Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Aristotle's Concept of Ethos: Persuasion through Character, Study notes of Communication

Aristotle's perspective on ethos, or the persuasive power of a speaker's character. Historically understood views of ethos, aristotle's artistic approach, and the three components of ethos: intelligence, virtue, and good will. The document also delves into the clinton speeches and raises questions about how we judge speaker credibility and detect dishonesty.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 02/13/2009

koofers-user-eag-1
koofers-user-eag-1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Aristotle's Concept of Ethos: Persuasion through Character and more Study notes Communication in PDF only on Docsity! Lecture 20 ETHOS "Persuasion is achieved by the speaker's personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think hum credible. We believe good men more fully and more readily than others: this is true generally whatever the question is, and absolutely true where exact certainty is impossible and opinions are divided. . . his character may almost be called the most effective means of persuasion he possesses." Aristotle, Rhetoric 1.2.1356a.4-12 I. HISTORICALLY, TWO VIEWS OF ETHOS: 1. owned 2. created (an attribute) II. Aristotle held that Ethos was an artistic mode of persuasion, along with logos and pathos. That means it created by the speech itself. III. Aristotle identified three components of ethos - "habits of mind" 1. intelligence = "mental habits" -- phronesis 2. virtue = "moral habits" -- arete 3. good will = "emotional habits" -- These traits suggest that there is a moral dimension to ethos. These are not necessarily personality traits but character traits. IV. Discussion of the Clinton speeches V. Issues for rhetorical theory: 1. How does a positive judgment of speaker credibility come about? 2. How do we know when a speaker is lying, or isn't behaving credibly?