


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Material Type: Exam; Class: Univ Physics: Thermal Physics; Subject: Physics; University: University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign; Term: Unknown 1989;
Typology: Exams
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Physics 213 Problem 1 Week 3 Adiabatic Compression a) Last week, we considered the problem of isothermal compression: 1.5 moles of an ideal diatomic gas at temperature 35oC were compressed isothermally from a volume of 0.015 m^3 to a volume of 0.0015 m^3. The pV-diagram for the isothermal process is shown below. Now we consider an adiabatic process, with the same starting conditions and the same final volume. Is the final temperature higher, lower, or the same as the in isothermal case? Sketch the adiabatic processes on the p-V diagram below and compute the final temperature. (Ignore vibrations of the molecules.) For an adiabatic process ViTiα^ = VfTfα^ , where α = 5/2 for the diatomic gas. In this case Ti = 273 K + 35oC = 308 K. We find Tf = Ti (Vi/Vf)1/α^ = (308 K) (10)2/5^ = 774 K. b) According to your diagram, is the final pressure greater, lesser, or the same as in the isothermal case? Explain why ( i.e. , what is the energy flow in each case?). Calculate the final pressure. We argued above that the final temperature is greater for the adiabatic process. Recall that p = nRT/ V for an ideal gas. We are given that the final volume is the same for the two processes. Since the final temperature is greater for the adiabatic process, the final pressure is also greater. We can do the problem numerically if we assume an idea gas with constant α. In an adiabatic processes, pV γ = constant, where γ = (α + 1) / α. Here, the gas is diatomic and non-vibrational, so α = 5/2, and γ = 7/5. Note that γ is always greater than one. Then for an adiabatic process, pfVf γ = piVi γ , or pf = pi (Vi/Vf) γ
. For an isothermal process, pfVf = piVi. or pf = pi (Vi/Vf). Since γ > 1, the final pressure must be greater in the adiabatic process. Numerically, pf = pi (Vi/Vf) γ = 2.56 × 10 5 Pa × (0.015 m 3 /0.0015 m 3 ) 7/ = 6.43 × 10 6 Pa Recall that in the isothermal process the final presume was 2.56 × 105 Pa. Thus the final pressure is greater in the adiabatic process.
c) Based on your diagram, would the amount of work done on the gas be larger, smaller, or the same as in the isothermal case (the work done in the isothermal case was 8844 J)? What about the heat flow? Explain your answers briefly. Compute the work done on the gas, Won, for this process. [Hint: You could do the integral - ∫pdV from Vi to Vf, because the pressure p can be written as a function of V. Alternatively, you could avoid the integral by noticing that work is simply related to ΔU for an adiabatic process, and that ΔU is simply related to ΔT for an ideal gas.] The short way: We can answer the question using the First Law, ΔU = Qin + Won. For the adiabatic process Qin = 0, by definition, so ΔU = Won for the adiabatic process. But ΔU = αnRΔT, so, Won = αnRΔT = (5/2)(1.5 mol)(8.314J/mol K)(774K – 308K) = 1.45 x 10 4
The long way: Recall that for the isothermal process the work done on the gas was 8850 J. The work done on the gas is greater in the adiabatic process. Incidentally, the derivation of the adiabatic formulas is as follows: For small changes in T and V, the first law (ΔU = - Wby) tells us: αNk dT = - p dV = - (NkT/V) dV which implies α dT/T = - dV/V α ∫ (dT/T) = - ∫ (dV/V) α ln T = - ln V + constants yielding, VT α = constant, or pV γ = constant (adiabatic process) with γ = (α+1)/α. These functional forms apply only in the temperature range where α and γ are constant.
b) Which requires a larger Won, an adiabatic compression or an isobaric compression? Which one has the smallest final temperature? Here, the adiabatic compression cannot release any of the energy put into it as work. It therefore keeps all the work done on it as internal energy and ends with a very high temperature. The isobaric process must lower its temperature during this process. If it didn’t, the gas molecules would strike the container walls more often (from the reduced volume). This process must therefore lose heat to the surroundings to slow the molecules down. Since the adiabatic process ended with the same volume as the isobaric, but with a higher pressure, the adiabatic process ends up with the larger temperature.