Authorship - Human Resource - Lecture Slides, Slides of Human Resource Management

In these Lecture Slides of Human Resource Management, the Lecturer has put emphasis on the following key points : Authorship, Experiment, Natural Urge, Manuscript, Collaborators, Author, Generous, Restrictive, Big Kahuna, Trivial Question

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 07/25/2013

deveshwar
deveshwar 🇮🇳

3.9

(15)

108 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
What goes into a paper?
The problem of putting in every experiment you have
done, a very natural urge, especially if you have done
the experiments yourself.
RESIST!! It is important to tell the story you want to
be remembered. Just because you did an experiment,
even if it “worked”, doesn’t mean it should be in the
manuscript, if it will divert the reader from the flow of
the main story.
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Authorship - Human Resource - Lecture Slides and more Slides Human Resource Management in PDF only on Docsity!

What goes into a paper?

The problem of putting in every experiment you have done, a very natural urge, especially if you have done the experiments yourself.

RESIST!! It is important to tell the story you want to be remembered. Just because you did an experiment, even if it “worked”, doesn’t mean it should be in the manuscript, if it will divert the reader from the flow of the main story.

What goes into a paper?

The problem of putting in every experiment you have done, a very natural urge, especially if you have done the experiments yourself.

RESIST!! It is important to tell the story you want to be remembered. Just because you did an experiment, even if it “worked”, doesn’t mean it should be in the manuscript, if it will divert the reader from the flow of the main story.

Tell the story you want to get across, directly and succinctly

Authorship

One of the perils….

Try to establish, with your collaborators, who in your lab is likely to be an author.

Although one can’t plan it completely, try to define roles early on.

My philosophy is to be generous, rather than restrictive about authorship – it’s the first author and the corresponding author that count most of the time.

Authorship

Another of the perils….

Should I collaborate with/

publish with “the big Kahuna?”

Try for a “gottcha” abstract

Try for a “gottcha” abstract

It needs to tell the reviewer why

s/he should want to read the paper

  • what’s the “take-home message”,

the bottom-line they are going to

tell the journal club about?

Avoid Hyperbole

I am a firm believer in the idea that the referees and readers should determine whether your work is “interesting”, “surprising”, “paradigm-shifting”, “revolutionary”, “earth-shaking”, “mind-boggling”, etc.