


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Solutions to problem 1, 2 and 3 of homework 6 for the statistics 13.1 fall 2008 course at ucla. The problems involve using a 2-sample t-test to compare the means of two independent samples and testing the null hypothesis that the means are equal. The data, calculations, and conclusions for each problem.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Stats 13.1 Fall 2008: Homework 6 Solutions
http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~dinov/courses_students.dir/08/Fall/STAT13.1.dir/
H0: μ 1 - μ 2 = 0 HA: μ 1 - μ 2 ≠ 0
2 2 1 2
1 2 0 =
SE y y
y y T
Now, we compare this to a Students T-distribution with n 1 + n 2 – 2 = 8 degrees of freedom using SOCR to find p(T(df=8) > T 0 = 0.494) = 0.
In this case we have a 2-tailed test, and so our p-value is 2*0.32 = 0.64. Conclusion: We fail to reject the null hypothesis since 0.64>0.10. We conclude that according to our data the mean weight of thymus glands after being incubated for 14 days is not different than the mean weight after being incubated for 15 days. In other words, there is no statistically significant mean difference in thymus glands weights.
Figure 1
H0: μ 1 - μ 2 = 0 HA: μ 1 - μ 2 ≠ 0
2 2 1 2
1 2 0 =
SE y y
y y T
Now, we compare this to a Students T-distribution with n 1 + n 2 – 2 = 13 degrees of freedom using SOCR to find p(T(df=13) > T 0 = 0.919) = 0.
In this case we have a 2-tailed test, and so our p-value is 2*0.19 = 0.38. Conclusion: We fail to reject the null hypothesis since 0.38>0.10.
23 13. 97 ( 36. 97 , 9. 03 ) 4
2 * 13 92 115 1. 52 *
82 % ( )
2
1 2
2
. 18 1 2 2 ,
1 2
= − ± =− ± = − −
= − ± −
CI x x t SE x x n n df
Problem 4
059 0. 180 ( 0. 121 , 0. 239 ) 17
262
22
95 % ( )
2 2
1 2
2
. 05 1 2 2 ,
1 2
= − ± + = ± = −
= − ± −
CI x x t SE x x n n df
We can say that we are 95% confident that the true difference in mean head widths between female crickets that were successful and female crickets that were unsuccessful in mating is somewhere between -0.121 and 0.239. We might also suggest that since 0 falls in this interval, then there is evidence to suggest that there is no difference in head widths between the two groups, and therefore the body size does not play a role in mating success.