Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

LGST 369 Commercial Law FINAL EXAM STUDY AHEAD TIPS Athabasca University, Exams of Commercial Law

LGST 369 Commercial Law FINAL EXAM STUDY AHEAD TIPS Athabasca University

Typology: Exams

2023/2024

Available from 07/31/2024

solution-master
solution-master 🇺🇸

3.4

(17)

7.1K documents

1 / 19

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download LGST 369 Commercial Law FINAL EXAM STUDY AHEAD TIPS Athabasca University and more Exams Commercial Law in PDF only on Docsity! LGST 369 Commercial Law FINAL EXAM STUDY AHEAD TIPS Athabasca University LGST 369 Commercial Law FINAL EXAM STUDY AHEAD TIPS Athabasca University Similarities of crimes and torts - --- torts and crimes often arise out of the same facts/ actions - common history Torts and crimes differences - --- torts are private law, defendant owes obligation to plaintiff, plaintiff sues the defendant, defendant pays compensatory damages - crimes are public law, defendant owes obligation to society, government prosecutes defendant, defendant is punished Intentional torts - --occur when people intentionally act in certain ways Negligence torts - --occur when a person acts carelessly Strict Liability torts - --occur when a person does something wrong without intending to do so and without acting carelessly - it is enough that the defendant was responsible for the situation that resulted in the plaintiff's injuries Vicarious liability - --occurs when one person is held liable for a tort that was committed by another person - employees create risk of vicarious liability Independant Contractor - --a worker who is not closely connected to the employer's business as an employee Determining an independent contractor - --- control duty of care - --exists if the defendant is required to use reasonable care to avoid injuring the plaintiff the duty of care controls - --the scope of liability under the cause of action in negligence factors of duty of care - --- reasonable foreseeability - proximity - policy reasonable foreseeability - --whether a reasonable person in the defendant's position would have recognized the possibility that their activities might injure the plaintiff proximity - --there must somehow be a close and direct connection between the parties proximity allows - --a court to look at all of the circumstances before deciding whether or not it would be appropriate to recognize a new duty of care types of proximity - --- social relationship - commercial relationship - direct causal connection - reliance on representation policy - --is concerned with the effect that a duty of care would have on the legal system and on society generally policy factors - --- floodgates - politics - vulnerable relationships reasonable person - --- the reasonable person is a fictional character of normal intelligence who makes prudence a guide to his conduct and who acts in accord with general and approved practice - the standard of care tells the defendant how to act and is based on the reasonable person test professional negligence - --- a professional must act as a reasonable professional would act in similar circumstances - professional standards - specialists - novices but-for test - --- the but-for test determines if the defendant was partially responsible for the plaintiff's loss - the but-for test requires the plaintiff to prove that they would not have suffered a loss but for the defendant's carelessness contributory negligence - --a legal defence for when a loss is caused partly by the defendant's carelessness and partly by the plaintiff's own carelessness - situation - accident - damage three essential elements of most contracts - --- obligation is voluntarily created by the parties - privity is enforceable only by or against a party to the contact - compensatory damages are forward looking offer vs. invitation to treat - --- the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat depends on the reasonable person test - did the person mean to create a separate contract every time an acceptance is received offer - --- an indication of a willingness to enter into a contract on certain terms - contract comes into existence as soon as offer is accepted invitation to treat - --- an indication of a willingness to receive an offer - invitation for others to make offers an offer may cease to exist by - --- revocation (offeror withdraws) - lapse - death or insanity - rejection - counter-offer firm offer - --- an offer that the offeror has promised to hold open for a certain time - offeror can still revoke at any time firm offer cannot be revoked if - --- offeror's promise was placed under seal - if offeree paid an option collateral contract - --a separate agreement one party makes in exchange for the other party's entry into the main contract interpreting express terms - --- literal approach - contextual approach - golden rule (ordinary meaning unless absurd) - contra preferemtem rule six parties that lack capacity - --- minors - mentally incapacitated persons - intoxicated persons - corporations - associations - Indian bands and aboriginals voidable contract with minor - --contract is voidable if minor is entitled to avoid the legal obligations that the contract would have otherwise created enforceable contract with minor - --contract is enforceable if minor affirmed it corporation acting beyond its capacity - --- if a statutory corporation attempts to contract in a way that exceeds its statutory powers, it acts ultra vires (beyond its capacity/authority) - any agreement is unenforceable contracts that must be evidence in writing - --- guarantee - contracts for the sale of an interest in land - contracts that are not to be performed within a year writing requirements - --- contract must be in writing or there must be sufficient evidence of it - document must provide evidence of essential elements of contract and be signed by both parties effect of non-compliance - --- contracts unenforceable unless evidence in writing - no remedy available if party does not perform undue influence - --- abuse of a relationship in order to influence someone and induce an agreement - presumption of undue influence if there is a fiduciary involved unconscionable transaction - --- an agreement that no right-minded person would ever make and no fair-minded person would ever accept - presumption of unconscionable transaction if there was an improvident bargain (no proper regard to future) and inequality in bargaining power of parties discharged contract - --- a contract is discharged when a party is relieved of the need to fulfill any more promises condition subsequent - --a contractual term that states that the agreement will be terminated if a certain event occurs true condition precedent - --A contractual term that states that an agreement will come into existence only if and when a certain event occurs. condition precedent - --a contractual term that states that while a contract is formed immediately, it does not have to be performed unless and until a certain event occurs breach - --occurs whenever a party does not perform precisely as promised condition - --- a term is a condition if a breach would substantially deprive the innocent party of the expected benefit of the contract - innocent party can affirm or discharge contract warranty - --- a term is a warranty if a breach would not substantially deprive the innocent party of the expected benefit of the contract - innocent party cannot discharge contract but can claim damages for any losses suffered intermediate or innominate term - --- a term is intermediate if depending on the circumstances a breach may or may not substantially deprive the innocent party of the expected benefit of the contract defective performance - --- occurs when a party fails to properly perform an obligation due under a contract - deviation is a specific type of defective performance three types of breach - --- defective performance - self induced impossibility - anticipatory breach - hard to raise money general partnership - --- a form of business organization that comes into existence when two or more people carry on business together with a view to profit - partnership automatically arises by operation of law when a relationship meeting these criteria begins key elements of partnership agreement - --- name - membership (criteria on admission or expulsion) - capitalization (financial contributions) - profits (how will profits be shared) - management - dissolution (when can partner dissolve membership) limited partnership - --- a partnership in which the personal liability of at least one partner is limited to the amount of the partner's investment in the business - comes into existence when filed with government authority limited partnership conditions - --- employees can be limited partners, not general partners - lose limited liability if they participate in controlling the business or allow their name to be used in firm name sole proprietors and partners - --carry on the business, own the property of the business, possess its rights, and are responsible for its liabilities directly, which shareholders are not incorporation process - --- a corporation is created only when certain documents are filed with the appropriate government office - once incorporated, company is governed by laws of jurisdiction where incorporation occurred incorporation steps - --- articles of incorporation - name search report on the proposed name of corporation - paying the fee organizing a corporation - --- directors named in articles must have meeting and pass resolution issuing shares to shareholders - directors usually adapt a general bylaw (arrangements for carrying on formal business) - bylaw must be passed by directors then shareholders - creation of shareholders agreement (contract between shareholders that customizes their governance agreements) corporate separate legal existence - --- corporation itself carries on business, owns property, possesses rights, and incurs liability - shareholder can be an employee or creditor of the corporation - corporation is unaffected if shareholder dies or withdraws - treated as separate tax payer corporate division of powers - --- shareholders elect a board of directors to manage or supervise the management of the corporation - directors delegate the responsibility of managing the corporation to the officers that they appoint - directors then monitor and supervise the officers' management of the corporation's business corporate governance structure - --- shareholders vote for large decisions, do not participate in managing the business of the corporation - directors are responsible for managing the business of the corporation and its internal affairs, issuing shares, declaring dividends, and calling shareholder meetings - officers are appointed by directors and usually exercise substantial management powers delegated to them by the directors - shareholders elect directors, directors appoint officers conflict of interest - --- arises when a fiduciary considers taking advantage of some opportunity in which the corporation has an interest - arises when a director or officer contracts with the corporation legal standard of care in decision making - --- directors must have basic understanding of business - directors must keep informed - business judgement rule director liability - --- directors may be liable for up to 6 months of employee wages where the corporation does not pay (bankruptcy) directors and officers are not liable if - --- they reasonably rely on financial statements or reports of lawyers or other professionals