assignment 8 in econ 3113, Assignments of Economics

assignment 8 in econ 3113 (Pak Hung AU)

Typology: Assignments

2023/2024

Uploaded on 03/01/2025

eric-tsai
eric-tsai 🇭🇰

5 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Problem Set 8
ECON 3113 Microeconomic Theory I 2024
Due date: Monday, May 6
1. Irma has an initial wealth of $50;000 and a car that is valued at $100;000. She faces a probability
of 5% of the car being stolen. She can purchase insurance to cover her potential loss. The insurance
term is as follows. If she wants to get a coverage of $q(i.e., compensation in case her car is being
stolen), she has to pay a (upfront) premium of 0:1q. Irma has a von-Neumann-Morgenstern utility
function u(c) = 4 ln c.
(a) Denote Irma’s wealth in the good state and bad state by cgand cbrespectively. What is the
set of state-wealth combinations (cg; cb)that Irma can choose from?
Solution: By purchasing a coverage of q, Irma’s wealth in the good and the bad state are
respectively
cg= 150000 0:1q
cb= 50000 0:1q+q= 50000 + 0:9q
Substituting q= 10 (150000 cg)into the equation for cbgives:
cb= 50000 + 0:910 (150000 cg)
,cb= 1400000 9cg
,9cg+cb= 1400000
Moreover, qcan only range from 0(zero coverage) to 100000 (full coverage). Therefore, the
combo of attainable state-wealth is the line segment with end points
zero coverage: (cg; cb) = (150000;50000)
full coverage: (cg; cb) = (150000 (0:1) (100000) ;150000 (0:1) (100000)) = (140000;140000)
In sum, the set of attainable state-wealth combinations (cg; cb)is given by
f(cg; cb) : 9cg+cb= 1400000 and 140000 cg150000 and 50000 cg140000g.
1
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download assignment 8 in econ 3113 and more Assignments Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Problem Set 8 ECON 3113 Microeconomic Theory I 2024 Due date: Monday, May 6

  1. Irma has an initial wealth of $50; 000 and a car that is valued at $100; 000. She faces a probability of 5% of the car being stolen. She can purchase insurance to cover her potential loss. The insurance term is as follows. If she wants to get a coverage of $q (i.e., compensation in case her car is being stolen), she has to pay a (upfront) premium of 0 : 1 q. Irma has a von-Neumann-Morgenstern utility function u (c) = 4 ln c.

(a) Denote Irmaís wealth in the good state and bad state by cg and cb respectively. What is the set of state-wealth combinations (cg; cb) that Irma can choose from? Solution: By purchasing a coverage of q, Irmaís wealth in the good and the bad state are respectively cg = 150000 0 : 1 q cb = 50000 0 : 1 q + q = 50000 + 0: 9 q Substituting q = 10 (150000 cg) into the equation for cb gives: cb = 50000 + 0: 9  10 (150000 cg) , cb = 1400000 9 cg , 9 cg + cb = 1400000 Moreover, q can only range from 0 (zero coverage) to 100000 (full coverage). Therefore, the combo of attainable state-wealth is the line segment with end points  zero coverage: (cg; cb) = (150000; 50000)  full coverage: (cg; cb) = (150000 (0:1) (100000) ; 150000 (0:1) (100000)) = (140000; 140000) In sum, the set of attainable state-wealth combinations (cg; cb) is given by f(cg; cb) : 9cg + cb = 1400000 and 140000  cg  150000 and 50000  cg  140000 g.

(b) How much insurance coverage would Irma purchase? Solution: Method 1: Equating MRS with price ratio, the FOC gives:

M RS =

4 (cg)^1 4 (cb)^1

cb cg

Substituting this into the budget line: 9 cg + cb = 1400000:

9 cg +

cg = 1400000 , cg =

and cb =

Using the fact that cb = 50000 + 0: 9 x, this suggests that the coverage purchase q is

q =

Method 2: Irmaís expected utility of purchasing q unit of coverage is

E [u (c)] = 0 : 95  (4 ln (150000 0 : 1 q)) + 0: 05  (4 ln (50000 + q 0 : 1 q)) = 3 :8 ln (150000 0 : 1 q) + 0:2 ln (50000 + 0: 9 q).

The FOC of expected utility maximization gives @E [u (c)] @q = 0 , 3 :8 ( 0 :1) (150000 0 : 1 q)^1 + 0:2 (50000 + 0: 9 q)^1 (0:9) = 0 ) x = 22222.

(c) Suppose Irma can install a burglar alarm, which costs $5000 and lowers the risk of car theft to 1%. Suppose the premium rate stays Öxed at 0 : 1. How much insurance coverage would Irma purchase after installing the burglar alarm? Solution: Method 1: The price ratio stays Öxed at 9. On the other hand, the MRS is now

M RS =

4 (cg)^1 4 (cb)^1

99 cb cg

With no insurance coverage, (cg; cb) = (150000 5000 ; 50000 5000) = (145000; 45000). The MRS over the attainable state-wealth combinations thus has

M RS = 99 cb cg

With MRS>price ratio at all attainable state-wealth combinations, Irma would opt for the corner solution of zero coverage q = 0. Method 2: By installing the burglar alarm and purchasing a coverage of $q, Irma has wealth 150000 5000 0 : 1 q with probability 99%, and a payo§ of 50000 5000 + q 0 : 1 q with probability 1%. Her expected utility is thus

E [u (c)] = 0 : 99  (4 ln (150000 5000 0 : 1 q)) + 0: 01  (4 ln (50000 5000 + q 0 : 1 q)) = 3 : 96  ln (145000 0 : 1 q) + 0: 04  ln (45000 + 0: 9 q)

Finally, rewriting the bad-state equation into s = (2700 cb) = 0 : 6 , and substituting it into the good-state equation, we get

cg = 2700 +

(2700 cb)

, cg +

cb = 6750.

(b) Suppose Amy has a von-Neumann Morgenstern utility function of uA (c) = 2 c^ (^12)

. What is her optimal state-wealth combination? Solution: Her MRS is 0 : 5 0 : 5

u^0 A (cg) u^0 A (cb)

c (^32) g c (^32) b

cb cg

^32

Equating it with the price ratio of state-wealth gives the FOC:  cb cg

^32

cb cg

^23

Substituting this into her budget constraint:

cg +

cg | {z } cb

^13!

cg = 6750 , cg =

2

^13 ^3147 :^3.

Using the FOC again,

cb =

^23

cg =

^23

2

^13 ^2401 :^8.

(c) What portfolio, i.e., stock and bond holdings, would Amy choose? Solution: Recall portfolio (b; s) is related to state-consumption by

cg = 500 + 1: 1 b + 2s; cb = 500 + 1: 1 b + 0: 5 s.

Substituting (cg; cb) = (3147: 3 ; 2401 :8) into the system above and solving gives:

b  1503 and s  496 : 97.