by AA
General Slightly fatigued. Laying still to avoid movement, breathingslowly.
Integumentary / Breast Warm skin; no significant diaphoresis.
HEENT / Neck Denies any problems with headaches, double
vision, difficulty with night vision,
hearing problems, ear pain,
sinus problems, chronic sore throats, or difficulty swallowing.
Cardiovascular Chest pain. Heart attack 10 days ago.
Denies history of irregular heartbeats nor
palpitations. Hypertension
Hyperlipidemia
Respiratory Denies wheezing and sputum production.
Gastrointestinal Reports mild nausea and reflux.
Genitourinary Denies urinary frequency, pain, incontinence, or difficulty.
Musculoskeletal Denies chest injury. No problems with muscles and joints.
Allergic / Immunologic
Endocrine Denies problems with heat or cold
intolerance, increasedthirst, increasedsweating, frequent urination,or
change in appetite.
Hematologic / Lymphatic No reports of bruising, bleeding gums, nose
bleeds, or other sites of increasedbleeding.
Neurologic Denies dizziness, seizures, numbness, or weakness.
Psychiatric Reports nervousness due to chest pain.
Physical Exams
Category
Data entered by AA
General Obese with a BMI of
29.4. AOx
Skin is dry and febrile.
Skin Skin warm and dry with no
lesions. Nails without ridging, pitting, or
peeling.
Capillary refill < 2 sec.
Quincke’sTest: Blanchingobserved.
46020670
HEENT / Neck Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic, no deformities, facial
features symmetric.Temporal arteries non-tender
to palpation.
Frontal and maxillary sinuses non-tender.
Eyes: Normal conjunctivae on inspection.
Visual acuity with Snellen pocket
card: OD 20/20, OS
20/20.
Throat/Neck: Mucous membranes moist. Oropharynx without
erythema, edema, or exudate. No stridor, no
foreign body. No visible scars,
deformities, or other lesions on neck
inspection. Trachea is midline and freely mobile.
JVP
WNL
Cardiovascular PMI nondisplaced. JVP WNL. No
significant change while standing, squatting,
during Valsalva maneuver or with sustainedhandgrip.
Chest / Respiratory Thorax atraumatic; no postsurgical scars.
Respirations shallow, normal rate, nonlabored. No
visible bounding of the chest. No
tenderness to chest wall
or vertebral body palpation. No
palpable thrill. Normal tactile fremitus.
Thorax normal/symmetrical to
percussion. Normal lungs sounds bilaterally.
Abdomen Abdomenatraumatic, obese, nondistended. Normoactive bowel sounds.
No hepatosplenomegaly or palpable
masses. Soft, nontender throughout exam.
Genitourinary / Rectal Normal pelvic exam. No masses or
tenderness. Normal external genitalia.
Musculoskeletal /
Osteopathic Structural
Examination
Normal muscle bulk. No evidence of swelling.
No calf tenderness or
inflammatory signs. No peripheral edema.
No asymmetry or deformity of the
back. No
tenderness or spasm of the
paraspinal muscles.
No localized tenderness of the spinous
processesor pelvic structures.
Neurologic PERRLA.CN II-XII intact.
Psychiatric AOx
Lymphatic No pathologically enlarged lymph nodes in
the cervical, supraclavicular,
axillary or inguinal chains.
46020670
1ry Survey:
46020670
Differential Diagnosis
Provisional Diagnosis
46020670
Management
The patient should be admitted and have the following investigations:
12 Leads ECG for any abnormal findings including T-wave inversion or ST segment elevation.
Cardiac enzymes (Myoglobin, Troponin I and CK MB.)
Chest X ray (for exclusion of trauma, pulmonary conditions & aortic aneurysm).
The patient should receive:
Aspirin 300 mg for chewing (to prevent propagation of the thrombus)
Oxygen inhalation session (5- 10 Litres / minute)
Nitro glycerine 10 mg sublingual tablets (for coronary vasodilatation) >> ask 1
st
about intake of
sildenafil.
Morphine 5- 10 mg IV (for relieving pain)
If the patient’s condition improved he should be put under observation for 24 hours.
Drugs taken after stabilization of the condition:
Heparin SC injection (to prevent new thrombus formation)
Glycoprotein IIb & IIIa inhibitors.
Beta Blockers to decrease cardiac demands
Diltiazim (if beta blockers are contraindicated, e.g.
Asthma) If the patient’s condition didn’t improve or MI was present
Patients with acute no traumatic chest pain are among the most challenging patients cared for by emergency
physicians. They may appear seriously ill or completely well and yet remain at significant risk for sudden death or an
acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
The typical pain of myocardial ischemia has been described as retrosternal or epigastric squeezing, tightening,
crushing, or pressure-like discomfort. The pain may radiate to the left shoulder, jaw, arm, or hand. In many cases,
particularly in the elderly, the predominant complaint is not of pain, but of a poorly described visceral sensation with
46020670
associated dyspnea, diaphoresis, nausea, lightheadedness, or profound weakness. The onset of symptoms may be
sudden or gradual, and
Symptoms usually last minutes to hours. In general, symptoms that last less than 2 minutes or are constant over days
are less likely to be ischemic in origin. Symptoms that are new or familiar to the patient but now occur with
increasing frequency, severity, or at rest are called unstable and warrant urgent evaluation even if they are absent at
the time of presentation. Cardiac risk factors should be used only to predict coronary artery disease within a given
population and not in an individual patient. It should also be mentioned that women, diabetics, and patients with
psychiatric disorders may have more subtle signs of ischemia.
Patients with acute myocardial ischemia may appear clinically well or be profoundly hemodynamically unstable. The
degree of hemodynamic instability is dependent on the amount of myocardium at risk, associated dysrhythmias, or
preexisting valvular or myocardial dysfunction.
Worrisome signs may be clinically subtle, particularly the presence of sinus tachycardia, which may be due to pain
and fear or may be an early sign of physiologic compensation for left ventricular failure. Patients with acute ischemia
often have a paucity of significant physical findings. Rales, a third or fourth heart sound, cardiac murmurs, or rub are
clinically relevant and important findings.
The presence of chest wall tenderness has been demonstrated in 5 to 10 percent of patients with AMI, so its
presence should not be used to exclude the possibility of acute myocardial ischemia.
Also, response to a particular treatment such as nitroglycerin should not be taken as evidence of a certain
disease.
Of all the diagnostic tools clinically used in assessing chest pain, the electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most
reliable when used and interpreted correctly. Patients with acute infarctions may have ECG findings that
range from acute ST-segment elevations to completely normal. This range means that the ECG is useful only
when it has a positive, or diagnostic, finding. New ST-segment elevations, Q waves, bundle branch block,
46020670
and T-wave inversions or normalizations are strongly suggestive of ischemia and warrant
aggressive management in the emergency department (ED). The presence of a normal or
unchanged ECG does not rule out the diagnosis of acute myocardial ischemia.
Serum markers, if positive, are highly specific for AMI. Myoglobin rises predictably in AMI but is
found in all muscle tissue, making it less reliable in the setting of AMI. Creatinine kinase and its
MB isoenzyme constitute the historical gold standard for diagnosing AMI. Cardiac-specific
troponin I is not found in skeletal muscle, so it has a much greater sensitivity and specificity for
AMI. The documentation of normal serum markers in the bloodstream does not exclude the
diagnosis of AMI.
In addition, these enzymes will not become elevated in serious disease conditions such as
unstable angina. The use of these markers can aid the clinician in assessing risk for patients with
chest pain, including disposition within the hospital. It must be remembered that a serial
enzyme evaluation is needed to appropriately risk stratify individual patients.
Emergency 2-dimensional echocardiography may have value in the evaluation of chest pain
when the ECG is nondiagnostic, eg, in patients with pacemakers, have a bundle branch block, or
have a baseline abnormal ECG. The finding of regional wall motion abnormalities in the acutely
symptomatic patient is strongly suggestive of active ischemia. Wall motion abnormality also
may represent previous myocardial injury. Twodimensional echocardiography also may aid in
the diagnosis of other conditions that may mimic ischemic disease, such as pericarditis, aortic
dissection, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Many tests currently being performed in some EDs will unmask otherwise unrecognized,
clinically significant ischemic disease. Patients with atypical chest pain and a normal stress
thallium or technetium scan have a very low incidence of short- and long-term subsequent
ischemic events.
Thallium or sestamibi testing can be done in the ED to further risk stratify patients in the
hospital and perhaps be used in consideration for patient discharge from the ED.
The priority must always be to exclude life-threatening conditions, and the ED physicians
should organize their test-ordering strategies to screen for those conditions first. (Table lists
possible causes of nontraumatic chest pain.)
Table Serious Causes of Chest Pain and Their Presen tation
Diagnosis Presentation
Pulmonary embolism Sudden onset, pleuritic pain, and dyspnea
46020670
46020670
Aortic dissection
Pericarditis
Pneumothorax
Acute coronary syndrome
Esophageal rupture
Tearing pain with radiation to back, neurologic symptoms
Positional ache, dyspnea
Pleuritic pain and dyspnea
Vague, pressure-like pain, radiation to arm, neck, jaw
Constant retrosternal, epigastric pain, history of inciting event
Pneumonia Pleuritic pain, cough, dyspnea, chills
SPECIFIC CAUSES OF CHEST PAIN Angina Pectoris
The pain of chronic stable angina is episodic and lasts 5 to 15 minutes. It is precipitated by
exertion andrelieved with rest or sublingual nitroglycerin within 3 minutes. The pain is
typically visceral in nature (aching, pressure, and squeezing), with radiation to the neck, jaw,
arm, or hand. In individual patients the character of each attack varies little with recurrent
episodes. Most patients can differentiate their usual angina from other causes of pain.
Physicians evaluating patients with stable angina should screencarefully for changes in the
pattern that would suggest a shift from stable to unstable angina or even suggest a different
diagnosis.
Unstable Angina :
Patients who complain of recent onset of angina, changes in the character of the angina, or
angina atrest are thought to have an unstable pattern of their angina. They are at risk for an
AMI or sudden cardiac death (see Chapter 21 for management).
Variant (Prinzmetal) Angina
This form of angina is thought to be due to spasm of the epicardial vessels in patients with
normal coronary arteries (one third of cases) or in patients with underlying atherosclerotic
disease (two thirds of cases). Pain typically occurs at rest and may be precipitated by the use
of tobacco or cocaine. The ECG typically shows ST-segment elevations during an acute
attack.
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ischemic pain that lasts longer than 15 minutes, is not relieved by nitroglycerin, or is
accompanied by diaphoresis, dyspnea, nausea, or vomiting suggests the diagnosis of AMI.
The clinician must understand the limitations of the screening tools used in the ED and
should have a high level of suspicion for AMI in patients with risk factors and prolonged or
persistent symptoms for whom there is no other clear diagnosis. Aortic Dissection
This diagnosis should be suspected in the patient who complains of sudden onset of severe,
tearing pain in the retrosternal or midscapular area. High-risk patients are also those at risk for
AMI, specifically the middle-age hypertensive male. The patient may be hypertensive or
hypotensive in shock. There may be a diastolic murmur of aortic regurgitation, indicating a
proximal dissection, or distal pulse deficits, indicating a distal dissection. The dissection may
occlude coronary ostia, resulting in myocardial infarction, or the carotids, resulting in cerebral
ischemia and stroke. Chest x-ray, computed tomography, trans esophageal echocardiography
(TEE), and angiography can aid in the diagnosis of this condition. Musculoskeletal Causes
Chest pain due to irritation or inflammation of structures in the chest wall is commonly seen in
the ED. Possible causes include costochondritis, intercostal strain due to severe coughing, and
pectoralis muscle strain in the settingof recent physical exertion. Patients will complain of sharp
pain that is worsened with movement of the chest wall (eg, coughing, and some pain that can be
elicited by palpation of the chest wall). These findings in patients withoutany other symptoms
and no history of significant cardiac disease support the diagnosis of musculoskeletal pain.
This pain is generally responsive to no steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. It is important to
emphasize that thepresence of chest wall tenderness does not rule out the possibility of
myocardial ischemia.
46020670
Gastrointestinal Causes
Esophageal reflux, dyspepsia syndromes, and esophageal motility disorders can produce chest
pain that is difficultto distinguish from ischemic pain. Patients may complain of burning,
gnawing pain associated with an acid taste radiating into the throat. Pain may be exacerbated by
meals, worsen when supine, and may be associated with belching. Clinicians should determine
whether the symptoms are due to a GI disorder based on the clinical presentation and the
absence of findings and/or risk factors suggesting an ischemic cause. Diagnostic decisions
should not be made on the basis of a response to a therapeutic trial of antacids, GI cocktails, or
nitroglycerin.
Assume that every patient complaining of chest pain might be having an AMI.
Patients with suspicious histories should have large-bore IV line established, a cardiac
monitor, supplemental O2, and ECG obtained as soon as possible. Vital signs and pulse
oximetry should bemonitored continuously.
Ask patients about cardiac risk factors, preexisting coronary artery disease, quality of chest
pain, time of onset and duration of symptoms, and whether the pattern has been stable, unstable,
continuous, or intermittent. Ask specifically for clues to noncardiac causes of chest pain: ability
to elicit pain by movement or cough; the relation of pain to meals; or pain that is of sudden
onset, referred to the back,or pleuritic in nature.
Examine patients while noting evidence of heart failure or valvular insufficiency,
pericardial rubs, or tenderness of the chest wall. Specifically, physicians should ask whether
pain elicited on palpation ofthe chest wall exactly reproduces the patient's pain.
An ECG should be obtained on all patients for whom there is a reasonable suspicion of
myocardial ischemia. A normal ECG, although minimizing the likelihood of an AMI, does not
definitively rule out thepossibility of MI.
If the etiology of chest pain remains unclear in some patients, clinicians should consider more
diagnostictests as guided by clinical suspicion and findings.
Clinicians should not use patients' clinical response to GI cocktails, nitroglycerin, or NSAIDs
to excludethe possibility of myocardial ischemia.
In patients with nondiagnostic ECGs for whom there is a clinical suspicion for ischemia,
clinicians shouldconsider provocative testing, echocardiography, or admission and observation.
Physicians should not rely on serum enzyme testing to rule out the possibility of clinically
significant disease.