Global Social Stratification - Introduction to Sociology - Lecture Notes, Study notes for Introduction to Sociology. Ambedkar University, Delhi
raja-sab19 November 2012

Global Social Stratification - Introduction to Sociology - Lecture Notes, Study notes for Introduction to Sociology. Ambedkar University, Delhi

PDF (70 KB)
3 pages
1Number of download
1000+Number of visits
Global Social Stratification, Social Stratification, Systems of Stratification, Slavery, Caste, Basis of Social Class, Stratification Universal, Global Stratification, the ories of Global Stratification, Maintaining Glob...
20 points
Download points needed to download
this document
Download the document
Preview3 pages / 3
Download the document
Global Social Stratification


Global Social Stratification

Social Stratification • system in which people are divided into layers reflecting their relative wealth

(property), power, and prestige – does not refer to individuals, but rather a way of ranking large groups of people that shows their

relative privileges – affects life chances – every society stratifies its members – nations of the world are stratified as well – supported by ideology (system of beliefs that justifies social arrangements)

Systems of Stratification

• slavery – early historical causes (debt, violation of law, war & conquest) and conditions (temporary in

some cases, not necessarily inheritable, not necessarily powerless & poor) – new world cause was economic and racist ideology developed to justify slavery (and continued

discrimination after civil war) • caste

– society divided into strata – individual status determined by birth and is lifelong – racial caste system replaced slavery in U.S. after civil war

• class – population divided into layers based primarily on wealth – allows for the possibility of social mobility

• gender – gender is a basis for stratification in every society – males have greater access to socially valued resources

Basis of Social Class • Marx: means of production

– bourgeoisie, proletariat – class consciousness, false consciousness

• Weber: wealth, power, prestige


Why is stratification universal? • functionalist perspective

– social positions must be filled > some positions more important than others > more important positions require more qualified people > greater reward must be offered to motivate more qualified people

– criticisms (Tumin) • lacks independent measure of “importance” • implies meritocracy which does not exist (example: college admission) • stratification is dysfunctional for many

• conflict perspective – competition for scarce resources – groups in power use social institutions to maintain disproportionate share of resources – ruling groups develop ideology to justify their position at top

• synthesis (Lenski) – functionalist perspective is accurate for less developed societies, conflict perspective is accurate

for more developed societies

How is stratification maintained?

• ideology is more important than force – controlling ideas – controlling information – social networks – technology

Global Stratification

• most industrialized nations – north america, western europe, japan, australia, new zealand – capitalist economies, 16% of population, 32% of land, very wealthy

• industrializing nations – eastern europe, russia – 16% of population, 20% of land, much lower income & standard of living

• least industrialized nations – most of latin america, africa, southern asia – 68% of population, 49% of land, extreme poverty


Theories of Global Stratification • colonialism

– industrial nations used technology & military power to exploit labor & resources of weaker nations

• economic imperialism - domination by large corporations • world system theory

– economic & political connections tie most of world’s countries together – core nations, semiperiphery, periphery, external area – globalization

• dependency theory – lack of economic development in least industrialized nations due to dominance of world

economy by most industrialized nations – supplying resources makes economies dependent on industrialized nations rather than

developing independent economies of their own • culture of poverty

– cultural elements perpetuate poverty: tradition & religion inhibit economic development – this theory is an example of “blaming the victim”

Maintaining Global Stratification

• neocolonialism: most industrialized nations use international markets to control least industrialized nations – price for natural resources, hazardous industries, foreign debt

• multinational corporations dominate economies of least industrialized nations – partnership between mnc and ruling elite to exploit labor & resources – profits accrue to mnc, not reinvested in the economic development of host countries

• new technologies controlled by most industrialized nations

comments (0)

no comments were posted

be the one to write the first!

Download the document