Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board's (Central Coast Water Board) findings regarding the Mission Hills Community Service District's (MHCSD) wastewater treatment plant in Lompoc, California. information about the current discharge of approximately 250,000 gallons per day of treated wastewater to the Lompoc Plain groundwater sub-basin, MHCSD's inability to achieve immediate compliance with chloride and total nitrogen effluent limits, and the proposed upgrades to the WWTP and WWTP operations to ensure compliance with permit limitations and improve treatment efficiency. The document also includes interim effluent limits and a schedule of tasks MHCSD must complete to achieve compliance.
What you will learn
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 6
895 Aerovista Place, Suite 101 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
The Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (Central Coast Water Board) finds that:
Table 1 – Lompoc Plain Sub-basin Median Groundwater Quality Objectives Constituent Units Concentration Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1, Chloride mg/L 250 Sulfate mg/L 500 Boron mg/L 0. Sodium mg/L 250 Nitrogen mg/L 2 mg/L = milligrams per liter
Table 2 – Effluent Limits Constituent Units 25-Month Rolling Median
30-Day Monthly Average
Sample Maximum
Chloride mg/L^250 BP^ ---^300 E Total Nitrogen (as N) mg/L
--- 10 (May-Sep) C^ 20 (May-Sep) C --- 15 (Oct-Apr) C^30 (Oct-Apr) C BP = Basin Plan
C = Central Coast Water Board Order No. 97-35 (Waste Discharge Requirements for Mission Hills Community Service District) established these effluent limits in 1997 based on six samples collected and analyzed for total nitrogen. E = Highest average value (295 mg/L rounded to 300 mg/L) derived from MHCSD effluent data for composite samples (Ponds 3-7) from 2014-2018.
Whenever a Regional Board finds that a discharge of waste is taking place or threatening to take place that violates or will violate requirements prescribed by the Regional Board, or the State Board, or that the waste collection, treatment, or disposal facilities of a discharger are approaching capacity, the board may require the discharger to submit for approval of the board, with such modifications as it may deem necessary, a detailed time schedule of specific actions the discharger shall take in order to correct or prevent a violation of requirements.
(^1) Comminution is mechanical reduction of solid materials by grinding solids found in wastewater into smaller
average particle sizes. (^2) A facultative lagoon is used to treat wastewater. The upper layer of a facultative pond is aerobic (aerobic =
available dissolved oxygen), while the lower layer is anaerobic (anaerobic = no available dissolved oxygen). Each pond layer supports different types of biologic organisms used to process the wastewater. (^3) Baffles are similar to floating curtains and are designed to create serpentine hydraulic flow patterns, increase
hydraulic retention time (the time it takes wastewater to travel from the inlet of the pond to the outlet of the pond), enhance flow characteristics to eliminate dead zones, and create biologic conditions in that improve treatment efficiency. (^4) The Rucker pond site is on a separate parcel from 21-acre WWTP site, is located approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the treatment facility, and is approximately 15 acres in size.
Controllable water quality shall conform to the water quality objectives contained herein. When other conditions cause degradation of water quality beyond the levels or limits established as water quality objectives, controllable conditions shall not cause further degradation of water quality.
Controllable water quality conditions are those actions or circumstances resulting from man's activities that may influence the quality of the waters of the State and that may be reasonably controlled.
Water quality objectives are considered to be necessary to protect those present and probable future beneficial uses enumerated in Chapter Two of this plan and to protect existing high quality waters of the State. These objectives will be achieved primarily through the establishment of waste discharge requirements and through implementation of this water quality control plan.
In setting waste discharge requirements, the Regional Board will consider the potential impact on beneficial uses within the area of influence of the discharge, the existing quality of receiving waters, and the appropriate water quality objectives. The Central Coast Water Board will make a finding of beneficial uses to be protected and establish waste discharge requirements to protect those uses and to meet water quality objectives.
a. Reduce chloride and total nitrogen concentrations in MHCSD’s effluent through WWTP modification and source control (e.g., in the case where MHCSD identifies sources and requires the responsible parties to treat or eliminate waste discharges to the MHCSD WWTP), with the goal of achieving compliance with the chloride and total nitrogen effluent limits in Order No. R3-2019-0042, and;
b. Develop and implement corrective actions for any man-made conditions or influences within MHCSD’s jurisdiction or control that contribute chloride and total nitrogen to the MHCSD WWTP.
In conducting an investigation…, the regional board may require that any person who has discharged, discharges, … or who proposes to discharge waste within its region … shall furnish, under penalty of perjury, technical or monitoring program reports which the regional board requires. The burden, including costs, of these reports shall bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the report and the benefits to be obtained from the reports. In requiring those reports, the regional board shall provide the person with a written explanation with regard to the need for the reports, and shall identify the evidence that supports requiring that person to provide the reports.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED , pursuant to California Water Code sections 13300 and13267, that MHCSD must:
Table 3 - Interim Chloride and Total Nitrogen Effluent Limits Constituent Units 25-Month Rolling Median
30-Day Monthly Average
Sample Maximum Chloride mg/L 300 --- 330
Total Nitrogen (as N) mg/L
--- 15 (May-Sep) 20 (May-Sep) --- 20 (Oct-Apr) 30 (Oct-Apr)
Table 4 - Task Summary Task Due Date 1 MHCSD Board approved plan to upgrade operations and the wastewater treatment facility
(completed on May 8, 2019) 2 Evaluate existing pond aeration/mixing system August 31, 2019 3 Propose and design an improved aeration/mixing system October 31, 2019 4 Develop aeration/mixing system bid documents & advertise January 31, 2020 5 Purchase an aeration/mixing system with MHCSD Board approval
April 30, 2020
6 Evaluate pond flow patterns and hydraulic retention times April 30, 2020 7 Install an upgraded pond aeration/mixing system May 31, 2020 8 Evaluate pond sludge distribution in Ponds 2 and 3 December 31, 2020 9 Collect samples to identify chloride sources October 31, 2021 10 Evaluate options for a chloride reduction program October 31, 2021 11 De-sludge Pond 3 if necessary December 31, 2021 12 Develop and implement valve repair program October 31, 2022 13 Develop a chloride reduction program November 30, 2022 14 Evaluate dissolved oxygen levels in all ponds Ongoing 15 Continue public outreach for chloride reduction Ongoing 16 Complete all actions February 28, 2025
i. A summary of progress during the previous six months (significant activities);
ii. Significant findings and associated actions;
iii. Activities scheduled for the next six months; and
iv. Raw data from samplings obtained within the previous six months.
Pursuant to California Water Code section 13320, any aggrieved person may seek review of this TSO Order by filing a petition with the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) for review in accordance with Water Code section 13320, and California Code of Regulations, title 23, section 2050 et seq. The State Water Board must receive the petition by 5 pm on 30th day after the date of this Order, except that if the 30th day following the date of this Order falls on a Saturday, Sunday or state holiday, the petition must be received by the State Water Board by 5 pm on the next business day. Copies of the law and regulations applicable to filing petitions are available online at the address below or will be provided upon request.
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/public_notices/petitions/water_quality
for John M. Robertson Executive Officer
HEK WDR Program Charge Code = A ECM Subject Name = Mission Hills CSD Time Schedule Order No. R3-2019- ECM/CIWQS Place ID = 240951 GeoTracker No. = WDR R:\RB3\Shared\WDR\WDR Facilities\Santa Barbara Co\Mission Hills CSD WWTP\TSO 2019\TSO R3-2019-0015 7-26-2019.doc