Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Modality and Hedging: Linguistic Strategies in Discourse, Appunti di Lingua Inglese

The concepts of modality and hedging in linguistics, focusing on how these devices are used to establish power relationships and ideological stances through language. It examines different types of modality, including deontic, epistemic, and dynamic modality, and discusses their application in various contexts, particularly in political discourse. The document also delves into hedging strategies, explaining how they are used to soften the impact of statements and create strategic ambiguity. Examples from barack obama's speeches are used to illustrate these concepts, providing insights into how modality and hedging contribute to persuasiveness and authoritativeness in communication. This analysis is useful for understanding the nuances of language and its impact on social and political dynamics.

Tipologia: Appunti

2023/2024

Caricato il 16/08/2025

debs00
debs00 🇮🇹

4 documenti

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
Truth ,modality and hedging
Linguistic items based:- on modality
-Hedging (I think, I believe, suppose)
-Modal verbs
-Modal adjectives/adverbs
Modality
* Modality is another linguistic device to establish power relationships and
ideological one through language.
* There are several ways to analyze modality. Many scholars have worked on this.
Modality is:
* People's commitment to what they say
* People might want to appear to be firmly aligned to an idea or thing but at the same
time wish to limit how much this is represented in terms of a firm promise or
command.
Modality is in the middle of truth and untruth. It is cutting a huge story short. It is the
connection between the speaker and the certainty, truth.
Different types of Modality
(we looked at these in LN516 when we looked at the interpersonal metafunction)
Deontic modality: It is about "how we compel and instruct others". It is about
obligation. Ex. You must close the door.(have to,must ,ought to)
Epistemic modality: it is about possibility/ies and it is about the speaker's judgment
of the truth. I think, I could, should.
Dynamic modality: Ability to complete an action, I can go to the dentist tomorrow.
Modal verbs:
Logical Possibility: Must (Most Certain), Will, Would, Should, May, Can, Could,
Might (Least Certain).
Examples: The dark clouds must mean rain today; Due to the news, the stock will go
down; The chemical would help the experiment; The case should prevent cracking;
pf3
pf4
pf5

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Modality and Hedging: Linguistic Strategies in Discourse e più Appunti in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

Truth ,modality and hedging Linguistic items based:- on modality -Hedging (I think, I believe, suppose) -Modal verbs -Modal adjectives/adverbs Modality

  • Modality is another linguistic device to establish power relationships and ideological one through language.
  • There are several ways to analyze modality. Many scholars have worked on this. Modality is:
  • People's commitment to what they say
  • People might want to appear to be firmly aligned to an idea or thing but at the same time wish to limit how much this is represented in terms of a firm promise or command. Modality is in the middle of truth and untruth. It is cutting a huge story short. It is the connection between the speaker and the certainty, truth. Different types of Modality (we looked at these in LN516 when we looked at the interpersonal metafunction) Deontic modality : It is about "how we compel and instruct others". It is about obligation. Ex. You must close the door.(have to,must ,ought to) Epistemic modality : it is about possibility/ies and it is about the speaker's judgment of the truth. I think, I could, should. Dynamic modality : Ability to complete an action, I can go to the dentist tomorrow. Modal verbs: Logical Possibility : Must (Most Certain), Will, Would, Should, May, Can, Could, Might (Least Certain). Examples: The dark clouds must mean rain today; Due to the news, the stock will go down; The chemical would help the experiment; The case should prevent cracking;

This change may improve the results; Being careless can have bad consequences; The charm could protect you; I might be tired tomorrow. Ability: Can (Stronger Ability), Could (Weaker Ability), Shall (Suggestion). Examples: He can type 34 words per minute; I could assist by interpreting the results; Shall we dance?. Necessity: Must (Obligation), Should (Advice). Examples: They must go to work today; You should floss every day. Permission : May (Most Formal), Might, Could, Can (Least Formal). Examples: May I turn my paper in tomorrow?; Might he have some more soup?; Could I buy the new model? Can I go to your house? Other Example: The authorities order you must come with me(deontic) Staff should notify the University about any strike action(depending on contest; and also the perspective, Effect on those who hear or read) You cannot swim here (dynamic modality, can non è deontic) We must take globalisation as an opportunity(deontic). Epistemic and Deontic modality in politics : Deontic Modality can be used to convince people. Can we think about epistemic modality - what would be the hearer's effect? And can we say that epistemic modality is not fruitful to the purpose of the speech? Modality plays an important role in the "texturing of identities" (Fairclough 2003:166). Epistemic is very produttivo for politicians rispetto a deontic. Modality tells us: -Author's identity. -How much power they have over others. -Should = someone is asking you to do something.

  • The way that in language we often use terms or grammar to soften the impact of what we have to say or to mitigate something (Machin and Mayr 186-7)
  • These create strategic ambiguity
  • Speakers avoid directness or commitment to something
  • Distance oneself from what we say
  • Dilute the force of our statements Examples: * Some people say that multiculturalism is outmoded but in fact it is still orthodox thinking. ( Who are these people and how authoritative they are? Is it some people or is it the author's idea?) * * These incomers sometimes expect everyone to speak to them in their own language and they quite often make little attempt to integrate themselves into French society or culture( Vague aggregations) Other ways of being vague : many, some, others, I do not know if it is true, Hedging in politics Very useful for the purpose one wants to achieve It highlights some specific points (regardless of whether these are true) This plays into persuasiveness and authoritativeness Extracts - Barack Obama speech-> But I think it's fair to say that much of this greeting is simply a reflection of the extraordinary alliance and deep friendship between Canadians and Americans.(I’m not imposing my idea on other people). Other hedging strategies common in politics : Some, somewhat , to a somewhat lesser extent Verbs such as report and suggest More concerned than before Since last year Historically Than we now experience ( comparisons ) Official documents (vague about which ones) While , although, nonetheless, moreover

Overexplaining something yet remaining vague Modality in visual

  • Kress and Van Leewen (1996)
  • Visual qualities:
  • Level of articulation of detail in objects and settings
  • Degrees of naturalistic lighting and colour
  • Distance to the real world
  • Emotive resonance (ex. Photo between prime minister uk and another politicians-> it is important to consider the background, here we are in the downstreet that reveals that it is official , color-> natural, realistic kind of thing-> formality… other foto of king and meloni-> intimacy, the background non si vede, perchè si vuole cìfocalizzare sulla relationship, the point is the 2 and their relationship).