Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Solution to Midterm Review Problem - Logical Equivalence | MATH 8, Exams of Mathematics

Material Type: Exam; Class: TRANS HIGHER MATH; Subject: Mathematics; University: University of California - Santa Barbara; Term: Winter 2007;

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/30/2009

koofers-user-vze-1
koofers-user-vze-1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Solution to Midterm Review Problem - Logical Equivalence | MATH 8 and more Exams Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity! Math 8 - Solutions to Midterm Review Problems Winter 2007 1. Prove the logical equivalence: (P∧ ∼ Q) ∧ (R ⇒ Q) ≡∼ [(P ⇒ Q) ∨R]. Solution. Starting with the left-hand side and using the identity A ⇒ B ≡∼ A ∨ B and then the distributive law, we have (P∧ ∼ Q) ∧ (R ⇒ Q) ≡ (P∧ ∼ Q) ∧ (∼ R ∨Q) ≡ (P∧ ∼ Q∧ ∼ R) ∨ (P∧ ∼ Q ∧Q) ≡ (P∧ ∼ Q∧ ∼ R) ∨ F ≡ P∧ ∼ Q∧ ∼ R ≡ ∼ [∼ (P∧ ∼ Q) ∨R] ≡ ∼ [(∼ P ∨Q) ∨R] ≡ ∼ [(P ⇒ Q) ∨R]. Alternatively, we could check that the left and right hand sides have identical truth tables: each side is False only when P is True and Q and R are both False. Another method would be to check that the proposition obtained by changing the “≡” to a “⇔” is a Tautology, by means of a truth table. 2. Simplify the sentential form (P∧ ∼ Q) ⇒ (P ∨Q) as much as possible. Solution. (P∧ ∼ Q) ⇒ (P ∨Q) ≡ ∼ (P∧ ∼ Q) ∨ (P ∨Q) ≡ (∼ P ∨Q) ∨ (P ∨Q) ≡ ∼ P ∨ P ∨Q ∨Q ≡ Q. 3. Write the following propositions symbolically with no words. (You do not have to prove them.) (a) “There does not exist a largest real number.” Solution. ∀x ∈ R ∃y ∈ R (y > x) or a more literal version would be ∼ [∃x ∈ R ∀y ∈ R (y ≤ x)]. (b) “The interval strictly between any two distinct real numbers contains at least one rational number.” Solution. ∀x ∈ R ∀y ∈ R [(x < y) ⇒ ∃z ∈ Q (x < z < y)] 1 (c) “Every nonempty set has at least two distinct subsets.” Solution. (We must assume that some set U of sets is given for the domain of interpretation.) ∀A [(A 6= ∅) ⇒ ∃B ∃C (B 6= C ∧B ⊆ A ∧ C ⊆ A)] 4. Determine whether the following statements are true or false, where the universe of discourse is the set of all real numbers, and give a brief justification. (a) ∀x ∃y [(y > 0) ⇒ (xy > 0)] Solution. True. Notice that the implication is automatically true whenever y ≤ 0. So for any x, one such y that makes the implication true is y = 0. (b) ∀x ∃y ∀z [(x + y)z2 ≤ 0] Solution. True. Since z2 ≥ 0 for any z, the inequality will be satisfied if and only if x + y ≤ 0. So for any x, we can choose y = −x (or any y < −x) to make the inequality true for all z. (c) ∃x ∀y (xy = 1) Solution. False. This says that there is some x that is equal to 1/y for every y 6= 0. Clearly that is impossible. (d) ∀y ∃x (x < y < x + 1) Solution. True. Any y satisfies the inequality y − 1/2 < y < y + 1/2, so we can take x = y − 1/2. 5. Recall that the Sheffer stroke of two propostions P and Q is defined as P ↑ Q ≡∼ (P ∧Q). If A = {x | P (x)} and B = {x | Q(x)}, let S = {x | P (x) ↑ Q(x)}. (Assume everything is contained in a fixed domain of interpretation U .) (a) Describe the set S in terms of A and B, using the standard set operations (eg. union, intersection, set difference, etc.). Solution. S = {x | P (x) ↑ Q(x)} = {x | ∼ (P (x) ∧Q(x))} = {x | P (x) ∧Q(x)}′ = (A ∩B)′. (b) Illustrate S using a Venn Diagram. Solution. Everything should be shaded except for the intersection of A and B. (c) If we also know that A ⊆ B, what else can we say about S? Solution. If A ⊆ B, then A ∩ B = A (think of a Venn diagram, if you are not sure about this). Thus S = (A ∩B)′ = A′ is the complement of A. 2