Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Understanding Text and Discourse: Cohesion, Coherence, and Language Use, Appunti di Inglese

The concepts of text and discourse in linguistics and academic research. The term 'text' refers to the verbal component produced by a writer or speaker, while 'discourse' encompasses language use and social practice. Various factors contributing to text cohesion and coherence, including reference, lexical relationships, and situational context. It also introduces the definitions of text by charteris-black and de beaugrande and dressler, highlighting the differences between text linguistics and discourse analysis.

Tipologia: Appunti

2018/2019

Caricato il 24/08/2022

caterina-pizzo-2
caterina-pizzo-2 🇮🇹

4

(4)

30 documenti

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
The term text and discourse are used in a variety of ways by different linguistics and researchers. Text
like any term in scientific literature (and by scientific I mean academic scholarly) unfortunately this term
can be used by different authors with different meanings. And even philosophers sometimes use words or
terms loosely. In this course, we will talk about text as the verbal component, the linguistic material, that is
produced by a writer or a speaker and this is processed by a recipient (a reader or a hero). If we think about
the etymology of this word text comes from latin “textus” which both means texture and text.
A verbal text is made up of a number of inter-connected parts.
What factors contribute to make a text a text (and not a string of sentences)?
Cohesive relations
The definition of “cohesion” by Charteris-Black is: ”different parts of a text can be related to each other by
various lexical and grammatical relationships, which contribute to the impression of the wholeness”.
If I say “I’ve just had a problem with the webcam” and “the window is open” this is no a text, there is no
cohesion between the two sentence. If I say, “I’ve just had a problem with the webcam” and “the window
in my classroom is open” this is may be a text. Why? Because I’m using the first person subject and then
I’m using the first possessive adjective. So we have a grammatical tie that links the two sentences.
Grammatical cohesion:
-Reference: How words are connected and related with other words that also occur in the text and
entities external to the text. Reference indicates the presence of elements that instead of being
semantically interpretable in autonomously way refer to something else for their interpretation.
When we talk language is economic. So, for instance, instead of repeating the same words over and
over we tend to use pronouns.
The first phenomenon that we see when we have reference is the phenomenon of “deixis is a
term that comes from the Greek language and means “to point to indicate”. Deixis has to do with
three main phenomenon:
People: I/We/You (ambiguity)
Time: Now/Then
Place: Here/There
We have endophoric and exophoric reference: words that refer to other words which occur within
the text establish endophoric references, those who refer to entities that are external to the text
establish exophoric references. Exophoric reference are words that can only be explained with
reference to the external social and political circumstances of the text.
Endophoric reference: anaphoric reference and cataphoric reference. Anaphoric reference arises
when a hearer understands a words by referring back to something preciously said. The majority of
endophoric references are also anaphoric.
Cataphoric reference arises “when a word refers forward to something that will follow in the text”.
Much less common than anaphoric reference.
-Substitution: is when you replace one element by another
-Ellipsis: is a substitution by zero instead of putting something else you don’t put anything.
-Conjunction: words that connect various sentences
Lexical Cohesion:
-Repetition : when a word is repeated in another sentence. We have simple repetition (when you
use the same, precise, identical word) and complex repetition (when you repeat a word that shares
the same roots)
-Collocation : is a phenomenon that is very interesting because it’s not
De Beaugrande and Dressler’s definition of text text is a communicative event that must satisfy the
following seven criteria:
1) Cohesion text internal criteria
2) Coherence
pf3
pf4

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Understanding Text and Discourse: Cohesion, Coherence, and Language Use e più Appunti in PDF di Inglese solo su Docsity!

The term text and discourse are used in a variety of ways by different linguistics and researchers. Text  like any term in scientific literature (and by scientific I mean academic scholarly) unfortunately this term can be used by different authors with different meanings. And even philosophers sometimes use words or terms loosely. In this course, we will talk about text as the verbal component , the linguistic material, that is produced by a writer or a speaker and this is processed by a recipient (a reader or a hero). If we think about the etymology of this word  text comes from latin “ textus ” which both means texture and text. A verbal text is made up of a number of inter-connected parts. What factors contribute to make a text a text (and not a string of sentences)?  Cohesive relations The definition of “cohesion” by Charteris-Black is: ”different parts of a text can be related to each other by various lexical and grammatical relationships, which contribute to the impression of the wholeness”. If I say “I’ve just had a problem with the webcam” and “the window is open”  this is no a text, there is no cohesion between the two sentence. If I say, “I’ve just had a problem with the webcam” and “the window in my classroom is open”  this is may be a text. Why? Because I’m using the first person subject and then I’m using the first possessive adjective. So we have a grammatical tie that links the two sentences. Grammatical cohesion:

  • Reference : How words are connected and related with other words that also occur in the text and entities external to the text. Reference indicates the presence of elements that instead of being semantically interpretable in autonomously way refer to something else for their interpretation. When we talk language is economic. So, for instance, instead of repeating the same words over and over we tend to use pronouns. The first phenomenon that we see when we have reference is the phenomenon of “ deixis ”  is a term that comes from the Greek language and means “to point to indicate”. Deixis has to do with three main phenomenon:  People : I/We/You (ambiguity)  Time : Now/Then  Place : Here/There We have endophoric and exophoric reference : words that refer to other words which occur within the text establish endophoric references, those who refer to entities that are external to the text establish exophoric references. Exophoric reference are words that can only be explained with reference to the external social and political circumstances of the text. Endophoric reference : anaphoric reference and cataphoric reference. Anaphoric reference arises when a hearer understands a words by referring back to something preciously said. The majority of endophoric references are also anaphoric. Cataphoric reference arises “when a word refers forward to something that will follow in the text”. Much less common than anaphoric reference.
  • Substitution : is when you replace one element by another
  • Ellipsis : is a substitution by zero  instead of putting something else you don’t put anything.
  • Conjunction : words that connect various sentences Lexical Cohesion :
  • Repetition : when a word is repeated in another sentence. We have simple repetition (when you use the same, precise, identical word) and complex repetition (when you repeat a word that shares the same roots)
  • Collocation : is a phenomenon that is very interesting because it’s not De Beaugrande and Dressler’s definition of text  text is a communicative event that must satisfy the following seven criteria:
  1. Cohesion text internal criteria
  2. Coherence
  1. Intentionality
  2. Acceptability text external criteria
  3. Informativity
  4. Situationality
  5. Intertextuality Text-external criteria  the first text external criteria is intentionality which is in a way mirrored by acceptability because intentionality has to do with the speaker’s intention to create a cohesive and coherent text and to perform a certain function, to achieve a certain goal through the use of language. The text recipient expects to receive a coherent and cohesive text. Then, we have informativity  all text are informative because all the text change the world, so they must contain some new or unexpected information. If there is no new information, there is no point in create a text and therefore the sentence is not really a text and does no make sense. All the text are informative, also depending on the quantity of new information a text maybe more or less informative. Situationality has to do with the situation, the context, in which the communicative event (the text) occurs which integrate the recipient prior knowledge and affect her/his process of text production or interpretation. So, the text is created in a situation, in a context, is no created in a vacuum and when we have interlocutors we are talking about people who have brains, experiences, certain skills and certain background information. So, the situation of this factor may affect the way in which the text is produced in the text producer part or interpretative on the text recipient communicative. Finally, intertextuality  an important notion for this course because this term is normally attributed to Mikhail Bakhtin: he was a philosopher. He was the first to formulate some hypothesis and to come up with 10 notions. Mikhail Bakhtin was Russian and he came up with very important similar word on philosophy and philosophy language but his work remain unknown until the 80s, so no really when the soviet union collapsed but some year before why is work remain unknown? Because of political reasons he was Russian therefore the enemy and therefore his ideas were kept within the border of Soviet Union. Intertextuality is an important notion in this course because intertextuality has to do with the fact that every text does not occur on its own but its in a way related to other texts. It maybe related to previous text that is to say that it may for instance contain some traces of other texts.
  6. Relation to preceding or simultaneous (or even future) texts
    1. relation to other texts with which they can be grouped by formal criteria (e.g. text types or genres) Basically, De Beaugrande and Dressler’s definition of text is considered a classical definition provided by text linguistics, and De Beaugrande and Dressler consider themselves text linguistic. It’s a definition you can find in that kind of approach but the fact that we can divide the 7 criteria into 2 parts make aware that they did not exclude some elements, some criteria, that have to do with the context and not so much with the text itself. That is to say that there are some elements (acceptability, intentionality, intertextuality) that have to do with the context in which the text occur. What happened historically was that there was an emphasis on the text elements that have to do with the textual verbal component. The term “discourse” was introduced in discourse analyses and some scholars were already originally in their youth text linguistics and they became discourse analyses because they realised the impact that context can have on the language. So, “pure” text linguistics give more emphasis to text-internal criteria, whereas discourse analysts traditionally attach more importance to the external factors, more than text linguistics. We may say that whereas text internal elements constitute the text, text external element constitute the context. Text linguistics does not ignore the context all together, but it attaches a subordinate role to the context, whereas Discourse Analysis views text and context as the two types of information that contribute to the communicative content of an utterance. Schriffin says that she will use the term “text” to differentiate linguistic material from the environment in which “sayings” occur. In terms of utterances, then, “text”, is the linguistic content; the stable semantic meanings of words, expressions, and sentence, but not the inferences available to hearers depending upon the contexts in which words, expressions, and sentences are used. Context is thus a world filled with people

Text : its analysis deals with the same elements of TL and looks for patterns (in syntax, lexis)  we notice the way in which people used the language and we notice whenever a pattern arises. Discourse practice : its analyses deals with processes of text production/consumption (e.g. editorial processes) and looks for patterns associated with a given topic or activity (e.g. political discourse, media discourse…) Social practice : its analysis looks for patterns in both the immediate situational context as well as the society and culture in which the text is produced (e.g. gendered representation of women, racist representation of immigrants…) Discourse is multimodal  all communicative events are multimodal (i.e. they rely on more than one semiotic system). The notion of discourse not only refers to the purely linguistic content but it also considers signs language, dramatization, the speakers’ disposition or the way they stand, talk, walk, laugh.. Discourse analysis relies on multimodal analytical tools. Discourse analysis as a multidisciplinary approach  “…discourse analysis for me is essentially multidisciplinary, and involves linguistics, poetics, semiotics, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, and communication research. What I find crucial though is that precisely because of its multi-faceted nature, this multidisciplinary research should be integrated. We should devise theories that are complex and account both for the textual, the cognitive, the social, the political and the historical dimension of discourse.” (van Dijk). What Do Discourse Analysts Study?

  • The language of humour
  • Power relationships in doctor/patient interviews
  • Dialogue in chat rooms
  • The discourse of the archives, records or files of psychoanalysts
  • The conversation at a dinner table
  • The scripts of a given television programme
  • The study of racism through the use of discourse
  • How power relations and sexism are manifested in the conversation between men and women
  • Openings and closings in different types of conversations
  • Representations of black/white people (or any race) in the written media (magazines, newspapers, etc.)
  • The use of linguistic politeness
  • Legal discourse used in trials