Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Avoiding Plagiarism & Proper Citation: Anglia Ruskin Harvard Referencing Guide, Exams of Technology

A brief guide on the importance of citing and referencing sources in academic work, and the consequences of plagiarism. It explains the Anglia Ruskin Harvard Referencing Style and provides examples for various types of sources. The document emphasizes the duty of students to avoid plagiarism and properly acknowledge the work of others.

Typology: Exams

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/05/2022

aichlinn
aichlinn 🇮🇪

4.4

(45)

1.9K documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Avoiding Plagiarism & Proper Citation: Anglia Ruskin Harvard Referencing Guide and more Exams Technology in PDF only on Docsity! Draft using the Anglia Ruskin Harvard Referencing Style, 6.1.2 version April 2019 Institute of Technology Tralee Library: Brief guide to citations, referencing and avoiding plagiarism Citing and Referencing sources It is expected as a matter of normal academic practice that students will refer to (or cite) the sources they use in their work. “Referencing is the practice of acknowledging in your own writing the intellectual work of others; work that has been presented in some way in the public domain” (Neville, 2010, p.1). The sources that you cite or refer to could be a book in print format, an e-book, journal article, film, piece of music, newspaper article, computer program, etc. Citing and referencing your sources shows the amount of research you’ve done and can strengthen your work by giving your ideas support from writers or researchers in the subject area (iParadigms, 2014). Definition of plagiarism As outlined in the Institute of Technology Tralee Quality Assurance Procedures section A 5.2. Plagiarism, as that term is understood and applied by the Institute, is the presentation of the work of another (or of others) as one’s own work, without acknowledgement, in order to gain academic credit. Plagiarism also includes the recycled presentation of one’s own work previously submitted for academic credit and/or award. It applies to text, graphics, tables, formulae, code or any representation of ideas in print, electronic or any other media. Plagiarism can of course result from a deliberate decision to cheat, but it can also occur through carelessness, without any fraudulent intent. It is crucially important for students to familiarise themselves with correct referencing practices and the nature and boundaries of plagiarism. “I did not intend to plagiarise” is not an acceptable excuse. Plagiarism is regarded as a disciplinary matter. Avoiding Plagiarism It is important to understand that plagiarism can take on several different forms. It may involve the whole or part of your work (essay, project etc.). Part plagiarism may vary from copying passages from other sources without citation to situations where you do cite your sources, don’t copy the wording directly but rely too heavily on the way the original sources are written when writing your own work. Plagiarism may also involve the use of false or misleading citations. While citations and references, which are poorly or improperly written, may not necessarily imply plagiarism, if the reader is unable to locate the sources as a result, then the possibility of plagiarism occurs. It is the duty of the student to avoid such suspicions by observing agreed citation and referencing conventions. The different forms in which plagiarism occurs are described below. It is essential to avoid such practices when presenting your academic work for assessment or publication.  Verbatim copying without citations At the most dishonest end of the spectrum this involves presenting a complete work (essay, project, software code etc.) written by another party as your own work. Otherwise, it may involve partial copying, the inclusion of passages or elements copied directly from other sources without any indication that this has been done. This partial copying may vary in its level of dishonesty from one sentence being copied from another source to large parts of the work being copied from one or more sources.  Verbatim copying with citations Even if the appropriate citations are included to show the sources of the ideas or Draft  False or misleading citations It is obviously dishonest to include citations which are not real (i.e. they are made up) and it is also dishonest to cite sources which are not the actual source from which the ideas or information was drawn. A variation on this involves including citations which are only very loosely connected with what you have written. This may be done to lend a false sense of academic authority to your writing. Normally sources cited should have focused specifically on the topic being discussed and not simply made some passing comment or allusion to the matter in the context of a work which has a different focus. It is also crucial that citations and references are properly written so that the reader can access the original sources. In particular, it is not acceptable to cite a book or lengthy report without including the page number or numbers if the relevant idea or information is only in a specific passage or section of the book. If the contents of the book or report as a whole is being drawn on or referred to, then page numbers will not be necessary. The same applies to the citation of websites; the specific page or pages within the website from which the idea or information was drawn must be shown unless the whole site is relevant.  Recycling own work Self-plagiarism is also dishonest. You should treat your own previous work like the work of another and cite it in a similar way. It is academically dishonest to repeatedly present the same research, ideas or arguments in different works without alerting the reader to the fact that you are drawing on your own previous work. Students must treat academic work they have presented for assessment purposes as if it were published work. If a prior presentation (e.g. an essay or project) is drawn on in the course of writing a subsequent work, another essay or project etc., then the prior work must be properly cited in the same way as if it were the work of another. information presented, verbatim copying is dishonest unless it is made clear which sen- tences or passages have been quoted and from where. While excessive use of quota- tions properly indicated is not dishonest, it is likely to be poor academic practice in that it amounts to having others write your work to a large extent.  Excessive reliance on wording and structure of sources with citations Even if all sources are appropriately cited, it is dishonest to rely too heavily on the way sources are written when writing your own work. Taking sentences and passages from cited sources and then slightly altering the wording is not academically honest in that it is assumed that in your work the ideas you have taken from elsewhere have been filtered through your understanding and then expressed in your words. Such heavy reliance on the way sources are written still amounts to stealing the writing style of others and steal- ing the way they expressed their ideas. To avoid being guilty of this kind of plagiarism, one should not begin by copying and pasting sentences and passages from other sources into one’s own work but by summarising in your own words the ideas you want to derive from those sources. A low match score on turnitin does not necessarily indicate that the work is free of this kind of plagiarism.  Excessive reliance on wording and structure of sources without citations This involves greater dishonesty than doing so with citations, as above. Not only are you presenting the way the work is written as your own when it is largely the writing of others but you are also presenting the ideas or information taken from other sources as your own without giving any credit to the original authors Page 2 Draft Page 5 Type Reference In-text citation Pictures, images and photographs Evans, W., 1936. Penny Picture Display. [photograph] (Ford Motor Company Collection, New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art). (Evans, 1936) Broadcasts Love Hate, 2010. [TV programme] RTE, RTE1, 24 October 2010. 21.30. (Love Hate, 2010) Electronic images (found on internet) Van Vechten, C., 1934. Man Ray. [photograph] Available at: http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_Ray#/media/File:Man_Ray_1934.jpg [Accessed 26 May 2015]. (Van Vechten, 1934) YouTube video City University of New York, 2013. Paul Krugman & Tony Atkinson in Conversation | Inequality and Economic Growth. [video online] Available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3l6E3mUNW70> [Accessed 25 August 2015]. (City University of New York, 2013) Podcast and archived TV programme RTE, 2015. The Battle for Rural Ireland. [video] 25 August 2015. Available at: < http://www.rte.ie/player/ie/show/10459688/> [Accessed 26 August 2015]. (RTE, 2015) CDs The Beatles, 1987. Abbey Road. [CD] London: EMI. (The Beatles, 1987) DVD, video or film Apocalypse Now Redux, 2001. [DVD] Directed by Francis Ford Coppola. USA: Zoetrope Studios / United Artists. (Apocalypse Now Redux, 2001) Maps Ordnance Survey of Ireland, 2012. Kerry. Discovery series, Sheet 71, 1:50000. Dublin: Ordnance Survey of Ireland. (Ordnance Survey of Ireland, 2012) Acts of the Oireachtais / Parliament Freedom of Information Act 2014. Dublin: Stationery Office. The full title of the document is used as the citation. (Freedom of Information Act, 2014) Statutory Instruments Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2014. 2014 SI No. 29/2014. Dublin: Stationery Office. The full title of the document is used as the citation. (Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2014) Official publications or reports The High Court, 2002. Report of the inspectors appointed to enquire into the affairs of Ansbacher (Cayman) Limited. (1999 /163 Cos). Dublin: Stationery Office. (The High Court, 2002) Law reports Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Court of Appeal. Always follow accepted legal citation. The first in-text citation should cite the case in full and include parties and case abbreviation. Annual report print Irish Film Board, 2008?. Irish Film Board annual report 2005. Dublin: Irish Film Board. 2008? This means probable year of publication. (Irish Film Board, 2008?) Annual report online Kerry Group, 2013. Annual report 2013: the secret ingredient to success. [online] Available at: <http://www.kerrygroup.com/docs/ annual-report-2013/Annual_Report_2013.pdf> [Accessed 26 May 2015]. (Kerry Group, 2013) Standards print British Standards Institution, 1994. BS 7721:1994 Gas turbines and gas turbine sets - measurement of emitted airborne noise. Milton Keynes: BSI. (British Standards Institution, 1994) or (BSI, 1994) Standards online British Standards Institution, 2014. BS EN 62198:2014 Managing risk in projects - Application guidelines. IHS Technical Indexes [online] Available through: IT Tralee Library website <https://library.ittralee.ie> [Accessed 26 May 2015]. (British Standards Institution, 2014) or (BSI, 2014) Patents Saw-Wai, H., Abdou, H., Kendal, C., Ohio University. 2013. Engineering of an ultra-thin molecular superconductor by charge transfer. European Patent EP2553741 (A1). (Saw-Wai, Abdou and Kendal, 2013) Dissertations and theses Herlihy, M., 2012. Strategic Planning in Irish Higher Education Institutions. MA. Institute of Technology Tralee. (Herlihy, 2012) Computer program (from the internet) OGSA-DAI, 2011. OGSA-DAI (4.2). [computer program] OGSA-DAI. Available at: <http://sourceforge.net/projects/ogsa-dai/files/OGSA-DAI -4.2/> [Accessed 27 August 2015]. (OGSA-DAI, 2011) Draft (SOURCE: http://www.plagiarism.org/citing-sources/whats-a- citation/) “Whenever you borrow words or ideas, you need to acknowledge their source. The following situations almost always require citation:  whenever you use quotes  whenever you paraphrase  whenever you use an idea that someone else has already expressed  whenever you make specific reference to the work of another  whenever someone else's work has been critical in developing your own ideas. Let's say that you want to introduce information from another source (a book, a journal article, or website, for example) into your paper. You could approach this by quoting the work directly or try to convey the information from the original source in your paper by rephrasing it in your own words. Quoting: To quote is to include the identical wording from the original source in your paper. Quoted material in your paper is distinguished from your own words by the use of " " or by indenting the quoted text (if quoting a longer passage). In addition to quotation marks or indenting, all quoted material should also be cited, using ... in-text citation. Paraphrasing: To paraphrase is to include the ideas or information from an original source in your paper by rephrasing those ideas or information in your own words. The key to successful paraphrasing is to use as few words as possible from the original text--be mindful not to change the meaning that you are trying to convey as you rephrase--and to cite your paraphrase. Without proper citation, your paraphrase could be construed as plagiarism.” When do I need to cite? Page 6 Draft Greetham (2008, p.257) has described plagiarism as “the attempt to present someone else’s ideas as your own”. One way to ensure that you avoid plagiarism is to use quotation marks where you have quoted exactly from an author and also to include the citation at this point, with full details in the reference list at the end of your assignment. Both Cottrell (2008) and Neville (2010) highlight the importance of correct referencing for both tracing the source of your ideas and also in supporting and adding validity to your arguments. While Northedge (2005) suggests that ideally quotes should be short and not used excessively, he also stresses the importance of always giving the correct reference, something Davis and Plaice (2011, p.148) describes as “an integral part of writing your essay”. The need to be “as concise as possible” when you quote is a point that is also made by iParadigms (2014). Your reference list for the above paragraph – using the Anglia Ruskin Harvard Referencing Style - would be written as detailed below. Please note that this reference list is also the reference list for this guide, as the same sources have been cited on pages 1 and page 3 of the guide. Reference List Cottrell, S., 2008. The study skills handbook. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Davis N. and Plaice, C., 2011. Information literacy: making the library work for you. In: Davis, N. et al., 2011. Learning skills for nursing students. Exeter: Learning Matters. Greetham, B., 2008. How to write better essays. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. iParadigms, 2014. Plagiarism.org - Best Practices for Ensuring Originality in Written Work. [online] Available at: <http://www.plagiarism.org/> [Accessed 18 Aug 2015]. Neville, C., 2010. Complete Guide to Referencing and Avoiding Plagiarism. 2nd ed. [e-book] Maidenhead: Open University Press. Available through: IT Tralee Library website <https://library.ittralee.ie> [Accessed 18 August 2015]. Northedge, A., 2005. The good study guide. Milton Keynes: Open University. An example of a possible paragraph from an essay is below (using sources cited in the guide) Page 7