Scarica Understanding Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse Analysis e più Dispense in PDF di Linguistica Inglese solo su Docsity!
Semiotics, Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics Semiotics is the general science of signs, a system that has been subdivided by Charles Morris into three main branches: syntax , semantics , and pragmatics. A sign can be defined as a conventional fact, action, or object used to convey a word, an information, or a command. Each sign consists of two main components: the plane of expression and the plane of content. A typical example is the traffic light: when it turns red (expression), we understand we must stop (content); green indicates that we may proceed. Syntax refers to the study of the structure of a language, focusing on how words relate to one another based on grammatical rules. Semantics , on the other hand, is concerned with meaning—specifically the conventional relationships between signs and what they represent. For instance, denotation is the potential of a word to enter into a relationship with what it refers to, while reference is the actual relationship between a language expression and its referent in a specific situation. Pragmatics studies meaning based on language use. It examines how meaning depends on context, how speakers mean more than what is explicitly said, and how social and interpersonal variables are negotiated during communication. Discourse is seen as a structured, unified, and meaningful stretch of language, used purposefully in real contexts. Both pragmatics and discourse analysis investigate how meaning is constructed and interpreted within context, but while discourse analysis focuses on how communication is structured to be meaningful and purposeful, pragmatics focuses on the social and cognitive principles enabling human communication in specific contexts. Two major approaches to discourse in the 20th century are structuralism —which views discourse as a unit of language—and functionalism —which regards discourse as language in use. For a stretch of language to be considered a text , it must have features such as cohesion , narrativity , causality , and motivation. Cohesion and Coherence A fundamental feature of a text is its texture , which is the quality that makes it recognizable as a unified whole. Texture is based on two key phenomena: cohesion and coherence. Cohesion refers to the explicit connections within the discourse, such as grammatical and lexical devices that tie different parts of a text together. In contrast, coherence refers to the logical and meaningful connections that participants can infer based on their knowledge of the world. Grammatical cohesion includes devices like reference , substitution , ellipsis , and conjunctions. Lexical cohesion is achieved through repetition , synonymy , hyperonymy , and collocation. An example of a cohesive grammatical device is the use of deictic expressions like "this", "here", or "now", which are interpreted as close to the speaker, while "that", "there", or "then" are distant. To interpret a text correctly, one must also consider context. Context includes three main sources of knowledge: the situational context (where the utterance takes place), the linguistic context (the language surrounding the utterance), and the general knowledge context (shared cultural or factual knowledge). The interaction of these aspects helps to define meaning. For example, when someone says “I’m sorry I’m late. There was a traffic jam,” the cognitive principle enables us to understand the cause-effect relationship, and the social principle recognizes this as an apology to preserve the interpersonal relationship.
Deixis and Reference Deixis concerns the relationship between the structure of language and its context of use. Deictic expressions are linguistic elements that point to contextual information. The deictic centre is typically the speaker’s perspective: "I–here–now". This centre can shift, a process called deictic projection. For instance, in "I’ll come to your house tomorrow", the movement is oriented toward the addressee’s space and time. There are five main categories of deixis: person deixis (identifying participants, like “I”, “you”), time deixis (“now”, “then”), space deixis (“here”, “there”), discourse deixis (referring to parts of the text: “this”, “the following”), and social deixis (marking social status or relationships). Deictics can be proximal (close to the speaker: “this”, “here”, “now”) or distal (distant: “that”, “there”, “then”). For example, discourse deixis refers to portions of a text, while social deixis reflects asymmetry or symmetry in social power and intimacy, using forms of address like first name, last name, kinship terms, professional titles, or honorifics. In English, asymmetry is often marked with mutual use of title and last name, while symmetry uses mutual first names. Intimacy is shown with first names; lack of intimacy with full names. Historically, social deixis was used racially in the American South, where white speakers would use first names for Black people, who in return used titles or full names for whites. Cultural variation plays a role: Americans tend to use informal terms of address even in formal contexts, while Chinese prefer formal address forms that reflect status. For example, in formal settings, Americans use First Name (44%) and Title + Last Name (48%), while Chinese speakers use Full Name (19%) and TLN (81%). These choices reflect the democratic vs. hierarchical nature of the respective cultures. Context and Under-determinacy Linguistic under-determinacy refers to the idea that the literal semantics of an utterance may not fully determine its meaning in context. Meaning must be inferred based on speaker intention and context. This distinction is highlighted in the difference between sentence (abstract grammatical form) and utterance (a specific speech event), and likewise between sentence meaning (studied by semantics) and utterance meaning (studied by pragmatics). Common examples of under-determinacy include irony , metaphor , metonymy , hyperbole , simile , understatement , and indirect answers. These expressions go beyond their literal meaning and rely on contextual inference. Exophoric reference refers to meaning dependent on context outside the text, while endophoric reference refers to intra-textual reference. Within endophora, we find anaphora (referring back) and cataphora (referring forward). Ambiguous references can be problematic and are clarified using deictics or referential cues. Meaning, Force and Speech Acts The speaker’s meaning involves both the utterance meaning (the literal proposition in context) and illocutionary force (speaker’s intention). Understanding meaning includes resolving lexical and syntactic ambiguities and identifying referents in context. The illocutionary force of an utterance can be recognized through IFIDs (Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices), such as performative verbs (“I promise”), stress, intonation, and word order. For an utterance to be successful, certain felicity conditions must be met, including: propositional, preparatory, sincerity, and essential conditions. Austin identified three speech acts : the locutionary act (the act of saying something), the illocutionary act (the act performed via the utterance), and the perlocutionary act (the effect on the
Positive and Negative Politeness Negative politeness involves illocutions that compete with social comity, such as directives (e.g., “Give me a lift”). Positive politeness involves illocutions that align with social comity, such as commissives and expressives (e.g., “You're wonderful!”). Indirectness mitigates the force of an imposition, allowing the hearer more freedom to refuse, while in convivial acts, where there’s no imposition, indirectness might reduce solidarity and be considered impolite. Maxims of the Politeness Principle Several maxims of the PP have been identified:
- Tact : oriented towards the hearer; minimizes cost or maximizes benefit to them. Ex: “Have a nice weekend.”
- Generosity : oriented towards the speaker; minimizes benefit or maximizes cost to self. Ex: “Let me wash the dishes.”
- Approbation : oriented towards the hearer; minimizes dispraise or maximizes praise. Ex: “It’s nice, but this is not my favorite.”
- Modesty : oriented towards the speaker; minimizes praise or maximizes dispraise of self. Ex: “I’m glad I didn’t do too badly.”
- Agreement : minimizes disagreement or maximizes agreement. Ex: “I agree, but consider he’s following a particular aesthetic.”
- Sympathy : maximizes sympathy or minimizes antipathy. Ex: “Congratulations for your promotion!”
- Consideration : minimizes discomfort or maximizes comfort. Ex: “I was sorry to hear about your husband.”
- Irony : superficially polite but insincere, thus rude. Ex: “Thank you very much!” (after being refused a favor).
- Banter : superficially impolite but insincere, thus polite. Ex: “This is so easy even you can do it!” Irony, Humour & Misinterpretation Irony is linked to linguistic under-determinacy, the CP, and the PP. Under-determinacy involves expressing something with an intended different result. In CP, irony may depend on shared understanding between speakers. In PP, irony is superficially polite but actually rude by implicature. Humor may arise from misinterpreting the illocutionary force of an utterance. For example, “I thank you” could sound sarcastic depending on tone, leading the hearer to think the speaker is not really thankful. Maxim Competition & Importance Maxims can conflict—for instance, a speaker may sacrifice quantity for quality or vice versa. Among them, the maxim of manner is often considered the most important because communication must be clear and well-organized to be understood. Even if quantity or quality varies, the message must be comprehensible and coherent.
Cohesion and Reference Cohesive devices like conjunctions help show semantic relations between sentences, but they are not the only indicators. Intonation and contextual coherence also play key roles in connecting ideas. Reference is crucial in communication as it relates meaning to previously mentioned items. Deixis and reference are different: deixis ties structure to context, while reference retrieves past meanings. Context and Meaning Language is always context-dependent. The same meaning can be expressed differently depending on the social setting or audience. For example, saying “I’m cold” to a teacher versus a friend requires different forms. Meaning is neither fully context-dependent nor independent—it depends on lexical choices and communicative goals. Felicity conditions, the necessary conditions for a speech act to succeed, are part of the cooperative principle's framework. The Role of Context in Communication Context shapes communication. Certain topics or expressions may be inappropriate in some contexts (e.g., discussing personal issues during a lesson). While meaning can be context-dependent, the right lexical tools allow a speaker to express their intended meaning effectively in any situation. About the Book : Reference and Cohesion in Discourse Reference is the act of mentioning something, and it can be either endophoric or exophoric. Endophoric reference refers to elements within the same text, such as pronouns like "we" or "us" that point to something previously mentioned. In contrast, exophoric reference is when the referent is not found within the text itself but depends on context, background knowledge, or the immediate situation for understanding. These forms of reference are key to creating grammatical cohesion, where referring expressions link with previous ones in the co-text. Grammatical cohesion helps bind a text together through mechanisms such as reference, substitution, and ellipsis. Lexical cohesion, on the other hand, deals with how lexical items relate to each other to ensure continuity and meaning throughout the text. Speech Acts, Culture, and Limitations Speech acts are deeply influenced by cultural and societal norms, and their expressions differ across communities and cultures. However, speech act theory has its limitations. Sometimes, utterances belong to more than one category, and the messiness of real spoken language — such as incomplete sentences or minimal responses like "oh, really?" — often does not fit neatly into the classifications of the theory. These features, although hard to classify, serve important social functions like maintaining interaction and avoiding silence. Functions and Structures of Language Brown and Levinson identified two macro-functions of language: transactional and interactional. The transactional function is concerned with conveying content and factual information, while the interactional function maintains social relationships and cohesion. To analyze discourse structure, two main approaches have been used: exchange structure and conversation analysis. Exchange structure, as explored by Sinclair and Coulthard in classrooms, reveals an unequal power dynamic where teachers initiate and evaluate, and students respond. This led to the IRF (Initiation-Response- Follow-up) model, where the teacher initiates, the student responds, and the teacher follows up with
