Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Final exam on Investments with full answers and explanation - 35 questions
Typology: Exams
1 / 14
15.433 Investments
Final Exam Spring 2003
Name: ____________________ Result: ______ Total: 40 points: ____
Instructions: This test has 35 questions. You can use a calculator and a “cheat sheet”. Each question may have multiple parts that are related. Answer all questions on the test. Use the blank, reverse pages if necessary. Please make every effort to write your solutions in a neat and legible manner - it enhances your chance of partial credit in case of error! The test is three (3) hours long and is out of 40 points. Use bullet points for the “discuss-questions” and briefly explain the bullet points … don’t write novels or books, the TA and I seriously appreciate it!
Good Luck!
Time Prevailing Reinvestment Rate
0 (purchase date) 6.0% 1 7.2% 2 9.4% 3 (maturity date) 8.2%
Ans: D
D) cannot be determined E) $1,
Ans: B
A) the coupon rate is greater than the current yield and the current yield is greater than yield to maturity B) the coupon rate is greater than yield to maturity C) the coupon rate is less than the current yield and the current yield is greater than the yield to maturity D) the coupon rate is less than the current yield and the current yield is less than yield to maturity E) none of the above are true.
Ans: D
Ans: D
Ans: A
Ans: B
A) $877. B) $888. C) $883. D) $893. E) $871.
Ans: A
Ans: B
Ans: Calculations are shown in the table below.
Strategy Cash Flow Buy a 1-year zero-coupon bond -$931. Sell 1.047157502 2-year zeros $890.00 * 1.047157502 = $931. Net Cash Flow $0.
Ans: C
Ans: C [this question has been cancelled as answer is rationally not obvious]
Ans: D
Ans: C
Ans: E
Ans: B
Ans: E
Ans: B
The risk- free return during the sample period was 6%.
Calculate the M2 measure for the Diamond Fund.
A) 4.0% B) 20.0% C) 2.86% D) 0.8% E) 40.0%
Ans: D
Ans: D
The return on a benchmark portfolio was 10%, calculated as follows: Weight Return Bonds (Lehman Brothers Index) 50% 5% Stocks (S&P 500 Index) 50% 15%
The contribution of asset allocation across markets to the total excess return was A) 1% B) 3% C) 4% D) 5% E) none of the above
Ans: C
Ans: E
Ans: When opening an account, the trader establishes a margin account. The margin deposit may be cash or near cash, such as T-bills. Both sides of the contract must post margin. The initial margin is between 5 and 15% of the total value of the contract. The more volatile the asset, the higher the margin requirement. The clearingho use recognizes profits and losses at the end of each trading day; this daily settlement is marking to market, thus proceeds accrue to the trader's account immediately; maturity date does not govern the realization of profits or losses.
Ans: Firms in other countries are not required to prepare financial statement according to U. S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting practices in other countries vary from those of the U. S. In some countries, accounting standards may be very lax or virtually nonexistent. Some of the major differences are: reserve practices, many countries allow more discretion in setting aside reserves for future contingencies than is typical in the U. S.; depreciation practices, in the U. S., firms often use accelerated depreciation for tax purposes, and straight line depreciation for accounting purposes, while most other countries do not allow such dual accounts, and finally, the treatment of intangibles varies considerably across countries. Finally, the problem of obtaining financial information may be considerable for some international investments, varying currency exchange rates present additional complications, translation of statements into English is another complication; potential government expropriation of assets and political unrest may be problems in some countries. In general, for the individual investor, investing in global or international mutual funds is a less risky way to add diversification to the portfolio than is attempting to value individual international securities.
Ans: Rate anticipation swap is an active bond portfolio management strategy, based on predicting future interest rates. If a portfolio manager believes that interest rates will decline, the manager will swap into bonds of greater duration. Conversely, if the portfolio manager believes that interest rates will increase, the portfolio manager will swap into bonds of shorter duration. This strategy is an active one, resulting in high transactions costs, and the success of this strategy is predicated on the bond portfolio manager's ability to predict correctly interest rate changes consistently over time (a difficult task, indeed).
Ans: Contingent immunization is portfolio management technique where the portfolio owner is willing to accept an average annual return over a period of time that is lower than that currently available. The portfolio manager may actively manage the portfolio until (if) the portfolio declines in value to the point that the portfolio must be immunized in order to earn the minimum average required return. Thus, the portfolio will be immunized contingent upon reaching that level. If that level is not reached, the portfolio will not be immunized, and the average annual returns will be greater than those required. Thus, this strategy is considered to be a combination active/passive bond portfolio management strategy.
Ans: The effects of possible liquidity premiums confound any simple attempt to extract expectation from the term structure. That is, the upward sloping yield curve may be due to expectations of interest rate increases, or due to the requirement of a liquidity premium, or both. The liquidity premium could more than offset expectations of decreased interest rates, and an upward sloping yield would result.
Ans: The expectations hypothesis is the most commonly accepted theory of term structure. The theory states that the forward rate equals the market consensus expectation of future short-term rates. Thus, yield to maturity is determined solely by current and expected future one-period interest rates. An upward sloping, or normal, yield curve would indicate that investors anticipate an increase in interest rates. An inverted, or downward sloping, yield curve would indicate an expectation of decreased interest rates. A horizontal yield curve would indicate an expectation of no interest rate changes. The liquidity preference theory of term structure maintains that short-term investors dominate the market; thus, in general, the forward rate exceeds the expected short-term rate. In other words, investors prefer to be liquid to illiquid, all else equal, and will demand a liquidity premium in order to go long term. Thus, liquidity preference readily explains the upward sloping, or normal, yield curve. However, liquidity preference does not readily explain other yield curve shapes. Market segmentation and preferred habitat theories indicate that the markets for different maturity debt instruments are segmented. Market segmentation maintains that the rates for the different maturities are determined by the intersection of the supply and demand curves for the different maturity instruments. Market segmentation readily explains all shapes of yield curves. However, market segmentation is not observed in the real world. Investors and issuers will leave their preferred maturity habitats if yields are attractive enough on other maturities.
Ans: The Sharpe measure indicates whether a portfolio underperformed the market index, but the difference between the market's Sharpe measure and the portfolio's Sharpe measure is difficult to interpret. M2 uses the same measure of risk as the Sharpe measure – variation in total return, calculated as the standard deviation. For managed portfolio P an adjusted portfo lio P* is formed by combining P with borrowing or lending at the risk- free rate to the point where P* has the same volatility as a market index (M). Then since M and P have the same standard deviation they can be directly compared using the M2 measure. M2 = rP* - rM. If P* outperforms M the measure will be positive, which means the CAL on which P* lies will have a steeper slope than the CML on which M lies. M2 is the distance between the CAL and the CML. The graph should look like the one in Figure 24.2 on page 814.
Ans: Some of the factors that might be considered in a multifactor international APT model are: (A) A world stock index (B) A national (domestic) stock index (C) Industrial/sector indexes (D) Currency movements. Studies have indicated that domestic factors appear to be the dominant influence on stock returns. Ho wever, there is clear evidence of a world market factor during the market crash of October 1987.
Ans: Many bonds are callable to give the issuer the option of calling the bond in and refunding (reissuing) the bond if interest rates decline. Bonds issued in a high interest rate environment will have the call feature. Interest rates must decline enough to offset the cost of floating a new issue. The disadvantage to the investor is that the investor will not receive that long stream of constant income that the bondholder would have received with a noncallable bond. In return, the yields on callable bonds are usually slightly higher than
the yields on noncallable bonds of equivalent risk. When the bond is called, the investor receives the call price (an amount greater than par value). The bond valuation calculation should include the call price rather than the par value as the final amount received; also, only the cash flows until the first call should be discounted. The result is that the investor should be looking at yield to first call, not yield to maturity, for callable bonds.
Ans: Some of the major accounting comparability problems in international investing are: (A) Depreciation. The U. S. allows firms to use different depreciation methods for financial reporting and tax purposes. The use of dual statements is uncommon in other countries. (B) Reserves. U. S. standards generally allow lower discretionary reserves for possible losses, resulting in higher reported earnings than other countries. (C) Consolidation. Accounting practices in some countries do not call for all subsidiaries to be consolidated in the corporation's income statement. (D) Taxes. Taxes may be reported as either paid or accrued. (E) P/E ratios. There may different practices for calculating the number of shares used to calculate the P/E ratios. For example, firms may use end-of-year shares, year-average shares, or beginning-of-year shares.
Ans: The following factors may be measured to determine the performance of an international portfolio manager. (A) Currency selection: a benchmark might be the weighted average of the currency appreciation of the currencies represented in the EAFE portfolio. (B) Country selection measures the contribution to performance attributable to investing in the better-performing stock markets of the world. Country selection can be measured as the weighted average of the equity index returns of each country using as weights the share of the manager's portfolio in each country. (C) Stock selection ability may be measured as the weighted average of equity returns in excess of the equity index in each country. (D) Cash/bond selection may be measured as the excess return derived from weighting bonds and bills differently from some benchmark weights.
listing three objections you have heard from your clients who have similar fears. Explain each of the objections is subject to faulty reasoning.
Ans: A few of the factors students may mention are
Ans: Sharpe's measure, (rP - rf)/sP, is a relative measure of the average portfolio return in excess of the average risk-free return over a period time per unit of risk, as measured by the standard deviation of the returns of the portfolio over that time period. Treynor's measure, (rP - rf)/bP, is a relative measure of the average portfolio return in excess of the average risk- free return over a period of time per unit of risk, as measured by the beta of the portfolio over that time period.
Jensen's measure, aP = rP -[rf + bP(rM - rf)], is a measure of absolute return (average return on the portfolio over a period of time) over and above that predicted by the CAPM.
As the risk measure in the Sha rpe measure of portfolio performance evaluation is total risk, this measure is appropriate for portfolio performance evaluation if the portfolio being evaluated represents the investor's complete portfolio of assets.
As the risk measure in the Treynor measure of portfolio performance evaluation is beta, or systematic risk, this measure is the appropriate portfolio performance evaluation measure if the portfolio being evaluated is only a small part of a large investment portfolio. This
measure is also appropriate for evaluation of managers of "subportfolios" of large funds, such as large pension plans.
As the Jensen measure, or Jensen's alpha, measures the return of a portfolio relative to that predicted by the CAPM, this measure is appropriate for the evaluation of managers of "subportfolios" of large funds. However, the Treynor measure is an even better measure for such a scenario.
Ans: The mean- variance approach relies on those two statistics to determine whether a portfolio earned an appropriate return relative to other portfolios. But when dealing with a perfect market timer the standard deviation is not relevant. The perfect timer will move in and out of the market as appropriate to earn the most favorable rate of return. Even when the market is riskier, as measured by standard deviation, it will be appropriate to be in the market if the returns are suitable. The other factor that is involved is skewness. A perfect market timer works with portfolios that are not normally distributed, but are skewed to the right. The skewness parameter is not incorporated into mean- variance analysis.
Ans: ETFs allow investors to trade index portfolios. Some examples are spiders (SPDR), which track the S&P500 index, diamonds (DIA), which track the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and qubes (QQQ), which track the Nasdaq 100 index. Other examples are listed in Table 4-3, page 117. (It is anticipated that there may soon be ETFs that track actively managed funds as well ad the current ones that track indexes.)
Advantages -
Disadvantages -