Ultrathin Nanowires - A Materials Chemistry Perspective, Notas de estudo de Engenharia Elétrica
igor-donini-9
igor-donini-9

Ultrathin Nanowires - A Materials Chemistry Perspective, Notas de estudo de Engenharia Elétrica

8 páginas
16Números de download
1000+Número de visitas
Descrição
Ultrathin Nanowires - A Materials Chemistry Perspective
30 pontos
Pontos de download necessários para baixar
este documento
Baixar o documento
Pré-visualização3 páginas / 8
Esta é apenas uma pré-visualização
3 mostrados em 8 páginas
Esta é apenas uma pré-visualização
3 mostrados em 8 páginas
Esta é apenas uma pré-visualização
3 mostrados em 8 páginas
Esta é apenas uma pré-visualização
3 mostrados em 8 páginas
Ultrathin Nanowires-A Materials Chemistry Perspective

R E

www.advmat.de

S E A R

Ultrathin Nanowires—A Materials Chemistry Perspective

C H

N

By Ludovico Cademartiri, and Geoffrey A. Ozin*

E W

SThis paper is dedicated to Geoff Ozin on the occasion of his 65th birthday

The recent years have seen an explosive interest in one-dimensional

nanostructures,[1] as testified by the number of citations this field has accrued; as

customary, its blossoming was enabled by chemical breakthroughs that allowed

the reproducible and affordable synthesis of such structures.[2,3] The limitations

of those syntheses was in the diameter of the nanowires that it could produce

(hardly< 10nm), and in the use of expensive and low-yield techniques, such as

chemical vapor deposition (CVD).

This paper attempts to summarize the very recent chemical breakthroughs

that have allowed the production of ultrathin nanowires, often in solution,

and often in gram-scale quantities. By no means is this a comprehensive

coverage of the field, which can in part be found in other excellent

reviews,[1,2,4–6] but a selection of those contributions that we feel would most

help put this emerging field in perspective. We will review the various

synthetic strategies, their pros and cons, and we will give our best guesses as

to the future directions of the field and what we can expect from it.

1. Introduction: Why Ultrathin Nanowires?

The term ‘‘ultrathin’’ is unscientific, as it doesnot explicitly specify a size range. Ultrathin nanowires are considered to be less than 10nm in diameters in most of the literature; we will see, though, that an especially large interest is emerging in nanowires below 2–3nm. The attractive characteristics of ultrathin nanowires are summarized in Figure 1. One aspect correlated with decreased diameter is the increased surface area, which in turn, has immediate repercussions on sensors,[7] catalyst supports,[8] and environmental-remediation applications.[9,10]

Less obviously, the decrease in size of the nanowires leads to a certain degree, to an increased colloidal stability: the gravitational force is easier to counteract by applying colloidal-stabilization strategies involving coulombic repulsion or steric stabilization.

[*] Prof. G. A. Ozin, Dr. L. Cademartiri [+]

Materials Chemistry Research Group Department of Chemistry University of Toronto 80 St. George Street, Toronto Ontario M5S 3H6 (Canada) E-mail: gozin@chem.utoronto.ca

[+] Present address: Dept. of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.200801836

Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013–1020  2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinhei

This important characteristic potentially allows the inorganic ultrathin nanowires to outperform carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in a variety of applications that involve solution processibility, such as microfluidics[11] and paint-on electronics; CNTs are known to be scarcely dispersible in solvents. Colloidal stability also allows the study of certain properties of nanowire synthesis (like absorption cross-sections) in a more com- fortable way.[12,13]

Closely related with their potential colloidal stability is the possibility of designing the surface chemistry of the nanowires by ligand exchange; while this is also true for thicker nanowires, the ultra- thin diameter amplifies the importance of this possibility. Bioconjugation techniques to employ nanowires for in vivo biodetec- tion[14] or as regeneration scaffolds[15] can now be imagined, together with the tuning

of their surface charge, to create layer-by-layer films of nanowires with nanometer-controlled thickness.[16]

Nevertheless, what really inspires a large number of scientists is the possibility of synthesizing, stabilizing, and isolating large numbers of ultrathin nanowires with the unprecedented structures predicted by theory.[17] Most of the work has been performed on metallic nanowires, from elements such as Al,[17]

Pb,[17,18] Bi,[19] Si,[20–22] Rh,[23] Ag,[24] Cu,[25,26] and Au.[27,28] In the case of Al, Pb, Au, Cu, Rh, and Bi, wires below a certain size have been found to preferentially adopt a multiwalled architecture. The stability of the outer surface determines the stability and properties of the entire structure; this explains the theoretical findings that surface vacancies on such wires would migrate to the core,[25] that melting would first occur in the core,[28] or that the core might be entirely missing, leading to a tube architecture.[29] The outer surface of the wires is predicted to show, in certain ranges of diameter, a helical twist, which would give an unprecedented chirality to the nanowires,[17] similarly to CNTs. Preliminary experimental evidence for such helicity has been obtained in Au nanowires[30] and Pt nanotubes.[29]

While there are a few reports of single ultrathin metallic wires and tubes suspended between electrodes in ultrahigh vacuum conditions,[29,30] there is the necessity to access such structures in a much less demanding way. It is possible that solution-phase syntheses will soon allow obtention of that size regime, where new structures emerge. One concern is that the ligand strategies

m 1013

R E S E A R C H

N E W

S

www.advmat.de

Figure 1. Potential of ultrathin nanowires: the various areas of interest behind the research on ultrathin nanowires are shown, together with possible areas of application.

1014

that are generally used to maintain nanostructures colloidally stable might alter the very reason why such ‘‘weird’’ structures emerge: the delicate equilibrium between surface and core energies.

The properties of such ultrathin nanowires are of great interest, as they have been demonstrated to show quantum conductance and ballistic conduction.[31] Negative magnetoresis- tance,[32] localization,[31] low thermal conductivity,[33] ferromag- netism,[34] and quantum size effects[35] are other properties that are of great importance for a variety of applications. For example, the low thermal conductivity of one-dimensional nanostructures is expected to boost the efficiency of thermoelectric devices, as recently demonstrated in silicon nanowires.[36,37]

The last point of interest for ultrathin nanowires we would like to stress is the possibility of studying the fuzzy interface between nanowires and molecular entities. Questions that arise are

Figure 2. Ultrathin-nanowire synthesis methodologies: the tools and pros and shown.

 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb

whether we can observe polymer-like topological properties in inorganic nanowires, if we can couple molecular properties, like monodispersity, with the quantum size effects of nanoscale materials, and what the interface between these two worlds would look like.

2. Ultrathin-Nanowire Synthesis Methodologies

The synthetic methodologies that have been employed for the synthesis of ultrathin nanowires are all within the nanowir- e-synthesis framework described by Xia et al.[1] More specifically they mostly involve templating, ligand control, and oriented attachment. In Figure 2, we have listed the tools, the pros, and the cons of each of these strategies, which we will individually cover through some case histories.

cons of the different synthetic strategies to obtain ultrathin nanowires are

H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013–1020

R E S E A R C H

N E W

S

www.advmat.de

2.1. Templating

The templating strategy involves the use of a hard or soft structure, called the template, as the directing agent of the growth of the nanowires. The isotropicity of crystal growth is constrained by the asymmetry of the template. As shown in Figure 2, the templates can be zeolites, mesoporous materials, nanocrystals, or micelles.

Romanov showed that molten bismuth could be infiltrated in the natural zeolite Mordenite to obtain ultrathin nanowires only two atoms across.[38] Hong et al. used an organic analog to a zeolite instead, obtained by the self-assembly of calix-4-hydro- quinones.[39] The redox activity of the calixarene was used to reduce silver ions in situ, and the result was the formation of silver nanowires 0.4 nm thick embedded in the matrix (Fig. 3a and b). In these cases, the wires were not extracted from the template.

In the case of mesoporous materials, like periodic mesoporous silicas (PMS), the pores are between2 and30 nm in diameter, permitting an easier infiltration. Holmes and coworkers showed

Figure 3. Templatingstrategies:a)HRTEMimageofAgnanowirearrays, formed calix [4] hydroquinone matrix. [39] b) Proposed atomic structure for the Ag nano HRTEM image of Fe3O4 nanowires produced in a mesoporous silica mater inclusion. [42] d) TEM image of poly(phenolformaldehyde) ultrathin nanowire bu removal of the PMS template. [47] e) Ultrathin Si nanowires grown by VLSmetho 5nm. [48] f,g) TEM and HRTEM images of ultrathin Si nanowires grown in super nanocrystal templating. [49] h) Drawing of an [(oleylamine)AuCl]n inorganic po plates the gold nanowires depicted in i). l) HRTEM image of gold nanowires gr mechanism. [54] Reproduced with permission from [4]. Reproduced with permis Copyright 2001, 2000 American Association for the Advancement of Science. permission from [42,48,54]. Copyright 2003, 2004, 2008 American Chemical So with permission from [47]. Copyright 1998 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013–1020  2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag G

how silicon, germanium, copper, cobalt, and iron oxide nanowires could be created within pores by supercritical inclusion techniques, which take advantage of the extremely low viscosity and surface energy of supercritical fluids.[40–43] An example of the magnetite nanowires produced by this technique is shown in Figure 3c. Ko and Ryoo showed, instead, how wet impregnation with metal-salt solution allowed the formation of metallic nanowires within the pores of mesoporous materials, which could also be extracted from the template.[44] This technique has then been used to produce a variety of nanowires of different metals.[45,46] The reduction of the salts was performed by UV irradiation. Ultrathin polymer nanowires have been produced by in situ polymerization of phenolformaldehyde within the pores of PMS.[47] As shown in Figure 3d, those fibers had a strong tendency to aggregate in bundles, a very common feature of nanowires liberated from mesoporous materials, as they lack specific surface stabilization.

Templating can also be performed by nanocrystals through the vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) reaction protocol, in which a molten metallic nanocrystal templates the dissolution and precipitation

inaself-assembled wires in a). [39] c) ial by supercritical ndles formed after d—the scale bar is critical solvents by lymer, which tem- own via a micellar sion from [39,49]. Reproduced with ciety. Reproduced

mbH & Co. KGaA, We

of the precursors, and gives the one- dimensional symmetry.[5] In Figure 3e, a 5 nm Si nanowire growing along the (110) axis with the templating Au nanocrystal at its tip is shown.[48] A similar mechanism was used by Korgel and coworkers to form Si and GaAs nanowires in supercritical solvents (Fig. 3f and g).[49] In this case, the nanowires were not stuck to a surface, as in the case of VLS methods, but were instead dispersed in the fluid phase. By using Bi/Au alloy colloidal nanocrystals, Kuno’s group demonstrated the synthesis of very- high-quality ultrathin CdSe[50] and CdTe[51]

nanowires in solution at relatively low tem- peratures.

Recently, a flurry of papers has appeared in the literature regarding Au ultrathin nano- wires. In the first report, Xia’s group reported the reduction of gold chloride salts through oleylamine and silver nanocrystals.[52] The mechanism they propose is the formation of an [(oleylamine)AuCl]n inorganic polymer, which templates the formation of ultrathin nanowires with uniform thickness. The poly- mer is shown in Figure 3h, and the product in Figure 3i. Preliminary evidence of such polymer chains was demonstrated.

A few days after, Sun’s and Lieber’s group reported the electrical characterization of samples obtained in very similar conditions.[53]

Au single-crystal nanowires of 9 nm diameter were found to have a good conductivity and a high failure current density. This work demon- strates that ultrathin nanowires can circumvent the electromigration problems of nanowires, which leads to failure. These wires are thus expected to be very promising for nanoelec- tronic circuitry. In a report which followed by few days, Yang’s group obtained a similar

inheim 1015

R E S E A R C H

N E W

S

www.advmat.de

1016

product (shown in Fig. 3l) via a similar procedure involving gold chloride salts and oleylamine.[54] In that work, the formation of the wires is attributed to a micellar mechanism.

The micellar growth mechanism is based on the assumption that the micelles formed by the long-chain alkylamines would guide the growth of the nanowires in one dimension. The curvature of the micelle at the tip of the nanowires would lead to a very loose packing of the alkyl chains, which in turn would allow for easier diffusion of the reagents to the tips.[55] At the same time, the alkylamines can slowly reduce the metal salts. Some doubts remain on this proposed mechanism, based on the fact that oleylamine (sometimes with oleic acid impurity) is generally used as the ligand in these reactions. Oleylamine has a double bond in the middle of the chain, which usually prevents the formation of ordered monolayers stabilized by van der Waals interactions. The micelles produced by oleylamine were thus not expected to be strong, well ordered, and dense enough to completely prevent the growth of the nanowires in two directions. In Xia and coworkers’ interpretation of the Au-nanowire growth mechanism,[52] themicelle is not really the template. According to their results, the nanowires are formed by the reduction and coalescence of [(oleylamine)AuCl] inorganic polymers. In this

case, the stability of the one-dimensional architecture during growth would be granted by the Au–Au bonds along the backbone of the polymer, instead of by an oleylamine micelle.

The micellar-templating mechanism was also proposed for the formation of FePt nanowires by Sun and coworkers,[55] for the growth of calcium phosphate[56] and barium sulfate[57] nanofibers by Mann and coworkers, and for the growth of ultrathin Te nanowires by Qian and co-workers.[58] The attractiveness of the micelle- and polymer-templating mechanisms is that they can marry the best aspects of a templating strategy with the advantages of ligand-control strategies, which are routinely used for the synthesis of monodisperse spherical nanocrystals. Together with monodispersity and the large know-how available, the possibility exists to obtain large amounts of colloidally stable material. In addition, one is not necessarily limited by anisotropic structures, as often happens for ligand-control strategies.

Figure 4. Ligand control strategies: a) HRTEM image of 2 nm Cu2S nanowires produced by decomposition of single-source precursor Cu{S2CNEt2} in the presence of decanethiol and oleic acid. [61] b) TEM image of 1.6 nm necklace Bi2S3 nanowires produced by the reaction of bismuth citrate with sulfur in oleylamine. [62] c,d) TEM image of 1.1 nm 2.2 nm samaria nanoribbons produced by high-temperature decomposition of samarium acetate in presence of oleylamine and decanoic acid. [66] e) TEM and HRTEM images of 1.2 nm ceria nanowires produced by high- temperature decomposition of cerium nitrate in the presence of diphenyl ether, oleic acid, and oleylamine. [67] Reproduced with permission from [61,66]. Copyright 2005, 2006 American Chemical Society. Reproduced with permission from [62,67].

2.2. Ligand Control

Ligand-control strategies for the synthesis of nanowires was an offspring of the work that was being done on shape control of nanocrys- tals. The first demonstration of the control- lable synthesis of CdSe nanorods demon- strated that using mixtures of ligands on anisotropic structures (like CdSe wurtzite) allowed for the growth of anisotropic struc- tures.[59] The principle is simple: one ligand

 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb

caps very strongly the sides of the nanostructure, thus strongly reducing its surface energy and therefore its growth rate, while the other ligand caps selectively and loosely the tips. This selective ligand shielding, coupled with the high chemical potential of the tips (due to their curvature and different lattice terminations), allows for the formation of nanowires with high aspect ratios.[60]

In some cases, the presence of two ligands is not necessary, as the difference in surface energy of the different facets of the nanostructure are already high enough to favor one-dimensional growth.

Some exceptionally thin nanowires have been obtained by this methodology. Qian and coworkers demonstrated the growth of Cu2S nanowires as thin as 1.7 nm (Fig. 4a).

[61] A mixture of decanethiol and oleic acid was used, and the morphology of the wires was found to be strongly dependent on the precursor ratio. Similarly, themorphology of Bi2S3

[62] and Sb2S3 [63] nanowires and

nanotubes was also dependent on the precursor ratio, as reported by our group and by Son and coworkers.[64]

Bi2S3 nanowires were formed via a heterogenous nanocrystal route,[65] by reacting a bismuth citrate slurry in oleylamine with a sulfur solution in oleylamine[62] (Fig. 4b). The diameter was found to be extremely monodisperse and independent of reaction

H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013–1020

R E S E A R C H

N E W

S

www.advmat.de

time. The structure of the wires was compared to a necklace, as it was composed of nanocrystalline grains along the backbone of the wire. Optical spectroscopy and photoconductivity experiments demonstrated the presence of quantum confinement effects and of excitons at room temperature, never before seen in Bi2S3. The exact mechanism of growth is still largely unknown, but we postulated, on the basis of our experiments, that some specifically stable one-dimensional configuration of the atomic structure of Bi2S3 must lie at about 1.6 nm,

[62] much like what happens for magic clusters. This is further confirmed by the ubiquitous 1.6 nm size in nanostructures formed from the isostructural Sb2S3.

[64,65] This strong valley in the energy landscape would prevent the nanowire to grow sideways, and instead would foster growth along one direction only. Sb2S3 nanowires and nanoplate- lets could be formed with a thickness of 1.7 nm, by reacting antimony oleate with sulfur dissolved in oleylamine.[63] Similarly, nanotubes formed by the rolling up of a 1.7 nm-thick ribbon could be formed by reacting SbCl3 with sulfur in oleylamine.

[64] In this case, different from Bi2S3, the nanowires were single crystalline.

Metal oxide nanowires were also produced in ultrathin diameters by Hyeon’s group. Sm2O3 nanowires, shown in Figure 4c and d, had a rectangular cross-section of 1 2 unit cells, corresponding to 1.1 nm 2.2 nm.[66] The nanowires were grown by decomposing hydrated samarium acetate in the presence of oleylamine and decanoic acid at high temperatures. The peculiarity of this reaction was its sensitivity to the specific fatty acids. The same reaction performed with oleic acid gave ultrathin platelets instead of wires.

By dissolving and decomposing cerium nitrate in diphenyl ether, oleylamine, and oleic acid, ceria nanowires with a diameter of 1.2 nm were obtained.[67] Wires with different lengths were produced by using different amounts of oleic acid, but also in this case the thickness was found to remain constant.

The ligand-controlled reactions have now demonstrated the feasibility of producing ultrathin nanowires of a variety of materials, irrespective of anisotropicity of the lattice. The last two examples of samaria and ceria both have cubic structures. The use of more than one ligand is also unnecessary, as the cases of Sb2S3 and Bi2S3 demonstrate. What is somehow clear is that a more thorough understanding of the mechanisms of these reactions is needed. Most of these examples show a remarkable selectivity for some determined thicknesses, which is not consistent with traditional ligand-controlled growth models. It is also possible that some of these examples are unrecognized cases of micelle-templated growth.

2.3. Oriented Attachment

Oriented attachment is maybe the most fascinating growth strategy for ultrathin nanowires,[68–70] where single-crystalline nanowires are produced by oriented aggregation of faceted nanocrystals.[4,71] This methodology has some unique features, such as the constancy of the nanowire diameter during growth, and the similarity with polymerization reactions, in which monomers are added to the tip of the growing polymer.[72] The attachment is usually driven by the formation of a permanent or temporary electric (or magnetic) dipole in each nanocrystal. The dipoles then orient in chains and attach. The matching of the

Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013–1020  2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag G

dipoles with specific facets of the structure allows for the final nanowire to often maintain single-crystallinity. The advantage of oriented attachment is that the diameter of the nanowire is largely determined by the diameter of the nanocrystals. The ease with which nanocrystals with small diameters (<4 nm) can be prepared renders this technique promising in the production of ultrathin nanowires.

Ultrathin CdSe nanowires were obtained by oriented attach- ment by reacting cadmium acetate (CdAc2) and selenourea in long-chain amines.[73] The diameter of the final wires could be tuned by changing the reaction temperature, or by using different long-chain amines. Longer-chain amines produced larger wires (Fig. 5a and b). In a following theoretical paper,[74] the same authors found that the formation of low-aspect-ratio quantum dots or rods followed by oriented attachment was the most energetically viable route to nanowires, confirming the experi- mental data. In the wurtzite structure of CdSe, the c axis can show facets entirely capped by cations or anions; this is a strong premise to the formation of dipoles in the structure during growth. ZnSe, another wurtzite solid, was also formed in the shape of ultrathin nanowires by oriented attachment, by reacting selenourea with cadmium acetate in the presence of molten octadecylamine (Fig. 5c).[75]

In all the examples mentioned above, very strong quantum confinement effects were observed, testifying to the crystallinity and small diameter of the wires. While it is true that oriented attachment is easier to obtain on structures possessing an anisotropic lattice, such as wurtzite, recent experiments have demonstrated that cubic structures can also undergo oriented attachment in spectacular ways.

PbSe nanocrystals undergo oriented attachment to form straight or zigzag nanowires, or even nanorings.[76] The shape of the final assembly depends on the ligands that stabilize the nanocrystal building blocks; octahedral nanocrystals were formed by using alkylamines, which strongly coordinate the (111) facets, which led to the formation of zigzag nanowires such as the ones shown in Figure 5d and e. Straight nanowires could be obtained using oleic acid instead, which preferential caps (100) facets. Nanorings were obtained by oriented attachment along different directions simultaneously. An important result of that work was that it demonstrated via simple probabilistic considerations that cubic structures could consistently show dipoles along various crystallographic directions, by virtue of the polarity of the (111) facets.

Recently, Patla et al. showed how the simple decomposition of lead hexadecylxanthate in trioctylamine could lead to the oriented attachment of PbS nanocrystals, to form PbS nanowires 2 nm thick (Fig. 5f and g).[77] Those nanowires would spontaneously assemble in parallel arrays, and undergo lateral-oriented attachment if compressed laterally in a Langmuir–Blodgett trough. Nanowires 2 nm wide would coalesce to form 6–10 nm nanowires. In2Se3, another cubic structure, could also be coerced into ultrathin nanowires, by oriented attachment of rod-like nanocrystals[78] using a heterogeneous synthesis strategy.[65]

A puzzling aspect of the oriented-attachment mechanism is that it seems to occur also in metals that are not expected to form long-lived dipoles on their surface, given their free-electron cloud and cubic lattices. Despite these considerations, Au nanowires were obtained by oriented attachment, by reacting chloroauric

mbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 1017

R E S E A R C H

N E W

S

www.advmat.de

1018

acid in oleylamine at reflux.[79] The reaction is almost identical to the one later reported by Huo et al.[54] and Wang et al.,[53] who gave a micellar-templating explanation for the results, as we previously saw.

Figure 5. Oriented attachment strategies: a,b) HRTEM image of CdSe nanow reacting cadmium acetate with selenourea in the presence of long-chain a lengths—DDA stands for dodecylamine, while HDA stands for hexadecylami image of ZnSe nanowires formed by reacting zinc acetate with selenourea octadecylamine. [75] d,e) HRTEM and TEM images of PbSe nanowires form oleate with trioctylphosphine selenide in the presence of oleic acid, and ol decylphosphonic acid, respectively. [76] f,g) TEM and HRTEM images of PbS na thermal decomposition of lead hexadecylxanthate in the presence of trioctylamin with permission from [73,76,77]. Copyright 2006, 2005, 2007 American Chemical with permission from [75].

 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb

Pt and Pd nanowires of similar ultrathin diameter (4 nm) were obtained by reducing Pd(NO3)2 or PtCl2 with NaBH4 in a mixture of toluene, water, octadecylamine and n-dodecyltrimethyl- ammonium bromide.[34]

ires synthesized by mines of different ne. [73] c) HRTEM in the presence of ed by reacting lead eic acid and tetra- nowires formed by e. [77] Reproduced Society. Reproduced

H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

3. Future Directions and Challenges

The challenge in the synthesis of ultrathin nanowires lies not so much in coercing the structure to grow preferentially in one direc- tion, but in completely halting the growth along the other two directions. This is accomplished by a barrier in the case of templating, by reducing surface energy in the case of ligand control, or by assembling preformed building blocks, in the case of oriented attachment.

The templating methodology has some drawbacks, related to the template removal, the colloidal stability, and the scale-up to gram scale. The micellar strategy is a hybrid approach between template and ligand con- trol, since the micelle is formed by the same molecules that are generally used as ligands. Its advantages are potentially many, but its mechanism is still not clear. It is not apparent, for example, if the micelles are formed due to the presence of some water traces, and if their role is necessary during the growth (which often happens at high temperatures), or if they are just responsible for the creation of an intermediate structure, which then reacts to form the wires.

The ligand-control methodology has shown some impressive examples of ultrathin nano- wires, but a common trait in most of those reactions is the inability to gradually tune the diameter of the nanowire. The occurrence of material-specific ‘‘magic’’ diameters still has to be experimentally validated in those samples, but it is consistent with most theoretical investigations of ultrathin semi- conductor and metallic nanowires. Such a mechanism would also explain how ligands could completely stop the growth along two directions, which is generally not the case for bulkier nanostructures. More research is necessary to further develop our understand- ing on this issue.

The oriented-attachment strategy still remains highly fascinating, especially since their discovery in cubic and metallic struc- tures, which were not initially thought to display strong enough dipole moments. A more systematic approach to a series of materials would probably allow better under- standing of the conditions under which

Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013–1020

R E S E A R C H

N E W

S

www.advmat.de

dipoles are formed, and how those dipoles affect the growth of the nanostructures. Monitoring the change of seed-particle concen- tration versus time of reaction would be highly important to understand the specific kinetics of attachment, similarly to what is done for polymerization reactions.

The challenges facing this field are impressive. Ultrathin nanowires are very difficult to characterize by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), as they tend to melt under the beam. In some cases, this has rendered the imaging almost impossible,[62] even with a cooled stage. X-ray diffraction methods are also very difficult to interpret, due to the extreme difference of coherence lengths along different crystallographic axes, leading to the overlap of extremely broad and sharp features.[63,66] In addition, the peaks are expected to show some measurable shifts with respect to the bulk structures, as the nanowires experience a strongly anisotropic pressure due to their surface curvature.

Also, given the fragility of these ultrathin nanowires, single-wire measurements are challenging, especially in those cases where the wires show a pronounced flexibility, which renders them unlikely to align across electrodes.

Despite these challenges, we find this field to be at the verge of a new blossom, as recent publications seem to suggest. The chemistry aspects are more and more well-defined, and more scientists can enter the fray by synthesizing their nanowires in solution by simple and scalable techniques. More chemistry awaits, stay wired!

Acknowledgements

G. A. O. is Canada Research Chair in Materials Chemistry. The authors are deeply indebted to NSERC and the University of Toronto for financial support. They are also humbled by the scientific contribution of all the coauthors in the Ozin’s group papers referenced in this work. Several relevant articles have appeared in literature between the date of submission and publication. We highlight in particular the synthesis of ultrathin SnO2 nanowires by XunWang and co-workers by attachment mechanism[80], the synthesis of ultrathin organosilica nanowires by Axel Muller and colleagues by polymer templating[81], and the synthesis of ultrathin colloidal gold nanowires by Luis Liz-Marzan and coworkers[82].

Published online: December 18, 2008

[1] Y. N. Xia, P. D. Yang, Y. G. Sun, Y. Y. Wu, B. Mayers, B. Gates, Y. D. Yin, F.

Kim, Y. Q. Yan, Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 353.

[2] J. T. Hu, T. W. Odom, C. M. Lieber, Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 435.

[3] A. M. Morales, C. M. Lieber, Science 1998, 279, 208.

[4] Z. Y. Tang, N. A. Kotov, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 951.

[5] M. Law, J. Goldberger, P. D. Yang, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2004, 34, 83.

[6] C. N. R. Rao, F. L. Deepak, G. Gundiah, A. Govindaraj, Prog. Solid State

Chem. 2003, 31, 5.

[7] Y. Cui, Q. Q. Wei, H. K. Park, C. M. Lieber, Science 2001, 293, 1289.

[8] J. M. Nhut, L. Pesant, J. P. Tessonnier, G. Wine, J. Guille, C. Pham-Huu, M.

J. Ledoux, Appl. Catal. A 2003, 254, 345.

[9] C. T. Yavuz, J. T. Mayo, W. W. Yu, A. Prakash, J. C. Falkner, S. Yean, L. L.

Cong, H. J. Shipley, A. Kan, M. Tomson, D. Natelson, V. L. Colvin, Science

2006, 314, 964.

Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013–1020  2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag G

[10] J. Yuan, X. Liu, O. Akbulut, J. Hu, S. L. Suib, J. Kong, F. Stellacci, Nat.

Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 332.

[11] G. M. Whitesides, Nature 2006, 442, 368.

[12] V. Protasenko, D. Bacinello, M. Kuno, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 25322.

[13] L. Cademartiri, E. Montanari, G. Calestani, A. Migliori, A. Guagliardi, G. A.

Ozin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10337.

[14] N. W. S. Kam, H. J. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6021.

[15] G. A. Silva, C. Czeisler, K. L. Niece, E. Beniash, D. A. Harrington, J. A.

Kessler, S. I. Stupp, Science 2004, 303, 1352.

[16] G. Decher, Science 1997, 277, 1232.

[17] O. Gulseren, F. Ercolessi, E. Tosatti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 3775.

[18] B. K. Agrawal, V. Singh, R. Srivastava, S. Agrawal, Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 12.

[19] B. K. Agrawal, V. Singh, R. Srivastava, S. Agrawal,Nanotechnology 2006, 17,

2340.

[20] M. Menon, D. Srivastava, I. Ponomareva, L. A. Chernozatonskii, Phys. Rev.

B 2004, 70, 6.

[21] I. Ponomareva, M. Menon, D. Srivastava, A. N. Andriotis, Phys. Rev. Lett.

2005, 95, 4.

[22] J. X. Cao, X. G. Gong, J. X. Zhong, R. Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 4.

[23] B. L. Wang, G. H. Wang, Y. Ren, H. Q. Sun, X. S. Chen, J. J. Zhao, J. Phys. :

Condens. Matter 2003, 15, 2327.

[24] J. J. Zhao, C. L. Buia, J. Han, J. P. Lu, Nanotechnology 2003, 14, 501.

[25] J. W. Kang, J. J. Seo, K. R. Byun, H. J. Hwang, Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 8.

[26] J. W. Kang, J. J. Seo, H. J. Hwang, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 8997.

[27] S. P. Ju, J. S. Lin, W. J. Lee, Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 1221.

[28] J. L. Wang, X. S. Chen, G. H.Wang, B. L. Wang, W. Lu, J. J. Zhao, Phys. Rev. B

2002, 66, 5.

[29] Y. Oshima, H. Koizumi, K. Mouri, H. Hirayama, K. Takayanagi, Y. Kondo,

Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 4.

[30] Y. Kondo, K. Takayanagi, Science 2000, 289, 606.

[31] J. I. Pascual, J. Mendez, J. Gomezherrero, A. M. Baro, N. Garcia, U.

Landman, W. D. Luedtke, E. N. Bogachek, H. P. Cheng, Science 1995,

267, 1793.

[32] K. Y. Arutyunov, Phys. C 2008, 468, 272.

[33] M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Chen, M. Y. Tang, R. G. Yang, H. Lee, D. Z. Wang, Z.

F. Ren, J. P. Fleurial, P. Gogna, Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1043.

[34] X. W. Teng, W. Q. Han, W. Ku, M. Hucker, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47,

2055.

[35] X. Y. Zhao, C. M. Wei, L. Yang, M. Y. Chou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 4.

[36] A. I. Boukai, Y. Bunimovich, J. Tahir-Kheli, J. K. Yu, W. A. Goddard, J. R.

Heath, Nature 2008, 451, 168.

[37] A. I. Hochbaum, R. K. Chen, R. D. Delgado, W. J. Liang, E. C. Garnett, M.

Najarian, A. Majumdar, P. D. Yang, Nature 2008, 451, 163.

[38] S. Romanov, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 1993, 5, 1081.

[39] B. H. Hong, S. C. Bae, C. W. Lee, S. Jeong, K. S. Kim, Science 2001, 294, 348.

[40] N. R. B. Coleman, M. A. Morris, T. R. Spalding, J. D. Holmes, J. Am. Chem.

Soc. 2001, 123, 187.

[41] N. R. B. Coleman, N. O’Sullivan, K. M. Ryan, T. A. Crowley, M. A. Morris, T.

R. Spalding, D. C. Steytler, J. D. Holmes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7010.

[42] T. A. Crowley, K. J. Ziegler, D. M. Lyons, D. Erts, H. Olin, M. A. Morris, J. D.

Holmes, Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 3518.

[43] K. J. Ziegler, B. Polyakov, J. S. Kulkarni, T. A. Crowley, K. M. Ryan, M. A.

Morris, D. Erts, J. D. Holmes, J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 585.

[44] C. H. Ko, R. Ryoo, Chem. Commun. 1996, 2467.

[45] Z. Liu, Y. Sakamoto, T. Ohsuna, K. Hiraga, O. Terasaki, C. H. Ko, H. J. Shin,

R. Ryoo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3107.

[46] A. Fukuoka, Y. Sakamoto, S. Guan, S. Inagaki, N. Sugimoto, Y. Fukushima,

K. Hirahara, S. Iijima, M. Ichikawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3373.

[47] S. A. Johnson, D. Khushalani, N. Coombs, T. E. Mallouk, G. A. Ozin, J.

Mater. Chem. 1998, 8, 13.

[48] Y. Wu, Y. Cui, L. Huynh, C. J. Barrelet, D. C. Bell, C. M. Lieber, Nano Lett.

2004, 4, 433.

[49] J. D. Holmes, K. P. Johnston, R. C. Doty, B. A. Korgel, Science 2000, 287,

1471.

mbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 1019

R E S E A R C H

N E W

S

www.advmat.de

1020

[50] J. W. Grebinski, K. L. Hull, J. Zhang, T. H. Kosel, M. Kuno, Chem. Mater.

2004, 16, 5260.

[51] M. Kuno, O. Ahmad, V. Protasenko, D. Bacinello, T. H. Kosel, Chem.Mater.

2006, 18, 5722.

[52] X. Lu, M. S. Yavuz, H.-Y. Tuan, B. A. Korgel, Y. Xia, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,

130, 8900.

[53] C. Wang, Y. Hu, C. M. Lieber, S. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8902.

[54] Z. Huo, C.-K. Tsung, W. Huang, X. Zhang, P. Yang, Nano Lett. 2008, 8,

2041.

[55] C. Wang, Y. L. Hou, J. M. Kim, S. H. Sun, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46,

6333.

[56] S. Sadasivan, D. Khushalani, S. Mann, Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 2765.

[57] J. D. Hopwood, S. Mann, Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 1819.

[58] G. C. Xi, Y. K. Liu, X. Q. Wang, X. Y. Liu, Y. Y. Peng, Y. T. Qian, Cryst. Growth

Des. 2006, 6, 2567.

[59] X. G. Peng, L. Manna, W. D. Yang, J. Wickham, E. Scher, A. Kadavanich, A.

P. Alivisatos, Nature 2000, 404, 59.

[60] X. Peng, Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 459.

[61] Z. P. Liu, D. Xu, J. B. Liang, J. M. Shen, S. Y. Zhang, Y. T. Qian, J. Phys. Chem.

B 2005, 109, 10699.

[62] L. Cademartiri, R. Malakooti, P. G. O’Brien, A. Migliori, S. Petrov, N. P.

Kherani, G. A. Ozin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3814.

[63] R. Malakooti, L. Cademartiri, A. Migliori, G. A. Ozin, J. Mater. Chem. 2008,

18, 66.

[64] K. H. Park, J. Choi, H. J. Kim, J. B. Lee, S. U. Son, Chem. Mater. 2007, 19,

3861.

 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb

[65] L. Cademartiri, J. Bertolotti, R. Sapienza, D. S. Wiersma, V. Kitaev, G. A.

Ozin, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 671.

[66] T. Yu, J. Joo, Y. I. Park, T. Hyeon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1786.

[67] T. Y. Yu, J. Joo, Y. I. Park, T. Hyeon, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7411.

[68] J. F. Banfield, S. A. Welch, H. Z. Zhang, T. T. Ebert, R. L. Penn, Science 2000,

289, 751.

[69] R. L. Penn, J. F. Banfield, Science 1998, 281, 969.

[70] H. Colfen, M. Antonietti, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5576.

[71] Z. Tang, N. A. Kotov, M. Giersig, Science 2002, 297, 237.

[72] R. L. Penn, J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 12707.

[73] N. Pradhan, H. F. Xu, X. G. Peng, Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 720.

[74] A. S. Barnard, H. F. Xu, X. C. Li, N. Pradhan, X. G. Peng, Nanotechnology

2006, 17, 5707.

[75] A. B. Panda, S. Acharya, A. Efrima, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 2471.

[76] K.-S. Cho, D. V. Talapin, W. Gaschler, C. B. Murray, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,

127, 7140.

[77] I. Patla, S. Acharya, L. Zeiri, J. Israelachvili, S. Efrima, Y. Golan, Nano Lett.

2007, 7, 1459.

[78] K. H. Park, K. Jang, S. Kim, H. J. Kim, S. U. Son, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,

14780.

[79] A. Halder, N. Ravishankar, Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1854.

[80] X. X. Xu, J. Zhuang, X. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12527.

[81] J. J. Yuan, Y. Y. Xu, A. Walther, S. Bolisetty, M. Schumacher, H. Schmalz,

M. Ballauff, A. H. E. Muller, Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 718.

[82] N. Pazos-Perez, D. Baranov, S. Irsen, M. Hilgendorff, L. A. Liz-Marzan,

M. Giersig, Langmuir 2008, 24, 9855.

H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013–1020

Até o momento nenhum comentário
Esta é apenas uma pré-visualização
3 mostrados em 8 páginas