

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
appunti corso di inglese, descrizione della città di Londra da parte di 2 autori: Blake e Wordsworth (differenze e similitudini)
Tipologia: Appunti
1 / 2
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!


There are many diffrences between Blake’s description of London and Wordsworth’s one. In fact Blake give a negative description of London, while Wordsworth give a positive one. First of all, we can clearly see that in Wordsworth’ sonnet ther are many personifaction: the city, the sun, the river, the houses, they are all personified, as we can see in the lines 4 and five where it says that the city “ wear the beauty of the morning”, in lines 9 and 10 when the autor talk about the sun and he says “his first splendor” , same as when he talk about the river in line 11 and the houses in the two last lines where he says that they seems asleep and they have a “mighty heart”. While in Blake’s poem there aren’t any personifactions, but we have a mix of realism and symbolism. In the second place, Blake’s London is full of people, as we can see in the first and second stanza where he describes the marks of weakneess, sorrow, sadness and fear in the face of every person he meets, the screams and weeping of people shouts he hear, and the fact taht he feels indignant of what he sees. While Wordsworth’s London is silent, there are no people around, the author is completly alone, and he feels calm. Also the time in which the "two Londons" are described is different, Blake's is in fact described at night, more precisely at midnight, and Wordsworth's is in the early morning, probably at dawn. Plus Blake's London is also described as dark, black, polluted and gloomy. This "blackening" of the city has both a realistic meaning due to the smoke and ashes, but also a symbolic one, because it represents the corruption and oppression of the whole city caused by the various institutions, who limit people’s freedom by giving
orders, rules and laws. On the contrary Wordsworth’s London is bright, glittering, shining and the air is smokeless, due at the fact that factories are now all closed cause it’s really early and everyone is still spleeping. In Blake’s London society people aren’t free, they are opressed, they are prisoners, in fact they wear manacles, which were forged by people’s minds. Cause it was the human mind itsself that has created these limits, and so it is the only one that can undone them, destroyed them. Even the river Thames is prisoners in Balke’s London, while is it totally the opposite in Wordsworth’s London, where the river is free, and also people are free. In the end, in Wordsworth’s London there is no separation between human benig and nature, they are fused togheter in one life, share the same heart, they are united. This because London is a human creation and if someone cuold ignore such a wonderful sight, they wuold show an insesitive suol, according to the author. While Blake, in his poem, go against any kind of institution especially the church the state, and the charter which is a political and economic document, going so far as to say that in this society even nature in opressed by economy and politcs, and that the only way to people to get free, in his opinion, is a revolution, in particular he refers to the French Revolution in 1794.