



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An in-depth exploration of structured interviews in quantitative research. It covers the basics of structured interviews, their importance for standardization and aggregation, and examples of structured interview questions. The document also discusses problems with structured interviews, such as response sets and interviewer characteristics, and solutions to mitigate these issues.
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Quantiative approaches!
!"A structured interview, sometimes called a standardized interview, entails the administration of an interview schedule by an interviewer. The aim is for all interviewees to be given exactly the same context of questioning. This means that each respondent received exactly the same interview stimulus as any other. The goal of this style of interviewing is to ensure that interviewees replies can be aggregated and this can be achieved reliably only if those replies are in response to identical cues. Interviewers are supposed to read out questions exactly and in the same order as they are printed on the schedule. Questions are usually very specific and very often offer the interviewee a fixed range of answers (this type of question is often called closed, closed ended, pre-coded, or fixed choice). The structured interview is the typical form of interview in survey research."! !(Bryman, p. 110)!
Goal : !Transformation of responses into numbers;! !aggregation of responses! Means 1 : standardization of the question (and of its context)!
!Why is the standardization of questions and responses so important?! !Otherwise, we would not know if the variation in the responses are due to :! ! !- differences between interviewees («"real variation"»)! ! !- differences between questions! ! !- differences between response options! ! !- differences between interview contexts! Quantiative approaches!
!Basic idea: there is a «"true variability"» of the phenomenon that interests us in the «"reality"». In order to measure this true variability, we try to reduce all possible «"error variabilities"» (due to context influences or translations of responses)! !The means of reducing error variability is the standardization of questions, interview context and responses. If we do this, we can be sure that all found differences are due to «"real"» differences between respondents.!! Quantiative approaches!
!If you were to consider your life in general these days, how happy or unhappy would you say you are, on the whole...! !Very happy! 1! !Fairly happy! 2! !Not very happy! 3! !Not at all happy! 4! !Can’t choose! 9! ISSP Religion 2008
!Attributes of interviewers that can have an influence on responses! !- ethnicity! !- gender! !- attractivity! !The responses often go in the direction of «"social desirability"».! Quantiative approaches!
!"Schuman and Presser (1981) cite a study that asked respondenets to nominate two or three of their favourite actors or entertainers. Respondents were much more likely to mention black actors or entertainers when interviewed by black interviewers than when interviewed by white ones."! !(Bryman, p. 126)! Quantiative approaches!
!Use different types of interviewers, men and women, not too attractive, not too unattractive, etc.!