Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Role and Power of Federal Courts in Policymaking, Study notes of Sociology of Deviance

An overview of the role and power of federal courts in policymaking through their constitutional interpretation, application, and judicial review. It covers the history of supreme court decisions, the structure and jurisdiction of lower federal courts, and the impact of supreme court decisions. Controversies over the leeway of courts in interpreting the constitution and the political history of supreme court are also discussed.

Typology: Study notes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 03/19/2012

rabiali
rabiali 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download The Role and Power of Federal Courts in Policymaking and more Study notes Sociology of Deviance in PDF only on Docsity!

Chapter 15 The Federal Courts

AP Photo/Eric Rowley

Judicial Policymaking

  • (^) Courts can apply policy-making power of

the courts as they comply with the

Constitution through

  • (^) Interpretation
  • (^) Application
  • (^) Judicial Review
  • (^) Power of the judicial branch to declare

unconstitutional the actions of the other

two branches or their individual units

Judicial Policymaking

  • (^) The Role of Courts and Judges
    • (^) There is controversy over the leeway that courts should have in exercising their rights of constitutional interpretation
    • (^) Strict construction
      • (^) holds that the document should be interpreted narrowly
      • (^) Judicial restraint
    • (^) Loose construction
      • (^) holds that the Constitution can be interpreted broadly
      • (^) Judicial activism

Political History of the Supreme Court

  • (^) Chief Justice John Marshall
    • (^) Marbury v. Madison (1803)
    • (^) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
  • (^) Chief Justice Roger Taney
    • (^) Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
    • (^) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
  • (^) Chief Justice Earl Warren
    • (^) Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
  • (^) Chief Justice Warren Burger
    • (^) Roe v. Wade (1973)

The Lower Federal Courts

  • (^) District Courts - Trial court level
    • (^) 95 U.S. district courts with judges appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate
  • (^) Original jurisdiction
  • (^) Includes both civil and criminal cases
  • (^) Criminal case
  • (^) Legal dispute dealing with an alleged violation of a penal law
  • (^) Civil case
  • (^) Conflict between two parties

Jack Kurtz/ZUMA/Corbis

The Lower Federal Courts

  • (^) U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal
    • (^) Primary intermediate-level appellate courts
    • (^) 13 courts of appeal
    • (^) Courts of appeal have only appellate jurisdiction - (^) Hearing cases in panels of three judges
    • (^) White House generally takes more care with nominations to the courts of appeal than it does with district court selections.

The U.S. Supreme Court

  • (^) Highest court in the country
  • (^) Number of justices at the discretion of Congress
  • (^) A chief justice and 8 associate justices
  • (^) Jurisdiction
    • (^) Constitution sets Court’s original jurisdiction
    • (^) Statutory law sets Court’s appellate jurisdiction
  • (^) Selection of justices
    • (^) Presidents look for appointees who share their political philosophy
    • (^) Must be confirmed by Senate

The U.S. Supreme Court

  • (^) Deciding to decide
    • (^) Makes policy from the cases that the justices themselves choose to hear and decide
    • (^) Test Cases
    • (^) Rule of Four
  • (^) Deciding the case
    • (^) Supreme Court deals with cases it chooses to hear:
      1. Without oral arguments: per curiam opinion.
      2. Full treatment:
        • (^) one justice assigned to prepare the majority opinion,
        • (^) other justices may write concurring or dissenting opinions.

Ian Tragen/Shutterstock Copyright © 2011, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

The U.S. Supreme Court

  • (^) Implementation
    • (^) Higher courts develop policy
    • (^) Lower courts interpret the rulings
    • (^) Government agencies implement rulings
  • (^) Impact
    • (^) Greatest impact is when the Court issues a clear decision in a well- publicized case and its position enjoys strong support from other branches and units of government, interest groups, and public opinion

Power, Politics, and the Courts

  • (^) How much influence do federal courts have in the policymaking process?
  • (^) How responsive are they to public concerns?
  • (^) Restrictions on the federal courts
    • (^) Both the Constitution and the law check judicial power.
    • (^) Other branches can change the law or the Constitution.
    • (^) The Court depends on the cooperation and compliance of other units of government and private parties to implement their decisions.