# Search in the document preview

04.06.1

**Chapter 04.06
Gaussian Elimination
***After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
*

1. *solve a set of simultaneous linear equations using Naïve Gauss elimination,
*2. *learn the pitfalls of the Naïve Gauss elimination method,
*3. *understand the effect of round-off error when solving a set of linear equations with
*

*the Naïve Gauss elimination method,
*4. *learn how to modify the Naïve Gauss elimination method to the Gaussian elimination
*

*with partial pivoting method to avoid pitfalls of the former method,
*5. *find the determinant of a square matrix using Gaussian elimination, and
*6. *understand the relationship between the determinant of a coefficient matrix and the
*

*solution of simultaneous linear equations.
***How is a set of equations solved numerically?
**One of the most popular techniques for solving simultaneous linear equations is the Gaussian
elimination method. The approach is designed to solve a general set of *n * equations and *n *
unknowns

11313212111 ... *bxaxaxaxa nn *=++++

22323222121 ... *bxaxaxaxa nn *=++++
. .
. .
. .

*nnnnnnn bxaxaxaxa *=++++ ...332211
Gaussian elimination consists of two steps

1. Forward Elimination of Unknowns: In this step, the unknown is eliminated in each
equation starting with the first equation. This way, the equations are *reduced* to one
equation and one unknown in each equation.

2. Back Substitution: In this step, starting from the last equation, each of the unknowns is found.

**Forward Elimination of Unknowns:
**

In the first step of forward elimination, the first unknown, 1*x * is eliminated from all rows
below the first row. The first equation is selected as the pivot equation to eliminate 1*x *. So,

Docsity.com

04.06.2 Chapter 04.06

to eliminate 1*x * in the second equation, one divides the first equation by 11*a * (hence called the
pivot element) and then multiplies it by 21*a *. This is the same as multiplying the first
equation by 1121 / *aa * to give

1 11

21 1

11

21 212

11

21
121 ... *ba
*

*axa
a
axa
*

*a
axa nn *=+++

Now, this equation can be subtracted from the second equation to give

1 11

21 21

11

21 2212

11

21
22 ... *ba
*

*abxa
a
aaxa
*

*a
aa nnn *−=

−++

−

or
22222 ... *bxaxa nn *′=′++′

where

*nnn aa
aaa
*

*a
a
aaa
*

1 11

21 22

12 11

21 2222

−=′

−=′

This procedure of eliminating 1*x *, is now repeated for the third equation to the
th*n * equation

to reduce the set of equations as
11313212111 ... *bxaxaxaxa nn *=++++

22323222 ... *bxaxaxa nn *′=′++′+′

33333232 ... *bxaxaxa nn *′=′++′+′
. . .
. . .
. . .

*nnnnnn bxaxaxa *′=′++′+′ ...3322
This is the end of the first step of forward elimination. Now for the second step of forward
elimination, we start with the second equation as the pivot equation and 22*a*′ as the pivot
element. So, to eliminate 2*x * in the third equation, one divides the second equation by 22*a*′
(the pivot element) and then multiply it by 32*a*′ . This is the same as multiplying the second
equation by 2232 / *aa *′′ and subtracting it from the third equation. This makes the coefficient of

2*x * zero in the third equation. The same procedure is now repeated for the fourth equation till
the th*n *equation to give

11313212111 ... *bxaxaxaxa nn *=++++

22323222 ... *bxaxaxa nn *′=′++′+′

33333 ... *bxaxa nn *′′=′′++′′
. .
. .
. .

*nnnnn bxaxa *′′=′′++′′ ...33

Docsity.com

Gaussian Elimination 04.06.3

The next steps of forward elimination are conducted by using the third equation as a pivot
equation and so on. That is, there will be a total of 1−*n * steps of forward elimination. At the
end of 1−*n * steps of forward elimination, we get a set of equations that look like

++ 212111 *xaxa *11313 ... *bxaxa nn *=++
22323222 ... *bxaxaxa nn *′=′++′+′
33333 ... *bxaxa nn *′′=′′++′′
. .
. .
. .
( ) ( )11 −− = *nnn
*

*n
nn bxa *

**Back Substitution:
**Now the equations are solved starting from the last equation as it has only one unknown.

)1(

)1(

−

−

= *n
nn
*

*n
n
*

*n a
b
*

*x *

Then the second last equation, that is the th)1( −*n * equation, has two unknowns: *nx * and 1−*nx *,
but *nx * is already known. This reduces the

th)1( −*n * equation also to one unknown. Back
substitution hence can be represented for all equations by the formula

( ) ( )

( )1 1

11

− +=

−− ∑−
= *i
*

*ii
*

*n
*

*ij
j
*

*i
ij
*

*i
i
*

*i a
*

*xab
x * for 1,,2,1 −−= *nni *

and

)1(

)1(

−

−

= *n
nn
*

*n
n
*

*n a
b
*

*x *

**Example 1
**The upward velocity of a rocket is given at three different times in Table 1.

** Table 1** Velocity vs. time data.

Time, *t * (s) Velocity, *v * (m/s)

5 106.8 8 177.2 12 279.2

The velocity data is approximated by a polynomial as

( ) 125 , 3221 ≤≤++= *tatatatv *
The coefficients 321 and* a, , aa * for the above expression are given by

Docsity.com

04.06.4 Chapter 04.06

=

2.279 2.177 8.106

112144 1864 1525

3

2

1

*a
a
a
*

Find the values of 321 and * a,, aa * using the Naïve Gauss elimination method. Find the velocity
at 11 ,9 ,5.7 ,6=*t * seconds.
**Solution
Forward Elimination of Unknowns
**Since there are three equations, there will be two steps of forward elimination of unknowns.
First step
Divide Row 1 by 25 and then multiply it by 64, that is, multiply Row 1 by 2.5664/25 = .

[ ] [ ]( ) 56.28.106 1525 × gives Row 1 as [ ] [ ]408.27356.28.1264

Subtract the result from Row 2

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

208.9656.18.40 408.27356.28.1264 2.1771 864

−−− −

to get the resulting equations as

−=

−−

2.279 208.96 8.106

112144 56.18.40

1525

3

2

1

*a
a
a
*

Divide Row 1 by 25 and then multiply it by 144, that is, multiply Row 1 by 5.76144/25 = . [ ] [ ]( ) 76.58.106 1525 × gives Row 1 as [ ] [ ]168.61576.58.28144

Subtract the result from Row 3

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

968.33576.48.16 0 168.61576.58.28144 2.2791 12144

−−− −

to get the resulting equations as

− −=

−− −−

968.335 208.96 8.106

76.48.160 56.18.40

1525

3

2

1

*a
a
a
*

Second step We now divide Row 2 by –4.8 and then multiply by –16.8, that is, multiply Row 2 by

3.54.816.8/ =−− . [ ] [ ]( ) 5.3208.96 56.18.40 ×−−− gives Row 2 as [ ] [ ]728.33646.58.160 −−−

Subtract the result from Row 3

Docsity.com

Gaussian Elimination 04.06.5

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

76.0 7.0 0 0 728.33646.58.160 968.3354.768.160

−−−− −−−

to get the resulting equations as

−=

−−

76.0 208.96 8.106

7.000 56.18.40

1525

3

2

1

*a
a
a
*

**Back substitution**
From the third equation

76.07.0 3 =*a *

70
760 3 *.
.a *=

1.08571 =
Substituting the value of 3*a * in the second equation,

208.9656.18.4 32 −=−− *aa *

8.4 56.1208.96 3

2 − +−

=
*a
*

*a *

4.8

08571.11.5696.208 −

×+− =

690519. =
Substituting the value of 2*a * and 3*a * in the first equation,

8.106525 321 =++ *aaa *

25 58.106

321
*aa
*

*a
*−−

=

25

08571.16905.1958.106 −×−=

290472.0 = Hence the solution vector is

=

08571.1 6905.19

290472.0

3

2

1

*a
a
a
*

The polynomial that passes through the three data points is then
( ) 3221 *atatatv *++=

125 ,08571.16905.19290472.0 2 ≤≤++= *ttt *
Since we want to find the velocity at 11 and 9 ,5.7 ,6=*t * seconds, we could simply substitute
each value of *t * in ( ) 08571.16905.19290472.0 2 ++= *tttv * and find the corresponding
velocity. For example, at 6=*t *

Docsity.com

04.06.6 Chapter 04.06

( ) ( ) ( ) m/s686.129

08571.166905.196290472.06 2

=
++=*v *

However we could also find all the needed values of velocity at *t * = 6, 7.5, 9, 11 seconds
using matrix multiplication.

( ) [ ]

= 1

0857116905192904720

2

*t
t
*

*. . .tv *

So if we want to find ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ),11 ,9 ,5.7 ,6 *vvvv * it is given by

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] [ ]

= 1111 1195.76

1195.76 08571.1 6905.19 0.290472 11 9 5.7 6

2222

*vvvv *

[ ]

=

1111 1197.56

1218156.2536 1.08571 19.6905 290472.0

[ ]252.828 201.828 165.104 686.129=
m/s 686.129)6( =*v *

m/s 041.165)5.7( =*v *
m/s 828.201)9( =*v *
m/s 828.252)11( =*v *

**Example 2
**Use Naïve Gauss elimination to solve

45101520 321 =++ *xxx *
751.17249.23 321 =+−− *xxx *

935 321 =++ *xxx *
Use six significant digits with chopping in your calculations.
**Solution
**Working in the matrix form

−−

315 7249.23

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

9 751.1 45

**Forward Elimination of Unknowns
**

First step Divide Row 1 by 20 and then multiply it by –3, that is, multiply Row 1 by 15.020/3 −=− .

[ ] [ ]( ) 15.045101520 −× gives Row 1 as [ ] [ ]75.65.125.23 −−−−

Docsity.com

Gaussian Elimination 04.06.7

Subtract the result from Row 2

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

501.8 5.8 001.0 0 75.65.125.23

751.17 249.23 −−−−−

−−

to get the resulting equations as

315 5.8001.00

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

9 501.8 45

Divide Row 1 by 20 and then multiply it by 5, that is, multiply Row 1 by 25.020/5 = [ ] [ ]( ) 25.045101520 × gives Row 1 as [ ] [ ]25.115.275.35

Subtract the result from Row 3

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

2.25 .5075.20 25.115.2 75.3 5

93 1 5

−− −

to get the resulting equations as

− 5.075.20 5.8001.00

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

− 25.2 501.8 45

Second step Now for the second step of forward elimination, we will use Row 2 as the pivot equation and eliminate Row 3: Column 2. Divide Row 2 by 0.001 and then multiply it by –2.75, that is, multiply Row 2 by

2750001.0/75.2 −=− . [ ] [ ]( ) 2750501.85.8001.00 −× gives Row 2 as [ ] [ ]75.233772337575.20 −−−

Rewriting within 6 significant digits with chopping [ ] [ ]7.233772337575.20 −−−

Subtract the result from Row 3

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

3375.452 5.23375 0 0 7.2337723375 2.75 0

25.2.50 75.2 0 −−−− −−

Rewriting within 6 significant digits with chopping [ ] [ ]4.233755.2337500 − to get the resulting equations as

5.2337500 5.8001.00

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

4.23375 501.8 45

This is the end of the forward elimination steps.

Docsity.com

04.06.8 Chapter 04.06

**Back substitution
**We can now solve the above equations by back substitution. From the third equation,

4.233755.23375 3 =*x *

5.23375 4.23375

3 =*x *

999995.0=
Substituting the value of 3*x * in the second equation

501.85.8001.0 32 =+ *xx *

0.001 0.999995585018

001.0 5.8501.8 3

2

×− =

− =

*..
*

*xx
*

001.0

49995.8501.8 − =

001.0

00105.0 =

05.1=
Substituting the value of 3*x * and 2*x * in the first equation,

45101520 321 =++ *xxx *

20 10 1545 32

1
*xx
*

*x
*−−

=

20

999995.01005.11545 ×−×−=

20 2500.19

20 99995.925.29

20 99995.975.1545

=

− =

−− =

9625.0 = Hence the solution is

=

3

2

1

][
*x
x
x
*

*X *

=

999995.0 05.1

9625.0

Compare this with the exact solution of

Docsity.com

Gaussian Elimination 04.06.9

[ ]

=

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

*X *

=

1 1 1

**Are there any pitfalls of the Naïve Gauss elimination method?
**Yes, there are two pitfalls of the Naïve Gauss elimination method.
**Division by zero:** It is possible for division by zero to occur during the beginning of the

1−*n * steps of forward elimination.
For example

1165 32 =+ *xx *
16754 321 =++ *xxx *
15329 321 =++ *xxx *

will result in division by zero in the first step of forward elimination as the coefficient of 1*x *
in the first equation is zero as is evident when we write the equations in matrix form.

=

15 16 11

329 754 650

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

But what about the equations below: Is division by zero a problem?
18765 321 =++ *xxx *

2531210 321 =++ *xxx *
56191720 321 =++ *xxx *

Written in matrix form,

=

56 25 18

191720 31210 765

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

there is no issue of division by zero in the first step of forward elimination. The pivot element
is the coefficient of 1*x * in the first equation, 5, and that is a non-zero number. However, at the
end of the first step of forward elimination, we get the following equations in matrix form

− −=

−− −

16 11

18

970 1100 765

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

Now at the beginning of the 2nd step of forward elimination, the coefficient of 2*x * in Equation
2 would be used as the pivot element. That element is zero and hence would create the
division by zero problem.

Docsity.com

04.06.10 Chapter 04.06

So it is important to consider that the possibility of division by zero can occur at the
beginning of any step of forward elimination.
**Round-off error:** The Naïve Gauss elimination method is prone to round-off errors. This is
true when there are large numbers of equations as errors propagate. Also, if there is
subtraction of numbers from each other, it may create large errors. See the example below.
**Example 3
**Remember Example 2 where we used Naïve Gauss elimination to solve

45101520 321 =++ *xxx *
751.17249.23 321 =+−− *xxx *

935 321 =++ *xxx *
using six significant digits with chopping in your calculations? Repeat the problem, but now
use five significant digits with chopping in your calculations.
**Solution
**Writing in the matrix form

−−

315 7249.23

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

9 751.1 45

**Forward Elimination of Unknowns
**

First step Divide Row 1 by 20 and then multiply it by –3, that is, multiply Row 1 by 15.020/3 −=− .

[ ] [ ]( ) 15.045101520 −× gives Row 1 as [ ] [ ]75.65.125.23 −−−−

Subtract the result from Row 2

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

501.8 5.8 001.0 0 75.65.125.23

751.17 249.23 −−−−−

−−

to get the resulting equations as

315 5.8001.00

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

9 501.8 45

Divide Row 1 by 20 and then multiply it by 5, that is, multiply Row 1 by 25.020/5 = . [ ] [ ]( ) 25.045101520 × gives Row 1 as [ ] [ ]25.115.275.35

Subtract the result from Row 3

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

2.25 .5075.20 25.115.2 75.3 5

93 1 5

−− −

Docsity.com

Gaussian Elimination 04.06.11

to get the resulting equations as

− 5.075.20 5.8001.00

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

− 25.2 501.8 45

Second step Now for the second step of forward elimination, we will use Row 2 as the pivot equation and eliminate Row 3: Column 2. Divide Row 2 by 0.001 and then multiply it by –2.75, that is, multiply Row 2 by

2750001.0/75.2 −=− . [ ] [ ]( ) 2750501.85.8001.00 −× gives Row 2 as [ ] [ ]75.233772337575.20 −−−

Rewriting within 5 significant digits with chopping [ ] [ ]233772337575.20 −−−

Subtract the result from Row 3

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

33742 23375 0 0 2337723375 2.75 0

25.2.50 75.2 0 −−−− −−

Rewriting within 6 significant digits with chopping [ ] [ ]233742337500 − to get the resulting equations as

2337500 5.8001.00

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

23374 501.8 45

This is the end of the forward elimination steps.
**Back substitution
**We can now solve the above equations by back substitution. From the third equation,

2337423375 3 =*x *

23375 23374

3 =*x *

99995.0 =
Substituting the value of 3*x * in the second equation

501.85.8001.0 32 =+ *xx *

0.001 0.99995585018

001.0 5.8501.8 3

2

×− =

− =

*..
*

*xx
*

001.0 4995.8501.8

001.0 499575.8501.8

− =

− =

Docsity.com

04.06.12 Chapter 04.06

001.0

0015.0 =

5.1=
Substituting the value of 3*x * and 2*x * in the first equation,

45101520 321 =++ *xxx *

20 10 1545 32

1
*xx
*

*x
*−−

=

20

99995.0105.11545 ×−×−=

20 500.12 20 5005.12

20 9995.95.22 20

9995.95.2245

=

=

− =

−− =

625.0 = Hence the solution is

[ ]

=

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

*X *

=

99995.0 5.1

625.0

Compare this with the exact solution of

[ ]

=

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

*X
*

=

1 1 1

**What are some techniques for improving the Naïve Gauss elimination method?
**As seen in Example 3, round off errors were large when five significant digits were used as
opposed to six significant digits. One method of decreasing the round-off error would be to
use more significant digits, that is, use double or quad precision for representing the
numbers. However, this would not avoid possible division by zero errors in the Naïve Gauss
elimination method. To avoid division by zero as well as reduce (not eliminate) round-off
error, Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting is the method of choice.

Docsity.com

Gaussian Elimination 04.06.13

**How does Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting differ from Naïve Gauss
elimination?
**The two methods are the same, except in the beginning of each step of forward elimination, a
row switching is done based on the following criterion. If there are *n * equations, then there
are 1−*n * forward elimination steps. At the beginning of the th*k * step of forward elimination,
one finds the maximum of

*kka *, *kka *,1+ , …………, *nka *

Then if the maximum of these values is *pka * in the
th*p * row, *npk *≤≤ , then switch rows *p *

and *k *.
The other steps of forward elimination are the same as the Naïve Gauss elimination method.
The back substitution steps stay exactly the same as the Naïve Gauss elimination method.
**Example 4
**In the previous two examples, we used Naïve Gauss elimination to solve

45101520 321 =++ *xxx *
751.17249.23 321 =+−− *xxx *

935 321 =++ *xxx *
using five and six significant digits with chopping in the calculations. Using five significant
digits with chopping, the solution found was

[ ]

=

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

*X *

=

99995.0 5.1

625.0

This is different from the exact solution of

[ ]

=

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

*X *

=

1 1 1

Find the solution using Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting using five significant digits
with chopping in your calculations.
**Solution
**

−−

315 7249.23

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

9 751.1 45

Docsity.com

04.06.14 Chapter 04.06

**Forward Elimination of Unknowns
**Now for the first step of forward elimination, the absolute value of the first column elements
below Row 1 is

20 , 3− , 5 or

20, 3, 5 So the largest absolute value is in the Row 1. So as per Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting, the switch is between Row 1 and Row 1 to give

−−

315 7249.23

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

9 751.1 45

Divide Row 1 by 20 and then multiply it by –3, that is, multiply Row 1 by 15.020/3 −=− . [ ] [ ]( ) 15.045101520 −× gives Row 1 as [ ] [ ]75.65.125.23 −−−−

Subtract the result from Row 2

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

501.8 5.8 001.0 0 75.65.125.23

751.17 249.23 −−−−−

−−

to get the resulting equations as

315 5.8001.00

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

9 501.8 45

Divide Row 1 by 20 and then multiply it by 5, that is, multiply Row 1 by 25.020/5 = . [ ] [ ]( ) 25.045101520 × gives Row 1 as [ ] [ ]25.115.275.35

Subtract the result from Row 3

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

2.25 .5075.20 25.115.2 75.3 5

93 1 5

−− −

to get the resulting equations as

− 5.075.20 5.8001.00

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

− 25.2 501.8 45

This is the end of the first step of forward elimination. Now for the second step of forward elimination, the absolute value of the second column elements below Row 1 is

001.0 , 75.2− or

0.001, 2.75

Docsity.com

Gaussian Elimination 04.06.15

So the largest absolute value is in Row 3. So Row 2 is switched with Row 3 to give

−

5.8001.00 5.075.20

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

−

501.8 25.2

7

Divide Row 2 by –2.75 and then multiply it by 0.001, that is, multiply Row 2 by 00036363.075.2/001.0 −=− .

[ ] [ ]( ) 00036363.025.25.075.20 −×−− gives Row 2 as [ ] [ ]00081816.000018182.000099998.00 −

Subtract the result from Row 3

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

.500181848 50018182.8 0 0 00081816.00.00018182 .000999980 0 501.8.58 .0010 0

−−

Rewriting within 5 significant digits with chopping [ ] [ ]5001.85001.800

to get the resulting equations as

−

5001.800 5.075.20

101520

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

=

−

5001.8 25.2

45

**Back substitution
**

5001.85001.8 3 =*x *

5001.8 5001.8

3 =*x *

=1
Substituting the value of 3*x * in Row 2

25.25.075.2 32 −=+− *xx *

75.2 5.025.2 2

2 − −−

=
*xx *

75.2

15.025.2 −

×−− =

75.2

5.025.2 − −−

=

75.2 75.2

− − =

1 =
Substituting the value of 3*x * and 2*x * in Row 1

45101520 321 =++ *xxx *

20 101545 32

1
*xx
*

*x
*−−

=

Docsity.com

04.06.16 Chapter 04.06

20

11011545 ×−×− =

20 1030

20 101545

− =

−− =

20 20 =

1= So the solution is

[ ]

=

3

2

1

*x
x
x
*

*X *

=

1 1 1

This, in fact, is the exact solution. By coincidence only, in this case, the round-off error is
fully removed.
**Can we use Naïve Gauss elimination methods to find the determinant of a square
matrix?
**One of the more efficient ways to find the determinant of a square matrix is by taking
advantage of the following two theorems on a determinant of matrices coupled with Naïve
Gauss elimination.
**
Theorem 1:
**

Let ][*A * be a *nn*× matrix. Then, if ][*B * is a *nn*× matrix that results from adding or
subtracting a multiple of one row to another row, then )det()det( *BA *= (The same is true for
column operations also).
**
Theorem 2:
**

Let ][*A * be a *nn*× matrix that is upper triangular, lower triangular or diagonal, then

*nnii aaaaA *×××××= ......)det( 2211

∏ =

=
*n
*

*i
iia
*

1

This implies that if we apply the forward elimination steps of the Naïve Gauss elimination method, the determinant of the matrix stays the same according to Theorem 1. Then since at the end of the forward elimination steps, the resulting matrix is upper triangular, the determinant will be given by Theorem 2.

Docsity.com

Gaussian Elimination 04.06.17

**Example 5
**Find the determinant of

=

112144 1864 1525

][*A *

**Solution
**Remember in Example 1, we conducted the steps of forward elimination of unknowns using
the Naïve Gauss elimination method on ][*A * to give

[ ]

−−=

7.000 56.18.40

1525
*B *

According to Theorem 2
)det()det( *BA *=

7.0)8.4(25 ×−×= 00.84−=

**What if I cannot find the determinant of the matrix using the Naïve Gauss elimination
method, for example, if I get division by zero problems during the Naïve Gauss
elimination method?
**Well, you can apply Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting. However, the determinant of
the resulting upper triangular matrix may differ by a sign. The following theorem applies in
addition to the previous two to find the determinant of a square matrix.
**Theorem 3:
**

Let ][*A * be a *nn*× matrix. Then, if ][*B * is a matrix that results from switching one row with
another row, then )det()det( *AB *−= .
**Example 6
**Find the determinant of

− −

− =

515 6099.23 0710

][*A *

**Solution
**The end of the forward elimination steps of Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting, we
would obtain

− =

002.600 55.20 0710

][*B *

( ) 002.65.210det ××=*B *

Docsity.com

04.06.18 Chapter 04.06

05.150= Since rows were switched once during the forward elimination steps of Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting,

( ) )det(det *BA *−=
05.150−=
**Example 7
**Prove

( )1det
1)det( −= *A
*

*A *

**Solution
**

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )1

1

1

1

det 1det

1detdet det det

][]][[

−

−

−

−

=

=

=

=

*A
A
*

*AA
IAA
*

*IAA
*

If ][*A * is a *nn*× matrix and 0)det( ≠*A *, what other statements are equivalent to it?
1. ][*A * is invertible.
2. 1][ −*A * exists.
3. ][][][ *CXA *= has a unique solution.
4. ]0[][][ =*XA * solution is ]0[][

=*X *.
5. ][][][][][ 11 *AAIAA *−− == .

**Key Terms:
***Naïve Gauss Elimination
Partial Pivoting
Determinant
*

Docsity.com