Summerhill School: A.S. Neill's Radical Education & Child Rearing Approach, Essays (high school) of Statistics

Three policy statements from summerhill school, an educational institution founded by a.s. Neill, known for his radical views on child rearing and education. Neill's writings challenge traditional values and confront the importance of self-expression, freedom, and happiness in education. The statements outline the aims and objectives of the school, providing insight into neill's educational philosophy.

Typology: Essays (high school)

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/04/2022

KarlienZ
KarlienZ 🇳🇱

3.5

(6)

169 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
SUMMERHILL POLICY STATEMENTS
The following three documents are a statement of the aims and objectives of Summerhill
School:
General Policy Statement (A.S. Neill)
Summerhill General Policy Statement
Policy Statement (Community Life)
As an introduction, here are some extracts from the book ‘Summerhill – a radical approach
to child rearing’ by the school’s founder, A.S. Neill.
A.S. Neill is widely considered to be one of the great educators of the time. UNESCO list
him as one of the 100 most influential educational thinkers and he was also listed as one of
twelve greatest educators of the last millennium by a UK national broadsheet newspaper in
December 1999.
His writings, together with other radical thinkers of the period such as Bertrand Russell,
confronted the values of the establishments for many years.
This piece stands as an example of his challenging views on education and freedom for
children. It is reproduced here to give some background and history to the Summerhill Policy
Statements.
‘I hold that the aim of life is to find happiness, which means to find interest. Education
should be a preparation for life. Our culture has not been very successful. Our education,
politics and economics lead to war. Our medicines have not done away with disease. Our
religion has not abolished usury and robbery. The advances of the age are advances in
mechanism – in communications and computers, in science and technology. New wars
threaten, for the world’s social conscience is still primitive.
If we feel like questioning today, we can pose a few awkward questions. Why does man hate
and kill in war when animals do not? Why does cancer increase? Why are there so many
suicides? So many insane sex crimes? Why the hate that is racism? Why the need for drugs to
enhance life? Why backbiting and spite? Why is sex obscene and a leering joke? Why
degradation and torture? Why the continuance of religions that have long ago lost their love
and hope and charity? Why, a thousand whys about our vaulted state of civilised eminence!?
I ask these questions because I am by profession a teacher, one that deals with the young. I
ask these questions because those so often asked by teachers are the unimportant ones, the
ones about French or ancient history or what not when these subjects don’t matter a jot
compared to the larger questions of life’s fulfilment – of man’s inner happiness.
How much of our education is real doing, real self-expression? Handwork is too often the
making of a wooden box under the eye of an expert. Even the Montessori system, well known
as a system of directed play, is an artificial way of making the child learn by doing. It has
nothing creative about it.
In the home the child is always being taught. In almost every home there is at least one
ungrown-up grown-up who rushes to show Tommy how his new engine works. There is
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Summerhill School: A.S. Neill's Radical Education & Child Rearing Approach and more Essays (high school) Statistics in PDF only on Docsity!

SUMMERHILL POLICY STATEMENTS

The following three documents are a statement of the aims and objectives of Summerhill School:

  • General Policy Statement (A.S. Neill)
  • Summerhill General Policy Statement
  • Policy Statement (Community Life) As an introduction, here are some extracts from the book ‘Summerhill – a radical approach to child rearing’ by the school’s founder, A.S. Neill. A.S. Neill is widely considered to be one of the great educators of the time. UNESCO list him as one of the 100 most influential educational thinkers and he was also listed as one of twelve greatest educators of the last millennium by a UK national broadsheet newspaper in December 1999. His writings, together with other radical thinkers of the period such as Bertrand Russell, confronted the values of the establishments for many years. This piece stands as an example of his challenging views on education and freedom for children. It is reproduced here to give some background and history to the Summerhill Policy Statements. ‘I hold that the aim of life is to find happiness, which means to find interest. Education should be a preparation for life. Our culture has not been very successful. Our education, politics and economics lead to war. Our medicines have not done away with disease. Our religion has not abolished usury and robbery. The advances of the age are advances in mechanism – in communications and computers, in science and technology. New wars threaten, for the world’s social conscience is still primitive. If we feel like questioning today, we can pose a few awkward questions. Why does man hate and kill in war when animals do not? Why does cancer increase? Why are there so many suicides? So many insane sex crimes? Why the hate that is racism? Why the need for drugs to enhance life? Why backbiting and spite? Why is sex obscene and a leering joke? Why degradation and torture? Why the continuance of religions that have long ago lost their love and hope and charity? Why, a thousand whys about our vaulted state of civilised eminence!? I ask these questions because I am by profession a teacher, one that deals with the young. I ask these questions because those so often asked by teachers are the unimportant ones, the ones about French or ancient history or what not when these subjects don’t matter a jot compared to the larger questions of life’s fulfilment – of man’s inner happiness. How much of our education is real doing, real self-expression? Handwork is too often the making of a wooden box under the eye of an expert. Even the Montessori system, well known as a system of directed play, is an artificial way of making the child learn by doing. It has nothing creative about it. In the home the child is always being taught. In almost every home there is at least one ungrown-up grown-up who rushes to show Tommy how his new engine works. There is

always someone to lift the baby up on a chair when the baby wants to examine something on the wall. Every time we show Tommy how his engine works we are stealing from that child the joy of life – the joy of discovery – the joy of overcoming an obstacle. Worse! We make that child come to believe that he is inferior, and must depend on help. Parents are slow in realising how unimportant the learning side of school is. Children, like adults, learn what they want to learn. All the prize-giving and marks and exams side-track proper personality development. Only pedants claim that learning from books is education. Books are the least important apparatus in a school. All that any child needs is the three R’s the rest should be tools and clay and sports and theatre and paint and freedom. Most of the school work that adolescents do is simply a waste of time, of energy, of patience. It robs youth of its right to play and play and play: it puts old heads on young shoulders. When I lecture to students at teacher training colleges and universities, I am often shocked at the ungrownupness of these lads and lasses stuffed with useless knowledge. They know a lot: they shine in dialectics: they can quote the classics - but in their outlook on life many of them are infants. For they have been taught to know, but have not been allowed to feel. These students are friendly, pleasant, eager, but something is lacking – the emotional factor, the power to subordinate thinking to feeling. I talk to these of a world they have missed and go on missing. Their textbooks do not deal with human character, or with love, or with freedom, or with self-determination. And so the system goes on, aiming only at standards of book learning – it goes on separating the head from the heart. It is time that we were challenging the school’s notion of work. It is taken for granted that every child should learn mathematics, history, geography, science, a little art and certainly literature. It is time we realised that the average young child is not much interested in any of these subjects. I prove this with every new pupil. When told that the school is free, every new pupil cries, “Hurrah! You won’t catch me going to lessons!” I am not decrying learning. But learning should come after play. And learning should not deliberately seasoned with play to make it palatable. Learning is important – but not to everyone. Nijinsky could not pass his school exams in St. Petersburg, and he could not enter the State Ballet without passing those exams. He simply could not learn school subjects – his mind was elsewhere. They faked an exam for him, giving him the answers with the papers – so a biography says. What a loss to the world if Nijinsky had really to pass those exams! Creators learn what they want to learn in order to have the tools that their originality and genius demand. We do not know how much creation is killed in the classroom with its emphasis on learning. I have seen a girl weep nightly over her geometry. Her mother wanted her to go to university, but the girl’s whole soul was artistic. The notion that unless a child is learning something the child is wasting his time is nothing