Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Economics Midterm Exam: UW, Economics Dept., Summer 2001, Econ 483, Exams of Economics

A midterm exam for the economics 483 course offered at the university of washington during the summer of 2001. The exam covers topics such as return calculations, random variables and probability, descriptive statistics, the cer model and monte carlo simulation, and portfolio theory. Students are required to answer questions related to simple and continuously compounded returns, probability distributions, descriptive statistics, the constant expected return model, and efficient portfolios.

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/18/2009

koofers-user-pbu
koofers-user-pbu 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Economics Midterm Exam: UW, Economics Dept., Summer 2001, Econ 483 and more Exams Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

University of Washington Summer 2001 Department of Economics Eric Zivot

Economics 483

Midterm Exam

This is a closed book and closed note exam. However, you are allowed one page of handwritten notes. Answer all questions and write all answers in a blue book or on separate sheets of paper. Time limit is 2 hours and 10 minutes. Total points = 100.

I. Return Calculations (15 pts)

Use the end of month price data for the S&P 500 index in the table below to answer the following questions.

Month Price Dec-98 1229. Jan-99 1279. Feb-99 1238. Mar-99 1286. Apr-99 1335. May-99 1301. Jun-99 1372. Jul-99 1328. Aug-99 1320. Sep-99 1282. Oct-99 1362. Nov-99 1388. Dec-99 1469.

  1. What is the simple return between December, 1998 and December, 1999? Suppose you can get this return every year for the next five years. What is the simple five year return?
  2. What is the continuously compounded return between December, 1998 and December, 1999? Suppose you can get this return every year for the next five years. What is the continuously compounded five year return?
  3. Why do we use continuously compounded returns instead of simple returns in our probability models of returns?

II. Random Variables and Probability (10 pts)

Let X be a continuous random variable with pdf p ( x ). Given the following shape characteristics of p ( x ), draw a rough sketch of the pdfs for the following cases.

  1. E [ X ] = 0, var ( X ) = 1, skew ( X ) = 0, excess kurt ( X ) = 0.
  2. E [X] = 0, var ( X ) = 1, skew ( X ) = -0.5, excess kurt ( X ) = 0.
  3. E [X] = 0, var ( X ) = 1, skew ( X ) = 0.5, excess kurt ( X ) = 0.
  4. E [X] = 0, var ( X ) = 1, skew ( X ) = 0, excess kurt ( X ) = 3.
  5. E [X] = 0, var ( X ) = 1, skew ( X ) = 0, excess kurt ( X ) = -3.

III. Descriptive Statistics (20 pts)

Consider the monthly continuously compounded returns on Boeing, Microsoft and the S&P 500 computed over the period June 1992 – October 2000. Descriptive statistics for these returns are given in the table below and histograms, boxplots and scatterplots are presented on the following pages. Based on the descriptive statistics and graphs, answer the following questions.

  1. Compare the return – risk properties of the three assets. Which asset appears to be safest asset and which asset appears to be the most risky asset?
  2. Do the return distributions of the three assets look like they could be normal distributions? Justify your answers.
  3. Describe the direction and strength of linear association between the three assets. Which assets appear to have the highest and lowest correlations?
  4. Why is the monthly standard deviation for the S&P 500 lower than the standard deviation values for Boeing and Microsoft?

Univariate Statistics rboeing rmsft rsp Count 100 100 100 Average 0.012 0.028 0. Median 0.020 0.022 0. Standard Deviation 0.076 0.107 0. Variance 0.006 0.011 0. Skewness -0.567 -0.511 -0. Excess Kurtosis 1.123 2.381 2.

0

Asset

 - Box plots for Boeing, Microsoft and S&P - rboeing rmsft rsp 
  • -0.
  • -0.
  • -0.
  • -0.
  • -0.
  • -0.

IV. The CER Model and Monte Carlo Simulation (20 pts)

Consider the constant expected return (CER) model

Rit = μi + εit , i = 1, …, N ; t = 1,..., T εit ~ iid N (0, σ (^) i^2 )

where Rit denotes the return on asset i and εit is a normally distributed random error term. For specificity, assume that μ i (^) = 0.025 and σ i =0.075.

  1. What is the interpretation of εit in the CER model?
  2. Briefly explain how you could generate one Monte Carlo simulation of T = 50 observations from the CER model for an asset using Excel.
  3. Recall, the least squares estimator of μi in the CER model is the sample mean

1

ˆ

T it t

R

T

μ

= ∑.

The sample mean is an unbiased estimator of μi ; that is, E [ μˆ (^) i ] = μ i .Using the concept of Monte

Carlo simulations from the CER model, briefly describe what it means for μˆ i to be an unbiased

estimate of μi.

  1. The precision of μˆ (^) i is measured by the standard error , SE ( μˆ i ). Using the concept of Monte

Carlo simulations from the CER model, briefly describe what SE ( μˆ (^) i )represents.

V. Portfolio Theory (15 pts)

Consider the problem of an investor trying to determine the best portfolio of two risky assets (stocks) and a risk-free asset (T-bill). Let the two risky assets be Boeing and Microsoft, the risk- free asset be a one-year T-bill and suppose the investment horizon is one year. It is assumed that investors like assets with high expected returns but dislike those with high risk (as measured by return standard deviation) and choose to hold efficient portfolios. Transfer the diagram below to your bluebook and answer the following questions.

-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% P or t f ol i o S D

Microsof t

Boeing

T-bill

  1. Identify the investment opportunity set consisting of only the two risky assets. On this diagram, identify the sets of inefficient and efficient portfolios.
  2. Identify the tangency portfolio and the set of efficient combinations of T-bills and the two risky assets. On this efficient set, indicate and describe the asset allocation of the portfolios that a very risk averse investor would choose to hold and the portfolios that a very risk tolerant investor would choose to hold.
  3. State the maximization problem to be solved to determine the tangency portfolio.

VI. Efficient Portfolios and Value-at-Risk (15 pts)

Consider an investor who has $100,000 to invest over the next year. Assume that the investor initially holds a portfolio consisting of 80% Boeing and 20% Microsoft. This asset is denoted “asset A” in the diagram below. Use the information in the table below to answer the following questions.

-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% P or t f ol i o S D

Microsof t

Boeing

T-bill

Asset A

Tangency

Asset E [ R ] SD ( R ) Asset A 0.186 0. Tangency 0.259 0. T-Bill 0.06 0

  1. What is the 5% Value-at-risk over the next year on the $100,000 portfolio consisting of just asset A? Assume that returns are continuously compounded. ( FYI – NORMINV(0.05, 0.186, 0.223) = -0.181)
  2. Find the efficient portfolio (combination of T-bills, Boeing and Microsoft) that has the same expected return as asset A. In this efficient portfolio, how much is invested in the T-bill, Boeing and Microsoft? What is the risk (standard deviation) of this portfolio?
  3. Find the efficient portfolio (combination of T-bills, Boeing and Microsoft) that has the same risk (standard deviation) as asset A. In this efficient portfolio, how much is invested in the T- bill, Boeing and Microsoft? What is the expected return of this portfolio?