Another View of Developmental Biology?, Exams of Developmental biology

Massachusetts Institute of Technology ... from computational analysis methods can be posed. ... Developmental biology sets out to explain how plants.

Typology: Exams

2022/2023

Uploaded on 05/11/2023

sumaira
sumaira 🇺🇸

4.8

(60)

263 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Cell
8
cesses (appropriately and importantly including both tational approaches, and address a greater scope of
biochemistry and biophysics/biomechanics facets of cell biologyproblems across hypothesis generation, hy-
dynamics). Some other areas at the forefront of cell pothesis testing,and intuition development. But achiev-
biology that could fall into this combination of categories ing that comfortable marriage will likely require a decade
are neglected; among these I might suggest protein and of continuing work by many researchers tackling a vari-
nucleic-acid regulatory processes underlying gene ex- ety of particular problems. In the meantime, this current
pression, ligand/receptor binding and trafficking pro- book is certainly the best available for the present early
cesses, and protein signal transduction networks. These courtship stage, and I will recommend it enthusiastically
are all exciting areas that should benefit tremendously to all my own students and colleagues.
from increased devotion of computational modeling ef-
forts. From a wider perspective, many dynamic molecu-
Douglas A. Lauffenburger
lar-level cell processes can be analyzed productively Biological Engineering Division and Bio logy Department
via computational techniques other than differential Massachusetts Institute of Technology
equations characterizing physico-chemical mecha- Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
nisms. That is, while differential equations derived from
underlying mechanistic hypotheses are wonderfully ca-
pable of simulating dynamic processes to generate pre-
Another View of Developme ntal Biology?
dictions based on those hypotheses, at least two other
outstanding challenges in cell biology that could benefit
from computational analysis methods can be posed. Molecular Principles of Animal Development
One challenge is the elucidation of hypotheses, in By Alfonso Martinez Arias and Alison Stewart
the first place, for operation of a cellular process for Oxford: Oxford University Press (2002).
experimental systems in which the key molecular com- 350 pp. $42.95
ponents and the topology of their interactions are not
well established. An enticing promise of systems biol- Developmental biology sets out to explain how plants
ogy, in its genomics and proteomics and metabolomics and animals develop. This is a very complex problem
(etc.) mode, is efficient production of experimental data and, as such, its solution demands the use of techniques
that can be “mined” in an unbiased, “data-driven” man- from a variety of disciplines. Hence, developmental biol-
ner to glean potential relationships among variables of ogy today is a multidisciplinary endeavor that rests
interest. The types of computational techniques em- chiefly on four pillars: morphology (embryology), genet-
ployed for data-mining tasks are typically based on sta- ics, molecular biology, and cell biology. Its goal is to
tistical or vector space methods rather than on differen- provide as complete a description of ontogenesis as
tial equations, and are not treated in this particular text. possible, together with a causal explanation of the
The resulting potential relationships, of course, suggest mechanisms involved. By applying the techniques and
physico-chemical hypotheses for operation of the mo- way of thinking of four of the major parcels of biology
lecular components represented by the “omics” vari- to the search for a solution of the problem of “develop-
ables, which can then be transformed into differential ment,” researchers have achieved what might be con-
equation-based computational models for testing pre- sidered a synthesis of biological disciplines.
dictions thereof. This hypothesis-formation step is by The problem of “development”—where do we come
now the “traditional” domain of bioinformatics, but it is from and how do we come to be—has occupied the
nonetheless a significant area for computational cell human mind certainly since long before the Classical
biology in facilitating a swift growth in the number of period (see, for example, the discussion on Egyptian
experimental problems that can be addressed by the and Indian antiquity in Joseph Needham’s A History of
kind of physico-chemical models articulated in this text Embryology, Second Edition [New York: Abelard Schu-
at hand. man], 1959); embryological work goes back to the Pre-
An additional challenge is how to recover intuitive socratic period, at least. However, developmental biol-
insights about operation of a cell process of interest, ogy as the application of a combination of biological
even when successful simulation of the process by a disciplines to the solution of the problem of “develop-
physico-chemical differential equation model has been ment” is a very young science. In the late 1930s, Donald
achieved. Computational prediction of the outcome of Poulson started investigating embryonic Drosophila
the next experiment is essential for building confidence mutants to show that genes play a role in development
in the validity of the model hypotheses, but does not (Erwin Baur had collected and analyzed mutants affect-
necessarily simultaneously bring intuitive understanding ing flowering in snapdragons even earlier); and Joseph
about why that outcome was obtained. Here again the Needham, Conrad Waddington, Johannes Holtfreter,
type of mathematics that can be brought to bear on this
and others became interested in the chemical nature of
question may go beyond what is presented in this text.
Spemann’s “Organisator” around the same time. But 30
For instance, Boolean logic, Bayesian network, or Mar-
to 40 more years were to pass before, in the 1970s and
kov chain methods may be gainfully employed to discern
1980s, genetics and molecular biology, followed a little
how certain variables influence others or how multiple
later by cell biology, formed a partnership with embryol-
variables combine to influence an outcome.
ogy in a concerted and systematic attempt to analyze
Thus, as the field of computational cell biology contin-
how animals develop. A similar approach was soon
ues to grow, I anticipate further benefit will arise from
adopted to understand plant development. Since the
additional texts that comprise a broader set of cell biol-
ogy topics anda morecomprehensive batteryof compu- early 1980s, the scientific strategy of dissecting devel-
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Another View of Developmental Biology? and more Exams Developmental biology in PDF only on Docsity!

Cell 8

cesses (appropriately and importantly including both tational approaches, and address a greater scope of biochemistry and biophysics/biomechanics facets of cell biology problems across hypothesis generation, hy- dynamics). Some other areas at the forefront of cell pothesis testing, and intuition development. But achiev- biology that could fall into this combination of categories ing that comfortable marriage will likely require a decade are neglected; among these I might suggest protein and (^) of continuing work by many researchers tackling a vari- nucleic-acid regulatory processes underlying gene ex- ety of particular problems. In the meantime, this current pression, ligand/receptor binding and trafficking pro- (^) book is certainly the best available for the present early cesses, and protein signal transduction networks. These (^) courtship stage, and I will recommend it enthusiastically are all exciting areas that should benefit tremendously (^) to all my own students and colleagues. from increased devotion of computational modeling ef- forts. From a wider perspective, many dynamic molecu- lar-level cell processes can be analyzed productively Douglas A. Lauffenburger via computational techniques other than differential Biological Engineering Division and Biology Department equations characterizing physico-chemical mecha- Massachusetts Institute of Technology nisms. That is, while differential equations derived from Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 underlying mechanistic hypotheses are wonderfully ca- pable of simulating dynamic processes to generate pre-

dictions based on those hypotheses, at least two other^ Another View of Developmental Biology?

outstanding challenges in cell biology that could benefit from computational analysis methods can be posed. One challenge is the elucidation of hypotheses, in Molecular Principles of Animal Development the first place, for operation of a cellular process for By Alfonso Martinez Arias and Alison Stewart experimental systems in which the key molecular com- Oxford: Oxford University Press (2002). ponents and the topology of their interactions are not 350 pp. $42. well established. An enticing promise of systems biol- (^) Developmental biology sets out to explain how plants ogy, in its genomics and proteomics and metabolomics (^) and animals develop. This is a very complex problem (etc.) mode, is efficient production of experimental data (^) and, as such, its solution demands the use of techniques that can be “mined” in an unbiased, “data-driven” man- (^) from a variety of disciplines. Hence, developmental biol- ner to glean potential relationships among variables of (^) ogy today is a multidisciplinary endeavor that rests interest. The types of computational techniques em- chiefly on four pillars: morphology (embryology), genet- ployed for data-mining tasks are typically based on sta- (^) ics, molecular biology, and cell biology. Its goal is to tistical or vector space methods rather than on differen- provide as complete a description of ontogenesis as tial equations, and are not treated in this particular text. (^) possible, together with a causal explanation of the The resulting potential relationships, of course, suggest mechanisms involved. By applying the techniques and physico-chemical hypotheses for operation of the mo- way of thinking of four of the major parcels of biology lecular components represented by the “omics” vari- to the search for a solution of the problem of “develop- ables, which can then be transformed into differential ment,” researchers have achieved what might be con- equation-based computational models for testing pre- sidered a synthesis of biological disciplines. dictions thereof. This hypothesis-formation step is by The problem of “development”—where do we come now the “traditional” domain of bioinformatics, but it is from and how do we come to be—has occupied the nonetheless a significant area for computational cell biology in facilitating a swift growth in the number of human mind certainly since long before the Classical period (see, for example, the discussion on Egyptian experimental problems that can be addressed by the kind of physico-chemical models articulated in this text and Indian antiquity in Joseph Needham’s^ A History of at hand. Embryology, Second Edition^ [New York: Abelard Schu- An additional challenge is how to recover intuitive man], 1959); embryological work goes back to the Pre- insights about operation of a cell process of interest, socratic period, at least. However, developmental biol- even when successful simulation of the process by a ogy as the application of a combination of biological physico-chemical differential equation model has been disciplines to the solution of the problem of “develop- achieved. Computational prediction of the outcome of ment” is a very young science. In the late 1930s, Donald the next experiment is essential for building confidence Poulson^ started^ investigating^ embryonic^ Drosophila in the validity of the model hypotheses, but does not mutants to show that genes play a role in development necessarily simultaneously bring intuitive understanding (Erwin Baur had collected and analyzed mutants affect- about why that outcome was obtained. Here again the ing flowering in snapdragons even earlier); and Joseph type of mathematics that can be brought to bear on this Needham, Conrad Waddington, Johannes Holtfreter, question may go beyond what is presented in this text. and others became interested in the chemical nature of For instance, Boolean logic, Bayesian network, or Mar- Spemann’s “Organisator” around the same time. But 30 kov chain methods may be gainfully employed to discern to 40 more years were to pass before, in the 1970s and how certain variables influence others or how multiple 1980s, genetics and molecular biology, followed a little variables combine to influence an outcome. later by cell biology, formed a partnership with embryol- Thus, as the field of computational cell biology contin- ogy in a concerted and systematic attempt to analyze ues to grow, I anticipate further benefit will arise from how animals develop. A similar approach was soon additional texts that comprise a broader set of cell biol- adopted to understand plant development. Since the ogy topics and a more comprehensive battery of compu- early 1980s, the scientific strategy of dissecting devel-

Book Reviews 9

opment from several different points of view simultane- ganisms as possible. They fail, because chapters 8–12, ously has become firmly established in everyone’s mind. which account for 175 of 399 printed pages of text (44%), Indeed, as I will argue below, the philosophical attitude present several examples of developmental events in of developmental biologists has changed, too. Idiosyn- particular species. The examples treated include the crasy determines that some researchers put more em- generation of lineages, the role of morphogens, myogen- phasis in morphology and others in genetics or molecu- esis, and neurogenesis in Drosophila and in vertebrates, lar biology; but the general orientation of their work, its patterning of the vulva in C. elegans , the limbs in verte- multidisciplinary character, is common for all. brates and the wing in Drosophila , tooth development, There are many books on Developmental Biology, and the development of branched structures—in other some of which are better than others. In accordance words, some of the most interesting and urgent prob- with the multidisciplinary, synthesizing character of the lems in developmental biology. Indeed, molecular and discipline, most books try to cover embryological, ge- cell biological aspects occupy a prominent place in the netic, and molecular and cell biological aspects of onto- discussion of these developmental processes; their em- genesis, to provide a complete description of develop- bryological aspects are not considered in any great de- ment. Moreover, ontogenesis is treated historically, tail. But the authors acknowledge that it is difficult to decomposing it in stages, thus establishing a temporal talk about development without speaking of developing and spatial framework for reference, following conven- organisms, and try in this manner to justify the sub- tions sanctioned by the experience of many years. In stance of the last five chapters of the book, without such books, students are confronted with stages, like betraying the cause that they have espoused. gastrulation or neurulation; with developmental pro- Taking everything into account: in my view this is one cesses, like myogenesis or development of the pan- of the good books on the discipline. The approach that creas; with mechanisms and concepts, like lateral inhibi- informs the text, the emphasis on molecules, is not new tion or induction, positional information, determination (witness from Joseph Needham’s Chemical Embryol- or community effect (in most books, though, concepts ogy , back in 1931; through Eric Davidson’s Gene Activity only make rare appearances!). Model organisms, like in Early Development, Third Edition , 1986; to the chap- Arabidopsis , C. elegans , sea urchin, Drosophila , zebra- ters on development in Bruce Alberts et al., Molecular fish, Xenopus , chicken, and mouse, play a prominent Biology of the Cell, Fourth Edition , 2002, or in Harvey role and frequently each one receives particular treat- Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, Fourth Edition , ment. An excellent example is Scott F. Gilbert’s Develop- 2000; and others). However, this is certainly the first mental Biology, Sixth Edition [Sunderland, MA: Sinauer], time that an up-to-date, comprehensive treatment of 2000). molecular and cell biology focused on animal develop- The book reviewed here is somewhat unorthodox, in ment has become available. Moreover, although the text that it aspires to break with this tradition. In accordance of the book is dominated by facts, these facts are em- with its title, the book is focused on the molecular and bedded in concepts—and this constitutes a most enjoy- cell biological aspects of development. In the Preface, able and valuable feature of the book. To justify their the authors write “ In this book we explore the idea that approach to writing yet another book on development, developmental biology can be discussed from the point the authors state that the change in methodology neces- of view of the molecules and the processes that drive sitates a change “ ...in the way the subject is taught. ” The the shaping of embryos, rather than from the point of question of whether teachers of developmental biology view of the organisms or its constituent parts .” And they should put more emphasis on molecular and cell biologi- indeed attain that goal—at least the one announced in cal aspects reminds me of discussions, held many years the first part of their sentence. Thus, in chapters 2–5 ago, about whether teaching genetics to undergradu- the reader is presented with the basic tenets of the ates should begin with Mendel or with the structure of molecular biology of development, whereas chapters 6 the DNA. Hence, I applaud the intentions expressed by and 7 discuss features of cells and their behaviors rele- the authors of this book, and consider that an emphasis vant for development, like the cell cycle, cell adhesion on molecular and cell biology is perfectly adequate for and cell polarity, cell death, and many more. But they a book on developmental biology in the 21 st^ century. As fail to achieve the goal implied in the second part of the a textbook for undergraduate students, however, the sentence. value of this book is questionable. The level of detail in I agree with the authors that “ ...precise descriptions of each chapter is too high, the text too dense, and the developing embryos... ...shed little light on the molecular style too personal. Much prior knowledge is actually elements involved or the nature of the processes they required for the reader to follow the text properly and mediate ”(how could they?). However, I part company to appreciate its virtues. The book, however, is excellent with them when they argue that embryology is not for advanced-level graduate students and postgradu- needed “ ...to answer the important questions ,” or when ates, as a rich source of information and references they claim that “ ... developmental biology is not embryol- on developmental concepts. The authors are not to be ogy ” (I would like to believe that this is a typo, and that blamed for two really weak points of the current edition, the authors want to say that developmental biology is namely the size of the figures and the typeface. Both not only embryology). One is relieved to read that they are very small and certainly do not contribute to the “ ...do not think that one should dispense with such de- book’s readability. But not only are the letters small; scriptions altogether. However, they only provide a they are also very pale and the text is printed in two framework for thinking about molecular interactions... ” columns. Reading this text is by no means an easy In accordance with this conviction, the authors try to exercise. The publisher has failed to match the level of discuss development with as few references to the or- expertise displayed by the authors in writing the text