




























Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A guide for the Atom Trapping Experiment in Physics 111B: Advanced Experimentation Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley. It includes a description of the experiment, objectives, background information on physics concepts related to atom trapping, safety guidelines, equipment used, experimental setup, and procedures. The document covers topics such as scattering rate, radiation pressure, Doppler shift, Doppler cooling, capture velocity, Rubidium spectrum, and feedback control. It also includes information on using atoms as a frequency reference and electronics for laser stabilization.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 36
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!





























Physics 111B: Advanced Experimentation Laboratory University of California, Berkeley
10.2.3 Rb Spectroscopy To Do................................... 18 10.3 Task 2: Generating and Calibrating an Error Signal....................... 18 10.3.1 Inputs............................................. 18 10.3.2 Front panel controls..................................... 18 10.3.3 Outputs............................................ 19 10.3.4 Generating the error signal................................. 19 10.4 Task 3: Locking the Laser...................................... 21 10.4.1 Measuring the system transfer functions.......................... 21 10.4.2 Tuning the lock box..................................... 22 10.4.3 Measuring the closed loop response............................. 23 10.5 Task 4: Magneto-Optical Trapping................................. 23 10.5.1 Qualitative characterization of the MOT.......................... 24 10.5.2 Using the MOT Software.................................. 25 10.5.3 Quantifying the number of trapped atoms......................... 26 10.5.4 Measuring the MOT loading rate.............................. 27 10.5.5 Measuring the MOT temperature.............................. 28 10.5.6 Observing optical molasses................................. 31
References 31
A Polarizaiton gradient cooling 32
B Control theory 32 B.1 Control and Feedback........................................ 33 B.1.1 Basics............................................. 34 B.1.2 Conditions for stable feedback............................... 34 B.1.3 Laser Stabilization System................................. 35
C Your Feedback 36
In this experiment we make use of laser spectroscopy and electronic feedback to stabilize the frequency of a coherent optical field to roughly one part in 10^8 , allowing us to examine precisely the interactions between atoms and light. We exert control over both the internal dynamics and also the center-of-mass motion of atoms, the building blocks of matter, reaching the lower reaches of the temperature scale and establishing conditions for the study and application of quantum coherence.
Our focus is on the technique of laser cooling, wherein the mechanical impacts of atom-light interactions are employed to extinguish the motion of atoms in a dilute gas. While discussions of such mechanical effects trace far back in the history of physics, laser cooling was developed most intensely in the 1980s by a broad community of atomic and laser physicists, including three scientists, Steven Chu, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, and William Phillips, who shared the 1997 Nobel Prize in Physics for its invention. The history of these developments, and much of the theory underpinning laser cooling, is chronicled in their Nobel lectures [1, 2, 3].
Of the many variants of laser cooling, the magneto-optical trap (MOT) is undeniably the workhorse. Invented at MIT and first demonstrated at Bell Labs [4], it combines the abilities of both cooling and also trapping
MUST be submitted as the first page of your lab report. Quick links to the checkpoint questions are found here: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Suggested Reading:
Reprints and other materials can be found on the Physics 111 Library Site
Other References
You should keep a laboratory notebook. The notebook should contain a detailed record of everything that was done and how/why it was done, as well as all of the data and analysis, also with plenty of how/why entries. This will aid you when you write your report.
The operation of a MOT can be understood starting with a few basic principles of atom-light interaction. Here we provide just a sketch of the physics principles involved. A more quantitative treatment, to which you will want to compare your measurements, is found in Ref. [5] H.J. Metcalf and P. van der Straten. Laser Cooling and Trapping full book or Searchable PDFs Metcalf Chapters
This description of the operation of a MOT starts with some basic ideas about light-atom interactions and their mechanical effects. We exhibit these basic effects by considering a simple, fictional, “two-level” atom. We then consider implications of the specific atomic structure of a real atom, rubidium. Namely, we show how that specific structure allows a MOT not only to cool atoms down to fairly low temperatures (via Doppler cooling), but also to trap them (via Zeeman shifts of optical transitions) while also cooling them to much lower temperatures (via polarization-gradient cooling).
6.1.1 Scattering Rate
Consider the absorption and spontaneous emission, or scattering, of light. We focus on a single optical transition between a particular ground state |g〉 and excited state |e〉 of the atom, neglecting the complexities of real atomic structure. Such a two-level atom, assumed to have zero velocity, and exposed to monochromatic light with frequency ωL, will scatter photons at a rate Γscat given as
Γscat =
s 1 + s + (2δ/Γ)^2
with the following definitions:
6.1.2 Radiation Pressure
In a single scattering event, the atom absorbs a photon with momentum ¯h~kL from the laser beam, and emits a photon with momentum ¯h~ks with the wavevector ~ks randomly oriented according to the dipole emission pattern. Over many scattering events, the average momentum of the emitted photons is zero, giving an average radiation pressure force on the atom:
F^ ~ = ¯h~kLΓscat (2)
6.1.3 Doppler Shift
In the frame of a moving atom with velocity ~v, the frequency of laser light will be different than that observed in the stationary lab frame. The detuning of this light from the atomic resonance frequency will then be given to first order as δ′^ = δ − ~kL · ~v (3)
Figure 5: Hyperfine levels for the 5S 1 / 2 ground state (hyperfine spin quantum number F ) and 5P 3 / 2 excited state (hyperfine spin quantum number F ′) are shown (not to scale). Rb-85 is on the left, and Rb-87 is on the right. Energy differences shown in frequency units. The transitions used for cooling and rempump light are indicated.
6.1.7 Rubidium Spectrum
Rubidium is composed naturally of two stable isotopes, 85 Rb and 87 Rb. In this experiment, we create a MOT for 85 Rb atoms (though both isotopes are present in the chamber). A pertinent level diagram for (^85) Rb is shown in Figure 5 (left). Further detail on both isotopes of rubidium is available in Ref. [6]. The
transition used for laser cooling drives atoms from the F = 3 ground state to the F ′^ = 4 excited state of the D2 line. This transition is nominally closed, meaning that atoms will continue to scatter light through many absorption/emission cycles. However, rare off-resonant excitation to the F ′^ = { 2 , 3 } excited states does allow the atom to decay to the F = 2 ground state, where it is far-detuned from the cooling light and thus lost to the laser cooling process. To mend this problem, we introduce also light resonant with the F = 2 → F ′^ = 3 transition, which pumps atoms back to the laser cooled states.
The F = 3 and F ′^ = 4 levels each contain a number of magnetic sublevels. The strengths of transitions between them are related according to the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (tabulated in Refs. [5, 6]). The strongest transition (lowest saturation intensity) occurs using circular polarized light driving the |F = 3 , mF = 3〉 → |F ′^ = 4, mF = 4〉 transition, with Isat = 1.7 mW/cm^2 [6]. In estimating the fluorescence rate of atoms in a MOT, for the purpose of determining the number of trapped atoms, it is suggested that you account for the simultaneous excitation by the many laser beams of the MOT by averaging over all possible atomic ground states and laser polarizations.
6.1.8 Effects of the Zeeman shift on light scattering: How a MOT traps
In the presence of a magnetic field, the energies of the ground and excited state sublevels are shifted by the linear Zeeman shift as ∆E = gF μB mF B, where the Lande g-factors are gF = 1/3 in the ground state and gF = 1/2 in the excited state, μB = h × 1 .4 MHz/G is the Bohr magneton, B is the magnetic field strength and the magnetic quantum number mF is defined with the quantization axis along the magnetic field direction. These Zeeman shifts vary the atomic resonance frequencies, allowing the radiation pressure force in a MOT to be not only velocity dependent (giving cooling) but also position dependent (giving trapping).
More explicitly, we see that σ+^ transitions (that increase mF ) have higher resonance frequencies than σ− transitions. Given that cooling light in a MOT is red-detuned from the atomic transition (δ < 0), we see that a magnetic field will bring the σ−^ transitions closer to resonance, increasing the radiation pressure force
from such light. Now we return to the one-dimensional laser cooling used to explain Doppler cooling and molasses. We consider that both light beams have left-handed circular polarization; such polarization drives a σ+^ transition when the laser wavevector points along the magnetic-field axis. Now we consider laser cooling atoms in presence of a linear gradient of the magnetic field, i.e. B~ = B′z ˆz. This configuration ensures that stationary atoms are always forced back to the zero-field position.
In our three-dimensional MOT, we apply gradient fields along all spatial dimensions by creating a spherical quadrupole field:
B^ ~ = B′z zˆ − B
′ 2
(xˆx + y ˆy) (10)
The change of sign of the gradient requires that we reverse the laser polarizations of the beams along the ˆx and ˆy directions.
6.1.9 Sub-Doppler Cooling
When researchers carefully measured the temperature of atoms emerging from MOTs or from optical mo- lasses, they found the atoms were cooled substantially below the temperature limits described by for Doppler cooling alone. If your experiment is successful, you will confirm this finding. Soon, it was determined that another cooling mechanism, polarization-gradient (PG) cooling, was also at work. PG cooling involves an interplay between optical pumping and light-induced energy shifts of the atomic ground state. You can learn more about PG cooling in Appendix A.
If you’ve been following the discussion above, you will realize that the operation of a MOT requires light whose frequency is within just 10’s of MHz from the atomic transition frequency. Producing light whose frequency is defined within 10’s of MHz is not difficult: we use a commercial external-cavity diode laser, which produces light with a linewidth of around 1 MHz or less. But how do we fix the central frequency of that laser light to be precisely some 10 MHz below the resonance frequency of 85 Rb on its F = 3 → F ′^ = 4 optical transition? The answer is to use 85 Rb atoms themselves as a frequency reference. That is, we use a rubidium vapor cell to generate an electronic signal that tells us what is the instantaneous frequency of our laser light, and then we use electronic feedback based on that signal to keep the laser’s optical frequency fixed.
In this experiment, the optical frequency measurement is made using a method called “Dichroic Atomic Vapor Laser Lock” (DAVLL) [16]. To explain how this method works, let us start by describing the absorption of light by a room-temperature rubidium vapor cell. As you read this section, you will find it helpful to refer to the actual experimental setup in the MOT experiment, both as sketched in Fig. 6, and also as actually laid out on the optical table.
6.2.1 Doppler broadened absorption in a vapor cell
As shown in Fig. 6, the “spectroscopy setup” includes two rubidium cells, which are both held at temperature a bit above room temperature. One of them is held within a housing that includes also several permanent magnets – that one is used to generate the DAVLL signal. Two light beams pass through this DAVLL cell, after which they are detected on separate photodetectors. A second cell is used to measure the rubidium spectrum at near-zero magnetic field. One light beam passes through this cell and is detected. Let us begin by explaining the signal that is detected in this second cell.
If one slowly scans the frequency of the laser light over a broad range – say 15 GHz or so – and measures the intensity of light that is transmitted through the vapor cell, one obtains (that is, you will; see Sec. 10.3.4) a signal such as shown in Fig. 10. We see that the light arriving at the detector is attenuated around four characteristic frequencies. These correspond to the frequencies for optical transitions from the following ground hyperfine levels: the F = 2 state of 87 Rb, the F = 3 state of 85 Rb, the F = 2 state of 85 Rb, and the
control. You might turn to Sec. B to learn more, or look up some helpful references [9, 10, 11].
Briefly, in this experiment, the optical frequency emitted by the laser is controlled by three properties of the laser: its temperature, the current supplied to the laser diode, and the voltage provided to a piezoelectric transducer (PZT) that moves an optical element with the laser cavity. All three quantities can be set manually using the New Focus laser controller. In addition, two quantities – the laser current and the PZT voltage – can be varied by applying external voltages to the laser controller. Small voltages applied at those external outputs each change the laser frequency by an amount linearly proportional to the applied voltage.
The DAVLL method is used to generate a voltage that effectively measures the frequency of the laser light. Near the settings at which we want to stabilize this frequency, the DAVLL signal can be used as an error signal to be used as part of a negative-gain, closed-loop feedback circuit.
The concept of negative-gain feedback stabilization is fairly intuitive. Consider the example of driving and keeping your car on the road. Your eyes and brain produce an error signal, telling you whether the car is veering to the right or the left. You respond to this veering through negative feedback: if the car drifts right, you steer so as to turn the car to the left, and visa versa. In contrast, if you feed back with positive gain, steering to the right when you veer to the right, you’ll only make things worse.
The feedback circuitry used in this lab has very many knobs and switches. This setup is holdover from a previous version of this lab where we asked students to adjust many things and characterize the feedback circuit very thoroughly. At present, however, you should only need to adjust a few things to stabilize the laser at the right frequency, observe a MOT, and get going on making various measurements on the MOT. Essentially, you just have to get all the signs right: (1) Produce an error signal with a linear slope at the frequency where you want to lock the laser. (2) Apply current feedback, with fixed feedback sign, and see whether that results in negative or positive feedback. If the feedback is positive, then you have to change the DAVLL signal so that the signal vs. frequency varies with a slope of opposite sign. (3) Apply PZT feedback and see whether this results in positive or negative feedback. If the feedback is positive, you can reverse the polarity of the PZT feedback by flipping a switch on the control box. (4) Adjust the magnitude of the gains. If the gain is too low, the laser frequency will vary a lot and your MOT will be unstable and hard to observe. If the gain is too high, the feedback will become unstable and/or the system will “fall out of lock.” Fortunately, the feedback circuitry is sufficiently stable over a very broad range of gain settings (simply because we have built such an awesome experimental setup!).
In working with this experiment, you must be mindful of a few hazards.
into the laser, in which case the staff may want to adjust the optical isolator. A λ/2 waveplate before the isolator rotates the optical polarization so as to match the input polarizer of the isolator.
9.2.2 MOT optics
9.2.3 Rubidium Spectroscopy Setup
Now we return to the optical setup where a rubidium vapor is probed in order to determine the frequency of the laser with respect to the rubidium resonance lines.
Figure 7: Vacuum chamber details.
The MOT is created at the center of an evacuated, octagonal vacuum chamber graced with many glass viewports to allow laser light to be directed at the atoms, and surrounded with electromagnets to create the requisite magnetic field. Follow along as we describe the elements of the vacuum apparatus, illustrated in Figure 7.
Figure 8: Schematic of the servo controller. Input: A bias voltage is taken as the sum of an externally provided voltage and an internal variable voltage and is then subtracted from the detector input. Buffered monitors give the detector voltage before and after that subtraction. PZT branch: Following a variable voltage divider, to set the overall PZT feedback gain, the signal is sent through a circuit that can flip its sign. Next, an op-amp with variable input resistors and feedback capacitors determines the PZT feedback gain. A switch selects between the direct output of this op-amp, ground (switching off the PZT gain), or a notch-filtered (and inverted) version of the op-amp output. The voltage is then summed with the external sweep and a manually dialed offset voltage. Current branch: A two-op-amp circuit establishes the gain settings for the current feedback, with a rotary dial establishing three different gain settings. The signal is sent through another amplifier with variable gain. Following the current gain on/off switch, the signal is then added to the external sweep and output.
1-3). The goal of the second portion is to produce a stable MOT (Days 3-4) and provide qualitative and quantitative assessments of its characteristics (Days 4-5).
Your first task is to familiarize yourself with the equipment. As you read through the following description, you are asked to identify and start working with the various experimental components.
Before you leave each day, make sure to review the MOT equipment list (below) for details on which devices should be turned off and which should be powered on. This is incredibly important, as failure to turn off some equipment could damage the system permanently.
LEAVE ON THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT:
10.2.1 MOT Optics To do:
The optical setup for this experiment is, at first glance, rather complex, comprising many lenses, mirrors and other optical components, and possessing very many knobs with which to adjust and tune the optics.
Figure 9: Diagram of the pins of the vacuum feedthrough system and their corresponding Rb getters. The open circles represent pins that are connected, while the solid circles are not connected to any getters.
To understand the role of and relation between all these components, it is best to use an IR viewing card and to follow the path of laser light through the apparatus.
As you go through the optics and learn about what all the components do, you will be tempted to tweak the setup and see what happens. You should feel free to do so, but it would be wise to take note of what you are doing, and to return the setup to its original configuration when you are done with your tweaking, at least until you feel very confident that you know you are doing the right thing (say on the last day or two of the lab). Otherwise, you will find yourself trying to improve the optical setup but only making it more misaligned and poorly performing.
[NOTE: As of April 13, 2010, the following settings of the rotatable quarter wave plates should give the proper circular polarization for a MOT: X-axis, rotation stage at 20 with numbers facing the incident beam; Y-axis, rotation stage at 268 with numbers facing the incident beam; Z-axis, rotation stage at 0 with numbers facing up]
Checkpoint Power:↑^ How does the power coming from each output port of the beamsplitter change as the preceding waveplate is rotated? Explain this quantitatively.
Checkpoint Two Quarter-Wave Plates:↑^ Explain how the two quarter-wave plates on the chamber level MOT beam path should be adjusted to provide the correct helicities for the op- eration of the MOT. What happens to the light polarization when the waveplates are rotated? Why is there no rotator on the second waveplate?
Current feedback branch:
Sweep:
10.3.3 Outputs
10.3.4 Generating the error signal
Observe the Doppler-broadened absorption spectrum:
Figure 10: A sweep of the 4 Rb spectrum lines as will be seen on the scope along with the sweep of the function generator. Notice the mirroring on the down sweep.
Checkpoint Four Peaks:↑^ Once you get your response from the photodetector as the picture shown above show your GSI the signal on the scope and point at the four peaks that correspond to the two different states of Rb^85 and Rb^87 respectively (don’t forget to mention which transition is which).
Note that the digital storage scope used for this experiment is connected to a computer, so that you can record data for analysis and your lab report.
Obtaining the DAVLL signal: