Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Myers-Briggs Personality Assessment: Understanding the History and Dimensions of MBTI, Transcriptions of Law

An in-depth exploration of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), a personality assessment tool based on Carl Jung's theory of psychological types. Learn about the history of MBTI, its dimensions, and how it is used to identify personality traits and types. Understand the significance of extroversion and introversion, sensing and intuition, and judging and perceiving in the context of MBTI.

Typology: Transcriptions

2018/2019

Uploaded on 03/28/2022

sneha-jain-4
sneha-jain-4 🇮🇳

5 documents

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Myers-Briggs Personality Assessment: Understanding the History and Dimensions of MBTI and more Transcriptions Law in PDF only on Docsity!

TITLE: Assessment 1: Personality Assessment

Table of Contents:

  • A. History of Myers Briggs Personality Indicator:.........................................................................................
  • B. Dimensions of Myers–Briggs Type Index:................................................................................................
  • C. Result:......................................................................................................................................................
  • D. Finding:....................................................................................................................................................
  • E. Conclusion:..............................................................................................................................................
  • References:..................................................................................................................................................

A. History of Myers Briggs Personality Indicator: The Myers–Briggs Type Index (MBTI) is a personality assessment used in personality typology that identifies specific psychological choices in how people see the processes and make judgments. Personality traits or agreeableness, perceiving or instinct, trying to express, evaluating, or perceiving are the four broad categories that the exam aims to identify. Several Americans, Catharine Cook Briggs, and her daughters Isabel Briggs Myers created the first editions of the MBTI. Briggs started her psychological research in 1917. She noticed significant disparities between her prospective son-in-demeanor laws and from other group members when she met him. Briggs began reading biographies and constructed a paradigm in which she advocated four emotional responses: contemplative (or thoughtful), instinctive, administrative, and extroverted. The MBTI was created for normal people and highlights the importance of inherent differences. "The MBTI's basic concept is that we must all have distinct opinions in how we interpret their encounters, and these tendencies underpin our preferences, needs, attitudes, and purpose," says the web application (Puji & Ahmad,(2016),p4(2)). The criterion "is created to execute a theory; consequently, the concept must always be grasped to comprehend the MBTI," according to the MBTI Document. The principle of psychological type, as discovered by Carl Jung, is at the heart of the MBTI. The coexistence of two contradictory pairs for mental processes, according to Jung: Thinking and experiencing is the "rational" (judgmental) capacities and Perception and intuition are two "unreasonable" (perceiving) capabilities. All of the other functions, according to Jung, are principally exhibited in anything but an internalized or aggressive form for each individual. Briggs and Myers established their personality type hypothesis, which itself is presented following, founded on Jung's original principles, and on which the MBTI is derived. Even though psychologist Hans Eysenck described the MBTI as a "moderately good assessment of Jung's key decisions as articulated in Psychological Types," he also stated that "[The MBTI] provides 16 personality types which are considered to be close to Jung's conceptual frameworks." This identification has always bothered me because it leaves out half of Jung's thesis (he had 32 types, by asserting that for every

conscious combination of traits there was an opposite unconscious one). The second half of his hypothesis is correct. B. Dimensions of Myers–Briggs Type Index: According to the author Jung, it is defined eight personality types by integrating the two perspectives with each of the functions. Extroversion perception, internalized sensory perception, emotionally expressive thought, introverted thinking, and and so on are examples of these sorts. The main of this indicator is to understand what they thought and who they are as per the preference of their life i.e. effort and relationship. Some of the MBTI's characteristics are based on Jung's study, while Briggs and Myers made a new level. These are the four components:  Extroversion Perception v/s Internalized Perception : The author details the components that reflect an individual's behavior. Personality types are inside and focused on their inner workings, whereas people on the spectrum are upward from and geared to the outside reality. Extroversion and introversion are terms that describe how people get their energy. Extroverts are fueled by interacting in big groups of people and having a huge number of friends rather than a small number of close friends, whereas introverts are energized by interacting one on one with a small circle of participants (Cohen & Keren, (2013),p1(3)).  Intuitive vs. Sensing. This level is concerned with how humans process information. Sensing personalities are drawn to the truth. They enjoy learning and focusing on facts by using their senses. Intuitive customers are more worried about first impressions. They adore contemplating options and thinking about things. Where users interpret information is determined by the second word of the MBTI test, Sensing (S) and Intuition (N). Someone good at sensing appreciates realities and lives at the moment. Becoming intuitive entails attempting to deduce the greater connections between events.  Emotion vs. Reasoning : This dimensionality combines the perceiving and intuition plan to identify how somebody responds to the information received. Many who value thinking make rational decisions,

evidence, and logic. Many who value feelings, on the other hand, make their decision based on individuals and sentiments. Another of the Jungian Type Inventory's criteria is Thinking and Feel. Regrettably, the phrase is outdated, as though entails more than just thinking, and feeling does not imply being emotionally unstable or frivolous. They would be about how we make decisions: logically or by respecting individuals. In this they help out to take a decisions which is based on the value and their supporting the other people and helps to identify the qualities which tends to be empathetic and compassionate and help to produce a peace and harmony (Choong, & Varathan,(2021),p7(5)).  Interpreting vs. Judging : Briggs and Myers included this third factor in the MBTI to identify whether a person makes sensible or unreasonable decisions while dealing with the universe. A judging person is structured and makes firm choices, whereas a discerning someone is dynamic and responsive. In another word, they are going to judge what they are observing. The Jungian Type Materials are supplied with the preferences of Judging and Recognizing. Furthermore, the nomenclature is a little outdated, as evaluating is more than just evaluation, and perceiving is more than just gazing at things. This is about how people approach the situation: organized or flexible and spontaneous. They desire closure from the outside universe with order, planning, and structure when you judge. They prefer to have things sorted and marked off their to-do list as soon as feasible. Judges might also want to look for a job that would allow individuals to set targets, organize themselves, and make choices C. Result: From these theories, they want to do the Myers- Briggs Test for identifying and emulating the personality traits themselves. As they want to understand or learn the meaning of life. As the Groups are classified into one of the Myers - Briggs type indicators based on their responses to the inventory's components. The MBTI's purpose is to help people better understand and investigate their characters, especially their interests, preferences, capabilities, weaknesses, potential job choices, and interaction with others.

The test is applied to that situation where students study in a school. So, the outcome of this test is that Identifying and understanding his own and others' abilities can be quite beneficial. When they're carrying out a task with other individuals and groups, they could notice that some of them are very talented and successful at doing certain tasks. By recognizing these distinctions, the group will be able to effectively distribute duties and collaborate to meet their objectives. Thus, the performer i.e. Extroversion Perception, censoring perception, emotion, and rezoning are the personality category which is based on the Myers- Briggs Test. This personality indicates Confident, energy, and impulsiveness. Those who enjoy being the focus of attraction are frequently referred to as "class clowns" or "performers." The performer i.e. Extroversion Perception, censoring perception, emotion, and recognizing personality type is the representation of the personal characteristics. They are practical and practical by nature. They like to learn through doing rather than reading, and they despise theoretical conversations. As a result, individuals with the performer i.e. Extroversion Perception, censoring perception, emotion, and recognizing personal characteristics which may find it difficult to succeed in typical educational environments. They, on the other hand, thrive in circumstances where they could engage with people or acquire through firsthand perception (Jinkerson & Hawkins, (2015), p8 (3)). The performer that is extraversion perception sensing perception emotion and recognizing have also negative consequences that sometimes it feels to the thought that about the present and the past actions which will live with them in the long term. They thought that they run into the new situation and identify the figure which they happen such as they start to work routine which they dislike ok in join new adventures activity e experience and always there looking forward which it means that the people live very much here in this trait. Hence, in another word the people help and are being kept aware of their environment and surrounding. They also learn and think about the perspective which they come to other people they also start to feel that what others are feeling and what others are thought for others and how they are responding to the other people as from this they found sympathetic, easy-going and wellbeing trait.

D. Finding: They analyses the MBIT and they found the negative and positive consequences based on the personality trait. After the test, they learn and start to compare with others which may be drastically affecting their life. From Opinions and suggestions, they do not agree with this test because of the negative consequences that the First and foremost, the MBTI is not a "testing." There are no correct or incorrect replies, and no one type is superior to another. The indicator's objective is not to assess the psychological state or make any form of judgment. These results are still not compared to any norms, unlike many other sorts of psychological testing. Rather than comparing their results, with those of other persons, the instrument's purpose is to simply provide more knowledge on their own particular identity (Montequín, & Nieto, (2013), p5 (2)). But, they look on the side they agree with because of i.e. Positive consequences, they identify the Control of their conduct in various situations by understanding your emotional experiences. This understanding can help you form better and more significant intimate relationships as well as achieve professional success. E. Conclusion: This is to be concluded that the people are alert of components of MBTI and along with assisting them in interacting with some other instructors and learners. When it comes to personal characteristics, they can be both very equivalent and very unique. A personality type does not inevitably have advantages or disadvantages; it simply differs in how researchers think and what they are doing. The MBTI scores reveal important disparities amongst people, which might misjudgments and misinterpretations. Thus, they help them to improve their relationship with others and also identify the qualities which they have himself, they recognize their tendencies and the abilities to monitor and control their behaviors. It aids in the improvement of interpersonal connections. Knowing personal characteristics allows them to accept others for who they are—or at the very least, appreciate

why people act the way they do. It can aid in the reduction of work engagement, allowing for the development of a more healthy and collaborative organizational climate. Hence, it can help members of the team deal with issues like collaboration, conflict resolution, change management, decision-making, leadership, and career transitions.

References: Puji, R. P. N., & Ahmad, A. R. (2016). Learning style of MBTI personality types in history learning at higher education. Economics , 3 (6), 289-295. Available at, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/295718898.pdf Cohen, Y., Ornoy, H., & Keren, B. (2013). MBTI personality types of project managers and their success: A field survey. Project Management Journal , 44 (3), 78-87. Available at, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pmj. Choong, E. J., & Varathan, K. D. (2021). Predicting judging-perceiving of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in online social forum. PeerJ , 9 , e11382. Available at, https://peerj.com/articles/11382/ Jinkerson, J., Masilla, A., & Hawkins, R. C. (2015). Can MBTI dimensions predict therapy outcome: differences in the thinking-feeling function pair in CBT. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome , 18 (1). Available at, https://researchinpsychotherapy.org/index.php/rpsy/article/view/ Montequín, V. R., Fernández, J. M., Balsera, J. V., & Nieto, A. G. (2013). Using MBTI for the success assessment of engineering teams in project-based learning. International journal of technology and design education , 23 (4), 1127-1146. Available at, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-012-9229-