3 phase transformer design notes, Assignments of Machine Design

3 phase transformer design notes for all type

Typology: Assignments

2020/2021

Uploaded on 05/13/2021

ujjalchakma
ujjalchakma 🇬🇧

4.5

(2)

7 documents

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Transformer Design
OUTPUT EQUATION: - It gives the relationship between electrical rating and physical dimensions
of the machines.
Let
V1 = Primary voltage say LV
V2 = Secondary voltage say HV
I1 = Primary current
I2 = Secondary current
N1= Primary no of turns
N2= Secondary no of turns
a1 = Sectional area of LV conductors (m2)
=
1
I
a1 = Sectional area of HV conductors (m2)
=
2
I
= Permissible current density (A/m2)
Q = Rating in KVA
We place first half of LV on one limb and rest half of LV on other limb to reduce leakage flux.
So arrangement is LV insulation then half LV turns then HV insulation and then half HV turns.
(1) For 1-phase core type transformer
Rating is given by
Q =
3
11
10
IV
KVA
=
3
11
1044.4
INf
m
KVA
11
44.4 NfV
m
=
3
11
1044.4
INBfA
mi
KVA -----------(1)
)(
mim
BA
Where
f = frequency
= Maximum flux in the core
i
A
= Sectional area of core
m
B
= Maximum flux density in the core
Window Space Factor
)(
w
w
AAreaWindow
WindowinWindingsofAreaSectionCuActual
K
w
A
NaNa
2211
)/&/(
)/()/(
2211
2211
IaIa
A
NINI
w
w
A
NINI
2211
So
http://eed.dit.googlepages.com, Prepared by: Nafees Ahmed
1
L
V
L
VL
V
L
V
H
V
H
V
H
V
H
V
1-phase core type transformer with
concentric windings
Window
)(
2
2211
11
NINIrTransformeIdealFor
A
NI
w
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Partial preview of the text

Download 3 phase transformer design notes and more Assignments Machine Design in PDF only on Docsity!

Transformer Design

OUTPUT EQUATION: - It gives the relationship between electrical rating and physical dimensions

of the machines.

Let

V 1 = Primary voltage say LV

V 2 = Secondary voltage say HV

I 1 = Primary current

I 2 = Secondary current

N 1 = Primary no of turns

N 2 = Secondary no of turns

a 1 = Sectional area of LV conductors (m

2 )

I 1

a 1 = Sectional area of HV conductors (m

2 )

2

I

 (^) = Permissible current density (A/m

2 )

Q = Rating in KVA

We place first half of LV on one limb and rest half of LV on other limb to reduce leakage flux.

So arrangement is LV insulation then half LV turns then HV insulation and then half HV turns.

(1) For 1-phase core type transformer

Rating is given by

Q =

3 1 1

V I  KVA

= ^ ^

3 1 1

f N Im

 KVA  

1 1 V 4. 44 f N m

= ^ ^

3 1 1

fA B N Ii m KVA^ -----------(1)^

( ) m i m    AB

Where

f = frequency

m  (^) = Maximum flux in the core

i A (^) = Sectional area of core

m B (^) = Maximum flux density in the core

Window Space Factor

( ) w

w WindowArea A

ActualCuSectionAreaofWindingsin Window K

w

A

a N a N 1 1 2 2

1 1 2 2

1 1 2 2  

  a I a I

A

I N I N

w

w

A

I N I N

1 1 2 2

So

L

V

L

V

L

V

L

V

H

V

H

V

H

V

H

V

1-phase core type transformer with

concentric windings

Window

1 1 2 2

1 1 ForIdealTransformerIN IN A

I N

w

( 2 ) 2

1 1    

 

 

w w K A N I

Put equation value of N 1 I 1 form equation (2) to equation (1)

KVA

K A Q fA B

w w i m

3 10 2

  1. 44

  

  1. 22 10 ( 3 )

3    

Q fA B K A KVA i m w w

(2) For 1- phase shell type transformer

Window Space Factor

Kw

w

A

a N a N 1 1 2 2

1 1 2 2

1 1 2 2  

  a I a I A

I N I N

w

w

A

I N I N

1 1 2 2

1 1 2 2

1 1 ForIdealTransformerIN IN

A

I N

w

So

( 4 ) 2

1 1 ^     

w w K A N I

Put equation value of N 1 I 1 form equation (4) to equation (1)

KVA

K A Q fA B

w w i m

3 10 2

  1. 44

  

  1. 22 10 ( 5 )

3     

Q f A B K A KVA i m w w

Note it is same as for 1-phase core type transformer i.e. equ (3)

(3) For 3-phase core type transformer

Rating is given by

Q =

3 1 1

  V I  KVA

= ^ ^

3 1 1

  f N Im  (^) KVA ^ V 1 (^)  4. 44 fmN 1 

=  

3 1 1

  fA B N Ii m KVA -----------(6) (^  mAiBm )

Window Space Factor

L

V

L

V

H

V

H

V

L

V

L

V

H

V

H

V

3-phase core type transformer with

concentric windings

L

V

L

V

H

V

H

V

Window

1-phase shell type transformer with

sandwich windings

LV

HV

LV

HV

LV

LV

HV

LV

HV

LV

Window

(1) Normal Si-Steel 0.9 to 1.1 T

(0.35 mm thickness, 1.5%—3.5% Si)

(2) HRGO 1.2 to 1.4 T

(Hot Rolled Grain Oriented Si Steel)

(3) CRGO 1.4 to 1.7 T

(Cold Rolled Grain Oriented Si Steel)

(0.14---0.28 mm thickness)

CHOICE OF ELECTRIC LOADING ^ 

This depends upon cooling method employed

(1) Natural Cooling: 1.5---2.3 A/mm

2

AN Air Natural cooling

ON Oil Natural cooling

OFN Oil Forced circulated with Natural air cooling

(2) Forced Cooling : 2.2---4.0 A/mm

2

AB Air Blast cooling

OB Oil Blast cooling

OFB Oil Forced circulated with air Blast cooling

(3) Water Cooling: 5.0 ---6.0 A/mm

2

OW Oil immersed with circulated Water cooling

OFW Oil Forced with circulated Water cooling

CORE CONSTRUCTION:

(a) U-I type (b) E-I type

(c) U-T type

(d) L-L type

EMF PER TURN:

We know

V 1 (^)  4. 44 fmN 1 ( 1 )

1

1       t m f N

V

SoEMF Turn E

and

Q =

3 1 1

V I  KVA ( Note: Take Q as per phase rating in KVA)

= ^ ^

3 1 1

f N Im

 KVA

10 ( 3 )

3 1 1   

EN I KVA t

In the design, the ration of total magnetic loading and electric loading may be kept constant

Magnetic loading =  m

Electric loading = N 1 I 1

So tan^ ( " ") 11 (^3 )

11

put in eqution r

cons t say r N I N I

m m

KVA

r

Q E

m t

3 10

  

Or KVA f r

E Q E

t t

3 10

  1. 44

   using equation (2)

E fr Q

t

(^23)

Or E^ tKt Q Volts / Turn

Where

3

  1. 44 10

Ktfr  is a constant and values are

Kt = 0.6 to 0.7 for 3-phase core type power transformer

Kt = 0.45 for 3-phase core type distribution transformer

Kt = 1.3 for 3-phase shell type transformer

Kt = 0.75 to 0.85 for 1-phase core type transformer

Kt = 1.0 to 1.2 for 1-phase shell type transformer

ESTIMATION OF CORE X-SECTIONAL AREA Ai

We know

E (^) tKt Q ( 1 )

(e) Mitred Core Construction (Latest)

o

% Fill 63.7% 79.2% 84.9% 88.5% 90.8% 92.3% 93.4% 94.8% 95.8%

ESTIMATION OF MAIN DIMENSIONS:

Consider a 3-phase core type transformer

We know output equation

Q f A B K A KVA i m w w

3

  1. 33 10

   

So, Window area

2 3

  1. 33 10

m

fA B K

Q

A

i m w

w (^)  

where Kw = Window space factor

forupto KVA HigherKV

K w 10 30

8

forupto KVA HigherKV

Kw 200 30

10

forupto KVA HigherKV

Kw 1000 30

12

For higher rating Kw = 0.15 to 0.

Assume some suitable range for

D = (1.7 to 2) d

Width of the window Ww = D-d

Height of the window

w

w

widthof window W

A

L  ( )

LWwAw

Generally 2 to 4 W

L

w

Yoke area Ay is generally taken 10% to 15% higher then core section area (Ai), it is to reduce the iron loss in

the yoke section. But if we increase the core section area (Ai) more copper will be needed in the windings

and so more cost through we are reducing the iron loss in the core. Further length of the winding will

increase resulting higher resistance so more cu loss.

Ay = (1.10 to 1.15) Ai

Depth of yoke Dy = a

http://eed.dit.googlepages.com, Prepared by: Nafees Ahmed

d

L

W

D

(D-d)

W w

=

H

h y

3-phase core type transformer

2-Step

Or Cruciform- Core

b (^) a

b

a

Height of the yoke hy = Ay/Dy

Width of the core

W = 2*D + d

Height of the core

H = L + 2*hy

Flux density in yoke

m y

i y B A

A B

ESTIMATION OF CORE LOSS AND CORE LOSS COMPONET OF NO LOAD CURRENT IC:

Volume of iron in core = 3LAi m

Weight of iron in core = density * volume

=  i^ * 3LAi Kg

i (^) = density of iron (kg/m3)

=7600 Kg/m

3 for normal Iron/steel

= 6500 Kg/m

3 for M-4 steel

From the graph we can find out specific iron loss, pi (Watt/Kg ) corresponding to flux density Bm in core.

So

Iron loss in core =pi*  i^ * 3LAi Watt

Similarly

Iron loss in yoke = py* ^ i * 2WAy Watt

Where py = specific iron loss corresponding to flux density By in yoke

Total Iron loss Pi =Iron loss in core + Iron loss in yoke

Core loss component of no load current

Ic = Core loss per phase/ Primary Voltage

Ic 1

3 V

P

i

ESTIMATION OF MAGNETIZING CURRENT OF NO LOAD CURRENT Im:

Find out magnetizing force H (atcore, at/m) corresponding to flux density Bm in the core and atyoke

corresponding to flux density in the yoke from B-H curve

B at m B at mm core c yoke  / ,  /

So

MMF required for the core = 3Latcore

Sectional area of secondary winging

2 2

I

a

Where  is current the density.

Now we can use round conductors or strip conductors for this see the IS codes and ICC (Indian Cable

Company) table.

DETERMINATION OF R 1 & R 2 AND CU LOSSES:

Let Lmt = Length of mean turn

Resistance of primary winding

2 1

(^61)

1 , , 75 a m

L N m R

mt dc o

  

o o ac dc

R to R 1 , , 75 1 , , 75

( 1. 15 1. 20 )

Resistance of secondary winding

2 2

(^62)

2 , , 75 a m

L N m R

mt dc o

  

R (^) 2 , ac , 75 o ( 1. 15 to 1. 20 ) R 2 , dc , 75 o

Copper loss in primary winding I R Watt 1

2 1

Copper loss in secondary winding I R Watt 2

2 2

Total copper loss (^2)

2 1 2

2 1

 3 I R  3 I R

' 1 2

2 1

 I R  R

I R p

2  (^31)

Where Total resis cereferred toprimaryside

R Rp R R

tan

' 01 1 2

  

Note: On No load, there is magnetic field around connecting leads etc which causes additional stray losses

in the transformer tanks and other metallic parts. These losses may be taken as 7% to 10% of total cu losses.

DETERMINATION OF EFFICIENCY:

Efficiency InputPower

Output Power  

OutputPower Losses

Output Power

 

 100  

OutputPower IronLoss Culoss

Output Power  (^) %

ESTIMATION OF LEAKAGE REACTANCE:

Assumptions

  1. Consider permeability of iron as infinity that is MMF is needed only for leakage flux path in the

window.

  1. The leakage flux lines are parallel to the axis of the core.

Consider an elementary cylinder of leakage flux lines of thickness dx at a distance x as shown in following

figure.

MMF at distance x

http://eed.dit.googlepages.com, Prepared by: Nafees Ahmed

x

x

a b 1

b 2

dx

N

1

I

1

=N

2

I

2

L

c

MMF Distribution

x b

N I

M

x 1

11 

Permeance of this elementary cylinder

L

A   o

c

mt o L

L dx   (Lc =Length of winding)

   S

Permeance A

L S

o

1 &

1

Leakage flux lines associated with elementary cylinder

d M Permeance x x   

Flux linkage due to this leakage flux

x x d   Noof trunswithwhichitisassociatedd

c

mt o L

L dx x b

N I

b

N I

1

11

1

11

dx b

x I L

L N

c

mt o

2

1

1

2 (^1)  

  

Flux linkages (or associated) with primary winding

 (^) 

1

0

2

1

1

2 1

' 1

b

c

mt o dx b

x I L

L

  N 

1 1

2 1

b I L

L

N

c

mt o

Flux linkages (or associated) with the space ‘a’ between primary and secondary windings

I a L

L

N

c

mt o o 1

2 1

We consider half of this flux linkage with primary and rest half with the secondary winding. So total flux

linkages with primary winding

' 1 1

o    

1 1

2 1 1

b a I L

L

N

c

mt o

Similarly total flux linkages with secondary winding

' 2 2

o

2 2

2 2 2

b a I L

L

N

c

mt o

Primary & Secondary leakage inductance

 

    3 2

(^21) 1 1

1 1

b a

L

L N I

L

c

mt o

(^22) 2

2

2 2

b a

L

L

N

I

L

c

mto

Primary & Secondary leakage reactance

 

  

      3 2

2 2

(^21) 1 1 1

b a

L

L X fL f N

c

mt o

(^22) 2 2 2

b a

L

L

X fL f N

c

mt o

c

mt o L

L dx x

b

N I

1

11

Tank of a 3-Phase transformer

CALCULATION OF TEMPERATURE RISE:

Surface area of 4 vertical side of the tank (Heat is considered to be dissipated from 4 vertical sides of the

tank)

St= 2(Wt + lt) Ht m

2 (Excluding area of top and bottom of tank)

Let

 = Temp rise of oil (

o C to 50

o C)

12.5St  =Total full load losses ( Iron loss + Cu loss)

So temp rise in

o C t 12.5S

Totalfullload losses  

If the temp rise so calculated exceeds the limiting value, the suitable no of cooling tubes or radiators must be

provided

CALCULATION OF NO OF COOLING TUBES:

H

W

h 1

h 2

H

t

Specific Heat dissipation

6 Watt/m

2

0 C by Radiation

6.5 Watt/m

2

0 C by Convection

Let xSt= Surface area of all cooling tubes

Then

Losses to be dissipated by the transformer walls and cooling tube

= Total losses

 12. 5  8. 5   Totallosses t t S xS

So from above equation we can find out total surface are of cooling tubes (xSt)

Normally we use 5 cm diameter tubes and keep them 7.5 cm apart

At= Surface area of one cooling tube

  d (^) tubeltube , mean

Hence

No of cooling tubes

t

t

A

xS

WEIGHT OF TRANFORMER:

Let

Wi = Weight of Iron in core and yoke (core volume* density + yoke volume* density) Kg

Wc= Weight of copper in winding (volume* density) Kg

(density of cu = 8900 Kg/m

3 )

Weight of Oil

= Volume of oil * 880 Kg

Add 20% of (Wi+Wc) for fittings, tank etc.

Total weight is equal to weight of above all parts.

d= 5 Cm

7.5 Cm

Tank and Arrangement of Cooling tubes

6 W-Raditon+6.5 W=12.5 Convection (^) 6.5*1.35 W  8. 5 ( 35% more) Convection only