Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Exam 2 Study Guide | Introduction to Political Science | POLS 2000, Study notes of Political Science

Exam 2 Study Guide Material Type: Notes; Professor: Marietta; Class: Introduction to Political Science; Subject: Political Science; University: University of Georgia; Term: Spring 2011;

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 05/08/2011

alexyates
alexyates ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

1

(1)

35 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Exam 2 Study Guide | Introduction to Political Science | POLS 2000 and more Study notes Political Science in PDF only on Docsity! Exam II Study Guide Grade explanation โ An A is a broad discussion of various facets of consideration and discussion. Reading a Regression โ Left/Right - how real it is โ Up/Down - how big it is Exam Layout โ Several short form essays and a few definitions. โ Extensive Intensive Causal Interpretivist Survey History Survey Experiments Experiments Q Method Ethnography Case Study Interviewing Extensive vs. Intensive โ Extensive (Surveys) โ large numbers, you can make comparisons and find effects โ criticized for having โ€œartificialโ€ designs, not capturing nuances โ Intensive (Interviewing and intensive Psychometrics) โ include a greater understanding of individual thought patterns and processes โ disadvantages include concerns about the reliability and generalizability Causal vs. Interpretive โ Causal โ ability to isolate causal mechanisms โ internal validity is the demonstration of causality โ lack of external validity โ Interpretive โ the more interpretivist an approach is, the less concerned it is with falsification and the statistical inference approach โ advantages include more precise concept formation and more in-depth understanding leading to theory creation Considerations in Empirical Measurement โ Validity โ how accurate a measure is for what youโ€™re trying to learn โ Reliability โ whether something is consistently measured โ Unobtrusive Measures โ observing an occurance as if youโ€™re part of it โ Concept Stretching โ people have a tendency to try to stretch a concept to apply to their own beliefs Standards of Causation โ Temporality โ for a to cause b, it must precede it in time โ Correlation โ when a and b rise and fall together โ Theory โ explanation of mechanism relating a to b Explain the process of empirical social science research as we have discussed it. โ Normative โž” Positive โž” Epistemology โž” Method โ There is always a major normative question. Why does it matter? โ€œIs our system of representation working?โ€ This takes you to: โ a positive question / an empirical question. The literal question. โ€œCan people use their value systems to vote for the person that represents them?โ€ Regressions โ Interpretation of results โ Limitations - linear Experiments โ control group โ the group you donโ€™t do anything to โ random assignment โ the mathematiccaly random collection of experiment participants โ internal vs. external validity โ€ข external is somethingโ€™s applicability to circumstances outside the lab