Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Medical Ethics Case Study: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare, Lab Reports of Nursing

A medical ethics case study that explores the ethical considerations and decision-making process faced by a general practitioner in a situation involving a mother's use of the traditional practice of 'coining' on her son. The case study delves into the ethical frameworks of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, analyzing the potential consequences, moral obligations, and virtuous actions that the practitioner must weigh. A comprehensive examination of the ethical dilemma, highlighting the complexities and nuances involved in navigating such sensitive situations in the healthcare field. It serves as a valuable resource for students, healthcare professionals, and anyone interested in understanding the ethical challenges that can arise in medical practice and the various ethical theories that can guide decision-making.

Typology: Lab Reports

2024/2025

Available from 09/20/2024

Amanda4721
Amanda4721 🇬🇧

4.5

(4)

687 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Medical Ethics Case Study: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare and more Lab Reports Nursing in PDF only on Docsity! 1 Medical Ethics Case Study Student's Name Institution Affiliation Date 2 Medical Ethics Case Study Utilitarianism Option one means that I would report the mother to Child Protective Services. The short- term consequences would be that the mother would face stringent measures from Child Protective Services because coining is considered maltreatment in the US. I would also feel proud of myself because of adhering to my professional code(Dimmock& Fisher,2020). On a long-term basis, the mother will not be able to perform coining in the future; hence his son may suffer in the future before they seek medical assistance. Overall, option one seems like the best option I should take as a general practitioner because it is in accordance with my professional code. The second option means I would not report the mother to Child Protective Services. I would contradict my professional code of ethics, thereby risking my career. On a long-term basis, I would encourage the mother to continue with the practice, which causes bruises on his son. Overall, option two does not seem to be a good option since it contradicts my professional code of ethics. Utilitarianism would require me to consider the alternative courses of action I would take. Secondly, it would require me to determine all the harms and benefits of each alternative for everyone affected (Dimmock& Fisher,2020). Thirdly, it would require me to pick the course of action that provides the greatest benefit after considering the costs involved. Using this approach, I would go by option one and report the mother. I would uphold my professional code of ethics to ensure that the boy is protected. On the hand, the mother would face repercussions from Child Protective Services. Deontology