
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An assignment for a com 300 course, focusing on community research and information evaluation. Students are required to explore theories related to their final project, search for and evaluate online information, and cite sources properly using apa style. The assignment includes identifying related communities or networks, providing annotated lists of urls, and explaining how theories from readings apply to the networks.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!

Assignment Description: In this community assignment, you will 1) explore theories related to your final project, 2) demonstrate your ability to search for and evaluate the credibility of online information, and 3) cite your sources properly (APA style 5th^ edition).
In a blog entry (750-1500 words) and via eSubmit, please address the following by 5 pm on Sunday 16 May
Grade Criteria 4.0 Student employs a creative and comprehensive search strategy that employs a number of the techniques and compares results across a variety of search engines/directories (not just Google); provides excellent annotation of each site; offers well-thought out explanation why the sites/documents included are credible and useful. Resources are more scholarly in nature; no significant spelling, grammatical, usage, or APA style errors. 3.0 Student employs a creative searching strategy, but it could be more comprehensive or exhaustive; gives good annotation; offers relatively good information about resource credibility; a few spelling, grammatical, usage, and/or APA style errors. Resources are mostly scholarly in nature. 2.0 Student demonstrates a sufficiency in searching strategy, but relied heavily on Google; annotates by quoting directly from the site; offers few details or relatively unconvincing argument about site credibility; a number of spelling, grammatical, usage and/or APA style errors. Resources are mostly popular in nature. 1.0 Bibliography contains fewer than required five (5) sites; uncreative searching strategy (relies solely on one search tool); unconvincing explanation of how sites relate to the topic; insufficient summaries; significant number of spelling, grammatical, usage, and APA style errors. 0.0 Annotated fewer than five (5) sites and all were short, popular articles; no explanation about why these sites were useful; major spelling, grammatical, usage, and APA style errors.