

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An effective data-collection procedure can greatly simplify the analysis and lead to improved understanding of the population or process that is being studied.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


4 Chapter 1/The Role of Statistics in Engineering
The need for statistical thinking arises often in the solution of engineering problems. Consider the engineer designing the connector. From testing the prototypes, he knows that the average pull- off force is 13.0 pounds. However, he thinks that this may be too low for the intended application, so he decides to consider an alternative design with a thicker wall, 1 8 inch in thickness. Eight pro- totypes of this design are built, and the observed pull-off force measurements are 12.9, 13.7, 12.8, 13.9, 14.2, 13.2, 13.5, and 13.1. The average is 13.4. Results for both samples are plotted as dot diagrams in Fig. 1-3. This display gives the impression that increasing the wall thickness has led to an increase in pull-off force. However, there are some obvious questions to ask. For instance, how do we know that another sample of prototypes will not give different results? Is a sample of eight prototypes adequate to give reliable results? If we use the test results obtained so far to conclude that increasing the wall thickness increases the strength, what risks are associated with this deci- sion? For example, is it possible that the apparent increase in pull-off force observed in the thicker prototypes is due only to the inherent variability in the system and that increasing the thickness of the part (and its cost) really has no effect on the pull-off force? Often, physical laws (such as Ohm’s law and the ideal gas law) are applied to help design prod- ucts and processes. We are familiar with this reasoning from general laws to specific cases. But it is also important to reason from a specific set of measurements to more general cases to answer the previous questions. This reasoning comes from a sample (such as the eight connectors) to a population (such as the connectors that will be in the products that are sold to customers). The reasoning is referred to as statistical inference. See Fig. 1-4. Historically, measurements were obtained from a sample of people and generalized to a population, and the terminology has remained. Clearly, reasoning based on measurements from some objects to measurements on all objects can result in errors (called sampling errors ). However, if the sample is selected properly, these risks can be quantified and an appropriate sample size can be determined.
In the previous subsection, we illustrated some simple methods for summarizing data. Some- times the data are all of the observations in the population. This results in a census. However, in the engineering environment, the data are almost always a sample that has been selected from the population. Three basic methods of collecting data are r A retrospective study using historical data r An observational study r A designed experiment
Population and Samples
12 13 14 15 Pull-off force FIGURE 1-2 Dot diagram of the pull-off force data when wall thickness is 3 32 inch.
12 13 14 15 Pull-off force
3 32 inch inch
= 1 = 8
FIGURE 1-3 Dot diagram of pull-off force for two wall thicknesses.
FIGURE 1- Statistical inference is one type of reasoning.
Physical laws
Types of reasoning
Product designs
Population
Statistical inference
Sample
Section 1-2/Collecting Engineering Data 5
An effective data-collection procedure can greatly simplify the analysis and lead to improved understanding of the population or process that is being studied. We now consider some examples of these data-collection methods.
Montgomery, Peck, and Vining (2012) describe an acetone-butyl alcohol distillation column for which concentration of acetone in the distillate (the output product stream) is an important variable. Factors that may affect the distillate are the reboil temperature, the condensate temperature, and the reflux rate. Production personnel obtain and archive the following records:
r The concentration of acetone in an hourly test sample of output product r The reboil temperature log, which is a record of the reboil temperature over time r The condenser temperature controller log r The nominal reflux rate each hour
The reflux rate should be held constant for this process. Consequently, production personnel change this very infrequently. A retrospective study would use either all or a sample of the historical process data archived over some period of time. The study objective might be to discover the relationships among the two temperatures and the reflux rate on the acetone concentration in the output product stream. However, this type of study presents some problems:
1. We may not be able to see the relationship between the reflux rate and acetone concentration because the reflux rate did not change much over the historical period. 2. The archived data on the two temperatures (which are recorded almost continuously) do not correspond perfectly to the acetone concentration measurements (which are made hourly). It may not be obvious how to construct an approximate correspondence. 3. Production maintains the two temperatures as closely as possible to desired targets or set points. Because the temperatures change so little, it may be difficult to assess their real impact on acetone concentration. 4. In the narrow ranges within which they do vary, the condensate temperature tends to increase with the reboil temperature. Consequently, the effects of these two process vari- ables on acetone concentration may be difficult to separate. As you can see, a retrospective study may involve a significant amount of data , but those data may contain relatively little useful information about the problem. Furthermore, some of the relevant data may be missing, there may be transcription or recording errors resulting in outli- ers (or unusual values), or data on other important factors may not have been collected and archived. In the distillation column, for example, the specific concentrations of butyl alcohol and acetone in the input feed stream are very important factors, but they are not archived because the concentrations are too hard to obtain on a routine basis. As a result of these types of issues, statistical analysis of historical data sometimes identifies interesting phenomena, but solid and reliable explanations of these phenomena are often difficult to obtain.
In an observational study, the engineer observes the process or population, disturbing it as little as possible, and records the quantities of interest. Because these studies are usually conducted for a relatively short time period, sometimes variables that are not routinely measured can be included. In the distillation column, the engineer would design a form to record the two temperatures and the reflux rate when acetone concentration measurements are made. It may even be possible to measure the input feed stream concentrations so that the impact of this factor could be studied.
Hazards of Using Historical Data