Application of Integration, Lecture Notes - Mathematics, Study notes of Advanced Calculus

application on integration sequence of integrable function power series improper integrals

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/08/2011

deville
deville 🇺🇸

4.7

(23)

390 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Applications of Integration
Adrian Down 16779577
July 28, 2005
1 Sequences of integrable functions
Theorem: if (fn) is a sequence of functions that are integrable on [a, b], and
(fn) converges to fon [a, b], then fis integrable on [a, b] and
Zb
a
f(x)dx = lim
n→∞ Zb
a
fn(x)dx
Notes: 1) The proof is easy if fnis continuous n
2) Theorem is false if fnconverges to fpointwise.
Proof: simply follow the definitions. Let > 0 be given. By the definition
of uniform convergence, Nsuch that
n>N |fn(x)f(x)|<
4(ba),x
Fix n > N.f(n) is integrable a partition Psuch that U(fn, P )
L(fn, P )<
2.
Now we want to compare upper and lower sums for ffor the same par-
tition. For each subinterval [tk1, tk]P,
M(f, [tk1, tk]) M(fn,[tk1, tk]) +
4(ba)
Likewise,
m(f, [tk1, tk]) m(fn,[tk1, tk])
4(ba)
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Application of Integration, Lecture Notes - Mathematics and more Study notes Advanced Calculus in PDF only on Docsity!

Applications of Integration

Adrian Down 16779577

July 28, 2005

1 Sequences of integrable functions

Theorem: if (fn) is a sequence of functions that are integrable on [a, b], and (fn) converges to f on [a, b], then f is integrable on [a, b] and

∫ (^) b

a

f (x)dx = lim n→∞

∫ (^) b

a

fn(x)dx

Notes: 1) The proof is easy if fn is continuous ∀n

  1. Theorem is false if fn converges to f pointwise. Proof: simply follow the definitions. Let  > 0 be given. By the definition of uniform convergence, ∃N such that

n > N → |fn(x) − f (x)| <

4(b − a)

, ∀x

Fix n > N. f (n) is integrable → ∃ a partition P such that U (fn, P ) − L(fn, P ) <  2. Now we want to compare upper and lower sums for f for the same par- tition. For each subinterval [tk− 1 , tk] ⊆ P ,

M (f, [tk− 1 , tk]) ≤ M (fn, [tk− 1 , tk]) +

4(b − a)

Likewise,

m(f, [tk− 1 , tk]) ≥ m(fn, [tk− 1 , tk]) −

4(b − a)

Now we examine the upper and lower sums for f.

U (f, P ) ≤

∑^ n

k=

M (fn, [tk− 1 , tk]) · (tk − tk− 1 ) +

∑^ n

k=

4(b − a)

(tk − tk− 1 )

≤ U (fn, P ) +

4(b − a)

(b − a) = U (fn, p) +

Can also get a lower bound for L(f, P ) similarly.

L(f, P ) ≥ L(fn, P ) −

Put these two facts together to examine the difference,

U (f, P ) − L(f, P ) ≤ U (fn, P ) +

− (L(f, P ) −

= U (fn, P ) − L(fn, P ) +

Thus f is integrable. Now we need to compute the value of the integral. Given n > N ,

∫ (^) b

a

f (x)dx −

∫ (^) b

a

fn(x)dx| = |

∫ (^) b

a

(f (x) − fn(x))dx|

∫ (^) b

a

|f (x) − fn(x)|dx ≤

∫ (^) b

a

4(b − a)

dx =

4(b − a)

(b − a) =

Thus

lim n→∞

∫ (^) b

a

fn(x)dx =

∫ (^) b

a

f (x)dx

2 Power Series

As usual, the type of series of functions that we’re interested in is power series. In particular, if

fn(x) =

∑^ n

k=

akxk^ with f (x) =

∑^ ∞

k=

akxk

Proof: Let

g(x) =

∑^ ∞

k=

ak · kxk−^1

g has the same radius of convergence as

x · g(x) =

∑^ ∞

k=

ak · kxk

Let β = lim sup n→∞

|akk|

(^1) k = lim k→∞

k

(^1) k · lim sup |ak|

(^1) k

limk→∞ k

1 k (^) = 1 → x · g(x) has the same radius of convergence as f (x). Thus we can differentiate a power series term by term. These two tactics are useful if you see a power series that looks similar to one for which you know the formula for.

3 Improper Integrals

So far, we can only integrate functions on finite closed intervals. Improper integrals generalize this. Suppose f is defined on [a, b), where b = +∞ is possible. Then if f is integrable on [a, d] for any d < b, consider

lim d→b−

∫ (^) d

a

f (x)dx =

∫ (^) b

a

f (x)dx

This definition holds if the limit exists. It is called the improper integral. Can do the same thing for half-open intervals on the other side. If f is defined on (a, b], where a could be −∞, and f is defined and integrable on [c, d], ∀c > a,

lim c→a+

∫ (^) b

c

f (x)dx =

∫ (^) b

a

f (x)dx

If f is defined on (a, b), then define ∫ (^) b

a

f (x)dx =

∫ (^) α

a

f (x)dx +

∫ (^) b

α

f (x)dx

for some α ∈ (a, b), assuming both limits exist. Note that we can’t take ∫ (^) ∞

−∞

f (x)dx = lim a→∞

∫ (^) a

−a

f (x)dx

This implies the integral is symmetric, which might not be the case. Examples:

∫ (^) ∞

1

dx x

= lim d→∞

∫ (^) d

1

dx x

= lim d→∞

(log d) = +∞

0

dx x

= lim c→ 0 +

c

dx x

= lim c→ 0 +

(− log c) = +∞

1

x−pdx = lim d→∞

∫ (^) d

1

x−pdx = lim d→∞

x−p+ −p + 1

|d 1 = lim d→∞

d−p+ −p + 1

−p + 1

If p > 1, then −p + 1 < 0 → d−p+1^ converges to 0 as d approaches ∞. So ∫ (^) ∞

0

x−pdx =

p − 1

If p < −1, then −p + 1 > 0 → d−p+1^ diverges to +∞ as d approaches ∞. So ∫ (^) ∞

1

x−pdx

diverges to +∞.

∫ (^) ∞

0

e−λxdx = lim d→∞

∫ (^) d

0

e−λxdx = lim d→∞

λ

e−λx)|d 0 = lim d→∞

λ

e−λd^ +

λ

λ > 0 → e−λd^ → 0 as d → 0 ∫ (^) ∞

0

e−λxdx =

λ