



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An inspector calls summary notes
Typology: Summaries
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




An Inspector Calls: In An Inspector Calls the central theme is responsibility. Priestley’s interested in our personal responsibility for our own actions and our collective responsibility to society. The play explores the effect of class, age and sex on people’s attitudes to responsibility, and shows how prejudice can prevent people from acting responsibly. Themes: Responsibility: Each member of the family has a different attitude to responsibility. Inspector wanted each member of the family to share the responsibility of Eva’s death. He tells them “each of you helped to kill her.” However his final speech is aimed at everyone, including the audience: “There are millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us, with their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness, all intertwined with our lives, and what we think and say and do.” The Inspector is talking about a collective responsibility, everyone is a part of “one body”. Inspector sees society as more important that individual interests. The views the Inspector is propounding are like those of Priestley who was a socialist. At the time the ethos was based on the individualism ethos of ‘laissez faire’ (leave alone), Priestley wanted characters to consider a social conscience and to embrace a collective responsibility. He also adds a clear warning at the end about what could happen if, like some members of the family, we ignore our responsibility. “And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, when they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.” In this quotation, Priestley would have wanted the audience to think about the world war they had just lived through- the result of government’s blindly pursuing ‘national interest’ at all costs. Also could be thinking about the Russian revolution in 1917, in which poor workers and peasants took over the state and exacted a bloody revenge against the aristocrats who has treated them so badly. Age: Older and younger generations take the Inspector’s message in different ways. While Sheila and Eric accept their part in Eva’s death and feel huge guilt about it, their parents are unable to admit they did anything wrong. Gerald Croft is caught in the middle, being neither young nor old. In the end he sides with the older generation, perhaps due to his aristocratic roots influencing him to want to keep the status quo and protect his own interests. Ultimately we can be optimistic that the younger generation, those who shape the future society, are able to take on board the Inspector’s message, just like Eric and Sheila. The old are set in their ways. They are utterly confident that they are right and see the young as foolish. The young are open to new ideas. This is seen early in Act 1 where both Eric and Sheila express sympathy for the
strikers; an idea that horrifies Mr Birling, who can only see production costs and ignores the human side of the issue. The old will do anything to protect themselves: Mrs Birling lies to the Inspector when he first shows her the photograph- she wants to cover up a potential scandal. The young are honest and admit their faults. Eric refuses to cover his part up, saying “the fact remains that I did what I did.” The old have never been forced to examine their consciences before and find they cannot do it now. The young see human side of Eva’s story and are very troubled by their part in it. They do examine their consciences. Mr and Mrs Birling have much to fear from the visit of the ‘real’ Inspector because they know they will lose everything. Sheila and Eric have nothing to fear from the visit because they have already admitted their guilt and will change. Gender: As Eva was a woman- in the days before women were valued in society and had not yet been awarded the right to vote- she was in an even worse position than a lower class man. Even upper class women had few choices. The best they could hope for, for most, was to impress a rich man and marry well. For working class woman a job was crucial. No social security at that time, so without a job they had no money. There were very few options to women in that situation, and many saw no alternative than prostitution. Mr Birling is dismissive of the several hundred women in his factory. “We were paying the usual rates and if they didn’t like those rates, they could go and work somewhere else.” Gerald saw Eva as “young and fresh and charming”- in other words someone vulnerable he could amuse himself by helping. Mrs Birling couldn’t believe that “a girl of that sort would ever refuse money.” Her charitable committee was a sham: a small amount of money was given to a small amount of women; hardly scratching the surface of the problem. Why did Priestley hinge his play on the death of a young working class woman rather than a young working class man? Class: Apart from Edna, the cast of the play doesn’t include any lower class characters. However, we learn a lot about the lower class as we hear about Eva’s life and we see the attitudes the Birling’s had for them. Character At the start of the play this character was… To this character, Eva was… Mr Birling Keen to be knighted to cement his hard fought rise to the upper class. Cheap labour. Sheila Happy spending lots of time in expensive shops. Someone who could be fired out of spite. Gerald Prepared to marry Sheila, despite her lower social position. A mistress who could be discarded at will. Eric Awkward about his Easy sex at the end of a
information and then talk, or as Sheila puts it, “he’s giving us the rope- so that we’ll hang ourselves.” He is a figure of authority- he deals with each member of the family very firmly and several times we see him “massively taking charge as disputes erupt between them.” He’s not impressed when he hears about Mr Birling’s influential friends and cuts through Mrs Birling’s obstructiveness. He seems to know and understand an extraordinary amount. He knows the history of Eva Smith and the Birling’s involvement in it, even though she only died hours ago. Sheila tells Gerald, “Of course he knows”. He knows things are going to happen- he says “I’m waiting… to do my duty.” He says this just before Eric returns, as if he expected Eric to reappear at that exact moment. He is obviously in a great hurry towards the end: he stresses “I don’t have much time.” Does he know the real Inspector will be arriving shortly? His final speech is like a sermon or a politician’s. He leaves the family with the message “We are responsible for each other” and warns them of the “fire and blood and anguish” that will result if they don’t pay attention to what he’s taught them. Mrs Birling: At the start she is describes as “about fifty, a rather cold woman and her husband’s social superior.” She is a snob and very aware of the differences between social classes. She’s irritated when Mr Birling praises the cook in front of Gerald and later dismissive of Eva saying “girls of that class”. She has the least respect for the Inspector and unsuccessfully tries to intimidate him, and lie to him claiming she didn’t recognise the photo he showed her. She still sees Sheila and Eric as ‘children’ and speaks to them in a patronising manner. She denies things she doesn’t want to believe: Eric’s drinking problem, Gerald’s affair with Eva, the fact that a working class girl would refuse money even if it was stolen, claiming “she was giving herself ridiculous airs.” She admits she was "prejudiced" against the girl who applied to her committee for help and saw it as her "duty" to refuse to help her. Her narrow sense of morality dictates that the father of a child should be responsible for its welfare, regardless of circumstances. Sheila: She is described at the start as "a pretty girl in her early twenties, very pleased with life and rather excited." Even though she seems very playful at the opening, we know that she has had suspicions about Gerald when she mentions "last summer, when you never came near me." Does this suggest that she is not as naive and shallow as she first appears? Although she has probably never in her life before considered the conditions of the workers, she shows her compassion immediately she hears of her father's treatment of Eva Smith: "But these girls aren't cheap labour - they're people." Already, she is starting to change.
She is horrified by her own part in Eva's story. She feels full of guilt for her jealous actions and blames herself as "really responsible." She is very perceptive: she realises that Gerald knew Daisy Renton from his reaction, the moment the Inspector mentioned her name. At the end of Act 2, she is the first to realise Eric's part in the story. Significantly, she is the first to wonder who the Inspector really is, saying to him, 'wonderingly', "I don't understand about you." She warns the others "he's giving us the rope - so that we'll hang ourselves" and near the end, is the first to consider whether the Inspector may not be real. She is curious. She genuinely wants to know about Gerald's part in the story. She is not angry with him when she hears about the affair: she says that she respects his honesty. She is becoming more mature. She is angry with her parents in Act 3 for trying to "pretend that nothing much has happened." Sheila says "It frightens me the way you talk:" she cannot understand how they can’t have learnt from the evening in the same way that she has. She is seeing her parents in a new, unfavourable light. At the end of the play, Sheila is much wiser. She can now judge her parents and Gerald from a new perspective, but the greatest change has been in herself: her social conscience has been awakened and she is aware of her responsibilities. Gerald: At the start he is described as “an attractive chap about thirty, rather too manly to be a dandy but very much on the easy well-bred man about town.” He’s an aristocrat- son of Lord and Lady Croft. We realise they aren’t overly impressed with Gerald’s engagement to Sheila as they declined the invitation to dinner. Not as willing as Sheila to admit his part in the girl’s death to Inspector and initially pretends he never knew her. Is he similar to Mr Birling- wanting to protect his own interests? Had some genuine feeling for Daisy Renton, he is very moved when he hears of her death. He arranged for her to live in his friend’s flat “because I felt sorry for her”. She becomes his mistress because “she was young and pretty and warm hearted, and intensely grateful.” Despite this, in Act 3 he tries to come up with as much evidence as possible to prove that the Inspector is fake for that would get him off the hook. It’s Gerald who confirms that the local force has no officer by that name, that it may not have been the same girl, and he who finds out from the infirmary that there hasn’t been a suicide in months. Seems to throw his energies into ‘protecting’ himself rather than ‘changing’ himself (unlike Sheila) At the end of the play he hasn’t changed. He hasn’t gained a new sense of social responsibility, which is why Sheila is unsure whether to take back the engagement ring. Eva: We never see her on stage: we only have the evidence Inspector and Birling’s give us. Inspector, Sheila, Gerald and Eric all say she’s “pretty”. Gerald describes her as “very pretty- soft brown hair and big dark eyes.” Her parents were dead and she was working class.
It was during the 1930’s that Priestley became very concerned about the consequences of social inequality in Britain, and in 1942 he set up a new political party, the Common Wealth Party, which argued for a new ‘morality’ in politics. The play was set in 1912, WW1 would start in 2 years. Birling’s optimistic view that there would not be a war is completely wrong. The play was written in 1945, WW2 ended on 8th^ May 1945. People were recovering from nearly 6 years of warfare, danger and uncertainty. Priestley deliberately set it in 1912 as the date represented an era when all was very different from the time he was writing. In 1912 there were rigid class and gender boundaries that seemed to ensure that nothing would change. Yet by 1945, most of the class and gender boundaries had been breached. Through the play, he encourages people to seize the opportunity the end of the war had given them to build a better society. Play set in 1912 when women were subservient to me. All a well off woman could do was get married and a poor woman was seen as cheap labour. Play written in 1945 and as a result of the wars, women had earned a more valued place in society. The ending leaves the audience on a cliff hanger. In Act 3 Birling’s believed themselves to be off the hook when it’s discovered the Inspector wasn’t real and that no girl had died in the infirmary. This releases some of the tension- but the final telephone call announcing that a real Inspector is on his way to ask questions about the suicide of a young girl, suddenly restores the tension very quickly. It’s an unexpected final twist. Priestley could have left it on a cliff-hanger to get the audience thinking about what they would do, as we don’t know what the Birling’s will do next.