Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Landmark Supreme Court Cases in American History: A Legal Overview, Quizzes of World History

An overview of five significant supreme court cases from the early history of the united states, including commonwealth v aves, proprietors of the charles river bridge v warren bridge, swift v tyson, prigg v pennsylvania, and farwell v boston & worcester railroad. These cases cover various legal issues such as slavery, contracts, common law, and fugitive slaves, and mark important shifts in american legal thought.

Typology: Quizzes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 04/14/2012

kingalex-1
kingalex-1 🇺🇸

2 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Landmark Supreme Court Cases in American History: A Legal Overview and more Quizzes World History in PDF only on Docsity!

TERM 1

Commonwealth v

Aves

DEFINITION 1 Also called Med's Case Issue of slavery and it's nature in the Union Master brought slave into Mass Ruled protected right of master to recover fugitive slave, but not to sojourn w/ slaves into free states TERM 2

Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v

Warren Bridge

DEFINITION 2 Shift between Marshall and Taney "Contract" didn't imply monoploy Followed Jacksonian resentment to monoploy States had right to encourage new and dynamic capital investment for communities betterment TERM 3

Swift v

Tyson

DEFINITION 3 Story tried to create fed common law Decide if fed crt had to follow NY common law or look elsewhere Ruled that unless specific laws, could look elsewhere TERM 4

Prigg v

Pennsylvania

DEFINITION 4 Attempt to nationalize law of slavery Created fed common law right of masters Ruled that 1) Fug slave law of 1793 was constitutional 2) Can't add further requirements to law 3) Constitution provided common law right to recapture 4) State officials ought to enforce fed law of 1793 5) No fug slave has right to due process TERM 5

Farwell v Boston & Worcester

Railroad

DEFINITION 5 L