



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The expectations for reading assignments in a university course, including the deliverables (one-page summaries) and grading rubric. The document also provides guidance on writing effective summaries and analyzing the technical assumptions in the assigned readings.
Typology: Papers
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




(^) Applications, implementations, technical architectures, approaches, interaction techniques, etc.
(^) Due in class the week after a reading is assigned (^) One page summary (^) 10 point font, 1.5 line spacing, times new roman font family (^) Name, and GTID please!
(^) 3 points excellent, 2 points average, 1 point needs improvement
(^) Analysis of what the article has said, and why that matters
(^) Vague (^) Some spotty coverage of a few of the points in the paper
(^) Tends to follow the paper structure, without much else (^) Covers more of the points (^) But is not analytic
(^) Begin with a statement about the paper’s overall objectives (^) Do not repeat what the author has said (^) Provides context for the contributions of the paper (^) Identifies the significance of the paper (^) Covers the majority of the major points in the paper in succinct specifics
(^) Gets at the architecture/assumptions of the system and why it matters (^) Does the system’s architecture make it more/less suitable for certain environments or situations? (^) Are there “flaws” (or unconsidered assumptions) that constitute a weakness of the system? (^) Integrates discussion from class and paper (and other papers) together (^) Sometimes resulting in a question or finding conflicting viewpoints