Arguments Against Gun Control, Essays (university) of Political Science

Statistics from the National Federation of State High School Associations reveal that, in 1999, 15 students perished while playing in high school football games. This fact received little to no coverage in the national media. Angry parents did not parade into Washington, D.C., in order to demand stricter regulation of high school football. Politicos feigning intense anguish did not bemoan football’s domination of most learning institutions’ sports programs.

Typology: Essays (university)

2019/2020

Available from 09/07/2021

study-notes99
study-notes99 🇺🇸

4.7

(3)

424 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Arguments Against Gun Control
Subject: Political Science Paper 1
Statistics from the National Federation of State High School Associations reveal that,
in 1999, 15 students perished while playing in high school football games. This fact received
little to no coverage in the national media. Angry parents did not parade into Washington,
D.C., in order to demand stricter regulation of high school football. Politicos feigning intense
anguish did not bemoan football’s domination of most learning institutions’ sports programs.
The large majority of this country’s citizens watched their favourite high school football
teams oblivious to the blood that soaked the pigskin and dripped onto America’s playing
fields.
Conversely, when 15 students died from gunshot wounds during the 1998-1999
school year, as the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention indicate, the national media
evangelized endlessly about the evils of guns. Apparently forgetting that many of the kid
killers, such as Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, had obtained their weapons illegally, hordes
of crusaders seethed that if guns weren’t legal and available, the school murders wouldn’t
have happened. A few local governments, hoping to score political points, filed lawsuits
against gun manufacturers, blaming them for the orgy of death and violence that seemed to
have consumed America’s school system.
Why did 15 deaths related to high school football inspire scant attention, while 15 deaths
resulting from gun violence kindled nationwide apoplexy?
Many right-wingers would simply answer, “Because the gun grabbers want to seize
our weapons, they will ignore any fact that stands in their way!” These conservatives believe
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Arguments Against Gun Control and more Essays (university) Political Science in PDF only on Docsity!

Arguments Against Gun Control Subject: Political Science Paper 1 Statistics from the National Federation of State High School Associations reveal that, in 1999, 15 students perished while playing in high school football games. This fact received little to no coverage in the national media. Angry parents did not parade into Washington, D.C., in order to demand stricter regulation of high school football. Politicos feigning intense anguish did not bemoan football’s domination of most learning institutions’ sports programs. The large majority of this country’s citizens watched their favourite high school football teams oblivious to the blood that soaked the pigskin and dripped onto America’s playing fields. Conversely, when 15 students died from gunshot wounds during the 1998- school year, as the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention indicate, the national media evangelized endlessly about the evils of guns. Apparently forgetting that many of the kid killers, such as Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, had obtained their weapons illegally, hordes of crusaders seethed that if guns weren’t legal and available, the school murders wouldn’t have happened. A few local governments, hoping to score political points, filed lawsuits against gun manufacturers, blaming them for the orgy of death and violence that seemed to have consumed America’s school system. Why did 15 deaths related to high school football inspire scant attention, while 15 deaths resulting from gun violence kindled nationwide apoplexy? Many right-wingers would simply answer, “Because the gun grabbers want to seize our weapons, they will ignore any fact that stands in their way!” These conservatives believe

leftists across America want to confiscate firearms for the sole purpose of extending government control over the citizenry. But really, the notion that an enormous conspiracy, in which common liberals from all regions of the country participate, exists to subjugate the American people, is patently absurd. Most Americans care too little about politics and government to sustain such a far-reaching plot. Instead, the average gun control advocate honestly does believe that laws tightly regulating firearms, if not outright banning them, would reduce the number of Americans who die as a consequence of criminal attacks. Gun control advocates amongst the populace acquire their ideas about firearms from news personalities and government officials who use guns as convenient scapegoats for this country’s high crime rate in order to avoid having to search for genuine causes and solutions. Whenever an event such as a school shooting occurs, the personalities and officials shamelessly exploit the opportunity to vilify guns and the individuals who own them. The real interest here is not to save lives, but to exacerbate public opinion against guns. That is why the whole world mourned the tragic deaths of 15 students from gunshot wounds during the 1998-1999 school year, but few people, if anyone, seemed to care those 15 high school football players died in 1999. The truth about guns is that they save far more lives than they take. According to the Fall 1995 issue of The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves an average of 2.5 million times per year, and only in less than 8 percent of these occurrences will citizens actually need to fire their guns, because most criminals will flee at the sight of a firearm. Of the 2.5 million annual instances of self- defence, 200,000 are cases of women defending themselves from sexual abuse. In contrast, accidental deaths, suicides, and homicides involving guns number, on average, less than 40,000 every year. This means that American citizens usually employ guns to defend themselves over 60 percent more times yearly than they do to kill, intentionally or otherwise.

have over the first 200 years of American history. (Contrary to the notion that the Second Amendment does not grant individuals the right to bear arms, the Supreme Court ruled in its 1990 decision U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez that the Second Amendment applies to “persons who are a part of a national community.”) As Thomas Jefferson, one of the most intelligent Founding Fathers, said, “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.”