







Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
During reading and planning time only the question paper may be annotated. You must NOT write in your answer booklet until instructed by the supervisor. This ...
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 13
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!








Time allowed Reading and planning: 15 minutes Writing: 3 hours
This question paper is divided into two sections:
Section A – This ONE question is compulsory and MUST be attempted
Section B – TWO questions ONLY to be attempted
Formulae and tables are on pages 9–13.
Do NOT open this question paper until instructed by the supervisor. During reading and planning time only the question paper may be annotated. You must NOT write in your answer booklet until instructed by the supervisor. This question paper must not be removed from the examination hall.
Advanced Financial
Management
March/June 2016 – Sample Questions
Section A – This ONE question is compulsory and MUST be attempted
1 Lirio Co is an engineering company which is involved in projects around the world. It has been growing steadily for several years and has maintained a stable dividend growth policy for a number of years now. The board of directors (BoD) is considering bidding for a large project which requires a substantial investment of $40 million. It can be assumed that the date today is 1 March 2016. The BoD is proposing that Lirio Co should not raise the finance for the project through additional debt or equity. Instead, it proposes that the required finance is obtained from a combination of funds received from the sale of its equity investment in a European company and from cash flows generated from its normal business activity in the coming two years. As a result, Lirio Co’s current capital structure of 80 million $1 equity shares and $70 million 5% bonds is not expected to change in the foreseeable future. The BoD has asked the company’s treasury department to prepare a discussion paper on the implications of this proposal. The following information on Lirio Co has been provided to assist in the preparation of the discussion paper. Expected income and cash flow commitments prior to undertaking the large project for the year to the end of February 2017 Lirio Co’s sales revenue is forecast to grow by 8% next year from its current level of $300 million, and the operating profit margin on this is expected to be 15%. It is expected that Lirio Co will have the following capital investment requirements for the coming year, before the impact of the large project is considered:
Section B – TWO questions ONLY to be attempted
2 Louieed Co Louieed Co, a listed company, is a major supplier of educational material, selling its products in many countries. It supplies schools and colleges and also produces learning material for business and professional exams. Louieed Co has exclusive contracts to produce material for some examining bodies. Louieed Co has a well-defined management structure with formal processes for making major decisions. Although Louieed Co produces online learning material, most of its profits are still derived from sales of traditional textbooks. Louieed Co’s growth in profits over the last few years has been slow and its directors are currently reviewing its long-term strategy. One area in which they feel that Louieed Co must become much more involved is the production of online testing materials for exams and to validate course and textbook learning. Bid for Tidded Co Louieed Co has recently made a bid for Tidded Co, a smaller listed company. Tidded Co also supplies a range of educational material, but has been one of the leaders in the development of online testing and has shown strong profit growth over recent years. All of Tidded Co’s initial five founders remain on its board and still hold 45% of its issued share capital between them. From the start, Tidded Co’s directors have been used to making quick decisions in their areas of responsibility. Although listing has imposed some formalities, Tidded Co has remained focused on acting quickly to gain competitive advantage, with the five founders continuing to give strong leadership. Louieed Co’s initial bid of five shares in Louieed Co for three shares in Tidded Co was rejected by Tidded Co’s board. There has been further discussion between the two boards since the initial offer was rejected and Louieed Co’s board is now considering a proposal to offer Tidded Co’s shareholders two shares in Louieed Co for one share in Tidded Co or a cash alternative of $22·75 per Tidded Co share. It is expected that Tidded Co's shareholders will choose one of the following options: (i) To accept the two-shares-for-one-share offer for all the Tidded Co shares; or, (ii) To accept the cash offer for all the Tidded Co shares; or, (iii) 60% of the shareholders will take up the two-shares-for-one-share offer and the remaining 40% will take the cash offer. In case of the third option being accepted, it is thought that three of the company's founders, holding 20% of the share capital in total, will take the cash offer and not join the combined company. The remaining two founders will probably continue to be involved in the business and be members of the combined company's board. Louieed Co’s finance director has estimated that the merger will produce annual post-tax synergies of $20 million. He expects Louieed Co’s current price-earnings (P/E) ratio to remain unchanged after the acquisition. Extracts from the two companies’ most recent accounts are shown below: Louieed Tidded $m $m Profit before finance cost and tax 446 182 Finance costs (74) (24) –––– –––– Profit before tax 372 158 Tax (76) (30) –––– –––– Profit after tax 296 128 –––– –––– Issued $1 nominal shares 340 million 90 million P/E ratios, based on most recent accounts 14 15· Long-term liabilities (market value) ($m) 540 193 Cash and cash equivalents ($m) 220 64 The tax rate applicable to both companies is 20%. Assume that Louieed Co can obtain further debt funding at a pre-tax cost of 7·5% and that the return on cash surpluses is 5% pre-tax. Assume also that any debt funding needed to complete the acquisition will be reduced instantly by the balances of cash and cash equivalents held by Louieed Co and Tidded Co.
Required:
(a) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the acquisition of Tidded Co from the viewpoint of Louieed Co. (6 marks)
(b) Calculate the P/E ratios of Tidded Co implied by the terms of Louieed Co’s initial and proposed offers, for all three of the above options. (5 marks)
(c) Calculate, and comment on, the funding required for the acquisition of Tidded Co and the impact on Louieed Co’s earnings per share and gearing, for each of the three options given above. Note: Up to 10 marks are available for the calculations. (14 marks)
(25 marks)
also proposes a redundancy programme for longer-serving staff, selecting for redundancy employees who have complained particularly strongly about recent changes in working conditions. There is a commitment in Staple Group’s annual report to treat employees fairly, communicate with them regularly and enhance employees’ performance by structured development.
Required:
(a) Evaluate the options for disposing of parts of Staple Group, using the financial information to assess possible disposal prices. The evaluation should include a discussion of the benefits and drawbacks to Staple Group from disposing of parts of the Staple Group. (19 marks)
(b) Discuss the significance of the finance director’s proposals for reduction in staff costs for Staple Group’s relationships with its shareholders and employees and discuss the ethical implications of the proposals. (6 marks)
(25 marks)
4 Furlion Co manufactures heavy agricultural equipment and machinery which can be used in difficult farming conditions. Furlion Co’s chief executive has been investigating a significant opportunity in the country of Naswa, where Furlion Co has not previously sold any products. The government of Naswa has been undertaking a major land reclamation programme and Furlion Co’s equipment is particularly suitable for use on the reclaimed land. Because of the costs and other problems involved in transporting its products, Furlion Co’s chief executive proposes that Furlion Co should establish a plant for manufacturing machinery in Naswa. He knows that the Naswan government is keen to encourage the development of sustainable businesses within the country. Initial calculations suggest that the proposed investment in Naswa would have a negative net present value of $1·01 million. However, Furlion Co’s chief executive believes that there may be opportunities for greater cash flows in future if the Naswan government expands its land reclamation programme. The government at present is struggling to fund expansion of the programme out of its own resources and is looking for other funding. If the Naswan government obtains this funding, the chief executive has forecast that the increased demand for Furlion Co’s products would justify $15 million additional expenditure at the site of the factory in three years’ time. The expected net present value for this expansion is currently estimated to be $0. It can be assumed that all costs and revenues include inflation. The relevant cost of capital is 12% and the risk free rate is 4%. The chief executive has estimated the likely volatility of cash flows at a standard deviation of 30%. One of Furlion Co’s non-executive directors has read about possible changes in interest rates and wonders how these might affect the investment appraisal.
Required: (a) Assess, showing all relevant calculations, whether Furlion Co should proceed with the significant opportunity. Discuss the assumptions made and other factors which will affect the decision of whether to establish a plant in Naswa. The Black Scholes pricing model may be used, where appropriate. (16 marks)
(b) Explain what is meant by an option’s rho and discuss the impact of changes in interest rates on the appraisal of the investment. (5 marks)
(c) Discuss the possibility of the Naswan government obtaining funding for further land reclamation from the World Bank, referring specifically to the International Development Association. (4 marks)
(25 marks)
Modified Internal Rate of Return
The Black-Scholes option pricing model
The Put Call Parity relationship
c P N(d P N(d e
Where:
d
P P r+
a 1 e 2
–rt
1
a e
ln( / ) ( 0 0.5s t s t
d d s t
2
2 1
R r I
n = e
( + )
1
1 – 1
p = c – Pa +P ee –rt
Present Value Table
Present value of 1 i.e. (1 + r )– n
Where r = discount rate n = number of periods until payment
Discount rate (r)
Periods
This table can be used to calculate N ( d ), the cumulative normal distribution functions needed for the Black-Scholes model of option pricing. If di > 0, add 0·5 to the relevant number above. If di < 0, subtract the relevant number above from 0·5.