Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Selected Solutions to Chapter 8 for Classical Mechanics by Goldstein, Exercises of Physics

Not my copyright. I found it on the internet and I see that it has not been uploaded here.

Typology: Exercises

2017/2018

Uploaded on 09/23/2018

arya-samanta
arya-samanta 🇮🇳

4.5

(12)

1 document

1 / 11

Toggle sidebar

Partial preview of the text

Download Selected Solutions to Chapter 8 for Classical Mechanics by Goldstein and more Exercises Physics in PDF only on Docsity! Theoretical Dynamics September 24, 2010 Homework 3 Instructor: Dr. Thomas Cohen Submitted by: Vivek Saxena 1 Goldstein 8.1 1.1 Part (a) The Hamiltonian is given by H(qi, pi, t) = piq̇i − L(qi, q̇i, t) (1) where all the q̇i’s on the RHS are to be expressed in terms of qi, pi and t. Now, dH = ∂H ∂qi dqi + ∂H ∂pi dpi + ∂H ∂t dt (2) From (1), dH = pidq̇i + q̇idpi − dL = pidq̇i + q̇idpi − ( ∂L ∂qi dqi + ∂L ∂q̇i dq̇i + ∂L ∂t dt ) = −∂L ∂qi dqi + q̇idpi + ( pi − ∂L ∂q̇i ) dq̇i − ∂L ∂t dt (3) Comparing (2) and (3) we get ∂H ∂qi = −∂L ∂qi = −ṗi (2nd equality from Hamilton’s equation) (4) q̇i = ∂H ∂qi (also Hamilton’s equation) (5) pi − ∂L ∂q̇i = 0 (H is not explicitly dependent on q̇i) (6) −∂L ∂t = ∂H ∂t (7) From (4) and (6) we have d dt ( ∂L ∂q̇i ) − ∂L ∂qi = 0, i = 1, 2, . . . , n (8) which are the Euler-Lagrange equations. 3 - 1 1.2 Part (b) L′(p, ṗ, t) = −ṗiqi −H(q, p, t) (9) = piq̇i −H(q, p, t)− d dt (piqi) (10) = L(q, q̇, t)− d dt (piqi) (11) = L(q, q̇, t)− ṗiqi − piq̇i (12) So, dL′ = ∂L′ ∂pi dpi + ∂L′ ∂ṗi dṗi + ∂L′ ∂t dt (13) = −q̇idpi − qidṗi + ∂L ∂t dt (from (9)) (14) Comparing (12) and (13) we get q̇i = − ∂L′ ∂pi (15) qi = − ∂L′ ∂ṗi (16) Thus the equations of motion are d dt ( ∂L′ ∂ṗi ) − ∂L ′ ∂pi = 0, i = 1, 2, . . . , n (17) 2 Goldstein 8.6 Hamilton’s principle is δ ∫ Ldt = 0 (18) or equivalently δ ∫ 2Ldt = 0 (19) We can subtract the total time derivative of a function whose variation vanishes at the end points of the path, from the integrand, without invalidating the variational principle. This is because such a function will only contribute to boundary terms involving the variation of qi and pi at the end points of the path, which vanish by assumption. Such a function is piqi. So, the ‘modified’ Hamilton’s principle is δ ∫ ( 2L− d dt (piqi) ) dt = 0 (20) 3 - 2 where t′ = dt/dθ and θ is some parameter. Using the constrained form of Hamilton’s equations we get q̇i = (1 + λ) ∂H ∂pi , i = 1, 2, . . . n (40) ṗi = −(1 + λ) ∂H ∂qi , i = 1, 2, . . . n (41) q̇n+1 = λ (42) ṗn+1 = −(1 + λ) ∂H ∂t = −∂L ∂t (43) By regarding H ′ = (1+λ)H as an equivalent Hamiltonian, these equations are the required (2n+ 2) equations of motion. Also, λ = q̇n+1 = dt/dθ. 4 Goldstein 8.26 4.1 Part (a) In the given configuration, both springs elongate or compress by the same magnitude. Suppose q denotes the position of the mass m from the left end. At t = 0, q(0) = a/2, but the unstretched lengths of both springs are given to be zero. Therefore, the elongation (compression) of spring k1 is q and the compression (elongation) of spring k2 is q. The potential energy is V = 1 2 k1q 2 + 1 2 k2q 2 = 1 2 (k1 + k2)q 2 (44) The kinetic energy is T = 1 2 mq̇2 (45) The Lagrangian is L = T − V = 1 2 mq̇2 − 1 2 (k1 + k2)q 2 (46) The momentum canonically conjugate to the coordinate q is pq = ∂L ∂q̇ = mq̇ (47) So the Hamiltonian is H = pq q̇ − L = 1 2 mq̇2 + 1 2 (k1 + k2)q 2 (48) that is, H(q, pq, t) = p2q 2m + 1 2 (k1 + k2)q 2 (49) Clearly, the Hamiltonian equals the total energy E. The energy is conserved since, dE dt = mq̇q̈ + (k1 + k2)qq̇ = q̇(−(k1 + k2)q) + (k1 + k2)qq̇ = 0 (50) where we have used the equation of motion1. In this case, the Hamiltonian is also conserved. 1 d dt ( ∂L ∂q̇ ) − ∂L ∂q = 0 =⇒ mq̈ + (k1 + k2)q = 0 3 - 5 4.2 Part (b) Substituting q = Q+b sin(ωt) and q̇ = Q+bω cos(ωt) into the expression for the Lagrangian, we get L(Q, Q̇, t) = 1 2 m(Q̇+ bω cos(ωt))2 − 1 2 (k1 + k2)(Q+ b sin(ωt)) 2 (51) and the momentum canonically conjugate to the coordinate Q is given by pQ = ∂L ∂Q̇ = m(Q̇+ bω cos(ωt)) (52) So the Hamiltonian becomes H(Q, pQ, t) = pQQ̇− L(Q, Q̇, t) (53) = m(Q̇+ bω cos(ωt))Q̇− 1 2 m(Q̇+ bω cos(ωt))2 + 1 2 (k1 + k2)(Q+ b sin(ωt)) 2 = mQ̇2 2 − mb 2ω2 2 cos2(ωt) + 1 2 (k1 + k2)(Q+ b sin(ωt)) 2 = p2Q 2m − pQbω cos(ωt) + 1 2 (k1 + k2)(Q+ b sin(ωt)) 2 (54) The Hamiltonian is now explicitly dependent on time, and hence is not conserved, as is confirmed by the fact that dH/dt 6= 0. The energy is given by E = T + V = 1 2 (Q̇+ bω cos(ωt))2 + 1 2 (k1 + k2)(Q+ bω sin(ωt)) 2 (55) So, dE dt = m(Q̇+ bω cos(ωt))(Q̈− bω2 sin(ωt)) + (k1 + k2)(Q+ b sin(ωt))(Q̇+ bω cos(ωt)) = (Q̇+ bω cos(ωt))(m(Q̈−Bω2 sin(ωt)) + (k1 + k2)(Q+ b sin(ωt))) = (Q̇+ bω cos(ωt))(mq̈ + (k1 + k2)q) (56) = 0 (c.f. footnote on prev. page) (57) Therefore, the energy is conserved, as expected (the energy is still given by T + V , but the Hamiltonian is not T+V anymore, as the relationship connecting the generalized coordinate to the cartesian coordinate is now explicitly dependent on time). 5 Goldstein 8.23 5.1 Part (a) The Lagrangian for the system is L = 1 2 m(v · v) + eA(r) · v − eV (r) (58) The canonical momentum is p = ∂L ∂v = mv + eA (59) 3 - 6 So the Hamiltonian is H = p · v − L (60) = (mv + eA) · v − ( 1 2 m(v · v) + eA(r) · v − eV (r) ) = m 2 v · v + eV (r) = (p− eA) · (p− eA) 2m + eV (r) (61) = 1 2m (p2 − 2ep ·A+ e2A2) + eV (r) (62) Now, p ·A = p · 1 2 B × r = 1 2 B · (r × p) (63) = 1 2 B · J (64) where J = r × p denotes the angular momentum. Also, A2 = 1 4 (B × r) · (B × r) = 1 4 B2r2 (as B is perpendicular to r) (65) So the Hamiltonian of equation (58) becomes H = p2 2m − e 2m B · J + e 2 8m B2r2 + eV (r) (66) 5.2 Part (b) Let vlab = (ẋ, ẏ) denote the velocity of the particle in the lab frame, and v ′ = (ẋ′, ẏ′) denote the velocity in the rotating frame. Without loss of generality, we may assume that motion is confined to the xy-plane. We first derive a relationship between the Hamiltonian in a rotating frame with that in a non-rotating frame (in this case, the lab frame). The coordinates are related by x = x′ cos(ωt)− y′ sin(ωt) (67) y = x′ sin(ωt) + y′ cos(ωt) (68) Here, it has been assumed that the rotation is counterclockwise, i.e. ω > 0 for counter- clockwise rotation. So the velocity components are related by ẋ = ẋ′ cos(ωt)− ẏ′ sin(ωt)− ω(x′ sin(ωt) + y′ cos(ωt)) (69) y = ẋ′ sin(ωt) + ẏ′ cos(ωt)− ω(x′ cos(ωt)− y′ sin(ωt)) (70) 3 - 7 So, [Li, f(r)]PB = − ∂Li ∂pα ∂f(r) ∂xα = −xα r ∂(ijkxjpk) ∂pα ∂f(r) ∂r = − ijkxαxjδα,k r ∂f ∂r = − ijkxjxk r ∂f ∂r = −(r × r)i r ∂f ∂r = 0 (88) 7 Problem 2 7.1 Part (a) [ξi, ξj ] = ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηβ (89) So, d d [ξi, ξj ] = d d ( ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηβ ) = d d ( ∂ξi ∂ηα ) Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηβ + ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ d d ( ∂ξj ∂ηβ ) = ∂ ∂ηα ( dξi d ) Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηβ + ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂ ∂ηβ ( dξj d ) = ∂ ∂ηα ([ξi, g]) Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηβ + ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂ ∂ηβ ([ξj , g]) = ∂ ∂ηα ( ∂ξi ∂ηγ Jγδ ∂g ∂ηδ ) Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηβ + ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂ ∂ηβ ( ∂ξj ∂ηω Jωθ ∂g ∂ηθ ) = ( ∂2ξi ∂ηα∂ηγ Jγδ ∂g ∂ηδ + ∂ξi ∂ηγ Jγδ ∂2g ∂ηαηδ ) Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηβ + ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ( ∂2ξj ∂ηβ∂ηω Jωθ ∂g ∂ηθ + ∂ξj ∂ηω Jωθ ∂2g ∂ηβ∂ηθ ) (90) Now, for  = 0, ξ = η, so the second order terms ∂2ξi ∂ηα∂ηγ ∣∣∣∣ =0 , ∂2ξj ∂ηβ∂ηω ∣∣∣∣ =0 3 - 10 equal zero. So, d d [ξi, ξj ] ∣∣∣∣ =0 = ∂ξi ∂ηγ Jγδ ∂2g ∂ηα∂ηδ Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηβ + ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂ξj ∂ηω Jωθ ∂2g ∂ηβ∂ηθ (91) = ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂2g ∂ηγ∂ηβ Jγδ ∂ξj ∂ηδ + ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂2g ∂ηγ∂ηβ Jδγ ∂ξj ∂ηδ (92) which is obtained by switching γ ↔ α, δ ↔ β in the first term and θ ↔ γ, ω ↔ δ in the second term. As J is antisymmetric, Jδγ = −Jγδ. So, d d [ξi, ξj ] ∣∣∣∣ =0 = ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂2g ∂ηγ∂ηβ Jγδ ∂ξj ∂ηδ − ∂ξi ∂ηα Jαβ ∂2g ∂ηγ∂ηβ Jγδ ∂ξj ∂ηδ (93) = 0 (94) So upto O(2), we have d[ξi, ξj ]/d = 0 and so [ξi, ξj ] is constant up to O( 2). As [ξi, ξj ]|=0 = [ηi, ηj ] = Jij , we have [ξi, ξj ] = Jij upto O( 2). So, ξ is a canonical transformation upto O(2). 7.2 Part (b) First of all, η(ξ, 0) = ξ (95) because at t = 0, the canonical coordinates overlap in phase space. So, using the result of part (a), η(ξ, t) can be treated as a one-parameter family of canonical transformations (parametrized by t), provided there exists some function g satisfying dξi dt = [ξi, g]PB (96) This condition is seen to be satisfied if g is taken as the Hamiltonian H, for in this case, [ξi, H]PB = ∂ξi ∂ξk Jkj ∂H ∂ξj (97) = δikJkj ∂H ∂ξj (98) = Jij ∂H ∂ξj (99) = ξ̇i (100) where the last equality is obtained via Hamilton’s equations. So, taking g = H satisfies the Poisson bracket relation with H acting as the generator of time translations. 3 - 11