


Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
exercise 134 English book first year
Tipologia: Esercizi
1 / 4
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!



Exercise pag 134: type morpheme
Behaviourism is based on observation and empirical evidence. Mentalism relies on pure belief. In the behaviourist approach (classical and operant) learn through a repetition (DRILLS) of phrases without any contest, through the environment and habits. Tabula rasa. On the other hand, the mental approach believes that we have a mental device since we are born and that allows us to learn the deeper structures of the
Chomsky and the children learning. Chomsky disagreed and rejected behaviourism because he knew that a child learns the deeper structure of the language. They learn their parents language regardless of the family teaching them. Non è tutto dato dall’ambiente abbiamo delle capacità innate date dalla lingua. His hypothesis is called INNATENESS HYPOTHESIS, in which children are biologically set up to recognize the patterns of the language. 3-What does research show about the Existence of innate mental device that helps the language acquisition? (pag 50-57) CIAMPSTICK CONNECTIVISM (Chomsky) Chomsky disagreed and rejected behaviourism because he knew that a child learns the deeper structure of the language. They learn their parents language regardless of the family teaching them. Non è tutto dato dall’ambiente abbiamo delle capacità innate date dalla lingua. His hypothesis is called INNATENESS HYPOTHESIS, in which children are biologically set up to recognize the patterns of the language. Only one beings have the ability of learning language. The children don’t imitate correctly and make up words and structures. PAG 52 WANNA/WANT TO. Who do you wanna invite to the party? A child would never say “Who do you want to fire John?” because he learned the deeper structures thanks to his brain that distinguish “Want to” from “wanna”. There are times where we can’t say wanna. He understands this so the deeper meaning. Innatess is supported by the native acquisition of sign language by deaf kids. It seems that children all learn the same things: es. They learn the order, later the verb. WIKOSKY SOCIAL INT (Vygotskij) though we learn a language by discussing , chatting and acting with other people, through social interaction. Easier by living in the country that you wanna learn. Per spiegare che è innato si incentra in una zona del cervello “hard wired” l’abilità di imparare una lingua è in tutti. Use the criticism in pdf 3. 4-Mention possible individual difference in language learning. (pag 72-74)
- Velum (velar) [k] - Tounge Vowel= vocale stress syllables=sillabe accentate WEAK VOWELS Italian tend to pronounce every stress syllables strong and clear. Ex. book(kk) English use weak vowels. In English they use the Schwa and another sound (ex. really).