Pesquisar no resumo do documento
JARQ 38 (2), 97 – 103 (2004) http://www.jircas.affrc.go.jp
Development and Utilization of a New Mechanized Cabbage Harvesting System for Large Fields
Mitsuru HACHIYA1*, Tetsuro AMANO2, Makoto YAMAGATA3 and Makoto KOJIMA3
1,3 Department of Integrated Research, National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region (Kasai, Hokkaido 082–0071, Japan)
2 Department of Integrated Research, National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region (Sapporo, Hokkaido 065–8555, Japan)
Abstract In establishing a technology system for labor saving in cabbage production, the most important issues are streamlining harvesting, reducing the work load, and reducing the amount of time required. We developed a mechanized trailer-supported harvesting system for cabbage growers in upland field areas. The system will benefit family-managed farms. The system, which requires only three people to oper- ate, consists of a harvester, remote-controlled tractor, and a trailer, where the cabbage can be pro- cessed, boxed and palletized. We investigated the suitability of this system from the point of work efficiency, ergonomics, and farm management through trials on a commercial farm. This article pre- sents the results of the field tests of the system.
Discipline: Agricultural machinery Additional keywords: harvester, trailer system, labor saving, ergonomics, upland agriculture
mechanization, total agricultural income generated by the
In large-scale upland rotation-crop areas in Tokachi- Hokkaido, the average farm household has primarily been cultivating wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, and beans on upland fields of about 30 ha of land. The prices of these crops have stagnated. To maintain farm household incomes, and to increase the variety of rotation crops, farmers have had to introduce vegetable production. Although the profitability of vegetable production per 10 a exceeds that of wheat or soybeans, the amount of time required per unit area is much higher than that for other crops. As shown in Fig. 1, compared to wheat (2 h·per- son/10 a), and soybeans (11 h·person/10 a), vegetables such as Chinese yam, edible burdock (sorted individu- ally), and cabbage require many more hours of work: 51 h·person/10 a, 63 h·person/10 a, and 48 h·person/10 a, respectively3. Under such conditions even if agricultural expenditures rise and agricultural income per 10 a gener- ated in vegetable production somewhat decreases, if the area of vegetable production can be greatly expanded by
Present address: 1 Crop Production Machinery and System Department, Institute o
*Corresponding author: fax +81–48–654–7129; e-mail mhachiya@ Received 25 September 2003; accepted 24 February 2004.
farm can be expanded. Development of labor saving technology in such a direction is necessary in the Tokachi region. Cabbage had shown constant increases in planted area, but after peaking at 2,820 ha in 1995 planted area started to decrease. It decreased to 2,080 ha, or 70% of its peak, in 2001. The decline in prices, caused by vege- table imports, has contributed to this trend, but other fac- tors for the decrease have been a shortage of labor for harvesting and the heavy workload involved in manual harvesting1,6.
Outline of the mechanized trailer-supported cabbage harvesting system
The testing of the new mechanized trailer-supported cabbage harvesting system was conducted with the goal of quickly introducing it to regular cabbage production. The system is considered to be the first step in a semi- automated system that addresses the needs of large-scale cultivation.
Examination of the new system of mechanized cab-
Agricultural Machinery (Saitama, Saitama 331–8537, Japan) ffrc.go.jp
M. Hachiya et al.
Potato for (individual
Irish potato for fresh market
Potato for processing
Adzuki bean Soybean
Cabbage m harvesting
o f t
Labor intensive ordinary upland crops
Labor saving ordinary upland crops
bage harvesting was conducted with consideration for its early introduction in the field. The system is considered to be the first step in improving a man-machine system that addresses the need for large-lot cultivation. Mecha- nization and rationalization of product handling and a decrease in costs have been realized through use of a trac- tor and a trailer, both of which are already owned by ordi- nary cabbage growers. A tractor and a trailer were the platform of the system, to which were attached simple equipment such as a belt-conveyer and a roller-con- veyer. Outlines of each part of the system are as follows:
Fig. 1. Agricultural income vs. a The calculations are based on the results of a survey based on the Annual Report on Wholesale Market of Ve income is after agricultural cash expenses and deprec gross income. The family labor expenses are not inclu
Fig. 2. Cabbage harvester im
sh market rted)
chanical Cabbage conventional
00,000 150,000 200,000
come (yen/10 a)
Labor intensity between ordinary upland crops & vegetables
(1) The harvester was developed jointly by the BRAIN-Institute of Agricultural Machinery and a pri- vate company through the “Urgent Development of Agri- cultural Machinery and It’s Commercial Enterprises Project”, and was commercialized in late 2001. The har- vester guides and pulls out cabbage plants using 2 counter-rotating disks. Another rotating disc blade cuts off the stem and outer leaves while cabbages are carried up toward the rear of the machine, where processing equipment cuts off any remaining unnecessary parts. The design concept of the manufacture of this harvester origi-
ount of time required by crop5 onducted in Memuro-Tokachi. Vegetable prices are etables and Fruits, Sapporo Market. The agricultural ation expenses were subtracted from the agricultural ed in the agricultural expenses.
roved for one-man operation
m c g i
JARQ 38 (2) 2004
A New Mechanized Cabbage Harvesting System for Large Fields
nally called for operation by 2 workers. We improved this machine to be operable by one person stationed at the rear of the machine, who is able to steer and to adjust the cutting height and traveling speed (Fig. 2).
(2) The tractor portion of the system is controlled by Worker A, the harvester operator, who is able to control the engine speed, steer, and shut down engine devices in case of an emergency. The tractor pulls a trailer, the third part of the system, which has a hydraulic conveyer pro- truding horizontally and carries the cabbage to the trailer from the harvester (Fig. 3). It is easy to adjust manually. This improvement made it possible for Worker A to safely and easily load the cabbage onto the conveyer.
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of trailer-supported mechanized ha one-man operation
Fig. 4. Harvesting, processing, boxing and loading unified in one harvesting system
remote controller for tractor
hydraulic belt (length=2,400
The conveyer gradient is also easily adjustable. Worker B, riding on the trailer, picks the cabbage off the belt con- veyer and processes cabbage by removing 2 or 3 outer leaves then placing it on the rotary stocker. On the left side of the trailer, 2 roller conveyers are installed for packaging and loading. The first sloped conveyer carries stacks of empty corrugated boxes (5 boxes per stack) to Worker C, and the second conveyer is used as a work table for Worker C, who puts 7 or 8 heads into each box, depending on the shipping standards. The second con- veyer also carries the packed boxes to the rear of the trailer to be stacked on pallets by Worker C. Each pallet contains 50 boxes (according to the current shipping method). The trailer has space for 3 pallets, which can hold cabbage from 3.2 a (One returning operation can cover an area of 1.2 m (0.6 m × 2 rows), and a row length of approx. 270 m. Therefore, the harvested area is 270 × 1.2 = 320 m2 or approx. 3.2 a).
Working performance of the harvesting system
Prior to field testing the trailer-supported cabbage harvesting system on a commercial farm in Tokachi, a test was conducted to estimate the quality of work of the harvester. 3 varieties of cabbage were used—ball type, sour type and kandama type. From 1.5 to 3.0% of the harvested heads were discarded because they were cut too deeply by the machine, and are considered a “cutting loss”. No soil was seen on the harvested cabbage and there was no difference between the varieties in the num-
vesting system based on harvester improved for
empty box conveyer
er B Worker C
each pallet contains 50 boxes
* Workers & their jobs Worker A: operates harvester & takes in cabbages Worker B: processes cabbages for shipping Worker C: packs & loads
or cabbage processing & packaging
: flow of cabbage
M. Hachiya et al.
ber of the outer leaves removed. These test results show that cutting accuracy was sufficient for practical use. The producers on the experimental farm and on the neighbor- ing cabbage farms gave generally satisfactory evaluations of the harvester cutting precision. Therefore the key to the rapid dissemination of the harvester is the systemati- zation of harvest work using this harvester as its core, and the systematization must be appropriate for the farm scale and the crop rotation system of each production area.
The field test for the trailer-supportedharvesting system was conducted in Tokachi. The farm used as the test site was 25 ha in size (including 2.3 ha planted in cabbage) with a work force of 3, all family members. Fig. 4 shows the harvest system in operation. As shown in Table 1, the yield averaged from 386 to 501 boxes/10 a. About 1% of the harvested heads were discarded because of being cut too deeply by the machine or other damage.
The rate of shippable heads was not stable, being from 70 to 80%. More than 20% of the harvested cab- bage heads were discarded because they were below the standard size. From these experiments we confirmed the importance of establishing technology to unify the size of cabbage for enabling mechanized non-selective harvesting4,10. Traveling speed was about 10 cm/s. This was considered a suitable speed so as not to overload the
Table 1. Test results of the trailer-sup
Tested field area [a] No. of workers [persons] Yield [t/10 a]
Average head weight [g] Head shape index (= height/dia.) [–] Traveling speed [cm/s] Percentage of sub-standard heads [%] (1) sub-standard [%] (2) split [%] (3) diseased or pest-damaged [%] (4) injured by machine [%] (5) deep cut [%] (6) other [%] Rate of work [h/100 boxes] Amount of time required [h·person/10 a] Field efficiency [%]
* Test no.1: Direct sowing on June 17 & harvesting o ** Test no.2: Direct sowing on June 24 & harvesting o
*** Test no.3: Direct sowing on May 15 & harvesting o
worker. Worker A standing on the step attached to the rear of the harvester could slightly adjust the cutter so that it did not stick into the soil, and thus was able to con- tinue to run the harvester without stopping. A forklift unloaded the boxed cabbage on the pallet after every round trip. Field efficiency of the trailer-supportedhar- vesting system exceeded 80% because there was no need to stop the harvester for unloading. Amount of time required was about 18 h·person/10 a , i.e. more than 50% less time than conventional manual harvesting, which requires 37.8 h·person/10 a6. In general, the conventional manual harvesting work is the following. The worker carries out the repetition of cutting each cabbage with a kitchen knife and filling each box in order along the fur- row. The workers pile the boxes of cabbage on a truck cargo stand after harvesting.
Effectiveness of introducing new system in terms of ergonomics
We measured and analyzed work strain and working posture during different steps in the process of conven- tional manual harvest and mechanized harvest. In order to measure work strain, a heart rate monitor (VINE Co.) with electrodes that attach to the chest was used with a 0.1 Hz sampling frequency. To measure posture, electro-
orted harvesting system for cabbage
1* 2** 3***
8.6 5.7 5.9 3 3 3 6.1 4.7 5.2
501 boxes/10 a) (423 boxes/10 a) (386 boxes/10 a) 1,516 ± 150 1,387 ± 160 1,633 ± 86
0.79 0.73 –
8.81 9.89 9.50 20.3 29.4 37.3 13.3 23.5 14.1 0.8 0.6 13.2 4.3 3.6 3.2 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.4 2.3 0.9 1.1 3.7 1.24 1.37 1.66
18.8 17.4 19.2 84.2 80.4 76.2
Sept. 11, 2002. Sept. 13, 2002. Aug. 13, 2003.
n n n
JARQ 38 (2) 2004
A New Mechanized Cabbage Harvesting System for Large Fields
0< 10< 20< 30< 40< 50< 60< 70< 80< 90< Angle of bending the lower back (deg.)
l w or
Conventional manual handling Operation of harvester [Worker A] Work on trailer [Worker C]
0 60 120 18
Worker C (femaWorker A (male)
static-capacity-type inclination sensors (VINE Co.), with a 2 Hz sampling frequency, were used. They were attached at 7 points of the body, including upper arm, femur, and trunk. As shown in Fig. 5, the angle at which workers have to bend at the waist was small in mecha- nized harvest. The operator of the harvester bent forward within a range of 10º and Worker C on the trailer about 10 to 15º. The conventional system requires a worker to bend to an angle of 111º as the mode value. There was no significant bending problem with the positions of the lower limbs of the workers. Compared with conventional manual harvesting, the test revealed that work postures were greatly improved and workload was reduced.
During harvesting work using the mechanized sys- tem we developed, two subjects’ heart rate ranged from 96 to 99 beats/min, an increase of 31 to 33%, compared to at rest (Fig. 6). Taking into account personal age dif- ferences among subjects, their work intensity under mechanized work was confirmed to be equivalent to a “relative heart rate”9 of 53 to 58% HRmax against
Fig. 6. Changes in heart rate during c
Fig. 5. Classification of working postures based on the harvest work system
) Element task
Harvesting Temporary suspension of work
Turn, loading & unloading
70.3 ± 2.9% HRmax during conventional manual har- vesting. The results show that the mechanized trailer- supported harvesting system improves the working con- ditions of the laborer. The work intensity level equaled moderate physiological loads based on the increase in the worker’s heart rate. Regarding the relative heart rate as the index, the optimal continuous work period estimated from workload2,5,7 can be calculated as follows:
t = antilog10 (log 5700 - 0.019 × HRmax + 0.567) (1) where:
HRmax [%]* = Ave. of HR [beats/min] ／ Esti- mated max. of HR [beats/min]
Estimated max. of HR** = 220 - age *: relative heart rate
**: estimated using the American Heart Associa- tion equation
The total rest time necessary8 to recover from fatigue is estimated using the following equation:
Tr = Tw•(e - b)／ e - 1.5 (2)
where: Tr = rest time [min] Tw = work time in a day [min] e = physical working strength [Vo2max] b = permitted limit for physical working strength
[Vo2max] The optimal continuous work period based on the heart rate of the test subjects is estimated to be approximately 2 to 2.5 h. Furthermore, to work continuously, a total of 1.5 h of rest time is necessary or desirable during an 8- hour workday, i.e. 6.5 h of actual work time in a day. One series of operations in the 2002–2003 field experiment took approximately 2 h, which is an appropriate length of time for a work period in terms of work intensity. As a result, it was determined, using proportional allotment
tinuous mechanized harvesting work
M. Hachiya et al.
Conventional Trailer system* Trailer system**
o f c
: 20 ha, : 25 ha, : 30 ha.
based on the data in Table 1 (rate of work-1 & -2), that 3 workers can harvest, without overstraining themselves, 11 to 12 a in one day (assuming an interrow distance of 60 cm).
Suitability of system from a farm management viewpoint
The mechanical harvesting system consists of the cabbage harvester for one-man-operation improved by us. A remote-control tractor and trailer for cabbage pro- cessing and packaging has the potential for wide-spread use by cabbage farmers as long as work load can be reduced and work efficiency of the machine can be increased. Capital expenditures with the introduction of this trailer-supported harvesting system are necessary. The machine purchase price including remodeling cost with the remote control of the tractor is 4.16 million yen (harvester; 2.85 million yen). Based on the results of field tests of the trailer-supported harvesting system, we implemented management evaluations of 20, 25 and 30 ha farms, which are the typical sizes of upland/vegetable farms in the district where the field tests were con- ducted. Linear Programming Program XLP, (Oishi et al.) was used to calculate the increase in cabbage cultivation with the introduction of the system.
Fig. 7 shows the case when cabbage is the only veg- etable produced in an upland farm. Cabbage acreage is estimated to increase by 0.8–0.9 ha using the mechanized trailer-supported harvesting system compared to conven- tional manual harvesting. When Chinese yam is also pro- duced, cabbage acreage is estimated to increase by 1.0– 1.7 ha using the new harvesting system. Also, we have calculated the upper limit of the possible investment for
Fig. 7. Changes in the cultivation area of cabbage with introduction of trailer-supported harvesting system
* traveling speed = 10 cm/s. ** traveling speed > 11 cm/s (expectation).
introducing this harvesting system. For the calculation, we set the expected useful life of the machine at 5 years, and the rate of earnings on investment at 2.5%, which is approximately the same as the basic interest rate of the Agriculture Modernization Fund. The investment limit is calculated as 2–2.5 million yen, meanwhile the capital outlay is 2.37 million yen assuming subsidies for agricul- tural machines are available. Investing in the trailer-sup- ported harvesting system is evaluated as a rational decision, considering the workload reduction.
Conclusion and outlook
This research was performed to establish a system- atic cabbage harvesting method for large-scale upland fields using a new harvester. The basis of this farm mechanization system is a remote-controlled tractor trav- eling with the harvester. The tractor draws a trailer that is equipped with conveyers to transfer cabbage from the harvester to the trailer where workers can process and pack the cabbage into corrugated boxes. This method only requires 3 workers to harvest, process and package cabbage. We investigated the suitability of this system from the point of work efficiency and ergonomics through trials on a commercial farm. We obtained the results as follows: (1) The amount of time required for harvesting was 18
h·person/10 a (1.7 a/h), i.e. more than 50% less time than conventional manual harvesting, which requires 37.8 h·person/10 a. Effective labor exceeded 80%, because it was unnecessary to interrupt the operation of the harvester to unload the boxed cabbage.
(2) The operator of the harvester had to bend at the waist about 10º and the processing and loading workers had to bend 15º. The conventional method required a worker to bend to an angle of over 110º. Taking into consideration the maximum heart rate, in the case of the tested subjects in these trials, one continuous work period should be limited to 2–2.5 h and the optimum total rest period should be 1.5 h in an 8 h work shift.
(3) Evaluating this system from a farm management viewpoint, the capital outlay can be compensated for the most part when introduction of the system is sub- ject to governmental subsidies.
We can say that the mechanization of cabbage harvesting in Tokachi represents a step in the right direction1. We will strive to further improve the efficiency of the system.
JARQ 38 (2) 2004
A New Mechanized Cabbage Harvesting System for Large Fields
1. Amano, T. et al. (2002) Changes in the cropping system of upland farms in Tokachi and effects of cabbage har- vester. J. Agric. Sci , 57 (9), 1–6 [In Japanese].
2 Bink, B. et al. (1962) The physical working capacity in relation to working time and age. Ergonomics, 5, 25–28.
3. Department of Agriculture, Hokkaido Government (2003) The agricultural production technology system in Hokkaido (2nd ed.). Available online at http://www.agri. pref.hokkaido.jp/center/syuppan/taikei/ (verified 25 Sep. 2003).
4. Fujiwara, T. et al. (2000) Effects of plant spacing and ini- tial-growth of seedlings after transplanting on the unifor- mity of cabbage heads at harvest. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci., 69 (3), 315–322 [In Japanese with English summary].
5. Hachiya, M. et al. (2002) Construction and evaluation of systematic cabbage harvesting method for large-scale upland fields. J. Hokkaido Branch Jpn. Soc. Agric.
Mach., 42, 19–24 [In Japanese with English summary]. 6. Hachiya, M. et al. (2003) A new mechanized system of
cabbage harvesting for upland fields. In Bull. Agric. Exp. Hokkaido Reg., National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, Memuro, Japan, pp.30 [In Japa- nese].
7. Toyokawa, K. (1998) A study on the work load of chain- saw man. Jpn. J. Farm Work Res., 34, 13–22.
8. Morris, W. H. M. et al. (1961) Physiological approach to evaluation of physical capacity. AMA Arch. Environ. Health, 2, 327–334.
9. Yamachi, K. et al. (1994) The science of the heart rate for prescription. Taishukan shoten, Tokyo, Japan, pp.306 [In Japanese].
10. Yamagata, M. et al. (2003) Direct sowing technology pre- supposing mechanical harvesting for large-scale cabbage production. In Bull. Agric. Exp. Hokkaido Reg., National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, Memuro, Japan, pp.28 [In Japanese].